The following HTML text is provided to enhance online
readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML.
Please use the page image
as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.
Page 459
form by the easy availability of appropriate land. Therefore the
panel hesitates to look beyond its initial potential mitigation of
240 Mt CO2/yr. In addition, a number
of years would be required to build reforestation to its full
mitigation potential.
Stimulation of ocean biomass with iron may be feasible and would
be a relatively low-cost option. Its application appears to be
limited at most to the mitigation of about 7 Gt CO2 equivalent per year (about 1.5 times
U.S. annual CO2 emissions). The
biological, ecological, and ocean chemical and physical dynamics of
this possibility are not well understood and should be investigated
further, both theoretically and experimentally. There continue to
be questions as to whether iron is the limiting nutrient.
Furthermore, the circulation dynamics of the antarctic ocean might
severely limit the effect. If feasible, the mitigation potential of
the possibilitystorage of CO2
in a standing crop and as dissolved CO2 with slow sequestering of carbon to the
ocean bottomcould probably be established over several years.
If applications of iron were stopped, the standing crop would be
expected to die within days or weeks, thus ending the mitigation
effect.
Cloud stimulation by provision of cloud condensation nuclei
appears to be a feasible and low-cost option capable of being used
to mitigate any quantity of CO2
equivalent per year. Details of the cloud physics, verification of
the amount of CCN to be added for a particular degree of
mitigation, and the possible acid rain or other effects of adding
CCN over the oceans need to be investigated before such system is
put to use. Once a decision has been made, the system could be
mobilized and begin to operate in a year or so, and mitigation
effects would be immediate. If the system were stopped, the
mitigation effect would presumably cease very rapidly, within days
or weeks, as extra CCN were removed by rain and drizzle.
Several schemes depend on the effect of additional dust (or
possibly soot) in the stratosphere or very low stratosphere
screening out sunlight. Such dust might be delivered to the
stratosphere by various means, including being fired with large
rifles or rockets or being lifted by hydrogen or hot-air balloons.
These possibilities appear feasible, economical, and capable of
mitigating the effect of as much CO2
equivalent per year as we care to pay for. (Lifting dust, or soot,
to the tropopause or the low stratosphere with aircraft may be
limited, at low cost, to the mitigation of 8 to 80 Gt CO2 equivalent per year.) Such systems could
probably be put into full effect within a year or two of a decision
to do so, and mitigation effects would begin immediately. Because
dust falls out naturally, if the delivery of dust were stopped,
mitigation effects would cease within about 6 months for dust (or
soot) delivered to the tropopause and within a couple of years for
dust delivered to the midstratosphere.
Such dust would have a visible effect, particularly on sunsets
and sunrises, and would heat the stratosphere at the altitude of
the dust. The