Committee on Ethical and Scientific Issues in Studying the Safety of Approved Drugs, Institute of Medicine. "1 Introduction." Ethical and Scientific Issues in Studying the Safety of Approved Drugs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2012.
The following HTML text is provided to enhance online
readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML.
Please use the page image
as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.
Ethical and Scientific Issues in Studying the Safety of Approved Drugs
FDA. 2011e. Guidance: Medication guides—distribution requirements and inclusion in Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies (REMS). Washington, DC: US Food and Drug Administration.
FDA. 2012. Report on the performance of drug and biologics firms in conducting postmarketing requirements and commitments; availability. Federal Register 77(44):13339-13343.
FDA Science Board Subcommittee. 2011. Review of the FDA/CDER pharmacovigilance program. Washington, DC: US Food and Drug Administration.
GAO (Government Accountability Office). 2008. FDA has begun to enhance its oversight of drugs approved on the basis of surrogate endpoints. Washington, DC: Government Accountability Office. GAO. 2009. Drug safety: FDA has begun efforts to enhance postmarket safety, but additional actions are needed. Washington, DC: Government Accountability Office.
Grossman, L. A., R. A. Merrill, and P. B. Hutt. 2007. FDA jurisdiction: A matter of definition. Washington College of Law Research Paper No. 2008-38. American University Washington College of Law.
Gu, Q., C. D. Dillon, and B. V. L. 2010. Prescription drug use continues to increase: U.S. prescription drug data for 2007-2008. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Hamburg, M. A., and J. M. Sharfstein. 2009. The FDA as a public health agency. New England Journal of Medicine 360(24):2493-2495.
HHS (US Department of Health and Human Services). 2010. HIPAA Mini-Sentinel and Sentinel. Washington, DC: Department of Health and Human Services.
Hilts, P. J. 2003a. Thalidomide. In Protecting America’s health. New York: Alfred A. Knoff. Pp. 144-165.
Hilts, P. J. 2003b. The modern plague. In Protecting America’s health. New York: Alfred A. Knoff. Pp. 236-254.
IOM (Institute of Medicine). 2002. Responsible research: A systems approach to protecting research participants. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
IOM. 2004. Patient safety: Achieving a new standard for care. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
IOM. 2007a. The future of drug safety: Promoting and protecting the health of the public. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
IOM. 2007b. Understanding the benefits and risks of pharmaceuticals: Workshop summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
IOM. 2010a. Evaluation of biomarkers and surrogate endpoints in chronic disease. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
IOM. 2010b. Ethical issues in studying the safety of approved drugs: A letter report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
Jenkins, J. K. 2010. Memorandum from John Jenkins to Janet Woodcock (dated September, 2010). Re: Recommendations for regulatory actions—rosiglitazone. Washington, DC: Food and Drug Administration.
Lomas, J. 2005. Using research to inform healthcare managers’ and policy makers’ questions: From summative to interpretive synthesis. Health Policy 1(1):55-71.
Marks, H. M. 1997a. Playing it safe: The Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act of 1938. In The progress of experiment: Science and therapeutic reform in the United States, 1900-1990. Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press. Pp. 136-163.