Questions? Call 800-624-6242 About | Ordering | New Menu | Items in cart [0] SEARCH

PAPERBACK price:$27.00 add to cart Rights & Permissions Free PDF Access Sign in to download PDF book and chapters Free Resources Display this book on your site! Related Titles Enhancing Food Safety:The Role of the Food and Drug Administration Nutrition Labeling:Issues and Directions for the 1990s Other Related Titles Food Labeling: Toward National Uniformity (1992) Institute of Medicine (IOM) Citation Manager Export the bibliographic data for this book in your chosen format Web Search Builder Use this book's key terms to search within this book, across our collection, or across the Web. Skim This Chapter Skim this chapter and use this chapter's key terms to search within this book. Reference Finder Paste in your own text to find books that relate to your topic. Citation Manager . "D States Providing Written Response to the Six Questions from the Committee on State Food Labeling." Food Labeling: Toward National Uniformity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 1992. Please select a format: Page 173   E-mail Share on facebook Facebook Share on delicious Delicious Share on stumbleupon Stumble Share on twitter Twitter More Sharing ServicesMore The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy. D States Providing Written Response to the Six Questions from the Committee on State Food Labeling Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware Florida Georgia Hawaii Illinois Indiana Iowa Maine Maryland Michigan Minnesota Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Mexico North Carolina North Dakota Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington Total 37 Page 173 Front Matter (R1-R16) 1 Summary (1-26) 2 Background of the Study (27-34) 3 Contextual Factors Affecting the Regulation of Misbranded Food (35-62) 4 Criteria for Determining Adequate Implementation of the Federal Statute (63-84) 5 Comparison and Analysis of Federal and State Food Labeling Requirements (85-140) 6 Issues Raised By States, Consumers, and Industry (141-162) Appendixes (163-164) A Provision for the State Food Labeling Study Contained in the Nutrition Labeling and Education Act of 1990 (165-166) B Participants at the Public Meeting Held by the Committee on State Food Labeling, May 30, 1991 (167-168) C Letter of Request Sent to State and Local Regulators and Consumer Groups by the Committee on State Food Labeling (169-172) D States Providing Written Response to the Six Questions from the Committee on State Food Labeling (173-174) E Individuals from States That Provided Information to the Committee on State Food Labeling (175-182) F State and Local Laws, Regulations, and Other Materials Submitted to the Committee on State Food Labeling (183-194) G Areas of Discrepancy Between Federal and State Food Labeling Requirements Identified by States and Consumer and Industry Groups (195-202) H State Food Labeling Requirements and Relationship to the Misbranding Provisions of Section 403 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (203-208) I Case Study: Requirements for Labeling Bottle Water (209-218) J Biographical Sketches of Committee Members and Staff (219-224) Index (225-240)

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 173
Food Labeling: Toward National Uniformity D States Providing Written Response to the Six Questions from the Committee on State Food Labeling Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware Florida Georgia Hawaii Illinois Indiana Iowa Maine Maryland Michigan Minnesota Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Mexico North Carolina North Dakota Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington Total 37

OCR for page 174
Food Labeling: Toward National Uniformity This page in the original is blank.

Representative terms from entire chapter:

uniformity north