The following HTML text is provided to enhance online
readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML.
Please use the page image
as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.
RESPONSIBLE SCIENCE: Ensuring the Integrity of the Research Process
American Association for the Advancement of Science-American Bar Association (AAAS-ABA) National Conference of Lawyers and Scientists. 1989. Project on Scientific Fraud and Misconduct. Reports on workshops one (September 18-20, 1987), two (September 23-25, 1988), and three (February 17-18, 1989). Three volumes. AAAS, Washington, D.C.
American Association of University Professors (AAUP). 1989. “Statement on plagiarism.” Academe (September/October):47-48.
American Bar Association (ABA). n.d. A Survey on the Teaching of Professional Responsibility. Center for Professional Responsibility, ABA, Chicago, Ill.
American Chemical Society (ACS). 1986. “Ethical guidelines to publication of chemical research.” Pp. 217-22 in The ACS Style Guide, Dodd, J. S. (ed.). ACS, Washington, D.C.
American Chemical Society (ACS). 1989. ACS Academic Professional Guidelines. ACS, Washington, D.C.
American Federation for Clinical Research (AFCR). 1989. “AFCR guidelines for the responsible conduct of research.” Clinical Research 37(September):510-11.
American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME). 1988. Society Policy: Ethics. P-15.7. ASME, New York.
American Sociological Association (ASA). 1989. Code of Ethics. ASA, Washington, D.C.
American Statistical Association (ASA), Ad Hoc Committee on Professional Ethics. 1983. “Ethical Guidelines for Statistical Practice.” The American Statistician 37(February):5-6. [With comments.]
American Statistical Association (ASA). 1989. Ethical Guidelines for Statistical Practice, Committee on Professional Ethics. ASA, Washington, D.C.
Amundson, N. R. 1987. “American university graduate work.” Chemical EngineeringEducation 21(4):160-63.
Andersen, Robert. 1988. “The federal government's role in regulating misconduct in scientific and technological research. ” Journal of Law and Technology 3:121-148.
Angell, M. 1983. “Editors and fraud.” CBE Views 6(2):3-8.
Angell, M. 1986. “Publish or perish: a proposal.” Annals of Internal Medicine 104(2):261-62.
Angell, M. and A. S. Relman. 1988. “Fraud in biomedical research: a time for congressional restraint. ” New England Journal of Medicine 318(June 2):1462-63.
Annals of Internal Medicine. 1982. “Authorship from the reader's side.” Annals of Internal Medicine 97(October):613-14.
Appelbaum, P. S., L. H. Roth, C. W. Lidz, P. Benson, and W. Winslade. 1987. “False hopes and best data: consent to research and the therapeutic misconception.” Hastings Center Report (April):20-24.
Arkin, H. R. 1985a. “Academic dismissals: due process, part 1.” Journal of the American Medical Association 254(November 1):2463-66.
Arkin, H. R. 1985b. “Academic dismissals: due process, part 2.” Journal of theAmerican Medical Association 254(November 8):2653-56.
Association of Academic Health Centers (AAHC). 1990. Conflicts of Interest in Academic Health Centers, AAHC Task Force on Science Policy. Policy paper 1. AAHC, Washington, D.C.
Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC). 1982. The Maintenance of HighEthical Standards in Conduct of Research, Ad Hoc Committee on the Maintenance of High Ethical Standards in the Conduct of Research. AAMC, Washington, D.C.
Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC). 1990. Guidelines for Dealing withFaculty Conflicts of Commitment and Conflicts of Interest in Research. AAMC, Washington, D.C.