National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

HARDBACK
price:$49.95
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

Telemedicine: A Guide to Assessing Telecommunications for Health Care (1996)
Institute of Medicine (IOM)

Citation Manager

. "4 THE POLICY CONTEXT OF TELEMEDICINE." Telemedicine: A Guide to Assessing Telecommunications for Health Care. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 1996.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
110
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


  • which types of telemedicine services would be covered;
  • how procedures would be coded for claims payment and other purposes;
  • how the payment level would be set for specific services;
  • how payment would be apportioned for a consultation involving an attending physician and a distant specialist;
  • whether and how nonphysician practitioners would be paid; and
  • whether and how payments would be divided into professional and facility components.

Payers would, for example, have to determine whether to pay the same rate for a service (e.g., psychiatric consultation) regardless of the mode of service (e.g., office visit versus telemedicine) or to set special rates for telemedicine. If special rates were negotiated, the amounts could depend on the payer's leverage vis-à-vis the provider, with the provider wanting rates as high as possible and the payer wanting rates as low as possible.

For physician payment rates based on resource costs (e.g., the Medicare relative value scale or RVS), a payer could set a higher payment rate for a telemedicine service if that service were more expensive to provide than alternatives and if the benefits were judged to be worth the extra costs. Conversely, if a telemedicine service were less expensive to provide than the alternative, the payer could lower the payment rate for telemedicine.

If payment rates exceed providers' costs, providers will be more inclined to use telemedicine in discretionary situations. This situation has characterized other innovative technologies and is inherent in the incentives of fee-for-service payment. Although payers may establish mechanisms to monitor appropriate utilization, such efforts have often proved difficult or unsatisfactory for a variety of clinical, administrative, political, and financial reasons (PPRC, 1988; IOM, 1989).

Per Case or Other Bundled Payment Methods

One alternative to traditional fee-for-service payment is payment of a fixed rate for a package of related services. This method has long been used for surgical services, for which one global payment covers physician services before, during, and after a procedure such as coronary artery bypass (CBO, 1986; OTA, 1986b; PPRC, 1987).

Page
110