National Academies Press: OpenBook

STAR 21: Strategic Technologies for the Army of the Twenty-First Century (1992)

Chapter: A Comparison of Technology Lists

« Previous: Appendixes
Suggested Citation:"A Comparison of Technology Lists." National Research Council. 1992. STAR 21: Strategic Technologies for the Army of the Twenty-First Century. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1888.
×

Appendix A
Comparison of Technology Lists

Several lists of defense-related technologies are currently in circulation. Naturally enough, these lists will be compared with one another by the defense community, industry, the academic R&D community, and many others interested in government policy and support for science and technology. To make such comparisons meaningful, two points must be borne in mind:

  • There is no standard taxonomy for classifying technologies. Nor is there a recognized and uniform distinction drawn between a technology and an application or systems concept that uses technology.

  • The selection criteria for these lists may differ. Indeed, differences should be expected if the purposes of the lists differ.

To compare lists in a meaningful way, it is therefore necessary to go beyond the listed items to the accompanying narrative to determine what each listed item signifies. This appendix will discuss three technology lists, not to draw any conclusions about their merit relative to the STAR list but rather to illustrate the importance of these two points. The following three lists will be considered:

  • the list of 13 key emerging technologies from the second edition (November 1990) of the Army Technology Base Master Plan;

  • the list of 21 Defense Critical Technologies from The Department of Defense Critical Technologies Plan, prepared by the Department of Defense for the Committees on Armed Services of the U.S. Congress; and

Suggested Citation:"A Comparison of Technology Lists." National Research Council. 1992. STAR 21: Strategic Technologies for the Army of the Twenty-First Century. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1888.
×
  • the list of 22 National Critical Technologies included in the March 1991 Report of the National Critical Technologies Panel.

STAR TECHNOLOGY AND SYSTEMS LISTS

A summary of the selection criteria and the classification approach used in the STAR study is a useful starting point for these comparisons. The STAR Science and Technology Subcommittee divided all Army-related technologies into the eight area-specific technology groups. Each Technology Group used its own classification of technologies it considered to be within its scope. Over a hundred of these ''technology species" were identified as having importance to ground warfare in the twenty-first century, which was the key objective specified for the STAR study. In Chapter 3 this full set of technologies is represented by "genus-and-species" short descriptions in the TFA Scope section for each report.

In response to an Army request for a short list of the highest-payoff technologies, representatives of the technology groups were asked to nominate, from each group's scope, one or two technologies that would have the highest technological and operational potential for Army applications. The candidate technologies were then reviewed by the Subcommittee as a whole. The resulting list of nine high-payoff technologies (listed in Table A-1) is relatively exclusive, in that many "species" covered by each group were necessarily omitted.

In addition to the list of nine high-payoff technologies, the STAR Committee has also proposed five high-payoff systems concepts and seven technology-related focal values that pertain to many systems. Depending on the system, a number of technologies—often from different TFA areas—contribute to a particular focal value. Consider, for example, the range of technologies relevant to affordability, to stealth and counterstealth capabilities, or to casualty reduction.

ARMY TECHNOLOGY BASE: KEY EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES

The first column of Table A-2 lists the 13 key emerging technologies in the Army Technology Base Master Plan (November 1990 edition). The Army described them as "those technologies whose development is considered most essential to ensure the long-term qualitative superiority of Army weapon systems" (U.S. Army, 1990). The technologies share the following characteristics with respect to their value to the Army, mode of selection, and anticipated advances:

Suggested Citation:"A Comparison of Technology Lists." National Research Council. 1992. STAR 21: Strategic Technologies for the Army of the Twenty-First Century. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1888.
×

TABLE A-1 STAR Technology-Relevant Lists

STAR Technology Groups

1. Computer Science, Artificial Intelligence, and Robotics

2. Electronics and Sensors

3. Optics, Photonics, and Directed Energy

4. Biotechnology and Biochemistry

5. Advanced Materials

6. Propulsion and Power

7. Advanced Manufacturing

8. Environmental and Atmospheric Sciences

9. Basic Sciences (became Long-Term Forecast of Research)

High-Payoff Technologies

1. technology for multidomain smart sensors

2. terahertz device electronics

3. secure, wide-band communications technology

4. battle management software technology

5. solid state lasers and/or coherent diode laser arrays

6. genetically engineered and developed materials and molecules

7. electric drive technology

8. material formulation techniques for "designer" materials

9. methods and technology for integrated systems design

High-Payoff Systems

1. robot vehicles (air or ground) for C3I/RISTA

2. electronic systems architecture

3. brilliant munitions for attacking ground targets

4. lightweight indirect-fire weapons

5. integrated theater air/missile defense

6. simulation systems for R&D, analysis, and training

Cross-Cutting Focal Values

1. affordability

2. reliability

3. deployability

4. joint operability

5. reduced vulnerability of U.S. combat and support systems (stealth and counterstealth capability)

6. casualty reduction

7. support system cost reduction.

Suggested Citation:"A Comparison of Technology Lists." National Research Council. 1992. STAR 21: Strategic Technologies for the Army of the Twenty-First Century. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1888.
×

TABLE A-2. Army Technology Base Key Emerging Technologies

Key Emerging Technology

Technology Areas (Selected)

Relevant STAR TFA or Section

STAR High-Payoff Technologies

1. Advanced Materials and Materials Processing

Composite armor: structural composites; high-temperature engine components; soldier body armor

Advanced Materials

material formulation techniques for "designer materials

2. Microelectronics, Photonics, and Acoustics

VHSIC silicon devices; MMICs; compound semiconductors; photonic devices; fiber-optic sensors; multispectral sensors; focal plane arrays; infrared sensors

Electronics and Sensors;

Optics, Photonics, and Directed Energy

multidomain smart sensors: terahertz-device electronics; secure, wideband communications technology

3. Advanced Signal Processing and Computing

Software producibility & life cycle; data base management systems; parallel systems; algorithms; automated systems (voice recognition)

Computer Science, Artificial Intelligence, and Robotics;

methods & techniques for integrated systems design;

battle management software technology

4. Artificial Intelligence

High-speed computation; knowledge acquisition & learning; neural nets; multisensor data fusion; adaptive control & robotics; AI for logistics, planning, simulation, maintenance, language training.

Computer Science, Artificial Intelligence, and Robotics; Electronics and Sensors; Optics, Photonics, Directed Energy

terahertz-device electronics;

battle management software technology

5. Robotics

sensors; unmanned ground vehicles; data rate reduction: environmental perception; robot manipulators; various robotics applications

Computer Science, Artificial Intelligence, and Robotics; Electronics and Sensors

 

Suggested Citation:"A Comparison of Technology Lists." National Research Council. 1992. STAR 21: Strategic Technologies for the Army of the Twenty-First Century. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1888.
×

Key Emerging Technology

Technology Areas (Selected)

Relevant STAR TFA or Section

STAR High-Payoff Technologies

6. Advanced Propulsion Technology

small turbine IHPTET engine cores; VTOL aircraft; ground vehicle transmissions; weapon chemical propulsion

Propulsion and Power

electric-drive technology

7. Power Generation, Storage, and Conditioning

energy storage for pulse power; electric drive power conditioning; fuel cells

Propulsion and Power

 

8. Directed Energy

laser efficiency; high energy-density capacitors; switches; high-power microwave

Propulsion and Power

solid state lasers pumped by diode lasers

9. Biotechnology

biosensors and enzyme decontamination for CTBW; vaccines; artificial tissues; multivalent assays for disease; bioremediation; food preservation and packing

Biotechnology and Biochemistry

genetically engineered and developed materials and molecules

10. Space Technology

communications (man-portable, LIGHTSAT); RISTA; terrain & weather; position & navigation; computation for space systems; fire support

Electronics and Sensors; Environmental & Atmospheric Sciences; Optics, Photonics, and Directed Energy

methods & techniques for integrated systems design;

11. Low-Observable Technology

radar: absorbing materials and cross-section reduction; infrared: special coatings, vehicle cooling techniques; visual: coatings to suppress or vary reflectance; noise suppression

Electronics and Sensors Advanced Materials

terahertz-device electronics; material formulation techniques for "designer" materials; methods & techniques for integrated systems design;

Suggested Citation:"A Comparison of Technology Lists." National Research Council. 1992. STAR 21: Strategic Technologies for the Army of the Twenty-First Century. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1888.
×

Key Emerging Technology

Technology Areas (Selected)

Relevant STAR TFA or Section

STAR High-Payoff Technologies

12. Protection/Lethality

armor; soldier eye protection; kinetic energy projectiles; explosives; mine detection; CTBW detection, protection, decontamination

Advanced Materials; Propulsion and Power; Biotechnology

material formulation techniques for "designer" materials; genetically engineered and developed materials and molecules

13. Neuroscience Technology

sleep studies; physiological response to adverse environments; sensory-motor integration applications to advanced weapons systems, robotics

See Systems Panel Reports on Health and Medicine; Personnel; Special Technologies

 

Suggested Citation:"A Comparison of Technology Lists." National Research Council. 1992. STAR 21: Strategic Technologies for the Army of the Twenty-First Century. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1888.
×
  • All hold great promise for solving important deficiencies or significantly increasing U.S. capabilities on the modern battlefield.

  • All were reviewed by Army technical managers, scientists, and engineers in terms of future needs, then presented to users and developers and finally approved by the Army leadership.

  • Each technology is promising but still immature. Knowledge gaps must be filled for each before technical decisions can be made about its use in Army applications.

Except for the mode of selection (item 2), these characteristics seem reasonably similar to those used by the STAR study to select the high-payoff technologies. However, these key emerging technologies represent a far broader classification than the STAR high-payoff technologies. Indeed, the first nine correspond quite closely with entire STAR TFAs or with major sections from several TFAs. (Compare columns 1 and 3 in Table A-2.)

The level of technology classification in the Army Technology Base Master Plan that corresponds better to the STAR technologies consists of the technology areas. These are listed in milestone tables for each key emerging technology (See U.S Army, 1990, Volume I, Chapter III). A representative sample of these technology areas is shown in column 2 of Table A-2.

There are more than 70 technology areas for the 13 key emerging technologies. This is the same order of magnitude as the hundred-odd technologies identified by the STAR Science and Technology Subcommittee. A comparison of the technology areas with the STAR technology species summarized in Chapter 3 shows them to be at a roughly equivalent level of detail. (Close comparison is sometimes difficult because some technology areas are application-oriented, which makes them closer to what STAR calls advanced systems concepts. The relation to similar STAR technology species is often clearer from the milestone descriptions that accompany each technology area.)

Of the four remaining key emerging technologies, three represent classifications by application: space technology, low-observable technology, and protection/lethality. Space technology and protection/lethality were addressed by STAR through its systems concepts. (See Space-Based Systems and the sections on lethal systems in Chapter 2; see also the recommendations for these system areas in Chapter 5.) Low-observable technology is represented by the STAR focal value of stealth and counterstealth capabilities; it is cited as an important feature of many STAR systems concepts and as a value to which many of the STAR-forecast technology advances could contribute.

Suggested Citation:"A Comparison of Technology Lists." National Research Council. 1992. STAR 21: Strategic Technologies for the Army of the Twenty-First Century. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1888.
×

The last of the key emerging technologies, neurosciences, comprises technology areas that correspond to several systems concepts described by STAR for Integrated Soldier Support (see Chapter 2), as well as technology species assessed by the Biotechnology and Biochemistry Group (biocoupling and bionics) and by the Computer Science, Artificial Intelligence, and Robotics Group (sensor-motor integration in advanced robot systems).

In summary, a meaningful comparison of the STAR study with the Army Technology Base technologies should compare nine of the key emerging technologies with the full range of six of the STAR TFAs, not just the nine high-payoff technologies. Three of the key emerging technologies are best compared with systems concepts developed by the STAR systems panels. The key emerging technologies are in fact an inclusive classification rather than a highly specific and exclusive selection like the STAR high-payoff technologies. The fourth column of Table A-2 shows where the STAR high-payoff technologies and systems fall with respect to this ''key emerging technologies" classification.

The point is not that one or the other list is better but rather that they are not directly comparable. In fact, if this set of Army Technology Base key emerging technologies seems particularly well suited to the Army's needs, perhaps it should be used as the starting point for the general technology classification to be used in future studies analogous to that of STAR. On the other hand, the key emerging technologies are so encompassing that, as a list, they do not provide specific input for focusing Army R&D efforts. An action-oriented list would need to he at the level of technology areas rather than key emerging technologies.

DEFENSE CRITICAL TECHNOLOGIES

Table A-3 lists the 21 Defense Critical Technologies and, in the second column, their principal component fields as specified in the original report (DOD, 1991). For a number of these technologies, the extent of their component fields shows that they are close in scope to an entire STAR TFA or to major sections of several TFAs. Compare, for example, the component fields of Semiconductor Materials and Microelectronic Circuits with the TFA scope of Electronics and Sensors or the fields for Composite Materials with the TFA scope for Advanced Materials.

Some of the Defense Critical Technologies do correspond to just a few closely related STAR technology species. Two examples are Pulsed Power (compare with the technologies for pulsed and short-

Suggested Citation:"A Comparison of Technology Lists." National Research Council. 1992. STAR 21: Strategic Technologies for the Army of the Twenty-First Century. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1888.
×

TABLE A-3. Defense Critical Technologies Compared with STAR

Defense Critical Technologies

Principal Component Fields (Selected)

Related STAR TFAs (and Systems Panels)

STAR High-Payoff Technologies and Systems

1. Semiconductor Materials & Microelectronic Circuits

VLSICs; CAD for complex circuits; high-resolution lithography; A/D converters; MMICs; T/R modules; signal control components; radiation-hard isolation

Electronics and Sensors

 

2. Software Engineering

system engineering process & environment; fault-tolerant software; software for parallel & heterogeneous stems;

Computer Science, Artificial Intelligence, and Robotics

methods & techniques for integrated systems design; electronic systems architecture

3. High Performance Computing

Advanced software technology & algorithms; networking; computer sci. research personnel; high-density packaging;

Computer Science, Artificial Intelligence, and Robotics

 

4. Machine Intelligence & Robotics

image understanding; autonomous planning; navigation; speech & text processing; machine learning; knowledge representation and acquisition; adaptive manipulation & control

Computer Science, Artificial Intelligence, and Robotics

battle management software technology; robot vehicles (air or ground) for C3I/RISTA

5. Simulation & Modeling

high-speed graphics; solutions for nonlinear equations; simulation verification and validation

Computer Science, Artificial Intelligence, and Robotics

simulation systems for R&D, analysis, and training

Suggested Citation:"A Comparison of Technology Lists." National Research Council. 1992. STAR 21: Strategic Technologies for the Army of the Twenty-First Century. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1888.
×

Defense Critical Technologies

Principal Component Fields

(Selected)

Related STAR TFAs

(and Systems Panels)

STAR High-Payoff Technologies and Systems

6. Photonics

laser devices; fiber optics; optical signal processing; integrated optics

Optics, Photonics, and Directed Energy

solid state lasers pumped by laser diodes; secure wideband communications; multidomain smart sensors

7. Sensitive Radar

Advanced monostatic radar; multistatic radar; radars for target recognition; laser radar; electronic counter countermeasures

Electronics and Sensors; Optics, Photonics, and Directed Energy;

see also Electronics Systems

terahertz electronic devices; integrated theater air/missile defense

8. Passive Sensors

thermal imagers; IR focal plane arrays; IR search and track; diffractive optics; sensor integration; passive antennas; passive RF and acoustic surveillance; fiber-optic sensors for environmental and systems monitoring; superconducting sensors

Optics, Photonics, and Directed Energy;

Electronics and Sensors;

Advanced Materials;

see also Electronics Systems;

multidomain smart sensors; solid state lasers pumped by diode lasers; secure wideband communications; material formulation techniques for "designer" materials; methods & techniques for integrated systems design;

9. Signal and Image Processing

algorithm development; hybrid optical-digital techniques; phased array control; neural networks

Computer Science, Artificial Intelligence, and Robotics; Optics, Photonics, and Directed Energy; Electronics Systems

electronic systems architecture; methods & techniques for integrated systems design

Suggested Citation:"A Comparison of Technology Lists." National Research Council. 1992. STAR 21: Strategic Technologies for the Army of the Twenty-First Century. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1888.
×

Defense Critical Technologies

Principal Component Fields

(Selected)

Related STAR TFAs

(and Systems Panels)

STAR High-Payoff Technologies and Systems

10. Signature Control

radar cross-section reduction: IR, visual, UV, magnetic signature reduction/management; acoustic quieting; LPI radar, communications, and navigation;

Advanced Materials; Electronics and Sensors; Optics, Photonics, and Directed Energy; Electronics Systems; Airborne Systems

secure wideband communications; material formulation techniques for "designer" materials; (see also stealth-counterstealth focal value)

11. Weapon System Environment

Environment characterization and prediction; target environment analysis and simulators

Environmental and Atmospheric Sciences; Computer Science, Artificial Intelligence, and Robotics

simulation systems for R&D, analysis, and training; methods & techniques for integrated systems design

12. Data Fusion

theory; algorithms and models; data base and knowledge base for fusion; reasoning systems

Computer Science, Artificial Intelligence, and Robotics; Electronics and Sensors; Optics, Photonics and Directed Energy

multidomain smart sensors; terahertz device electronics; secure wideband communications; battle management software technology

13. Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD)

Unsteady aerodynamic regimes; turbulence modeling; internal flows

Propulsion and Power; see also Airborne Systems Panel Report

 

14. Air-Breathing Propulsion

high pressure ratio, lightweight compression systems; high-temperature, improved-life combustion systems; high efficiency turbines; reduced-signature multifunctional nozzles; adaptive, survivable, high-speed integrated control systems; scramjet technology;

Propulsion and Power; see also Airborne Systems Panel Report

methods and technology for integrated systems design

Suggested Citation:"A Comparison of Technology Lists." National Research Council. 1992. STAR 21: Strategic Technologies for the Army of the Twenty-First Century. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1888.
×

Defense Critical Technologies

Principal Component Fields

(Selected)

Related STAR TFAs

(and Systems Panels)

STAR High-Payoff Technologies and Systems

15. Pulsed Power

Energy storage; power switching and conditioning; high-power microwave

Propulsion and Power; Optics, Photonics and Directed Energy

solid state lasers and/or coherent diode-laser arrays

16. Hypervelocity Projectiles and Propulsion

projectile design; propulsion; projectile-target interaction

Propulsion and Power;

see also Lethality Systems

integrated theater air/missile defense

17. High Energy-Density Materials

explosives; propellants; warheads; nuclear isomers

Propulsion and Power; Advanced Materials

lightweight indirect-fire weapons

18. Composite Materials

organic matrix composites; metal matrix composites; ceramic matrix composites, hybrid composites

Advanced Materials

material formulation technologies for ''designer" materials

19. Superconductivity

low-temperature and high-temperature superconductors for magnets, sensors, electronics

Electronics and Sensors

 

20. Biotechnology

 

Biotechnology and Biochemistry

genetically engineered and developed materials and molecules

21. Flexible Manufacturing

computer-aided design, engineering, manufacturing, production; data bases; communications and networking; intelligent software interfaces

Computer Science, Artificial Intelligence, and Robotics; Advanced Manufacturing

methods & techniques for integrated systems design

Suggested Citation:"A Comparison of Technology Lists." National Research Council. 1992. STAR 21: Strategic Technologies for the Army of the Twenty-First Century. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1888.
×

duration power and power conditioning under Battle Zone Electric Power in the Propulsion and Power section of Chapter 3) and High Energy Density Materials (see Energetic Materials in the Advanced Materials section). Still other technologies on this list correspond more closely to STAR advanced systems concepts than to STAR technology classifications. Examples are Sensitive Radar, Passive Sensors, or Weapon System Environment.

Again, the point of this comparison is not to determine which classification is better but to show that the Defense Critical Technologies in fact cover a broad area roughly coextensive with the entire set of STAR TFAs, plus some of the technology applications (systems concepts) covered by the STAR systems panels.

NATIONAL CRITICAL TECHNOLOGIES

The National Critical Technologies (NCT) Panel was charged with identifying up to 30 national critical technologies in its biennial report to the President and Congress. A national critical technology is defined as an area of technological development that is essential for the long-term national security and economic prosperity of the United States (National Critical Technologies Panel, 1991). Unlike the STAR study or the other two list-producing activities discussed above, the NCT Panel is responsible for technology that is nonmilitary but nonetheless essential to economic prosperity. Thus, its list can be expected to have a wider compass than the defense-related classifications.

Table A-4 lists the 22 NCTs in column 2, with the NCT class headings shown in the first column. Although this table does not summarize the description of each technology from the NCT report, the technology titles show that this list, too, represents a broader level of technology aggregation than most of the STAR high-payoff technologies. The correlation to STAR TFAs or major sections of TFAs is quite high (column 3 of Table A-4), especially in light of the broader ambit of the NCT Panel's mission

CONCLUSIONS

Each of the three technology lists is more meaningfully compared with the combined scopes of the STAR TFAs than with the STAR high-payoff technologies. The latter were intended to be a fairly exclusive handful of specific rapidly advancing technologies whose pursuit seems most likely to produce major technology payoffs for the Army.

Suggested Citation:"A Comparison of Technology Lists." National Research Council. 1992. STAR 21: Strategic Technologies for the Army of the Twenty-First Century. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1888.
×

TABLE A-4. National Critical Technologies and STAR Technologies

NCT Category

National Critical Technologies

Related STAR TFAs

STAR High-Payoff Technologies and Systems

Materials

Materials synthesis and processing

Advanced Materials

material formulation techniques for "designer" materials

 

Electronic and photonic materials

Electronics and Sensors; Optics, Photonics and Directed Energy

terahertz-device electronics

 

Ceramics

Advanced Materials

 

 

Composites

Advanced Materials

 

 

High-performance metals and alloys

Advanced Materials

 

Manufacturing

Flexible computer-integrated manufacturing

Advanced Manufacturing; Computer Science, Artificial Intelligence, and Robotics

methods and technology for integrated system design

 

Intelligent processing equipment

Advanced Manufacturing; Computer Science, Artificial Intelligence, and Robotics

 

 

Microfabrication, nanofabrication

Advanced Manufacturing; Electronics and Sensors

 

 

Systems management technologies

Advanced Manufacturing; Computer Science, Artificial Intelligence, and Robotics

 

Suggested Citation:"A Comparison of Technology Lists." National Research Council. 1992. STAR 21: Strategic Technologies for the Army of the Twenty-First Century. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1888.
×

NCT Category

National Critical Technologies

Related STAR TFAs

STAR High-Payoff Technologies and Systems

Information and Communications

Software

Computer Science, Artificial Intelligence, and Robotics

methods and technology for integrated system design; battle management software technology

 

Microelectronics and optoelectronics

Electronics and Sensors; Optics, Photonics, and Directed Energy

terahertz-device electronics

 

High-performance computing and networking

Computer Science, Artificial Intelligence, and Robotics

electronic systems architecture

 

High-definition imaging and displays

Electronics and Sensors; Optics, Photonics, and Directed Energy

 

 

Sensors and signal processing

Electronics and Sensors; Optics, Photonics, and Directed Energy

multidomain smart sensors; terahertz-device electronics; secure wideband communications

 

Data storage and peripherals

(not specifically addressed in STAR TEAs)

electronic systems architecture

 

Computer simulation and modeling

Computer Science, Artificial Intelligence, and Robotics

simulation systems for R&D, analysis, and training

Biotechnology and Life Sciences

Applied molecular biology

Biotechnology and Biochemistry

 

 

Medical technology

(Health and Medical Systems Panel)

 

Suggested Citation:"A Comparison of Technology Lists." National Research Council. 1992. STAR 21: Strategic Technologies for the Army of the Twenty-First Century. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1888.
×

NCT Category

National Critical Technologies

Related STAR TFAs

STAR High-Payoff Technologies and Systems

Aeronautics and Surface Transportation

Aeronautics

Propulsion and Power; Airborne Systems Panel

robot vehicles (air or ground) for C3/RISTA

 

Surface transportation technologies

Propulsion and Power

electric drive technology

Energy and Environment

Energy technologies

Propulsion and Power; Advanced Materials

material formulation techniques for "designer" materials

 

Pollution minimization, remediation, and waste management

Biotechnology and Biochemistry; (see also Health and Medical Systems Panel)

 

Suggested Citation:"A Comparison of Technology Lists." National Research Council. 1992. STAR 21: Strategic Technologies for the Army of the Twenty-First Century. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1888.
×

On the other hand, when the items on these lists are understood in terms of the scopes specified for them by the lists' authors, there is surprisingly wide agreement among them and with the full set of important technologies represented in the STAR TFAs and reports of the Systems Panels.

REFERENCES

DOD. 1991. The Department of Defense Critical Technologies Plan for the Committees on Armed Services, United State Congress. Department of Defense Report AD-A234 900. Washington, D.C. May 1.


National Critical Technologies Panel. 1991. Report of the National Critical Technologies Panel. Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office. Washington, D.C. March.


U.S. Army. 1990. Army Technology Base: Volume 1. Headquarters, Department of the Army, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Research and Technology (SARD-ZT). Washington, D.C. November.

Suggested Citation:"A Comparison of Technology Lists." National Research Council. 1992. STAR 21: Strategic Technologies for the Army of the Twenty-First Century. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1888.
×
This page in the original is blank.
Suggested Citation:"A Comparison of Technology Lists." National Research Council. 1992. STAR 21: Strategic Technologies for the Army of the Twenty-First Century. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1888.
×
Page 269
Suggested Citation:"A Comparison of Technology Lists." National Research Council. 1992. STAR 21: Strategic Technologies for the Army of the Twenty-First Century. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1888.
×
Page 270
Suggested Citation:"A Comparison of Technology Lists." National Research Council. 1992. STAR 21: Strategic Technologies for the Army of the Twenty-First Century. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1888.
×
Page 271
Suggested Citation:"A Comparison of Technology Lists." National Research Council. 1992. STAR 21: Strategic Technologies for the Army of the Twenty-First Century. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1888.
×
Page 272
Suggested Citation:"A Comparison of Technology Lists." National Research Council. 1992. STAR 21: Strategic Technologies for the Army of the Twenty-First Century. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1888.
×
Page 273
Suggested Citation:"A Comparison of Technology Lists." National Research Council. 1992. STAR 21: Strategic Technologies for the Army of the Twenty-First Century. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1888.
×
Page 274
Suggested Citation:"A Comparison of Technology Lists." National Research Council. 1992. STAR 21: Strategic Technologies for the Army of the Twenty-First Century. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1888.
×
Page 275
Suggested Citation:"A Comparison of Technology Lists." National Research Council. 1992. STAR 21: Strategic Technologies for the Army of the Twenty-First Century. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1888.
×
Page 276
Suggested Citation:"A Comparison of Technology Lists." National Research Council. 1992. STAR 21: Strategic Technologies for the Army of the Twenty-First Century. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1888.
×
Page 277
Suggested Citation:"A Comparison of Technology Lists." National Research Council. 1992. STAR 21: Strategic Technologies for the Army of the Twenty-First Century. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1888.
×
Page 278
Suggested Citation:"A Comparison of Technology Lists." National Research Council. 1992. STAR 21: Strategic Technologies for the Army of the Twenty-First Century. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1888.
×
Page 279
Suggested Citation:"A Comparison of Technology Lists." National Research Council. 1992. STAR 21: Strategic Technologies for the Army of the Twenty-First Century. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1888.
×
Page 280
Suggested Citation:"A Comparison of Technology Lists." National Research Council. 1992. STAR 21: Strategic Technologies for the Army of the Twenty-First Century. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1888.
×
Page 281
Suggested Citation:"A Comparison of Technology Lists." National Research Council. 1992. STAR 21: Strategic Technologies for the Army of the Twenty-First Century. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1888.
×
Page 282
Suggested Citation:"A Comparison of Technology Lists." National Research Council. 1992. STAR 21: Strategic Technologies for the Army of the Twenty-First Century. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1888.
×
Page 283
Suggested Citation:"A Comparison of Technology Lists." National Research Council. 1992. STAR 21: Strategic Technologies for the Army of the Twenty-First Century. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1888.
×
Page 284
Suggested Citation:"A Comparison of Technology Lists." National Research Council. 1992. STAR 21: Strategic Technologies for the Army of the Twenty-First Century. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1888.
×
Page 285
Suggested Citation:"A Comparison of Technology Lists." National Research Council. 1992. STAR 21: Strategic Technologies for the Army of the Twenty-First Century. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1888.
×
Page 286
Next: B Contributors to the STAR Study »
STAR 21: Strategic Technologies for the Army of the Twenty-First Century Get This Book
×
Buy Hardback | $65.00
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

Dramatic political and economic changes throughout the world, coupled with rapid advances in technology, pose an important question for the U.S. Army: What technologies are best suited to defending U.S. interests against tomorrow's military threats?

STAR 21 provides an expert analysis of how the Army can prepare itself for the battlefield of the future—where soldiers will wear "smart" helmets and combat chemical warfare with vaccines produced in days to counter new threats.

This book summarizes emerging developments in robotics, "brillant" munitions, medical support, laser sensors, biotechnolgy, novel materials, and other key areas. Taking into account reliability, deployability, and other values that all military systems will need, the volume identifies new systems and emerging technologies that offer the greatest payoff for the Army.

The volume addresses a host of important military issues, including the importance of mobile, rapidly deployable forces, the changing role of the helicopter, and how commercial technology may help the Army stay ahead of potential opponents.

Alternative Selection, Doubleday's Military Book Club

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!