National Academies Press: OpenBook

Society's Choices: Social and Ethical Decision Making in Biomedicine (1995)

Chapter: Part II: Commissioned Papers

« Previous: 6. Conclusions and Recommendations
Suggested Citation:"Part II: Commissioned Papers." Institute of Medicine. 1995. Society's Choices: Social and Ethical Decision Making in Biomedicine. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/4771.
×

PART II
COMMISSIONED PAPERS

Suggested Citation:"Part II: Commissioned Papers." Institute of Medicine. 1995. Society's Choices: Social and Ethical Decision Making in Biomedicine. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/4771.
×
This page in the original is blank.
Suggested Citation:"Part II: Commissioned Papers." Institute of Medicine. 1995. Society's Choices: Social and Ethical Decision Making in Biomedicine. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/4771.
×

The second part of this report presents a series of essays commissioned by the committee on various aspects of the social and ethical dimensions of decision making in biomedicine. Altogether there are 12 essays; they are ordered according to the scope of the issues they address. The first several essays explore broad questions while the later essays are more narrowly focused on a specific aspect of decision making or a particular bioethics effort.

Moral Epistemology

Thomas Nagel provides a definition of moral knowledge, examines mechanisms for acquiring such knowledge, and considers the possibility of arriving at moral knowledge through some kind of intellectually defensible process. He relates these issues to the challenges faced by public ethics bodies in contemporary, pluralistic America as they seek to explain and justify their views to their fellow citizens.

Public Moral Discourse

Dan W. Brock describes some of the features of the nature of public ethics bodies-the different goals they pursue, their typical charge and composition, and the role in public policy that they typically play. He argues that the method by which ethics bodies have tended to address and reason about moral issues is fundamentally similar to the methods of moral philosophy, and explains why the substantive conclusions that public ethics bodies reach by this process are justified.

The Value of Consensus

Martin Benjamin examines the nature, value, and limits of consensus in bioethical deliberation. He describes various types of consensus, as well as notions such as compromise and majority rule, and raises normative and methodological issues to be explored by ethics bodies as they consider what role consensus should play in their deliberations.

Bioethics Commissions: What Can We Learn from Past Successes and Failures?

Bradford H. Gray provides an analysis of the lessons to be learned from the experiences of two earlier ethics commissions-the National Commission and the President's Commission-both of which are generally cited as successes. From a survey of the members and staff of these commissions, he draws conclusions about the senses in which these two commissions were successful and the reasons behind their successes and failures.

Suggested Citation:"Part II: Commissioned Papers." Institute of Medicine. 1995. Society's Choices: Social and Ethical Decision Making in Biomedicine. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/4771.
×
Limiting Life-Prolonging Medical Treatment: A Comparative Analysis of the President's Commission and the New York State Task Force

Baruch A. Brody compares the accomplishments of these two ethics bodies, one at a national level and one at a state level, in their different approaches to one issue: limiting life-prolonging medical treatment. He explains why the nature of their successes differed and explores the important connections between the role of an ethics body and the context in which it operates, and the structure and process of that body.

The Formulation of Health Policy by the Three Branches of Government

Lawrence Gostin explores the role of government in formulating health policy. He considers the kinds of health policy questions that different government bodies are best equipped to solve, the data that they need to do so, and the mechanisms for making that data available to decision makers.

The Role of Religious Participation and Religious Belief in Biomedical Decision Making

Charles M. Swezey provides a framework for understanding the complex relationship between religion and bioethical decision making. He identifies significant dimensions of religious belief, sketches the elements of decision making, and traces the interactions between the two to illuminate the impact of religious belief on the practice of modern medicine.

Trust, Honesty, and the Authority of Science

Steven Shapin explores the moral authority of scientists by way of an historical inquiry into their credibility. He describes how the credibility of scientific claims and the moral standing of those who make the claims have been intertwined in the past. He points to the modern disengagement of virtue and expertise-the weakening of trust relationships in science-as problematic to science.

Institutional Ethics Committees: Local Perspectives on Ethical Issues in Medicine

Elizabeth Heitman examines the historical development of institutional ethics committees and describes the roles of these committees in policymaking, education, and consultation on ethical issues in medical care. She provides a comprehensive account of the administrative aspects of institutional eth-

Suggested Citation:"Part II: Commissioned Papers." Institute of Medicine. 1995. Society's Choices: Social and Ethical Decision Making in Biomedicine. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/4771.
×

ics committees and identifies issues that these committees will confront in the future, such as cost-containment, liability, and long-term care.

The Ethical, Legal, and Social Implications Program of the National Center for Human Genome Research: A Missed Opportunity?

Kathi E. Hanna provides a comprehensive history and description of the Ethical, Legal, and Social Implications Program of the National Center for Human Genome Research. She explores the program's role in policy debate about genetic technology, analyzes its strengths and weaknesses, and considers strategies for reshaping the program so that it can more effectively achieve its intended goals.

AIDS, Ethics, and Activism: Institutional Encounters in the Epidemic's First Decade

Ronald Bayer examines the role of consultation between ethicists and those at risk of HIV in the confrontation of critical policy questions raised by the HIV epidemic. He explores how the distinctive political context of this consultation-the intensity of the discussion, the political forces called into play, and the demands made and solutions sought by activists-have fostered an unusual series of institutional efforts to engage activists in the process of establishing guidelines for AIDS policy.

"La Pénible Valse Hésitation": Fetal Tissue Research Review and the Use of Bioethics Commissions in France and the United States

R. Alta Charo compares and contrasts the roles and experiences of bioethics commissions in France and the United States, focusing on both countries' efforts in the area of fetal tissue research. She explores the political and historical context for bioethical deliberation in the two countries and points to significant social conditions to which commissions may have to be responsive in order to succeed

Suggested Citation:"Part II: Commissioned Papers." Institute of Medicine. 1995. Society's Choices: Social and Ethical Decision Making in Biomedicine. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/4771.
×
This page in the original is blank.
Suggested Citation:"Part II: Commissioned Papers." Institute of Medicine. 1995. Society's Choices: Social and Ethical Decision Making in Biomedicine. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/4771.
×
Page 195
Suggested Citation:"Part II: Commissioned Papers." Institute of Medicine. 1995. Society's Choices: Social and Ethical Decision Making in Biomedicine. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/4771.
×
Page 196
Suggested Citation:"Part II: Commissioned Papers." Institute of Medicine. 1995. Society's Choices: Social and Ethical Decision Making in Biomedicine. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/4771.
×
Page 197
Suggested Citation:"Part II: Commissioned Papers." Institute of Medicine. 1995. Society's Choices: Social and Ethical Decision Making in Biomedicine. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/4771.
×
Page 198
Suggested Citation:"Part II: Commissioned Papers." Institute of Medicine. 1995. Society's Choices: Social and Ethical Decision Making in Biomedicine. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/4771.
×
Page 199
Suggested Citation:"Part II: Commissioned Papers." Institute of Medicine. 1995. Society's Choices: Social and Ethical Decision Making in Biomedicine. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/4771.
×
Page 200
Next: Moral Epistemology »
Society's Choices: Social and Ethical Decision Making in Biomedicine Get This Book
×
Buy Hardback | $67.95 Buy Ebook | $54.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

Breakthroughs in biomedicine often lead to new life-giving treatments but may also raise troubling, even life-and-death, quandaries.

Society's Choices discusses ways for people to handle today's bioethics issues in the context of America's unique history and culture—and from the perspectives of various interest groups.

The book explores how Americans have grappled with specific aspects of bioethics through commission deliberations, programs by organizations, and other mechanisms and identifies criteria for evaluating the outcomes of these efforts. The committee offers recommendations on the role of government and professional societies, the function of commissions and institutional review boards, and bioethics in health professional education and research.

The volume includes a series of 12 superb background papers on public moral discourse, mechanisms for handling social and ethical dilemmas, and other specific areas of controversy by well-known experts Ronald Bayer, Martin Benjamin, Dan W. Brock, Baruch A. Brody, H. Alta Charo, Lawrence Gostin, Bradford H. Gray, Kathi E. Hanna, Elizabeth Heitman, Thomas Nagel, Steven Shapin, and Charles M. Swezey.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!