Loughran, T.A., Mulvey, E.P., Schubert, C.A., Chassin, L.A., Losoya, S., Steinberg, L., Cota-Robles, S., Piquero, A.R., Fagan, J., and Cauffman, E. (2010). Differential effects of adult court transfer on juvenile offender recidivism. Law and Human Behavior, 34(6), 476-488.

Loughran, T., Piquero, A.R., Fagan, J., and Mulvey, E. (2011a). Deterring serious and chronic offenders: Research findings and policy thoughts from the pathways to desistance study. In N. Dowd (Ed.), Justice for Kids: Keeping Kids Out of the Juvenile Justice System (pp. 201-218). New York: New York University Press.

Loughran, T.A., Paternoster, R., Piquero, A.R., and Pogarsky, G. (2011b). On ambiguity in perceptions of risk: Implications for criminal decision-making and deterrence. Criminology, 49(4), 1029-1061.

Loughran, T.A., Pogarsky, G., Piquero, A.R., and Paternoster, R. (2012). Reassessing the certainty effect in deterrence theory using insight from prospect theory. Justice Quarterly, 29, 712-741.

Lowenkamp, C.T., and Latessa, E.J. (2005). Increasing the effectiveness of correctional programming through the risk principle: Identifying offenders for residential placement. Criminology and Public Policy, 4(2), 263-290.

Lowenkamp, C.T., Latessa, E.J., and Holsinger, A.M. (2006). The risk principle in action: What have we learned from 13,676 offenders and 97 correctional programs? Crime and Delinquency, 52(1), 77-93.

Lowenkamp, C.T., Latessa, E.J., and Smith, P. (2006). Does correctional program quality really matter? The impact of adhering to the principles of effective intervention. Criminology & Public Policy, 5(3), 575-594.

Lubow, B. (2010). State of the Initiative. Speech presented at the JDAI National Inter-site Conference, October 6, Kansas City, MO. Available: http://www.aecf.org/~/media/PDFFiles/JDAI/2010StateOfTheInitiativeJan2011.pdf [May 2012].

Lucas, S.R. (1999). Tracking Inequality: Stratification and Mobility in American High Schools. New York: Teachers College Press.

Luckenbill, W., and Yeager, C. (2009). Family Involvement in Pennsylvania’s Juvenile Justice System. Available: http://www.modelsforchange.net/publications/238 [May 2012].

Ludwig, J., and Duncan, G. (2006). Promising solutions in housing and the community. In K.A. Dodge, T.J. Dishion, and J.E. Lansford (Eds.), Deviant Peer Influences in Programs for Youth: Problems and Solutions (pp. 312-327). New York: Guilford Press.

Luna, B., Thulborn, K.R., Munoz, D.P., Merriam, E.P., Garver, K.E., Minshew, N.J., Keshavan, M.S., Genovese, C.R., Eddy, W.F., and Sweeney, J.A. (2001). Maturation of widely distributed brain function subserves cognitive development. NeuroImage, 13(5), 786-793.

Lynn, L.E., Jr. (1997). Innovation and the public interest: Insights from the private sector. In A.A. Altshuler and R.D. Behn (Eds.), Innovation in American Government: Challenges, Opportunities, and Dilemmas (pp. 83-103). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

MacArthur Foundation Research Network on Adolescent Development and Juvenile Justice. (2006). Bringing Research to Policy and Practice in Juvenile Justice. Available: http://www.adjj.org/downloads/552network_overview.pdf [June 2011].

Maccoby, E.E. (2007). Historical overview of socialization research and theory. In J.E. Grusec and P.D. Hastings (Eds.), Handbook of Socialization Theory and Research (pp. 13-41). New York: Guilford Press.

MacDonald, J.M., Haviland, A., and Morral, A.R. (2009). Assessing the relationship between violent and nonviolent criminal activity among serious adolescent offenders. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 46(4), 553-580.

Mack, J.W. (1909). The juvenile court. Harvard Law Review, 23(2), 104-122.



The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement