National Academies Press: OpenBook

Factors Affecting Contraceptive Use in Sub-Saharan Africa (1993)

Chapter: 5 Family Planning Programs and Policies

« Previous: 4 The Household, Kinship, and Community Context
Suggested Citation:"5 Family Planning Programs and Policies." National Research Council. 1993. Factors Affecting Contraceptive Use in Sub-Saharan Africa. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2209.
×
Page 128
Suggested Citation:"5 Family Planning Programs and Policies." National Research Council. 1993. Factors Affecting Contraceptive Use in Sub-Saharan Africa. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2209.
×
Page 129
Suggested Citation:"5 Family Planning Programs and Policies." National Research Council. 1993. Factors Affecting Contraceptive Use in Sub-Saharan Africa. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2209.
×
Page 130
Suggested Citation:"5 Family Planning Programs and Policies." National Research Council. 1993. Factors Affecting Contraceptive Use in Sub-Saharan Africa. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2209.
×
Page 131
Suggested Citation:"5 Family Planning Programs and Policies." National Research Council. 1993. Factors Affecting Contraceptive Use in Sub-Saharan Africa. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2209.
×
Page 132
Suggested Citation:"5 Family Planning Programs and Policies." National Research Council. 1993. Factors Affecting Contraceptive Use in Sub-Saharan Africa. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2209.
×
Page 133
Suggested Citation:"5 Family Planning Programs and Policies." National Research Council. 1993. Factors Affecting Contraceptive Use in Sub-Saharan Africa. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2209.
×
Page 134
Suggested Citation:"5 Family Planning Programs and Policies." National Research Council. 1993. Factors Affecting Contraceptive Use in Sub-Saharan Africa. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2209.
×
Page 135
Suggested Citation:"5 Family Planning Programs and Policies." National Research Council. 1993. Factors Affecting Contraceptive Use in Sub-Saharan Africa. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2209.
×
Page 136
Suggested Citation:"5 Family Planning Programs and Policies." National Research Council. 1993. Factors Affecting Contraceptive Use in Sub-Saharan Africa. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2209.
×
Page 137
Suggested Citation:"5 Family Planning Programs and Policies." National Research Council. 1993. Factors Affecting Contraceptive Use in Sub-Saharan Africa. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2209.
×
Page 138
Suggested Citation:"5 Family Planning Programs and Policies." National Research Council. 1993. Factors Affecting Contraceptive Use in Sub-Saharan Africa. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2209.
×
Page 139
Suggested Citation:"5 Family Planning Programs and Policies." National Research Council. 1993. Factors Affecting Contraceptive Use in Sub-Saharan Africa. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2209.
×
Page 140
Suggested Citation:"5 Family Planning Programs and Policies." National Research Council. 1993. Factors Affecting Contraceptive Use in Sub-Saharan Africa. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2209.
×
Page 141
Suggested Citation:"5 Family Planning Programs and Policies." National Research Council. 1993. Factors Affecting Contraceptive Use in Sub-Saharan Africa. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2209.
×
Page 142
Suggested Citation:"5 Family Planning Programs and Policies." National Research Council. 1993. Factors Affecting Contraceptive Use in Sub-Saharan Africa. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2209.
×
Page 143
Suggested Citation:"5 Family Planning Programs and Policies." National Research Council. 1993. Factors Affecting Contraceptive Use in Sub-Saharan Africa. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2209.
×
Page 144
Suggested Citation:"5 Family Planning Programs and Policies." National Research Council. 1993. Factors Affecting Contraceptive Use in Sub-Saharan Africa. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2209.
×
Page 145
Suggested Citation:"5 Family Planning Programs and Policies." National Research Council. 1993. Factors Affecting Contraceptive Use in Sub-Saharan Africa. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2209.
×
Page 146
Suggested Citation:"5 Family Planning Programs and Policies." National Research Council. 1993. Factors Affecting Contraceptive Use in Sub-Saharan Africa. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2209.
×
Page 147
Suggested Citation:"5 Family Planning Programs and Policies." National Research Council. 1993. Factors Affecting Contraceptive Use in Sub-Saharan Africa. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2209.
×
Page 148
Suggested Citation:"5 Family Planning Programs and Policies." National Research Council. 1993. Factors Affecting Contraceptive Use in Sub-Saharan Africa. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2209.
×
Page 149
Suggested Citation:"5 Family Planning Programs and Policies." National Research Council. 1993. Factors Affecting Contraceptive Use in Sub-Saharan Africa. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2209.
×
Page 150
Suggested Citation:"5 Family Planning Programs and Policies." National Research Council. 1993. Factors Affecting Contraceptive Use in Sub-Saharan Africa. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2209.
×
Page 151
Suggested Citation:"5 Family Planning Programs and Policies." National Research Council. 1993. Factors Affecting Contraceptive Use in Sub-Saharan Africa. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2209.
×
Page 152
Suggested Citation:"5 Family Planning Programs and Policies." National Research Council. 1993. Factors Affecting Contraceptive Use in Sub-Saharan Africa. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2209.
×
Page 153
Suggested Citation:"5 Family Planning Programs and Policies." National Research Council. 1993. Factors Affecting Contraceptive Use in Sub-Saharan Africa. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2209.
×
Page 154
Suggested Citation:"5 Family Planning Programs and Policies." National Research Council. 1993. Factors Affecting Contraceptive Use in Sub-Saharan Africa. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2209.
×
Page 155
Suggested Citation:"5 Family Planning Programs and Policies." National Research Council. 1993. Factors Affecting Contraceptive Use in Sub-Saharan Africa. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2209.
×
Page 156
Suggested Citation:"5 Family Planning Programs and Policies." National Research Council. 1993. Factors Affecting Contraceptive Use in Sub-Saharan Africa. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2209.
×
Page 157
Suggested Citation:"5 Family Planning Programs and Policies." National Research Council. 1993. Factors Affecting Contraceptive Use in Sub-Saharan Africa. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2209.
×
Page 158
Suggested Citation:"5 Family Planning Programs and Policies." National Research Council. 1993. Factors Affecting Contraceptive Use in Sub-Saharan Africa. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2209.
×
Page 159
Suggested Citation:"5 Family Planning Programs and Policies." National Research Council. 1993. Factors Affecting Contraceptive Use in Sub-Saharan Africa. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2209.
×
Page 160
Suggested Citation:"5 Family Planning Programs and Policies." National Research Council. 1993. Factors Affecting Contraceptive Use in Sub-Saharan Africa. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2209.
×
Page 161
Suggested Citation:"5 Family Planning Programs and Policies." National Research Council. 1993. Factors Affecting Contraceptive Use in Sub-Saharan Africa. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2209.
×
Page 162
Suggested Citation:"5 Family Planning Programs and Policies." National Research Council. 1993. Factors Affecting Contraceptive Use in Sub-Saharan Africa. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2209.
×
Page 163
Suggested Citation:"5 Family Planning Programs and Policies." National Research Council. 1993. Factors Affecting Contraceptive Use in Sub-Saharan Africa. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2209.
×
Page 164
Suggested Citation:"5 Family Planning Programs and Policies." National Research Council. 1993. Factors Affecting Contraceptive Use in Sub-Saharan Africa. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2209.
×
Page 165
Suggested Citation:"5 Family Planning Programs and Policies." National Research Council. 1993. Factors Affecting Contraceptive Use in Sub-Saharan Africa. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2209.
×
Page 166
Suggested Citation:"5 Family Planning Programs and Policies." National Research Council. 1993. Factors Affecting Contraceptive Use in Sub-Saharan Africa. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2209.
×
Page 167
Suggested Citation:"5 Family Planning Programs and Policies." National Research Council. 1993. Factors Affecting Contraceptive Use in Sub-Saharan Africa. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2209.
×
Page 168
Suggested Citation:"5 Family Planning Programs and Policies." National Research Council. 1993. Factors Affecting Contraceptive Use in Sub-Saharan Africa. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2209.
×
Page 169

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

5 Family Planning Programs and Policies To concentrate primarily on cultural and socioeconomic barriers as a main reason for low contraceptive prevalence in the African region belies the fact that small, well-managed projects and programs throughout the subcontinent have been achieving prevalence rates of 20 percent or more in recent years.) These include projects in Muslim and Catholic francophone countries (e.g., projects in Matadi in Zaire, Ruhengeri in Rwanda, Niamey in Niger), Muslim Sudan, and a host of anglophone countries (Kenya, Ghana, and others). Although it may be argued that some of these projects achieved such prevalence levels in the more educated and urbanized sectors of soci- ety, this pattern of uptake was also common in Asia and Latin America in the earlier days of family planning. In any event, although none of the projects discussed in this chapter were located in the deepest rural reaches, some such as Ruhengeri were outside urban areas. It is instructive to exam- ine those programs that are associated with increased contraceptive use in the last decade, as well as situations in which little program support and poor project effectiveness are associated with low prevalence rates. A review of program directions and potentials is particularly called for in this period of economic retrenchment in Africa. As reviewed in Chapters 3 and 4, economic factors may have substantial effects on the acceptance of iPrograms influence prevalence in two ways: They meet existing demand and stimulate interest in the adoption of family planning among nonusers. 128

FAMILY PLANNING PROGRAMS AND POLICIES 129 family planning. There is growing utilization of family planning services in Africa, and the first indications of fertility decline were observed in several African countries in the 1980s. The future role of programs in sustaining and increasing the rate of contraceptive utilization and the lessons learned regarding factors necessary to maintain viable programs are ripe for review. This chapter describes the historical development of.population policies and contraceptive services in Africa, reviews the contributions of private versus public sector delivery, and discusses future prospects for family planning programs in the region. THE AFRICAN CONTEXT I?OR POPULATION AND FAMILY PLANNING PROGRAMS The sub-Saharan context for family planning information and service delivery differs from that of Asia, Latin America, or North Africa. Impor- tant factors in sub-Saharan Africa, include weak policy support, relatively late program implementation, generally inadequate resources, weak absorp- tive capacity, and interregional disparities, each of which is discussed be- low. Weak Policy Support Of the first ten governments to promulgate policies supporting family planning and slower population growth, only one Mauritius was in the African region.2 However, due to its unique cultural and geographic char- acteristics, Mauritius is not given emphasis in this volume. Until recently, political and policy support for family planning demonstrated by African governments was cautious at best. However, such support is increasing. In her analysis of policy support, Heckel (1986, 1990) indicated that by 1986, 13 sub-Saharan countries had established explicit population policies that encouraged slower population growth, 3 of them in separate policy docu- ments and 10 as part of national economic or social development plans. Ten of these statements emphasized the need to reduce or stabilize rapid rates of population growth but did not set specific targets. As of 1991, some 20 African governments had adopted population policies and established government agencies responsible for coordinating policies or programs (Roudi, 1991~. Regardless of the status of their popu- lation policies (or lack thereofy, almost all African countries now provide 2In 1951, India became the first country worldwide to have an official population policy; by 1965, five other Asian countries plus Fiji, Egypt, Turkey, and Mauritius had followed suit.

130 FACTORS AFFECTING CONTRACEPTIVE USE either direct or indirect support for family planning programs (United Na- tions, 1989b, Population Reference Bureau, 1990~. The rationale supporting policies has varied from country to country. In Kenya, the pressure on land resources has been highlighted (see Chapter 4 for discussion), whereas Botswana has noted unemployment and a high dependency ratio (Heckel, 1986~. Relatively Late Program Implementation Although early family planning activities were initiated during the co- lonial period in much of Africa (particularly in English dependencies), post colonial implementation of programs in the 1960s was slow due primarily to low government recognition of the need for services and fluctuating government support, insufficient external assistance, opposition from the Roman Catholic Church in some regions, logistical problems, and lack of trained manpower (United Nations Population Fund, 1983~. By 1969, only five continental African countries, Benin, The Gambia, Ghana, Kenya, and Zimbabwe (12 percent of the total countries discussed in this report, among them containing 10 percent of the African population), had officially com- mitted themselves to the initiation of family planning programs (World Bank, 1985~. As of 1991, only three had carried through on this commit- ment to any substantial degree. During the same period, 1969 to 1991, three of the five North African countries and all of the most populous, as well as many smaller, countries of Asia had established family planning programs. Moreover, although a few nongovernmental family planning organizations were active in Africa as early as the l950s, most programs were not initiated until the end of the 1970s or later. Not only did family planning programs generally start later in Africa, the strength of government commitment to existing programs has tended to lag behind that of other regions. Assessments of national family planning activities and family planning effort, based on contraceptive availability, policy statements, and program activity, indicate that in the early 1980s, only one sub-Saharan country, Mauritius, demonstrated strong program com- mitment; the other countries of the region were judged to have either weak programs or no programs at all. In contrast, more than half the countries of North Africa, Asia, and Latin America were deemed to have moderate or strong programs (Ross et al., 1988; United Nations, 1989a). A 1986 World Bank review noted that only Zimbabwe provided substantial access to fam- ily planning outside urban areas; although Botswana and Kenya had pro- grams underway, the review indicated that "access by potential clients re- mained limited. Countries such as Ghana, Liberia, Malawi, Nigeria, Rwanda and Tanzania had all started programs but had made only limited progress to date." In the rest of Africa, "what services exist are provided in limited

FAMILY PLANNING PROGRAMS AND POLICIES 131 areas by small nongovernmental organizations that are often poorly funded" (World Bank, 1986:5~. Since then, family planning programs in Africa have been improving at a faster rate than those of other regions. In their assessment of policy and program strengths,3 Mauldin and Ross (1991) indicated that between 1982 and 1989, the sub-Saharan countries showed the greatest improvement in program effort of all regions. However, the overall score for family plan- ning programs in Africa still lagged well behind that in Latin America or Asia. Mauldin and Ross concluded that of 38 African countries, one (Botswana) had a strong program; five (Ghana, Kenya, Mauritius, Zambia, and Zimba- bwe) had moderate programs; and the remaining countries had weak, very weak, or no programs. Of countries worldwide in the weak or no-program category, Africa accounted for 60 percent. Poor contraceptive availability continued to represent a substantial program weakness in the region (Mauldin and Ross, 1991~. Generally Inadequate Resources Although it is difficult to obtain accurate information, available data suggest that per capita funding for family planning activities in the African region is less than half of that in Asia and Latin America. In most sub- Saharan countries, the annual per capita expenditure (government and donor sources combined) is less than $0.20 (Ross et al., 1988~. Such disparities have long existed: In 1980, only four African countries provided more than $0.50 per capita in public expenditures for population programs; more than half the countries in North Africa and Asia provided this amount or more (World Bank, 1985~. Resource disparities become even more important if we consider that per capita income, and thus personal resources available for the private purchase of health and family planning services, are substan- tially lower in Africa than in other regions. Weak Absorptive Capacity Merely increasing the funds for family planning services would not in itself address African resource problems. Absorptive capacity in the region is weak. To give but one example, the availability of health personnel, who may be expected to play a key role in contraceptive distribution, is much lower in sub-Saharan Africa than in other regions. World Bank data from 3The calculation of program effort is based on 30 items that fall into four broad categories: policy and stage setting activities, service and service-related activities, record keeping and evaluation, and availability and accessibility of family planning supplies and services (Mauldin and Ross, 1991).

132 FA CTORS AFFECTING CONTRA CEPTIVE USE the mid-1980s indicate that of the 33 sub-Saharan countries for which data were available, half had fewer than one physician per 15,000 population, and almost all had fewer than one per 5,000 population (World Bank, l990b). In all other regions combined, only two countries (Nepal and Bhutan) had a physician/population ratio of 1/15,000 or less, and countries with fewer than one physician per 5,000 population were in the minority (World Bank, l990b). Although less extreme, the same differential held for nursing personnel (World Bank, l990b). Increasing resources for service delivery in Africa will require long-term emphasis on human capital and infrastruc- ture development, as well as the development of strategies to increase avail- able financing. Interregional Disparities Substantial interregional disparities in family planning program devel- opment exist within Africa. Historically, family planning programs have been more prevalent in anglophone than in francophone sub-Saharan coun- tries. In their review of family planning programs in francophone countries up to 1974, Gauthier and Brown (1975a) indicated that none of them had a policy aimed at reducing the rate of population growth. By the mid-1970s, all the anglophone countries of the region, except for Somalia and Malawi, had private associations promoting family planning, whereas only four francophone countries had such associations (Gauthier and Brown, 1975a,b). Francophone African countries have generally been substantially more con- servative in the promotion of contraception, whether their populations are predominantly Catholic or Muslim. Almost 10 years after the Gauthier and Brown analysis, Faruqee and Gulhati singled out six continental anglophone countries as making substantial progress in family planning program and policy development, but only one francophone country, Senegal; the latter was deemed to have the weakest policy and program support of the group (Faruqee and Gulhati, 1983~. In a number of francophone countries, a 1920 law based on the old French legal code (hereafter referred as the French law) still prohibits dis- tribution of contraceptive supplies and information (United Nations, 1989b). Although the law is generally not strictly enforced, it exerts a negative influence on program development. Many francophone countries also have highly centralized, physician-based public sector service delivery, and regu- lations that specifically prohibit the provision of contraceptives by person- nel other than doctors. Because the ratio of population to physicians is high in most sub-Saharan countries, as indicated above, such regulations se- verely restrict family planning availability. Moreover, as discussed below, community-based distribution, private sector delivery, and social marketing

FAMILY PLANNING PROGRAMS AND POLICIES 133 have all been introduced later in the francophone countries and continue to be less common. Contraceptive prevalence rates in francophone countries are lower than those of their anglophone counterparts (see Chapter 2~. That this difference is due primarily to programmatic rather than cultural factors is suggested by the fact that contraceptive prevalence in areas of Niger, Zaire, and Rwanda, where effective service delivery has been initiated, has risen to rates com- parable to those of well-managed programs in anglophone countries (Direc- tion de la Sante Fam~liale and Population Communication Services, 1989; McGinn, 1990; Wawer et al., 1990; Bertrand et al., 1993~. The weak policy support, relatively late program implementation, gen- erally inadequate resources, weak absorptive capacity, and interregional dispandes in Africa indicate the problematic milieu within which family planning projects and programs have operated, and suggest reasons for the pattern of success in family planning programs or relative lack thereof seen in different coun- tries. INTERNATIONAL AND REGIONAL INFLUENCES ON POPULATION POLICY DEVELOPMENT A number of factors have influenced the gradual move toward govern- ment policies more favorable to family planning in Africa (Goliber, 1989~. The rapidity of population growth has been documented authoritatively in a series of national censuses.4 The degree to which rapid population growth is outstripping growth in social infrastructure (e.g., educational and health facilities) and job creation, has been brought home to governments through basic sociodemographic and economic analyses such as presentations by the Futures Group conducted to date in more than 20 African countries (Middleberg, personal communication, 1991~. The importance of external influences on policy development cannot be underestimated. In the early 1960s, the U.S. Congress passed legislation endorsing population research because of the perceived effect of population growth on economic development (Piotrow, 1973~. U.S. foreign policy emphasized an economic interdependence between the United States and developing countries (Donaldson and Tsui, 1990~. In 1967, Title X to the Foreign Assistance Act was passed, providing support to voluntary family planning programs overseas. The United States offered assistance to gov- ~rnm~nts U.S. agencies, and UN voluntary health or other qualified organi 4Most censuses were conducted with the assistance of external donors, notably the United Nations Population Fund and the U.S. Agency for International Development, with technical assistance from the U.S. Bureau of the Census.

134 FACTORS AFFECTING CONTRACEPTIVE USE zations for program implementation (Piotrow, 1973), and $35 million was earmarked for population programs. Support for population activities had become part of U.S. national policy, rather than an occasional technical assistance foray supported by private citizens or organizations. The special role of the United States in international population programs is based not only on its early interest, but also on its continued financial support. In terms of total dollars, the United States was the dominant donor to interna- tional population activities between 1965 and 1980 (Donaldson and Tsui, 1990~. Another major international player in the population field is the United Nations. From 1962 to 1972, a series of resolutions were adopted in the governing bodies of the UN agencies advising governments to examine their demographic circumstances and take appropriate action (Finkle and Crane, 1975~. The United Nations in 1969 designated a separate fund to respond to global population needs, the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA), to be administered by the United Nations Development Fund (Futures Group, 1988b). The United Nations gave legitimacy to population programs because its endorsement meant approval of member states from developing countries. Population programs that might otherwise have been viewed with suspicion acquired credibility. In 1972, a resolution of the UN Economic and Social Council called for a Draft World Population Plan of Action to be prepared for the 1974 Bucharest World Population Conference (Mauldin et al., 1974~. This conference was the first major population meeting to invite political representatives from all over the world, rather than just international population specialists, to dis- cuss population strategies (Mauldin et al., 1974~. However, whereas devel- oped nations regarded the Bucharest conference as a potential catalyst to increase the role of the United Nations and its member governments in limiting population growth, many developing countries viewed the same event as one that would strengthen the unity of the Third World in achiev- ing a "new economic order" (Finkle and Crane, 1975~. Amendments were introduced to the draft plan that shifted the focus away from demography to socioeconomic development. The final version of the World Population Plan of Action examined population variables within the context of social and economic development (Mauldin et al., 1974~. At Bucharest, African countries did not indicate that rapid population growth was one of their major problems. Ten years later, African views on the necessity of fertility reduction had changed. The Kilimanjaro Pro gramme of Action for African Population and Self-Reliant Development was formulated at a regional conference for African governments, held in Tanzania in January 1984, to prepare for the second International Conference on Population, which took place in Mexico City later that year. The Kilimanjaro Programme declared that effective

FAMILY PLANNING PROGRAMS AND POLICIES 135 programs were needed in Africa to reduce the high levels of fertility and mortality (Finkle and Crane, 1975~. It reaffirmed the rights of parents to decide the number and timing of their children, and called on all countries to ensure the availability of safe, effective, and affordable contraception (Futures Group, 1988b). At the Mexico City conference, Africa joined the other developing regions of the world in declaring that population problems must be addressed regardless of whether a "new economic order" was es- tablished (Finkle and Crane, 1975~. This stance represented a major change in attitudes and priorities. HISTORICAL EVOLUTION OF FAMILY PLANNING PROGRAMS On a national level, to what degree does the presence or absence of a population policy affect family planning programs? As demonstrated in the discussion of selected countries below, many pilot projects have been implemented successfully in the absence of a supportive government policy. Indeed, the presence of the projects themselves may promote policy development by providing evidence for government leaders that family planning will be culturally acceptable. However, there is evidence that the policy milieu is important for large-scale program success. Two of the three countries (Kenya and Botswana) currently having the most successful national programs and the highest contraceptive prevalence rates (CPRs) were among the first group to adopt population policies in Africa Zimbabwe being the one exception where strong government support of programs occurred without an explicit policy. In countries with centralized government control over service deliv- ery, such as the francophone countries, the lack of such policies has con- tributed to reluctance to expand programs and may in part account for their having, as a group, the lowest CPRs in Africa. The implementation of family planning programs in Africa has tended to follow four stages, which occur within different time frames depending on the country.5 These stages are: 1. implementation of early pioneering projects, most conducted by nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) or only weakly linked to the public sector; SThe four stages of African program development to date that are discussed here are congru- ent with a program typology developed by the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) to guide its assistance efforts in the 1990s and beyond (Destler et al., 1990). Accord- ing to the USAID model, most African countries are at the emergent (modern method preva- lence of 0-7 percent) or launch stages (prevalence 8-15 percent). Only three (or four if Mauritius is included) are at the growth level or beyond (prevalence greater than 16 percent). The implications of the different stages of program development for international donor techni- cal and funding assistance are discussed later in this chapter.

136 FACTORS AFFECTING CONTRACEPTIVE USE 2. family planning service expansion, usually including both discrete projects and preliminary government involvement, setting in motion the initiation of a national program; 3. broad-based service expansion and consolidation, particularly in the national program, and relative policy stability that results in appreciable effects on the CPR; 4. substantial and sustainable increases in CPR resulting in a fertility decline. In most sub-Saharan countries in the fourth stage (principally Botswana, Kenya, and Zimbabwe), the public sector is the primary, al- though not the sole, service provider. First Stage: Pioneers Pioneer projects throughout Africa have introduced family planning and demonstrated its political and cultural acceptability. In most cases, such programs have been implemented in milieus having little or no experience in contraceptive delivery and weak or no policy support. The weak support resulted in part from the very dearth of experience: Lacking empirical evidence to the contrary, African leaders were concerned that contraception would not be perceived as a need by their populations. The role of the pioneer programs has been crucial in changing political attitudes. The early program activities have most frequently been implemented by NGOs, missionary groups, or as joint endeavors between in-country and developed country universities and research groups. In almost all cases, such projects have received external funding and technical support. With few exceptions, public sector involvement has been relatively minimal. Even where some degree of government involvement has been inevitable, such as within the highly centralized service delivery systems of francophone Af- rica, the pioneers have generally been small operations research programs, or other discrete entities outside the main health service delivery system. As such, they can be deemed "experimental" and disavowed quickly if the government perceives political fallout (Wawer et al., l991b). In francophone countries, the first stage has generally been limited, due to the relatively monopolistic and centralized role of government in service delivery. This limitation accounts for the slow development of family planning in these countries; francophone countries have had less exposure to the small, suc- cessful nongovernmental family planning projects that have influenced policy in anglophone countries. Exceptions to the general rule of weak government support for or in- volvement in early projects can be found in a few African countries. Kenya and Ghana were the first to formulate population policies, in 1966 and 1969, respectively. In these countries, government support of program ac- tivities occurred relatively soon after or in parallel with many of the early

FAMILY PLANNING PROGRAMS AND POLICIES 137 NGO activities (World Bank, 1980, 1986~. In Zimbabwe, the preindependence government, although not declaring an official population policy, was con- cerned about rapid population growth and, since the mid-1960s, has strongly supported private family planning activities (World Bank, 1982~. The implementation of pioneer projects in Africa has occurred in two distinct waves. The earliest projects were implemented in a small group of countries (Kenya, Ghana, and Nigena) between the mid-19SOs and the 1970s, and demonstrated that family planning was acceptable to substantial por- tions of the target populations even in what were considered to be pronatalist settings. Examples of such projects include those of the Family Planning Associations of Nairobi and Mombasa, which began providing contracep- tive information and services in 1955 (World Bank, 1980~; the Gbaja Fam- ily Health Nurse Project in Nigeria (1967-1970) (Ross, 19864; the project in Danfa in Ghana (Reinke, 1985) begun in 1969; and collaboration with the International Postpartum Program of the Population Council, which also began in Ghana and Nigeria in 1969 (Castadot et al., 1975~. For cultural and political reasons, many pioneer projects concentrated on family plan- n~ng as a maternal and child health issue. A number of the early projects demonstrated that service delivery strategies that had been or were being tested in Asia, including community-based distribution (CBD) and varia- tions on commercial sales of contraceptives, could be adapted to African settings (Black and Harvey, 1976; DeBoer and McNiel, 1989~. A second wave of "pioneer projects" was implemented or begun in the period from the mid-1970s to the present in countries that for political or cultural reasons were slower to promote family planning. (The early stages of family planning service delivery in Africa have thus occurred over a 30- year time span, depending on the country.) These projects have yielded lessons already learned elsewhere (i.e., family planning can be culturally acceptable; CBD can work in African settings; and contraceptive services can be successfully integrated into health care) (Senegal and U.S. Agency for International Development, 1982; Bertrand et al., 1984, 1993; Wawer et al., 1990), but served to demonstrate again the acceptability of family plan- ning on a regional level. In virtually all cases, the early pioneers helped to introduce family planning, but did not have a great effect on contraceptive prevalence rates, except in small, select populations. In the project populations themselves, ultimate contraceptive prevalence rates have varied substantially: from less than 5 percent in the Nigerian Oyo State CBD project, Sine Saloum in Senegal, Bouafle in Cote d'Ivoire (Ross, 1986; University College Hospital et al., 1986; Columbia University, 1990) to almost 20 percent or more in the populations served in Danfa, Ruhengeri in Rwanda, Matadi in gas-Zaire, Niamey in Niger, and the Sudan (Ross, 1986; Farah and Lauro, 1988; McGinn, 1990; Wawer et al., 1990; Bertrand et al., 1993~. The definitions of "suc

138 FACTORS AFFECTING CONTRACEPTIVE USE cess" for early programs are thus highly variable. In the case of the Oyo State or Cote d'Ivoire projects, success was not necessarily demonstrated in the effect on the CPR, but rather in the very fact that these projects were implemented, showed some influence on prevalence (albeit limited), and laid the groundwork for an expansion and replication of these models in other regions (Wawer et al., 199 lb). , No attempt was made to assess the community CPR achieved as a result of the Market-Based Distribution Project in Ibadan, Nigeria (see Chapter 4), which focused on contraceptive sales by traders in an urban market. (The project did record the quantities of contraceptives sold.) However, this project has been replicated in two new settings in Nigeria and one in Ghana, at the behest of local governments (Wawer et al., l991b), suggesting "suc- cess" in making innovative family planning delivery more acceptable to policymakers and political leaders. With respect to the prevalence achieved, what may account for the great disparities among the various pilot projects? Given the great varia- tions in project design and implementation, direct comparisons are not very instructive. However, it seems that projects that established a clear identity for the family planning component (whether integrated with other health services or not) performed better. In both Oyo State and Sine Saloum, for example, there are indications of shortcomings in the promotion of family planning services: greater emphasis on the curative program elements at the expense of preventive and contraceptive services, and perhaps reluc- tance by project management or workers to stress family planning (Ross, 1986; University College Hospital et al., 1986~. The Ruhengeri project in Rwanda achieved more than 19 percent prevalence in one area, compared to 8 percent in the second project site. Although dissimilarities in the educa- tional level of the target populations accounted somewhat for the results, project staff emphasized the differences in the level of local political sup- port for the projects, which were said to affect the degree to which project workers carried out their 'promotional and distribution activities (McGinn, 1990~. Second Stage: Mixed Private and Public Activities and Service Expansion In the wake of the pioneering projects, countries have tended to follow one of several directions. In one model, found in Nigeria, early projects have loosened political constraints on the development of other, larger, nongovernmental projects. Countries such as Kenya and Ghana have ex- panded both governmental and nongovernmental activities. In a third model, found particularly in the francophone countries, governments have been

FAMILY PLANNING PROGRAMS AND POLICIES 139 reassured and have expanded their own services, but they continue to be reluctant to promote private sector delivery and NGO involvement. Third Stage: Increasing Consolidation of Service Delivery In the third stage, service delivery is sufficiently well established, ad- vertised, and accessible to result in substantial contraceptive prevalence rates at the national level. It is interesting to note that the three African countries that have progressed through this stage (Zimbabwe, Botswana, and Kenya) had one thing in common: strong government involvement in family planning. Although the private sector played and continues to play a role in each country, in none is it the primary source of supplies (Botswana, 1989; Kenya, 1989; Zimbabwe, 1989~. Experience from these three countries may have implications for several other African nations. For example, in Niger, a dramatic government rever- sal of its negative stance on family planning has resulted in strong govern- ment support for the public sector distribution of services. In Niamey, CPR has increased from less than 6 percent in 1984 to more than 25 percent in 1989 (Direction de la Sante Familiale and Population Communication Ser- vices, 1989; Wawer et al., 19901. Although services are not yet available on a national level (in part because of weaknesses in the coverage provided by the government infrastructure), the results in Niamey suggest that intrin- sic cultural or religious barriers to acceptance may be limited and that distribution itself is a major determinant of CPRs in this setting. In Rwanda, as a result of the favorable experience of the Ruhengeri project, the govern- ment is embarking on a national program of family planning promotion by community agents and is strengthening service delivery in all public sector outlets (McNamara et al., 1990~. Based on the experience of the current African front-runners, it would appear that government involvement is an essential step in the attainment of substantial contraceptive use in Africa. Although the government infra- structure may be weak, it remains the only means of providing truly na- tional coverage in most settings. The primary and valuable role of the nongovernmental sector at the third stage of program development appears to consist in the testing of innovative service delivery strategies that are then adopted by and adapted to the public sector. Fourth Stage: Effects on Fertility The three countries in the fourth stage, Botswana, Kenya, and Zimba- bwe, demonstrate not only strong government involvement in family plan- ning service delivery, but also significant associated increases in contracep- tive use, as discussed in Chapter 2. These increases have been accompanied

140 FACTORS AFFECTING CONTRACEPTIVE USE by decreases in fertility. In Chapter 7, we examine the contribution of contraceptive use, relative to postpartum infecundability, to these declines (see also Jolly and Gribble, 1993~. Although not yet a major factor in family planning delivery in the sub- Saharan region, it is conceivable that private sector contraceptive delivery may become more important over time. Such a shift could occur as the result of donor emphasis on social marketing and other commercial strate- gies (a current trend in support by the U.S. Agency for International Devel- opment (USAID), for instance), sufficient client motivation to use family planning even in the face of some extra costs, and financial pressures on the public sector resulting in service cutbacks. At present, however, it is not possible to predict the degree to which the private sector will become a more important factor in the coming decade. PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT IN SELECTED COUNTRIES This section reviews the development or lack thereof of family plan- ning activities in a number of countries with different policy and program commitments. Countries with Programs Demonstrating the Most Success to Date Kenya Among the earliest organized family planning services in Africa were those provided by the Family Planning Associations of Nairobi and Mombasa, starting in 1955. In 1961, the Nairobi and Mombasa associations joined as the Family Planning Association of Kenya (FPAK), and a year later became the first tropical African affiliate of the International Planned Parenthood Federation (IPPF) (World Bank, 1980~. As indicated earlier, Kenyan gov- ernment interest in population programs began earlier than in most other African countries: In 1966, several years after a demographic survey re- vealed an annual population growth rate of 3 percent, the government in- cluded family planning as part of its development policy (Krystall, 1975~. Assigned to the Ministry of Health (MOH), the program was launched in 1967, with the goal of providing information and services in all government hospitals and health centers throughout the country (Krystall, 1975~. In its early years, due to the lack of an effective health infrastructure and short- ages of skilled personnel, the Ministry of Health (MOM) relied heavily on FPAK and expatriate staff for technical assistance (Kenya, 19891. Close cooperation ensued between the pioneering family planning providers and the government, as evidenced by the fact that by 1968, the FPAK operated 40 clinics, the majority of them in MOH facilities (World Bank, 1980~. In

FAMILY PLANNING PROGRAMS AND POLICIES 141 addition, the MOH program was supplemented by services provided by the Nairobi City Council and other smaller organizations. In the early stages, a number of nongovernmental programs in Kenya tested service delivery outside the clinic structure. The Kinga Experiment launched in 1972, and supported by Population Service, tested condom commercial social marketing techniques in one district. An aggressive advertising cam- paign used various media (radio, movies, and displays) and initiated subsi- dized condom sales through village stores. Current use of condoms among survey respondents increased from 4 percent before the program to 15 per- cent a year after project initiation; current use of any method increased from 21 to 35 percent. No such changes were discerned in the control population. It is reported that in its early stages, the project encountered opposition from community members, particularly a potential competitor (an influential physician). Local support from project shopkeepers quelled the issue. On its termination in 1974, the project was replicated by another condom social marketing program in the area (Black and Harvey, 1976; Ross, 1986~. The Health for the Family/Chogoria Hospital program has been in op- eration since 1974, with support and funding from a number of sources, including the Presbyterian Church of East Africa, Family Planning Interna- tional Assistance, and the Ford Foundation. The program conducts both clinical and community-based distribution of integrated health and family planning services. By late 1983, survey data indicated that almost 30 per- cent of all eligible women in the area were active users of contraception (DeBoer and McNiel, 1989; Ross, 1986~. The data from these pilot projects suggest that family planning uptake can be rapid in well-conducted programs. Such information is instructive in an examination of progress within the Kenyan national program. Starting with the five-year plan of 1975-1979, the government launched its informa- tion and service delivery activities. One goal was to reduce the annual rate of natural increase from 3.3 percent in 1975 to 3.0 percent by 1979 (Kenya, 1989~. A World Bank review concluded that in its first four years, the national maternal and child health/family planning program had made satis- factory progress in reaching operational targets, particularly in establishing about 300 service delivery points (World Bank, 1980~. Initially, however, the family planning component met with limited success. Although by 1978, the national CPR (modern methods only) was 6 percent (Kenya, 1980), the program had succeeded in recruiting only 55 percent of the acceptors targeted for 1976 and 60 percent in 1977. In part, the shortfall was ascribed to the setting of unrealistically high targets (World Bank, 1980; Kenya, 1989~. However, important problems were also noted in sustaining the rate of adoption, in client retention and continuation, and in ensuring access and quality of care. Distance, short hours of operation, insufficient outreach,

42 FACTORS AFFECTING CONTRACEPTIVE USE personnel problems, and inadequate training were all said to contribute to the shortfall (World Bank, 1980~. The lack of coordination between differ- ent providers exacerbated these difficulties. In 1982, partly in response to such problems, the government of Kenya established the National Council for Population and Development to coordi- nate public and private sector activities (Kenya, 19891. Throughout the decade, the government has worked closely with a large number of multilat- eral and bilateral donors (the World Bank, UNFPA, USAID, other govern- ments, and more than 25 international nongovernmental and private asso- ciations) to improve both public and private sector programs (United Nations Population Fund, 1991~. Between the mid-1970s and 1990, the use of modern methods through- out Kenya more than tripled (see Chapter 21. Services have been expanded such that even in rural areas, prevalence is now 16 percent compared to 26 percent in cities (see Chapter 2 and Kenya, 1989~. The public sector con- tinues to be the major provider of contraceptives (67 percent of all users of modern methods receive supplies from government facilities, 13 percent from the FPAK, and 16 percent from various private sources) (Kenya, 1989~. Among women knowing at least one modern method, more than 90 percent cite a government clinic or pharmacy as a source for contraception (see Table 2-9~. Although initial progress in increasing the CPR and reducing fertility was slow, the rate of change appears to be accelerating (Working Group on Kenya, 1993~. Increased use in Kenya has been aided by the facts that government commitment has been reasonably consistent, both the pub- lic and the private sectors provide family planning, and the country has not undergone major political or economic disruptions, as occurred for example in Uganda and Ghana. Botswana and Zimbabwe Botswana and Zimbabwe, the other continental African countries that have achieved substantial rates of contraceptive use, have experienced long- term and strong government involvement in family planning service deliv- ery. Botswana implemented a small maternal and child health and family planning project in 1967, in conjunction with the IPPF affiliate (Botswana, 1989~. The government adopted a policy favorable to the development of family planning in 1970 (Gauthier and Brown, 1975b). From the begin- ning, family planning was integrated into the general context of MCH rather than being established as a separate program. In 1973, a national program was instituted under the aegis of the MOH. MCH and family planning services are available during operating hours in all government health fa- cilities. According to the 1988 Botswana Demographic and Health Survey (DHS), the public sector supplies 96 percent of all current users (Botswana,

FAMILY PLANNING PROGRAMS AND POLICIES 143 1989~. Among women knowing at least one modern method, almost all cite a government clinic or pharmacy as a source for contraception (see Table 2-9~. Zimbabwe has achieved a CPR of 36 percent for modern methods (see Chapter 2~. Prior to independence, the government had not established an official population policy, but encouraged the development of family plan- ning services. From the 1970s onward, most government, private, and mis- sion health facilities dispensed family planning information, and the gov- ernment subsidized the private family planning association (Gauthier and Brown, 197Sb). In 1981, after independence, MOH assumed responsibility for family planning activities as part of its child spacing program. The Zimbabwe Family Planning Association, the IPPF affiliate, became a corpo- rate body under the wing of the ministry and later developed into the Zim- babwe National Family Planning Council (ZNFPC). Personnel from the disbanded private association became employees of the ministry. Contra- ceptive services were made available at a nominal charge (Nortman, 1981~. At this time, service delivery continues to be coordinated by the ZNFPC, and three-quarters of acceptors receive their services from national or mu- nicipal branches of public programs, including the ZNFPC community-based distribution program (Zimbabwe, 1989~. Most multilateral, bilateral, and NGO family planning assistance is channeled through ZNFPC programs (United Nations Population Fund, 1991~. Countries with Historical Variation in Policy Development and Program Implementation Ghana Ghana was among those countries demonstrating early support for population activities and, starting in the late 1960s, served as the testing ground for a number of innovative delivery strategies. Unlike Kenya, Botswana, and Zimbabwe, however, Ghana has not lived up to the early promise of rapid progress in family planning program development. Ghana promulgated its official population policy in 1969, and the Na- tional Family Planning Programme (GNFPP) was established a year later. Coordination of public and private sector activities was delegated to the Ministry of Finance and Economic Planning. Participating agencies in- cluded the Christian Council of Ghana and the IPPF-affiliated Planned Par- enthood Association of Ghana (PPAG), private sector agencies that had been offering family planning services since the 1960s (McNamara et al., 1990~. In 1972, the GNFPP was still small and expended an estimated $23 per acceptor at the time, compared to $3.60 for the postpartum program (Ross, 1986~. In part because of the positive policy milieu, Ghana was among those

144 FACTORS AFFECTING CONTRACEPTIVE USE African countries in which innovative service delivery strategies were first tested. Between 1969 and 1973, Ghana and Nigeria served as the only two African countries to participate in the International Postpartum Program, which was initiated in 1966 by the Population Council with USAID sup- port.6 Ghana (and Nigeria) ranked near the bottom in terms of the accep- tance ratio:. There were 9,000 direct acceptors (persons initiating use of contraception within three months after delivery) in Ghana among 93,000 delivering women, with another 11,000 indirect acceptors. It should be noted, however, that in Ghana the ratio of direct and indirect acceptors to deliveries/miscarriages rose more than fourfold during the life of the pro- gram (Ross, 1986~. Although progress in the African centers lagged behind those in other countries, the program experience represented a new and substantial program direction. Ghana was also the site of the Danfa Comprehensive Rural Health and Family Planning Project, which ran from 1969 to 1979 in Danfa district, about 25 miles outside of Accra. The project served a population of ap- proximately 60,000, and was conducted by the University of Ghana Medical School, Department of Community Health and the University of California, Los Angeles, School of Public Health. Funding was made available by the government of Ghana and USAID. The project tested three different com- binations of health and family planning service delivery, with a fourth site serving as a control. In 1975, the quasi-experimental design was eliminated to loosen constraints on service delivery and in response to a government policy decision that family planning would be integrated with basic health services. By 1977, contraceptive prevalence had risen to 18 percent in the most successful project area that received comprehensive health and family planning services. (Prevalence in the control area was 5 percent and only 2 percent in the area receiving family planning services without health ser- vices.) It has been noted that project proximity to Accra and inputs from the two collaborating universities may have resulted in better management and supervision than that found in less visible project sites, and thus af- fected the high prevalence achieved in at least one project area (Ross, 1986~. Ghana served as one of the first African regions to experiment with social marketing. In 1970-1971, the GNFPP sponsored the Ghana Social Marketing Experiment, with the parastatal Ghana National Trading Corpo 6By 1974, the program had expanded to 138 hospitals in 21 countries (Castadot et ah, 1975; Gauthier and Brown, 1975a,b; Ross, 1986). Three of the seven participating African hospitals were in Ghana. Worldwide, participating hospitals conducted 3.2 million deliveries and had more than 1.0 million family planning acceptors. More than 500,000 (or 16 percent) of all postpartum women were direct acceptors who initiated family planning use within three months of delivery (Ross, 1986).

FAMILY PLANNING PROGRAMS AND POLICIES 145 ration. However, only two weeks into the promotional campaign, all press and radio advertising was stopped because of criticism by influential public officials, and the television and film components were never initiated. Be- tween 1976 and 1980, the government of Ghana and Westinghouse Health Systems established a sales program for contraceptives through existing commercial networks. Sales in the 18-month period commencing January 1979 amounted to about 37,000 couple-years of protection. The peak months of sales coincided with the peak months of advertisement (Ross, 1986~. Problems included large monthly swings due to supply disruption. Like its predecessor described above, this project experienced problems with admin- istration and wavering political support, raising the question of whether such difficulties are inherent in mixed private-public sector approaches (Ross, 1986). By 1974, the GNFPP had expanded considerably. Family planning was offered in 135 clinics throughout the country; more than half were MOH facilities. In that year, the GNFPP also extended its commercial distribu- tion program by allowing nonprescription contraceptive sales through non- governmental commercial outlets; prior to that, all social marketing had been conducted through the parastatal Ghana National Trading Company, which supplied more than 600 outlets (McNamara et al., 1990~. Between 1970 and 1974, the GNFPP enrolled 110,000 new acceptors (approximately 6 percent; Alar, 1975~. Of these new users, 42 percent were recruited in MOH clinics and 39 percent in PPAG facilities, with the Christian Council and other private clinics recruiting the remaining 19 per- cent. However, by 1974, only some 47,000 women, or 3 percent, continued to use a method (Armar, 1975~. The total number of users in 1974 was well below the GNFPP target of 10 percent. The target itself may have been unrealistically high. Also, the numbers may represent an underestimate because of irregular reporting from clinics associated with the national pro- gram; in addition, other private sources reached an unknown number of clients. However, problems with program coordination, quality control, and high contraceptive discontinuation rates were all cited as contributing to slow progress (Armar, 1 975; McNamara et al., 1 990~. Political support for family planning was uneven, as illustrated by the problems experienced by the social marketing experiments described above. As shown in Chapter 2, 5 percent used modern methods in 1988, close to the level of 3 percent in 1979. Persisting programmatic and economic difficulties help explain this lack of progress. Although population policy has been retained through successive administrations over the past 20 years, political commitment has been erratic (McNamara et al., 19909. Poor insti- tutional coordination and support, interagency tensions, poor management accentuated by a lack of skilled personnel, and inadequate government funding also contributed (Nabila, 1986; Benneh et al., 19891. Economic detenora

146 FACTORS AFFECTING CONTRACEPTIVE USE lion, beginning in the early 1970s and reaching its lowest point in 1983, led to less investment in the country's health service infrastructure (see Chapter 3j. Material shortages curtailed MCH and family planning services. Since 1985, there have been signs of renewed public sector commitment to family planning programs. A short-term primary health care plan for 1986 gave priority to MCH and family planning, and signaled a turnaround made possible by improvements in the national economic situation. By 1986, 330 clinics offered family planning, up from 135 in 1974 (Nabila, 1986~. A new contraceptive marketing program was launched in 1986. Important roles in the new initiatives were and continue to be played by governmental and nongovernmental donor agencies such as IPPF and Fam- ily Planning International Assistance. The Ghana Social Marketing Pro- gram (GSMP), funded by USAID, supports a network of approximately 3,000 pharmacists selling contraceptives, a national program to train tradi- tional birth attendants in rural areas, and an expansion of the GSMP to encourage traders in the markets to sell contraceptives (Kenya, 1980; McNarnara et al., 1990~.7 The potential for rapid uptake of family planning in segments of the Ghanaian population is illustrated by an operations research project sup- ported by USAID, the Ghana Registered Midwives Association Project. In this project, an 18-month follow-up conducted in December 1989 on a sample of 130 project midwives, indicated that this group had performed 18,884 deliveries and serviced 12,411 new family planning clients in the period under review, for a relatively high ratio of one family planning client to 1.5 delivenes.8 The 1988 Ghana DHS results indicate that the government supplied 35 percent of current users, compared to 23 percent who received services from pharmacies (representing in part the Social Marketing Program), and 18 percent who cited the PPAG (Ghana Statistical Service, 1989~. Among women who know of at least one modern method and a source for the method, 88 percent cited the government as a source (Chapter 29. Nigeria In Nigeria, government interest in population issues has been slow to develop. Nigeria's Second National Development Plan, 1970-1974, con 7The last two programs were initiated as operations research projects, assisted by Columbia University. Almost 40 percent of the midwives were in rural practice, and all reported that at least part of their clientele came from villages or urban slums (Ghana Registered Midwives Association and Columbia University Center for Population and Family Health, 1988; McNamara et al., 1990).

FAMILY PLANNING PROGRAMS AND POLICIES 147 rained a chapter on population policy. The gist of the document was that the demographic situation did not call for emergency action. Subsequently, in 1975, following several delays in the development of its terms of refer- ence, the National Population Council was created by the government to advise on population policies and activities. However, by the mid-1970s, none of the actions in the second plan's population policy had been carried out; voluntary family planning services had not been integrated into the overall health care delivery system, and there was no discernible federal support for contraceptive services (de Sweemer, 1975). As of 1974, what- ever family planning services were available were provided commercially through pharmacies or private maternity homes, as part of university-oper- ated studies, or through the clinics of the Family Planning Council of Nige- ria, an IPPF affiliate (de Sweemer, 1975~. As in many other places in Africa, the IPPF affiliate had initiated small-scale activities as early as 1969 in a number of states in Nigeria (Nigeria (Ondo State), 19891. It is interesting to note that despite its lack of government commitment, Nigeria served as the site of several of the earliest innovative service deliv- ery projects in Africa. As indicated above, Nigeria was one of only two African countries that participated in the International Postpartum Program of the Population Council. As in the case of Ghana, participating hospitals generally lagged behind those of other developing countries. Approximately 5 percent of all obstetric/abortion cases became direct acceptors, and an- other 8 percent were indirect acceptors. However, in the final analysis, the ratio of all acceptors to all obstetric/abortion cases rose from 4 percent in 1969 to 16 percent in 1972-1973 (Ross, 1986~. The Ishan Experiment (1969-1972) in Midwestern State, covered a population of roughly 300,000. The project consisted of hospital-based family plan- ning service delivery and full-time community motivators. Within four years, contraceptive prevalence in the target population rose from 1 to 24 percent. During the three years of project operation, a sizable number of private and semiprivate maternal and child health clinics in Ishan began to offer family planning services; of the 24 percent of women using modern methods, 9 percent received supplies from the project hospital, and 15 per- cent cited other sources (Ross, 1986~. It is likely that the family planning motivation provided by the project had a positive effect on acceptance from these other sources as well. The Calabar Rural Maternal and Child Family Health Project was con- ducted between 1975 and 1980 in Cross River State, serving a population of approximately 200,000 in 280 villages. The project was initiated by the State Ministry of Health and the Population Council with UNFPA financial support. Calabar was part of an international program designed to test methods of delivering maternal care and family planning services to rural populations lacking health infrastructure (Taylor and Berelson, 1971; Ross,

148 FACTORS AFFECTING CONTRACEPTIVE USE 1986~. Four countries participated: Nigeria, Turkey, the Philippines, and Indonesia. The Nigerian version of the trial has been described as best reflecting the original intent in trying to determine what it would take to provide basic MCH and family planning services to all eligible rural women (Ross, 1986~. Results were mixed. Although 63 percent of all women in the area remained uninformed about modern family planning as of a 1979 survey, those who had interacted with project workers had higher levels of knowledge and use. Ever use of family planning was 18 percent among those who had discussed contraception with project personnel, compared to 8 percent among all respondents. However, the discontinuation rate for all women was high, so that only 2 percent of the sample of all women aged 25-54 used a method at the time of the 1979 survey. Problems included the limited coverage provided by the clinic-based system, substantial popula- tion migration, and centralized supervision, which worked against the inte- gration of family planning within the operation of the health centers. In addition, because the project was operated independently of the State Min- istry of Health, it had little effect on local decision makers, who ultimately did not accept the concept of a low-cost, low-level personnel strategy for rural health care (Ross, 1986~. The subsequent Oyo State Community Based Delivery of Health and Family Planning Project (1981 onward), conducted as an operations re- search project by the Department of Community Medicine, Ibadan Univer- sity, and Columbia University, also had relatively little effect on prevalence of use. The proportion of all women in the target population using modern methods did not exceed 5 percent (University College Hospital et al., 1986), a finding thought in part to reflect the greater emphasis placed on health service delivery to the detriment of the family planning component. How- ever, the project met with political approval, illustrated the feasibility of integrating family planning with basic health care in a community-based distribution strategy in rural Nigeria, and showed that government person- nel could sustain and expand the project after the involvement of the Uni- versity College Hospital had ended. The successful transfer of the pilot project was the result of a carefully planned "apprenticeship." State per- sonnel first observed the functioning of the pilot program, then participated in the training of trainers, observed and,assisted university staff in the initial steps of the expanded project, and gradually took over the operations (Ross, 1986; University College Hospital et al., 1986~. A number of social marketing activities have at present been tested by university groups and local governments. The Ibadan Market Based Distri- bution Project, implemented as an operations research project by University College Hospital, Ibadan University, and Columbia University, has been replicated in Lagos and Ilorin with local government support. On the national front, results from the 1973 census showed that the

FAMILY PLANNING PROGRAMS AND POLICIES 149 population had risen to more than 80 million and that the annual population growth rate was greater than 3.5 percent. The findings influenced national leaders to fear that population growth was outstripping food production (de Sweemer, 1975~. However, it was not until 1988 that an official policy fostering the provision of family planning services was adopted (Nigeria (Ondo State), 1989~. Although there is still no comprehensive national family planning program, a large number of NGOs conduct projects at the local and state levels, many with local and state government support (United Nations Population Fund, 1991~. Among many other activities it supports, USAID is providing funding to expand private sector distribution through commercial and other channels (United Nations Population Fund, 1991~. Modern contraceptive prevalence in Nigeria in 1990 was 4 percent (see Chapter 2), reflecting the relative lack of federal government support. Ni- geria represents one site where private sector delivery may provide a sub- stantial alternative to the relatively slow government implementation of services. The relatively low prevalence achieved to date, however, suggests the difficulties inherent in trying to provide extensive coverage to a large population in the absence of a broad-based program. Uganda As in the case of Ghana, Uganda realized early the problems inherent in rapid population growth, but made little subsequent progress in program development largely because of severe economic and political problems. The government first discussed the high population growth rate in its Third Five-Year Development Plan, 1972-1977. The Ugandan government also assisted the Family Planning Association, an IPPF affiliate, in providing family planning information. In 1973, 20 out of 28 clinics offering contra- ceptive services in Uganda were run by association staff (Nortman, 1981~. As of 1981, the government planned to integrate family planning services into all medical units (Nortman, 1981~. Needless to say, subsequent politi- cal chaos precluded any effective implementation of these plans. In 1988- 1989, contraceptive prevalence in Uganda was 3 percent, and half the cur- rent users received their supplies from the Family Planning Association of Uganda and from private sources (Chapter 2 and Uganda, 19891. Countries with Consistently Weak Support for National Family Planning Programs Sudan In the Sudan, lack of government interest in population issues is now coupled with civil and economic disturbance to create a situation in which 1

150 FACTORS AFFECTING CONTRACEPTIVE USE little progress seems possible. Family planning for birth spacing is nomi- nally a part of MCH services, although it is not a priority. The MCH infrastructure through which contraceptives are to be delivered is itself very limited in the coverage it provides (McNamara et al., 1990~. A 1985 UNFPA needs assessment mission noted the lack of an institutional base for MCH, administrative difficulties, the absence of guidelines for service de- livery, and economic hardship as reasons that family planning delivery has not progressed (United Nations Population Fund, 19911. Public health offi- cials are cautious in view of social values supporting high fertility and the perception that Sudanese women hold negative views about birth control (McNamara et al., 1990) However, even within this context, it has been possible to mount a successful family planning project. In 1980, the Department of Community Medicine, University of Khartoum, initiated the Community-Based Family Health Program (an operations research project conducted with technical assistance from Columbia University and USAID funding) to test the deliv- ery of contraceptives and selected primary health care services by village midwives. The project site was a rural area north of Khartoum. A project extension was implemented in 1984 in 60 villages north of the original area. Both the original and the extension sites achieved 20 percent prevalence of current use of modern methods by 1987- the original area starting from a base of 8.5 percent in 1980 and the extension area from 6.8 percent in 1984. The extension area achieved the same level in approximately half the time of the original project (Farah and Lauro, 1988~. One reason for the acceler- ated progress in the new villages was application of the lessons learned through operations research, which identified weaknesses in components such as supervision. It is interesting to note that religious beliefs did not appear to represent an insurmountable barrier to family planning acceptance in the villages. Mali Mali was the first francophone country to adopt a policy favorable to the development of family planning. To establish the policy, in 1972, Mali repealed the French law of 1920, and in 1980, the Family Health Division was created in the Ministry of Public Health and Social Affairs (Mali, 1989~. As of the early 1980s, family planning services were available in government-operated maternal and child health centers. The private Asso- ciation Malienne pour la Promotion et la Protection de la Famille (AMPPF) was given responsibility for providing family planning information and education (Gauthier and Brown, 1975a; Nortman, 19811. Although family planning is nominally available, it is not emphasized within the MCH system, which itself provides only limited population coverage (Mali, 1989~. The AMPPF,

FAMILY PLANNING PROGRAMS AND POLICIES 151 an IPPF affiliate, which was created in 1971, is the only nongovernmental agency involved in family planning in the country. Given the lack of em- phasis on family planning and the limited coverage, it is not surprising that in 1987 the use of modern contraceptives in Mali was only 1 percent (see Chapter 2~. Zaire In 1972, in Zaire, President Mobutu declared the government's policy on family planning as being one of support for naissances desirables (desir- able births). No demographic objective was attached to the policy, and in the 1970s, the government was generally favorable to rapid population growth. A clinic offering contraceptive services was established in 1973 at Mama Yemo hospital in Kinshasa, directly under the authority of the Office of the President. A few MCH/family planning clinics were established as off- shoots of the hospital service. Religious or private groups operated a small additional number of clinics in Kinshasa and in the interior of the country (Gauthier and Brown, 1975a). In the early years, donor agencies supported a few service and research projects, including programs of the Association Zairoise pour le Bien-Etre Familiale, an IPPF affiliate (United Nations Population Fund, 1991~. The Projet des Services des Naissances Desirables (National Family Planning Project) is nominally national in scope, but problems with communications and transport preclude true national coverage. Even in such a weak policy and program setting, however, a well-managed project did substantially increase prevalence rates in its target populations. Opera- tions research projects in the cities of Matadi and Kananga reached preva- lence levels (modern methods) of 23 and 17 percent, respectively, in the late 1980s (Bertrand and Brown, 1992~. Yet even these geographically limited gains have been undermined by Zaire's current political turmoil. In view of political instability, major donor agencies have withdrawn their support from Zaire. Local organizations are attempting to maintain pro- gram activities, but these activities are threatened by the lack of donor support and general deterioration of living conditions in Zaire. Countries Where Rapid Progress in Family Planning May Occur Rwanda Until fairly recently, Rwanda exemplified countries with slow develop- ment of family planning programs. However, increased political will to address population issues is resulting in progress. Rwanda's growing com- mitment to population programs is influenced by two demographic factors: a population density of about 270 persons per square kilometer and an

152 FA CTORS AFFECTING CONTRA CEPTIVE USE annual rate of natural increase of 3.5 percent (World Bank, 1990b). The rate of population growth was already recognized as a problem in the colo- nial era prior to 1962. However, it was not until the five-year plan of 1977- 1981 that research was proposed on issues such as desire for family plan- ning.9 The 1982-1986 plan was more specific: It proposed to maintain the population growth rate of 3.7 percent per year while the conditions for rapid decline after 1986 were set in place. The Office National de la Population (ONAPO) was established by decree in 1981, and the political will to sup- port its efforts has since been strong and consistent. By the mid-1980s, with financial and technical assistance from USAID, UNFPA, and other donors, ONAPO and the Ministry of Health had instituted family planning services in about 65 percent of the government health clinics throughout the country (McNamara et al., 1990) Problems remain. By late 1988, estimates from service statistics indi- cated a national prevalence of 4.2 percent, an increase from the 1.0 percent reported by the 1983 National Fertility Survey, but nonetheless representing a sizable gap between national policy and individual practice (McNamara et al., 1990~. Existing outreach efforts are still underdeveloped; at many cen- ters, family planning is offered during fixed days and hours separately from other services. The position of the Roman Catholic Church continues to present an obstacle of considerable magnitude. (Approximately 40 percent of the population is Catholic.) According to May et al. (1990), up to 60 percent of the Rwandans use health facilities operated by the Catholic Church, which offer only natural family planning methods. Despite these cultural, religious, and programmatic constraints, Rwandan pilot projects have demonstrated that a sizable proportion of the population may be ready to accept family planning services. The Ruhengeri operations research project introduced community education and distribution of contra- ceptives by volunteers belonging to the network of the Centers for Develop- ment and Continuing Education of the Ministry of the Interior and Commu- nity Development. Three noncontiguous communes were selected for the project. In one, volunteers provided information and clinic referrals, and distributed contraceptives. In the second, information and referrals were the only interventions. A third, which originally had three service sites and twice the number of family planning clients as the experimental areas, served as the control. Between January 1988 and June 1989, prevalence rose from 2.3 to 6.4 percent in the distribution area, from 4.5 to 28.5 percent in the family planning referral area, and from 6.9 to 7.4 percent in the control area. Overall, 70 percent of women with one to three living children indi- cated that they wished to use family planning in the future. Project person 9Prior plans had concerned themselves with population distribution issues (Emmanuel, 1988).

FAMILY PLANNING PROGRAMS AND POLICIES 153 net attributed the success in the second area to somewhat higher levels of education among women in this area, higher levels of activity among the volunteers at this site, and particularly strong support from local community leaders (McGinn, 1990; McNamara et al., 1990~. In the distribution site, the first area, several changes in commune leadership over the 16 months weakened support for the volunteers (McNamara et al., 1990~. Nonetheless, government officials were encouraged by the project findings and launched a new national effort. Based on preliminary project results, ONAPO set in motion a national information, education, and communication (IEC) pro- gram, and 17,000 volunteers have been trained as family planning promot- ers, though not as community distributors. Niger Although the government of Niger has allowed contraceptives to be sold in public and private pharmacies since the 1970s (Gauthier and Brown, 1975a), it did not abrogate the French law of 1920 until the late 1980s. As of 1983-1984, however, the government dramatically reversed its previ- ously lukewarm stance regarding family planning. With UNFPA support, the Centre National de Sante Familiale was inaugurated in late 1984 to coordinate family planning research, training, and program planning. A 1988 national conference on family health served as an official takeoff point for the population program. The chief of state, President Kounche, made a surprise visit to the conference and stated that population planning and contraceptive services were necessities given population growth rates. Since then, partly through operations research and other pilot projects, con- traceptive services have been made available through clinics to the popula- tion in the national capital of Niamey and in several smaller cities. Preva- lence in Niamey has risen from less than 6 percent in 1984, to more than 25 percent by 1989 (Direction de la Sante Familiale and Population Communi- cation Services, 1989; Wawer et al., 1990~. The results suggest substantial latent demand for fertility regulation, and the potential for further progress in family planning in the strengthened policy milieu. The greatest current challenge may be ensuring adequate coverage in this Sahelian country fac- ing economic hardships. MAJOR DONORS FOR POPULATION ACTIVITIES Estimates of the proportion of population related expenditures covered by developing country governments range from 60 to 75 percent, with do- nor agencies contributing between 15 and 20 percent, and the remainder of expenditures covered by individuals (Population Crisis Committee, 1990; United Nations Population Fund, 1991~. More than three-quarters of for

154 FACTORS AFFECTING CONTRACEPTIVE USE eign assistance for developing country population programs comes from the public sector, either directly from the governments of developed countries or through the United Nations' membership assessments. The remaining amount is derived from the private sector through voluntary organizations, foundations, and nongovernmental organizations (Nortman, 1981~. Devel- oped countries finance population programs in a variety of ways. Approxi- mately 30 percent of such funding goes directly into bilateral programs; one-third is disbursed multilaterally through the UN agencies; and the re- ma~ning funds are distributed through organizations in the private sector (United Nations Population Fund, 1992~. In all, it is estimated that in 1988, $290 million was expended in the provision of family planning services in Africa (or approximately $0.60 per capita). However, a substantial proportion of these funds were used for expatriate administrative and technical assistance costs, reducing the amounts spent on direct services in Africa. This amount represents both Afnc an and international donor support for family planning activities; information, edu- cation, and communication (IEC) programs; and the provision of services. Expenditures for Africa by donor governments increased from $128 to $153 million from 1989 to 1990, the greatest proportional increase for any region (United Nations Population Fund, 1992~. The private sector made the first overtures of population assistance on the African continent. Private charities, foundations, and nongovernmental organizations did not encounter the bureaucratic and political obstacles in conducting fieldwork that foreign governments faced. The implementation of relatively small programs by private voluntary organizations did not re- quire the innumerable authorizations and reviews that governmental agen- cies require. Private voluntary organization's missions were expressly hu- manitanan, raising fewer host country anxieties that assistance might be linked to complex political or economic agendas. The International Planned Parenthood Federation (IPPF) was formed in 1952 and was the first agency of any magnitude to provide family planning in many African countnes.~° Africa became IPPF's sixth region of the world at a meeting in Ghana in June 1971 (Suitters, 1973~. The geographi- cal coverage of the IPPF Africa region includes the 42 independent ma~n- land and island countries south of the Sahara (United Nations Population Fund, 1991~. Twelve countries signed up to be members of the new IPPF region in the early 1970s (Suitters, 1973~. Today that number has doubled to 24. In addition there are several other countries in Africa, such as iOIPPF is the largest nongovernmental agency providing family planning services and educa- tional programs to increase public and government awareness of population programs (Johns Hopkins University Population Information Program, 1983). The IPPF operates through its 134 member family planning associations throughout the world.

FAMILY PLANNING PROGRAMS AND POLICIES 155 Zimbabwe, that have no independent family planning program but where IPPF is nevertheless helping to support family planning. The African federation members are about evenly divided between francophone and anglophone countries (United Nations Population Fund, 1991~. IPPF's strategy is to stimulate the formulation of national family planning associations to satisfy local demand for activities. IPPF provides cash grants, technical assistance, and commodities to its member associa- tions. Outside funding from local supporters or other foreign donors supplements IPPF contnbutions. Africa has become IPPF's priority region and in 1990, Africans 24 member associations received $13 million. IPPF has played a major role in encouraging service delivery through its support of commu- nity-based distribution and other innovative service delivery strategies. Like IPPF, the Population Council was founded in 1952 with a mission to promote knowledge and action leading to fertility reduction (Suitters, 1973~. In its early years, the Population Council emphasized demographic studies and building research capacity at other institutions. The Population Council has received most of its funding from USAID and from the Ford and Rockefeller Foundations (Johns Hopkins University Population Infor- mation Program, 1983~. The Population Council helped to launch world- wide pioneering programs for fertility reduction in the 1960s and 1970s, including the postpartum program discussed earlier. Over the years, the Population Council has also invested in biomedical research, technical as- sistance, and training and fellowships for professionals in the population field. A current regional project is assisting the development of country- specific population policy documents in 16 French- and Portuguese-speak- ing countries (Population Council, 1989~. In 1990, total population funding of sub-Saharan Afnc an projects amounted to $5.9 million and was distrib- uted among 23 countries. In 1952, the Ford Foundation began supporting population activities. The Ford Foundation played a leading role in drawing world attention to population questions, developing new contraceptives, and supporting aca- dem~c research and training, and during the 1950s and early 1960s was the largest single source of funds for population activities (Warwick, 1982~. By the 1980s, however, population assistance no longer received major funding from Ford. This situation recently changed; in fiscal 1990, a plan was approved to reorganize the population program to emphasize reproduc- tive health, including social science research and the promotion of public 1lThe Western Hemisphere region also received $13 million, but this amount was divided among its 46 members (International Planned Parenthood Federation, 1990). i2It began with an annual commitment of $60,000. Its commitment rose to $26 million in 1966, then subsequently decreased to $14 million by the end of the 1970s (Warwick, 1982).

156 FACTORS AFFECTING CONTRACEPTIVE USE discussion surrounding legal and cultural issues in reproduction (Ford Foundation, 1990~. During fiscal year 1990, a total of $1,492,700 was allocated to programs in Senegal, Nigeria, Zimbabwe, and Kenya (Ford Foundation, 1990~. In the late 1960s and 1970s UNFPA and USAID became major con- tributors to population assistance. The majority of funds committed to the United Nations by developed countries are given to UNFPA (Nortman, 1981~.~3 UNFPA is active in 43 sub-Saharan African countries, of which 31 are UNFPA priority countries. 14 From 1983 to 1991, population program ex- penditures in Africa increased more than 300 percent, from approximately $16.9 to $55.0 million (or approximately 32 percent of total expenditures worldwide). In 1991, approximately one third of expenditures were spent on family planning, one fourth on IEC, one fifth on data collection and policy development, with the remainder spent on other population-related activities (Cornelius, 1992~. In addition to UNFPA, the World Bank has been a significant multilat- eral donor of population assistance to Africa.is The bank's first loan to the region was in 1974. In the 1980s, its efforts expanded to over 20 countnes, and $68 million was loaned for population activities between 1982 and 1989 (World Bank, 1989~. By the middle of 1992, almost $290 million in loans had been approved, representing 18.5 percent of total population lend- ing (World Bank, 1993~.~6 The majority of funds have been targeted to combined population, health, and nutrition projects with the view that fam- ily planning is best introduced through health efforts. Kenya is the only country that has received loans for free standing population projects. The 13As many as 130 governments have contributed to UNFPA, with the United States and Japan leading in cumulative contributions. In 1985 the United States withdrew its support of UNFPA, claiming that UNFPA was collaborating with a coercive family planning program in China. UNFPA spent more than $900 million on population funding from its creation in 1969 through 1982. Most of UNFPA's support goes toward family planning programs. The total allocation between 1969 and 1981 was about 45 percent, followed by basic data collection at 17 percent and IEC programs at 13 percent (Johns Hopkins University Population Information Program, 1983). UNFPA decides each year what portion of its funds to retain for direct execution of UNFPA activities. Remaining funds are distributed among developing country governments, private organizations, and other UN organizations for population projects (Nort- man, 1981). UNFPA has a total of 55 priority countries. l5The World Bank, spent $366 million on population assistance worldwide during the 1970s (World Bank, 1992). World Bank loans tend to emphasize development of an infrastructure, as well as construction of facilities for integrated health and family planning programs (Johns Hopkins University Population Information Program, 1983). 16The dollar amounts cited here only include loans specifically for family planning activities and demographic survey work. Total project loan amounts are much higher.

. FAMILY PLANNING PROGRAMS AND POLICIES 157 World Bank has also promoted changes in population policy in Kenya, Nigeria, and Senegal and has aided in program development in Kenya and Rwanda (World Bank, 1989~. USAID has expended $3.9 billion on population activities over the past 25 years, of which $2.9 billion was provided in the last 10 years alone (Destler et al., 1990~.~7 USAID provides the greatest amount of funds for population activities in Afnca of all donor governments. By 1989, USAID had bilateral population programs in 37 countries, of which 16 were in Afnca; another 20 countries received assistance through its central Office of Population (Destler et al., 1990~. In fiscal year 1990, USAID spent almost $281 million on population and family planning assistance; $73 mil- lion, or 26 percent of these funds, was expended on support for Afncan programs in 38 countnes, having a total of 284 subprojects (U.S. Agency for International Development, 1991~. As in other regions, the greatest share of subproject funds in Africa was spent on service delivery activities (37 percent), followed by IEC (22 per- cent), and training activities (20 percent) (U.S. Agency for International Development, 1991~. Policy development figured more prominently in the Afncan portfolio than in other regions, because policy was less developed (U.S. Agency for International Development, 1990~. More than one-third of the African subprojects were undertaken by government or parastatal organizations. Approximately 40 percent of the projects in fiscal year 1989 were undertaken by the private sector compared to 58 percent in Asia and the Near East (U.S. Agency for International Development, 19901. In fiscal year 1990, contraceptive shipments to Africa totaled $10.9 million and represented 20 percent of USAID's contraceptive shipments worldwide. Kenya, Nigena, Tanzania, Zaire, and Zimbabwe received three- fourths of the contraceptives. Condoms accounted for about two-thirds of the cost of the contraceptives sent to Afnca, followed by oral contracep- tives (17 percent), vaginal foaming tablets (12 percent), and intrauterine devices (IUDs; 5 percent) (U.S. Agency for International Development, 1991~. USAID has estimated that the total number of contraceptive users in the Afncan region will have increased from 9 million in the mid-1980s to 32 17The objective of USAID's population assistance is twofold: to promote the ability of individuals to choose the number and timing of their births and to bring population growth in line with economic growth and production (U.S. Agency for International Development, 1991). USAID seeks to assist developing countries that favor population reduction and have an existing infrastructure in which family planning programs can be developed. It provides funding directly to developing country institutions, as well as through numerous nongovern- mental and private voluntary organizations. In the early 1970s, USAID contributed roughly half the budgets of the IPPF and the UNFPA, more than 90 percent of the funds for the Pathfinder Fund, and substantial amounts to the Population Council (Warwick, 1982).

158 FA CTORS AFFECTING CONTRACEPTIVE USE million in the year 2000, and 66 million in 2020 (Destler et al, 1990~.~8 Even if annual costs per user drop to $15 by 2010, the funding needed to supply users in the African region will have risen from approximately $180 million in the mid-1980s to almost $1 billion in 2010. It is estimated that approximately half of this amount will be financed by the African coun- tries' private and public sectors, with the remaining balance financed by international donors (Futures Group, 1988a). LESSONS LEARNED FROM PROGRAMS AND PROJECTS A number of themes and findings emerge from the descriptions of pro- grams and projects above and from program-related research. Evidence of Demand for Fertility Regulation Services in Diverse Settings Although strong pronatalist attitudes and tendencies can be identified in many African settings and have substantial cultural underpinnings, sizable proportions of many sub-Saharan populations are interested in child spacing or limiting family size and will consider using contraception. This interest is apparent from survey research (Chapter 2, Bongaarts, 1991; Wawer et al., l991b), ethnographic studies (see Chapter 4), and the experiences of the many projects cited above. In recent DHS surveys, between one-quarter and one-half of the women in countries as diverse as Burundi, Ghana, Kenya, and Zimbabwe indicated they wanted no additional births (Bongaarts, 1991~. The need for high-quality contraception is also indicated by several studies that have reviewed the prevalence of legal and illegal abortion in African countries. Results of research conducted in the late 1970s and early 1980s generally suggest that there was a rise in hospital admissions for abortion complications throughout the region and that postabortion cases seen in hospitals represented only a small proportion of total procedures conducted by trained or untrained practitioners (Coeytaux, 1988~. A study conducted in a Nigerian secondary school indicated that almost one-third of the female students had undergone an induced abortion (Nichols et al., 19861. Recently, a small case history study of abortion in Kenya noted that many of the urban abortion patients had previously used contraception and had discontinued use because of side effects or dissatisfaction, or were using a method at the time of the pregnancy and experienced a method failure (Baker and Khasiani, 1992). Such study results suggest that there are subgroups of women for whom the prevention of unwanted pregnancy is 18Estimates are based on current contraceptive prevalence and on country-specific projec- tions of users corresponding to the United Nations high population growth scenario.

FAMILY PLANNING PROGRAMS AND POLICIES 159 of crucial importance and that improved service provision will prevent abortion and unwanted births. A Range of Service Delivery Strategies Have Been Successful There appears to be no one "magic bullet" with respect to the type of delivery strategy that will be successful. In Ruhengeri, the most effective approach was intensive IEC and referral to clinics; in the Sudan and Bas- Zaire, door-to-door distribution proved feasible and effective; market-based distribution is showing itself to be a useful option in several sites in Nige- ria. Both integrated and vertical service delivery programs have improved family planning utilization; equally, both strategies have at times had mini- mal effects (Taylor, 1979; United Nations Population Fund, 1979; Trias, 1980~. Important components in achieving success are local support, good management, and a commitment to family planning by project directors, such that the service does not become lost among other interventions. Pilot and Operations Research Projects Have Contributed Substantially Pilot or operations research (OR) projects can be reassuring to local or national leaders who would like to see a test of family planning but are reluctant to undertake a potentially politically damaging activity. Under the guise of these projects, new approaches can be tested, carefully monitored, documented, and possibly, jettisoned as an experiment that failed should the need arise (an uncommon experience). In 1987, more than one-third of innovative service delivery approaches discussed at the Harare Conference on Community Based and Alternative Distribution Strategies in Africa had originated as operations research projects (Columbia University Center for Population and Family Health, 1987~. To some extent, the African situation with respect to pilot and OR projects mirrors the early days of family planning in Asia. Small demon- stration and NGO projects preceded national involvement or continued to play a critical role even as government programs came into their own (Freedman, 1987). Family Planning Effort Is Associated With Contraceptive Prevalence In 1985, Lapham and Mauldin developed an international family plan- ning effort score based on policy milieu, stage-setting activities, service 19The evidence in this section is based on data pooled from African and non-African coun- tries. There is no evidence for Africa alone.

160 FACTORS AFFECTING CONTRACEPTIVE USE related activities, record keeping, evaluation, and availability and accessi- bility of fertility control supplies and services (Lapham and Mauldin, 1985~. They then examined the interactions between national socioeconomic indi- cators (based on indices from 1970) and program effort variables as predic- tors of contraceptive prevalence in the period 1977-1983.2° The key con- clusions were . . . the two conditions socioeconomic setting and program effort work most effectively together. Countries that rank high on both socioeconomic setting and program effort generally have higher contraceptive prevalence than do countries that rank high on just one, and still more than countries that rank high on neither. Furthermore, the path analysis suggests that program effort components are strongly associated with the availability and accessibility of family planning .... Moreover, the chances of achieving increased contraceptive prevalence by means of an aggressive family plan- ning program range from good to very good among all but the lowest socioeconomic setting countries (Lapham and Mauldin, 1985:132-133. Bongaarts et al. (1990) have updated the Lapham and Mauldin analysis and reconfirmed the conclusions that both socioeconomic development and family planning program strength influence contraceptive use and fertility, and that they operate synergistically, with one reinforcing the other. Of the 29 African countries considered in their analysis, 16 countries were in the low-development category (1980 data), and 21 had very weak or no family planning programs (based on the program in place in 1982~. Between 1965 and 1985, countries falling into the "low development index/very weak no program" category recorded on average no decline in fertility. The re- searchers concluded that "much can be done to improve service delivery, particularly in countries where programs are still weak. Although the de- velopment of effective programs is more challenging in settings where the demand for birth control is weak, well-designed programs can have a sub- stantial impact on fertility and population growth" (Bongaarts et al., 1990:307~. In an examination of programs worldwide, Mauldin and Ross (1991) identified strong associations between family planning program vigor and contraceptive prevalence. The prevalence rate ranged from 6 percent in those countries with very weak or no programs, to 20 percent in those with weak programs, to 45 percent or more in those with moderate and strong programs. The correlation between program effort score and CPR was .70, and the correlation between the contraceptive availability score and preva- lence was even stronger, .84 (Mauldin and Ross, 19919. Furthermore, they 200f the 26 sub-Saharan countries included in the Lapham and Mauldin analysis, 14 were in the lowest socioeconomic grouping in 1970.

FAMILY PLANNING PROGRAMS AND POLICIES 161 suggested that the association between program effort and prevalence would have been stronger were it not for the fact that positive population policies, which increased the overall score, were not necessarily related to strong program implementation. The relationship between contraceptive availabil- ity and decline in the total fertility rate was also noteworthy (Mauldin and Ross, 1991~. Access to Family Planning Is Associated With Contraceptive Prevalence Modern contraceptive use cannot occur in situations where methods and information on correct use are unavailable. Lack of availability may be due to many factors, including distance to services, barriers intrinsic to delivery systems (such as limited hours of operation and low provider en- thusiasm), and high cost. DlIS has reported the effects of distance on service utilization for ten countries, of which three (Togo, Uganda, and Zimbabwe) are in sub-Saharan Africa. Despite some limitations inherent in the sampling methods used to collect much of the data (Wilkinson et al., 1991), the results are instructive. In Togo and Uganda, utilization rates of modern methods are highest among women living within 5 kilometers of a static family planning provider; in Zimbabwe, prevalence remained high even in women somewhat distant from stationary providers, in part due to adequate outreach and community-based approaches (Wilkinson et al., 19911. However, even in Zimbabwe, the use of contraception decreased for users living 5 kilometers or more from a provider, and the use of clinical methods (IUD, tubal ligation) increased. For all 10 countries examined, the effects of distance on use of modern methods were strongest in Togo and Uganda; in other countries, greater availability of clinical methods, alternative sup- ply strategies, and better transportation ameliorated the effects of distance to some degree (Wilkinson et al., 19919.2~ Based on analysis of the 1988- 1989 Kenyan DHS and Kenyan Community Survey, Hammerslough has suggested that the rise in service availability in Kenya accelerated but did not initiate the fertility transition; the acceleration was related in part to the increased likelihood that contraceptors used efficient contraceptives (Hammerslough, l991b). With respect to cost, as a rough rule of thumb, contraceptives are deemed to be "accessible" if their total cost does not exceed 1 to 2 percent of 2lCare should be taken in interpreting results of the relationship of distance to contraceptive use because skepticism has been voiced about the validity of distance as a measure of accessi- bility. It has been suggested that a variety of data collection techniques are needed to measure accessibility (Commitee on Population, 1991).

162 FA CTORS AFFECTING CONTRA CEPTI VE USE household income per annum (Lewis, 1985~. A recent set of studies con- ducted by the Population Council examined private sector costs of contra- ceptives in relation to per capita income in 94 countries (Population Crisis Committee, 1991~. The annual cost of 100 condoms represented more than 2 percent of per capita income in 19 out of 23 sub-Saharan countries repre- sented in the analysis. In Benin, Burundi, Central African Republic, Ethio- pia, Madagascar, Mali, and Togo, it was estimated that the private sector price of 100 condoms represented more than 15 percent of annual per capita income. Similarly, for oral contraceptives, the annual cost of 13 cycles was estimated to represent more than 2 percent of per capita income in 20 sub- Saharan countries. The need for public sector or subsidized family plan- ning delivery is thus evident in the African region; the Population Council study suggested that in many of the sub-Saharan countries in question, less than one-third of couples currently has access to such low-cost supplies. Donor Support Is Essential In 1986, a World Bank document noted that "the cost of providing family planning in Africa is not great in absolute terms, but it will not be easily met by domestic resources" (World Bank, 1986:6~. The bank esti- mated that average costs per user fall to approximately $20 per year as contraceptive prevalence reaches 20 percent or more of couples of repro- ductive age. The document suggested that "an increase in external assis- tance not only for family planning but also for policy planning, data collec- tion and analysis, and training will be necessary for several decades if family planning is to be a realistic option for Africans . . ." (World Bank, 1986:6~. The authors urged that population assistance to Africa increase as rapidly as the absorptive capacity allows and pointed out that "even a tri- pling of the external assistance currently spent on population in Africa, from $53 million to $160 million, would imply an increase in assistance from $0.12 to just $0.36 per capita, half the $0.75 figure cited as a goal for overall spending" (World Bank, 1986:61. The difficulty of developing strong family planning programs in poor socioeconomic settings has been noted (Mauldin and Ross, 1991~. Most African countries fall into the lowest economic categories in rankings de- veloped by the World Bank and USAID. Given the economic downturn in much of Africa in recent decades, coupled with the potential for major increases in contraceptive use, the critical role that donors can play in popu- lation programs in Africa cannot be overemphasized. To date, the history of population and family planning programs in Africa has been inextricably linked to donor support. Donor inputs into pilot and operations research projects, policy development, data collection, service delivery, information campaigns, and technical assistance at all phases have played a crucial role

FAMILY PLANNING PROGRAMS AND POLICIES 163 in achieving what success is now evident. The quality and effectiveness of many family planning projects have depended fundamentally on the inter- play between donor organization budgets and technical assistance, and host country health care infrastructure, laws, and regulations. The importance of this assistance reflects economic constraints faced by African governments and NGOs, as well as the hesitancy of national leaders to undertake a con- troversial activity without some external assistance. One important problem faced by donor agency grantees may be de- scribed as donor fatigue. Any one strategy for service delivery is likely to demonstrate its effects only slowly or may be applicable in only a limited segment of the population. Donors often feel the pressure from their own constituencies to show more dramatic results or at least demonstrate that they support dynamic innovation. Thus, over the years, programs in Africa have experienced sequential or short-lived donor enthusiasm for clinic-based approaches, community-based distribution, commercial retail sales, and variations on these themes. Donor support for innovation has many positive effects. However, it is detrimental if the emphasis on a new approach reduces sup- port (financial, political, technical) for a tried-and-true strategy that can and will pay off over time. As indicated earlier in this chapter, the USAID population program development typology was developed to guide funding and technical assis- tance efforts at different program stages (Destler et al., 1990~. At the earliest emergent stage (prevalence less than 8 percent), it is argued that assistance needs are broad and substantial, and multidisciplinary technical assistance is required. At the launch stage (prevalence 8-15 percent), it is suggested that donor support may be directed to more specialized technical assistance and implementation agencies, in particular to meet training needs and promote programmatic and financial sustainability. From the launch stage onward, growing emphasis is placed on involving the commercial sector. The typology and the suggested directions for action provide a conceptual framework for donor strategies. The model recognizes that a mix of private and public sector involvement in family planning is desirable and that the move to sustainability is gradual. In the African setting, appli- cations of the model would have to take into consideration the weak overall economic base and the potential for setbacks in population programs if national economies deteriorate further. True financial independence and autonomous sustainability will be harder to achieve in Africa than in set- tings having preexisting strong private sectors and more solid economic bases. The current economic situation in Africa, the opportunity to expand family planning much more rapidly in the next decade, and a continuing need for technical input suggest that donor involvement will continue to be essential for the foreseeable future.

164 FACTORS AFFECTING CONTRACEPTIVE USE New Mechanisms Are Needed to Increase Resources Governments, donor agencies, and programs need to address the prob- lem of static resources at a time of growing family planning demand and costs. Strategies to improve the use of existing resources and to coopt new sources of manpower and funds include direct cost recovery (fees for ser- vice and supplies), social marketing, employer donations, leveraging of re- sources (matching requirements, collaborative service delivery arrangements, debt conversion), service coverage by third parties, expansion of private sector services, and increasing program efficiency (economies of scale, less costly service delivery models, introduction of more effective contraceptive technologies; Destler et al., 1990; Lande and Geller, 19914. USAID projec- tions indicate that, over time, a greater proportion of service delivery costs will need to be met with local private resources (Destler et al., 1990~. There is evidence that some clients can and will pay for family plan- ning services; indeed, acceptance of modestly priced contraceptives has at times been higher than that of free commodities in the same setting (Lewis, 1985~. Within programs, the trend has been to provide services free of charge in the initial phases and to institute fees only after demand has been stimulated. The merits of such phasing in of payments remain controver- sial. In the Oyo State CBD project in Nigeria, contraceptive use fell in project areas where fees were introduced some time after project initiation; areas in which similar prices were charged from program inception achieved and maintained distribution levels equivalent to those in the initial free service areas (University College Hospital et al., 1986~. The more pressing question is not whether it is possible to charge for services, but rather the degree to which fee-for-service and other fund- raising schemes can cover the true cost of family planning delivery. As indicated earlier, contraceptives may be considered accessible if their total cost does not exceed 1-2 percent of average annual income per capita. Lewis has concluded that most cost recovery efforts do not cover more than one-quarter of total costs, or half of noncommodity costs (Lewis, 1985~. Commercial prices that reflect true costs are often too high for the average household, particularly in Africa where such prices relative to income are generally the highest in the world. Donor and government subsidization of services will likely remain important in Africa, whether contraceptives are distributed through the public or private sector. More small-scale research is needed to determine the extent of price elasticity and to improve market segmentation in order to set realistic fees for different population subgroups. Worldwide, the proportion of the total population served by the private sector tends to increase as family planning services mature, with developed countries being much more dependent on private providers than developing countries (Destler et al., 1990; Lande and Geller, 1991~. It is also notewor- thy that a comparison of family planning costs in developing countries

FAMILY PLANNING PROGRAMS AND POLICIES 165 suggests that social marketing and clinics offering primarily voluntary ster- ilization were the most cost-effective family planning delivery modes (with respect to cost per couple-year of protection, CYP); community-based dis- tribution services had the highest costs per CYP, but became somewhat more cost-effective if coupled with clinics offering long-term methods such as the IUD and tubal ligation (Huber and Harvey., 1989~. The relative success of social marketing with respect to cost-effectiveness was attributed in part to such programs' ability to reach massive audiences quickly once they are introduced. Project and Program Success Needs to Be Interpreted Broadly Increase in contraceptive prevalence is not necessarily the only measure of success in many early family planning projects. The Oyo CBD project, for instance, may not have had a substantial effect on the use of modern methods but did result in greater acceptance of community-based distribu- tion of family planning by the state government. Projects with limited size and scope have had important effects in reassuring policymakers of the acceptability and feasibility of family planning services and have resulted in policy changes and expansion of services (Destler et al., 1990; Wawer et al., l991b). To ensure that the lessons learned have reached policymakers, the involvement of such leaders in the project from its early stages is fre- quently desirable, as in the cases of the Danfa project, the Oyo State CBD project, the Sudan CBD project, and Ruhengeri. All resulted in policy changes or were sustained and replicated by the public sector following their OR/pilot phase. Projects that provide less opportunity for policymakers to become aware of and comfortable with their approaches, as in the case of the Calabar project in Nigeria, may not stimulate future family planning efforts. PRIVATE VERSUS PUBLIC SERVICE DELIVERY, INCLUDING SOCIAL MARKETING The degree of coverage that may ultimately be provided by the private sector in Africa is still unknown. According to DHS data (Cross, 1990), there currently exist wide variations in the source of contraceptives by country. In Botswana, Kenya, and Zimbabwe, countries with the highest contracep- tive prevalence in continental sub-Saharan Africa, government sources sup- ply between 73 (Kenya) and 92 percent (Botswana) of all modern contra- ceptive methods. The public sector is also the major supplier in Burundi (87 percent of users) and Mali (76 percent of users); contraceptive preva- lence in both these countries is less than 2 percent. In five other sub- Saharan countries (Ghana, Liberia, Senegal, Togo, and Uganda all low

166 FA CTORS AFFECTING CONTRACEPTIVE USE prevalence countries), the government sector supplies half or less of all users. Pharmacies supply between 11 and 23 percent of users in Ghana, Liberia, and Togo; other private sources (which may include private health providers or nongovernmental organizations) account for between one-quar- ter and one-half of users in Ghana, Kenya, Liberia, Senegal, and Uganda. Interestingly, government sources of contraception predominate in the three Asian countries with DHS data (Thailand, Sri Lanka, and Indonesia),22 whereas pharmacies and other private sources service the majority of users in most Latin American countries. The patterns noted above persist when supply methods are considered separately from clinical methods. Experience to date and the data above suggest that public sector in- volvement has been a critical element in national expansion of family plan- ning services in Africa, and that those countries with relative success stories continue to rely in large part on government sources. The data also make clear, however, that in the majority of countries, the public sector, although it may be the predominant source of methods, is actually reaching only a portion of the population. Thus, there remains a need to expand the net- works available for service provision, both in countries where progress is being made and in countries with little family planning delivery to date. Expansion of services into the private sector, including pharmacies, private practitioners, and nonmedical retailers and traders, has recently become an area of great interest. Social marketing, wherein contraceptive supplies are generally sold at subsidized prices, represents a model that may be used to involve private distributors. As yet, social marketing remains a small component in family planning delivery in Africa. Statistics compiled by DK-Tyagi (DKT) International (a subsidiary of Population Services International) indicate that there were eight sub-Saharan.countries where social marketing projects provided more than 10,000 CYPs in 1991 (DK-Tyagi International, 1992~. The CYPs reported ranged from 18,000 in Cote d'Ivoire to 200,000 in Zaire. Condoms were the sole method delivered in five of the countries; the Zaire program also included foaming tablets; the Ghanaian, oral contraceptives; and in Zimbabwe, oral contraceptives and IUDs. In both Ethiopia and Zaire, the program was estimated to have provided coverage for 4 percent of the target market, the latter defined as being 80 percent of women in union, aged 15- 44; in the other five countries, the coverage provided was 2 percent or less (DK-Tyagi International, 19921. Social marketing programs, and indeed any attempts to reach the private sector (outside both governmental and NGO programs), are recent in origin 22In some Asian countries such as Taiwan, the private sector played a large role in service delivery in the early implementation of family planning programs.

FAMILY PLANNING PROGRAMS AND POLICIES 167 and cannot be expected to have achieved their full potential. Unfortunately, there is a dearth of information from which to project what this potential may ultimately be. Data on the numbers and distribution of private sector providers not affiliated with public or nongovernmental programs are often unavailable for a given country. Country assessments carried out by the Social Marketing for Change (SOMARC) program of the Futures Group, point to potential obstacles to social marketing. The Togo assessment noted that the parastatal pharmaceutical company had a monopoly on pharmaceu- tical imports, which may reduce flexibility, efficiency, and resupply, and hinder plans for cost recovery and self-sustainability; the parastatal distri- bution network was limited, reaching only approximately 165 points of sale; and current regulations would permit the sale of oral contraceptives in fewer than 70 outlets nationwide (Baird et al., 19909. Commercial distribu- tors lacked experience with the product line, and the report further noted that ". . . since the volume of product is limited and the profit margin very small compared to the rest of their product lines, there is the possibility of a lack of interest in the long term benefits of this program" (Baird et al., 1990~. Based on these observations, SOMARC ultimately recommended that the social marketing program be housed within a nongovernmental organization, the IPPF-affiliated Association Togolaise pour le Bien-Etre Fami li al (B. aird et al., 1 9 9 0) . In Rwanda, it was noted that "the country's commercial infrastructure is rudimentary .... Distribution and marketing activities are passive in nature and advertising is not widely used. There are very few commercial entities which provide a significant coverage of the country in terms of distribution despite the fact that the network of pharmacies has increased from 28 in 1987 to 124 in 1989" (Karambizi and O'Sullivan, 1989~. This report also noted that import duties on contraceptives, although lower due to their classification as essential drugs, were still "high enough to increase the retail price beyond the purchasing capacity of the majority of the people." The concerns noted do not preclude the establishment of social market- ing programs. However, they do suggest that commercial approaches are likely to become widespread much more gradually in the sub-Saharan re- gion than, for example, in Latin America, and it is thus too early to dismiss the importance of CBD and other noncommercial approaches, despite their potentially higher cost. It should also be mentioned that the cost-effective- ness of social marketing mentioned above was based on assessment of pro- grams in four Latin American, three Asian, one North African, and two sub- Saharan countries: the last two, Kenya and Nigeria, are not representative of the potential for social marketing in Africa as a whole. In neither case are programs overly constrained by restrictive policies, and both countries have better than average networks of commercial distributors who can be mobilized to provide services, thus achieving the broader distribution asso

168 FA CTORS AFFECTING CONTRACEPTIVE USE elated with lower unit cost. Thus, social marketing per se is unlikely to be a programmatic magic bullet for Africa, and diversified approaches will continue to be needed 23 THE IMPACT OF AIDS ON FAMILY PLANNING PROGRAM ACTIVITY No discussion on population activities in Africa is complete without some reference to the potential impact of acquired immune deficiency syn- drome (AIDS) on family planning programs in the next decade. Unfortu- nately, little data is available and what can be said about the impact of AIDS is more speculation than fact. It is thought that AIDS may affect family planning services in two ways. First, it may decrease the resources available for these services both financial and human. Public health officials may target their limited re- sources to addressing the AIDS epidemic resulting in fewer resources avail- able for other health services, such as the promotion and delivery of family planning. Health workers may be reluctant to promote family planning among populations severely affected by AIDS, for fear of going against the possible pronatalist response to AIDS or because they too believe it is important to promote childbearing to offset AIDS-related deaths. Further- more, some health providers may be reluctant to insert IUD s because of the possible connection between the use of an IUD and increased spread of sexually transmitted diseases, including human immunodeficiency virus- which causes AIDS and because IUDs may increase bleeding (Williamson, personal communication, 1993~. Second, AIDS may increase the demand for contraception, particularly condoms. Information, education, and communication (IEC) efforts regard- ing the use of condoms in preventing AIDS are already under way in Africa and the flow of condoms to Africa has increased dramatically (Williamson, personal communication, 19931. Although condoms are not as well ac- cepted as other methods as a means of pregnancy prevention within mar- nage, such education efforts have at least made many Africans more aware of the potential usefulness of this method. In addition, it is generally be- lieved that governments, in response to the spread of AIDS, have become more willing to broadcast information on condoms and AIDS via the mass 23It should also be noted that in a number of non-African countries there has been a decrease in the use of the private/commercial sector (particularly pharmacies) for family planning sup- ply in the last decade. This decline has been attributed in part to an increase in the use of clinical methods (the IUD, sterilization) (Lance and Geller, 1991). In these cases, cost savings on a national level are more likely to result from the adoption of more effective methods than from commercial cost recovery per se.

FAMILY PLANNING PROGRAMS AND POLICIES 169 media. In the wake of these efforts, messages in the media on other family planning methods may seem more acceptable in the future. CONCLUSION As noted by Freedman, ". . . in the rapidly changing world, the reports of traditional cultural constraints in developing countries may be more rep- resentative of the past than of the present. All developing countries in- creasingly are linked to the world communication and transportation net- work carrying ideas and messages that permeate cultural barriers to varying degrees . . ." (Freedman, 1987:58~. Information regarding successful pro- grams is being disseminated to other regions, through exchanges, confer- ences, and word of mouth, and is resulting in successful replication of service delivery strategies (Columbia University, Center for Population and Family Health, 1987, 1990; Wawer et al., l991b). The relative success or weakness of family planning implementation in each of the countries discussed above is largely predicated on very specific political and economic circumstances. Caution is therefore in order in drawing any conclusions as to the determinants of the different outcomes. However, in a general sense, programs have tended to encounter particular problems where original national commitment was weak, or where it faltered as a result of political instability or economic decline. To date, the contribution of nongovernmental sources to contraceptive use in African countries has been important in introducing the services, reaching specific target popula- tions, and opening the door to innovations. However, private and voluntary services have had a modest effect at best on national contraceptive preva- lence rates and coverage. The qualitative evidence in this chapter suggests that limited access to contraceptives contributes to the relatively low use of family planning in sub-Saharan Africa. Government programs are beginning to have substan- tial effects on contraceptive use and to produce indications of an effect on fertility in a number of African countries (Botswana, Kenya, and Zimba- bwe). The potential for major increases in contraceptive use in the next decade is great in a group of nations that includes Ghana, Niger, and Rwanda. Elsewhere, attitudes favoring family planning and resources for contracep- tive delivery programs are at least becoming more prevalent. For the poten- tial to be realized, programs will require sustained domestic and donor assistance, in the form of favorable political and policy support and fund- ing.

Next: 6 Regional Analysis of Contraceptive Use »
Factors Affecting Contraceptive Use in Sub-Saharan Africa Get This Book
×
 Factors Affecting Contraceptive Use in Sub-Saharan Africa
Buy Paperback | $50.00
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

This book discusses current trends in contraceptive use, socioeconomic and program variables that affect the demand for and supply of children, and the relationship of increased contraceptive use to recent fertility declines.

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!