National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: 7 Conclusions and Recommendations
Suggested Citation:"References." Institute of Medicine. 1997. A Review of the Department of Defense's Program for Breast Cancer Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/5808.
×

References

ACS (American Cancer Society). 1995. Breast Cancer Facts and Figures 1996. Atlanta: ACS.

ACS. 1996a. Oral and written comments presented to the Committee to Review the Department of Defense's Breast Cancer Research Program. Washington, D.C.: ACS, September 5.

ACS. 1996b. Research Program Report 1995. Atlanta: ACS.

ACS. 1997. Report to the Board of Directors from the Workshop on Guidelines for Breast Cancer Detection. Atlanta: ACS.


Barofsky, I., and P.H. Sugarbaker. 1990. Cancer. Pp. 419-439 in Quality of Life Assessments in Clinical Trials, Spilker, B., ed. New York: Raven Press.

Berns, E.M., J.A. Foekens, I.L. van Staveren, et al. 1995. Oncogene amplification and prognosis in breast cancer: Relationship with systemic treatment. Gene 159:11-18.

Brower, V. 1997. Lawyers, physicians seek genomic rules. Nature Biotechnol . 15:10.


CBCRP (California Breast Cancer Research Program). 1997. BCRP's Home Page. [WWW document]. URL http://www.ucop.edu/srphome/bcrp

CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention). 1997. World Wide Web site. URL http://www.cdc.gov

Colditz, G.A., W.C. Willett, D.J. Hunter, et al. 1993. Family history, age, and risk of breast cancer. Prospective data from the Nurses' Health Study. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 270:338-343.

Committee on Appropriations, U.S. House of Representatives. 1993. H. Rpt. 103-339, 11/09/93, pp. 110-111.

Suggested Citation:"References." Institute of Medicine. 1997. A Review of the Department of Defense's Program for Breast Cancer Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/5808.
×

Committee on Appropriations, U.S. House of Representatives. 1994a. H. Rpt. 103-562, 06/27/94, p. 273.

Committee on Appropriations, U.S. House of Representatives. 1994b. H. Rpt. 103-747, 09/26/94, p. 149.

CTI (Critical Technologies Institute)/RAND datasearch. 1996.

DHHS (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services). 1996a. New Frontiers in Breast Cancer Imaging and Early Detection. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Public Health Service, Office on Women's Health.

DHHS. 1996b. President Clinton Announces National Action Plan on Breast Cancer Internet Web Site. [WWW document]. URL http://www.hhs.gov/news/press/1996pres/961028a.html (accessed November 8, 1996).


Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group. 1992. Systemic treatment of early breast cancer by hormonal, cytotoxic, or immune therapy. Lancet 339:1-15, 71-85.

Elwood, J.M., B. Cox, and A.K. Richardson. 1993. The effectiveness of breast cancer screening by mammography in younger women. Online J. Curr. Clin. Trials Document No. 32.


Hall, F.M. 1986. Screening mammography-potential problems on the horizon. N. Engl. J. Med. 314:53-55.

Harris, J.R., M.E. Lippman, U. Veronesi, and W. Willett. 1992a. Breast Cancer (Part 1). N. Engl. J. Med. 327:319-328.

Harris, J.R., M.E. Lippman, U. Veronesi, and W. Willett. 1992b. Breast Cancer (Part 3) N. Engl. J. Med. 327:473-480.

Horton, J.A., M.C. Romans, and D.F. Cruess. 1992. Mammography Attitudes and Usage Study, 1992. Women's Health Issues 2:180-188.

Hryniuk, W., and M.N. Levine. 1986. Analysis of dose intensity for adjuvant chemotherapy trials in stage II breast cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 4:1162-1170.


IOM (Institute of Medicine). 1993. Strategies for Managing the Breast Cancer Research Program: A Report to the U.S. Army Medical Research and Development Command. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

IOM. 1995. Recommendations for Research on the Health of Military Women. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

IOM. 1996. Military Researchers Interested in Women's Health Issues. Directory. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.


Kelsey, J.L., and M.D. Gammon. 1990. Epidemiology of Breast Cancer. Epidemiol. Rev. 12:228-240.

Kerlikowske, K., D. Grady, J. Barclay, E.A. Sickles, and V. Ernster. 1996. Effect of age, breast density, and family history on the sensitivity of first screening mammography. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 276:33-38.

Suggested Citation:"References." Institute of Medicine. 1997. A Review of the Department of Defense's Program for Breast Cancer Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/5808.
×

Susan G. Komen Foundation. 1996. Oral and written comments presented to the Committee to Review the Department of Defense's Breast Cancer Research Program. Washington, D.C.

Kosary, C.L., L.A. Gloeckler, B.A. Miller, et al. 1996. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1973-1992: Tables and Graphs. (NIH Pub. No. 96-2789). Bethesda, Md.: National Cancer Institute.

Li, L., X. Li, U. Francke, and S.N. Cohen. 1997. The TSG101 tumor susceptibility gene is located in chromosome 11 band p15 and is mutated in human breast cancer. Cell 88:143-154.

Love, S.M., with K. Lindsey. 1995. Dr. Susan Love's Breast Book. Reading, Pa.: Addison-Wesley.


Malkin, D., F.P. Li, L.C. Strong, et al. 1990. Germ line p53 mutations in a familial syndrome of breast cancer, sarcomas, and other neoplasms. Science 250:1233-1238.

McDowell, I., and C. Newell. 1987. Measuring Health: A Guide to Rating Scales and Questionnaires. New York: Oxford University Press.

Miki, Y., J. Swensen, D. Shattuck-Eidens, et al. 1994. A strong candidate for the breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility gene BRCA1. Science 266:66-71.

Miller, B.A., E.J. Feuer, and B.F. Hankey. 1993. Recent incidence trends for breast cancer in women and the relevance of early detection: An update. CA Cancer J. Clin. 43:27-41.

Miller, B.A., L.N. Kolonel, L. Bernstein, et al. 1996. Racial/ethnic patterns of cancer in the United States 1988-1992. (NIH Pub. No. 96-4104). Bethesda, Md.: National Cancer Institute.


NAPBC (National Action Plan on Breast Cancer). 1996. Grant Information . [WWW document]. http://www.napbc.org/napbc/grantinf.html (accessed November 8, 1996).

NCI. 1996. Written statement in response to questions from the Committee to Review the Department of Defense's Breast Cancer Research Program. August 20, 1996.

NCI. 1997a. Cancer Net Mail Service. [WWW document]. URL http://cancernet.icicc.nci.nih.gov

NCI. 1997b. Cancer Information Service (1 800 4 Cancer).

NIH (National Institutes of Health). 1997. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement. Breast Cancer Screening for Women Ages 40-49. Bethesda, Md.: NIH.


PhRMA (Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America). 1995. New Medicines in Development for Cancer. Washington, D.C.: PhRMA.

Pisani, P. 1992. Breast cancer: Geographic variation and risk factors. J. Environ. Pathol. Toxicol. Oncol. 11:313-316.

Suggested Citation:"References." Institute of Medicine. 1997. A Review of the Department of Defense's Program for Breast Cancer Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/5808.
×

Romans, M.C. 1992. Report from The Jacobs Institute--American Cancer Society workshop on mammography screening and primary care providers: Current issues. Women's Health Issues 2:169-172.


SAIC (Science Applications International Corporation). 1996. Orientation Handbook for New Integration Panel Members. A Programmatic Review Primer. Fort Detrick, Md.: SAIC, June 13.

Savitsky, K., A. Bar-Shira, S. Gilad, et al. 1995. A single ataxia telangiectasia gene with a product similar to P1-3 kinase. Science 268: 1749-1753.

Serova, O., M. Montagna, D. Torchard, et al. 1996. A high incidence of BRCA1 mutations in 20 breast-ovarian cancer families. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 58:42-51.

Silvestrini, R., S. Veneroni, M.G. Daidone, et al. 1994. The Bcl-2 protein: A prognostic indicator strongly related to p53 protein in lymph node-negative breast cancer patients. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 86:499-504.

Smith, R.A., B.L. Black, G.W. Price, et al. 1992. Workshop IV: Legal aspects, legislative effect, cost-effectiveness, and barriers to breast cancer screening. Cancer 69(Suppl.):2005-2007.

Stewart, A.L., and J.E. Ware. 1992. Measuring Functioning and Well-Being: The Medical Outcomes Study Approach. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.

Stewart, T.H.M., M.W. Retsky, S.C.J. Tsai, and S. Verma. 1994. Dose response in the treatment of breast cancer. Lancet 343:402-404.

Strax, P. 1990. Detection of breast cancer. Cancer 66(Suppl.):1336-1340.


UIS (United Information Systems). 1996. Procedural Manual for Executive Secretaries. Bethesda, Md.: UIS.

USAMRDC (U.S. Army Medical Research and Development Command). 1993. Broad Agency Announcement for Breast Cancer Research. Fort Detrick, Md.: USAMRDC, September 15.

USAMRMC (U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command). 1995a. Abstracts: Breast Cancer Research Program FY 92, 93 and 94. Fort Detrick, Md.: USAMRMC, October 4.

USAMRMC. 1995b. Broad Agency Announcement for Breast Cancer Research . Fort Detrick, Md.: USAMRMC, June 1.

USAMRMC. 1995c. Supplement to the Broad Agency Announcement for Breast Cancer Research for the Breast Cancer Center Program. Fort Detrick, Md.: USAMRMC, June 15.

USAMRMC. 1995d. U.S. Army Breast Cancer Research Program: 1993-1994 Award List and Glossary of Terms. Fort Detrick, Md.: USAMRMC, March 17.

Suggested Citation:"References." Institute of Medicine. 1997. A Review of the Department of Defense's Program for Breast Cancer Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/5808.
×

USAMRMC. 1996a. Broad Agency Announcement for Department of Defense Breast Cancer Research Program. Fort Detrick, Md.: USAMRMC, April 15.

USAMRMC. 1996b. Department of Defense Breast Cancer Research Program: 1995 Abstract Book. Fort Detrick, Md.: USAMRMC.

USAMRMC. 1996c. Written and oral presentations to the Committee to Review the Department of Defense's Breast Cancer Research Program. Washington, D.C.: USAMRMC, July 8 and September 4.

USAMRMC. 1996d. U.S. Army Breast Cancer Research Program: 1995 Award List and Glossary of Terms. Fort Detrick, Md.: USAMRMC, October 1.

USAMRMC. 1997. Oral presentations to the Committee to Review the Department of Defense's Breast Cancer Research Program. Washington, D.C.: USAMRMC, January 13-14.

Wadman, M. 1996. Breast cancer policy comes under fire. Nature 383:113.

Wood, W.C., D.R. Budman, A.H. Korzun, et al. 1994. Dose and dose intensity of adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II, node-positive breast carcinoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 330:1253-1259.

Wooster R., G. Bignell, J. Lancaster, et al. 1995. Identification of the breast cancer susceptibility gene BRCA2. Nature 378:789-792.


Ziegler, R.G., R.N. Hoover, M.C. Pike, et al. 1993. Migration patterns and breast cancer risk in Asian-American women . J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 85:1819-1827.

Zukerberg, L.R., W.-I. Yang, M. Gadd, et al. 1995. Cyclin D1 (PRAD1) protein expression in breast cancer: Approximately one-third of infiltrating mammary carcinomas show overexpression of the cyclin D1 oncogene. Mod. Pathol. 8:560-567.

Suggested Citation:"References." Institute of Medicine. 1997. A Review of the Department of Defense's Program for Breast Cancer Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/5808.
×
This page in the original is blank.
Suggested Citation:"References." Institute of Medicine. 1997. A Review of the Department of Defense's Program for Breast Cancer Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/5808.
×
Page 107
Suggested Citation:"References." Institute of Medicine. 1997. A Review of the Department of Defense's Program for Breast Cancer Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/5808.
×
Page 108
Suggested Citation:"References." Institute of Medicine. 1997. A Review of the Department of Defense's Program for Breast Cancer Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/5808.
×
Page 109
Suggested Citation:"References." Institute of Medicine. 1997. A Review of the Department of Defense's Program for Breast Cancer Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/5808.
×
Page 110
Suggested Citation:"References." Institute of Medicine. 1997. A Review of the Department of Defense's Program for Breast Cancer Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/5808.
×
Page 111
Suggested Citation:"References." Institute of Medicine. 1997. A Review of the Department of Defense's Program for Breast Cancer Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/5808.
×
Page 112
Next: Appendix A: Individuals Who Provided Testimony to the Committee »
A Review of the Department of Defense's Program for Breast Cancer Research Get This Book
×
Buy Paperback | $45.00 Buy Ebook | $35.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

According to current statistical data, one in eight women will be diagnosed with breast cancer. The five-year survival rate for breast cancer patients has improved in recent years, but the overall mortality rates have changed little. In 1993 Congress allocated $210 million for breast cancer research as part of the Department of Defense budget. An Institute of Medicine (IOM) committee was convened at that time to advise the U.S. Army Medical Research and Development Command on strategies for managing a breast cancer research program. This book evaluates the program's management and achievements to date. Although it is too early to evaluate the program in terms of breakthrough results and new insights produced by the funded projects or investigators, this book documents the process used to select research proposals for funding and analyzes the portfolio of funded projects in terms of their responsiveness to the recommendations and fundamental questions articulated in the 1993 IOM report.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!