. "References." Statistics, Testing, and Defense Acquisition: New Approaches and Methodological Improvements. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 1998.
The following HTML text is provided to enhance online
readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML.
Please use the page image
as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.
1973 OSD Cost Analysis Improvement Group. DoD Directive No. 5000.4. June 13.
1981 Military Handbook 189, Reliability Growth Management. MIL-HDBK-189. Philadelphia: Naval Publications and Form Center.
1982 Test and Evaluation of System Reliability, Availability, and Maintainability: A Primer. Third edition, Report No. DoD 3235.1-H.
1992 COMPOTEV FOR Test Plant for Project 1376-OT-11C1.
1993 Longbow Apache Test and Evaluation Master Plan - Annex D: Mission Profiles and Operational Mode Summary for AH-64 Apache Longbow. Prepared by Scenarios and Simulations Branch.
1994a DoD Modeling and Simulation (M&S) Management. Directive No. 5000.59. Undersecretary of Defense for Acquisition.
1994b Reliability. Availability. and Maintainability (RAM) Rationale Report for the Longbow (AH-64D). Fort Rucker, Ala.: U.S. Army Aviation Center and Fort Rucker.
1995a Family of Medium Tactical Vehicles (FMTV). Office of the Director, Operational Test and Evaluation, The Pentagon, Washington, DC, 18 August. (unclassified version), [Online]. Available: http://www.dote.osd.mil/.
1995b Test and Evaluation Master Plan for the ATACMS/BAT. U.S. Army Operational Test and Evaluation Command.
1996 DoD 5000 Series. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Defense.
1997 Director, Operational Test and Evaluation FY 1996 Annual Report. (unclassified version), [Online]. Available: http://www.dote.osd.mil/.
1998a Army Performance Improvement Criteria. Strategic Management and Innovations Division, Management Directorate. Headquarters, Department of the Army.
U.S. General Accounting Office 1986 Weapon Performance: Operational Test and Evaluation Can Contribute More to Decision making. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
1987a DoD Simulations: Improved Assessment Procedures Would Increase the Credibility of Results. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
1987b Testing Oversight. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
1996 Best Practices: Commercial Quality Assurance Practices Offer Improvements for DoD. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
1997 Test and Evaluation: Impact of DoD's Office of the Director of Operational Test and Evaluation. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Vardeman, S. 1992 Response to How Much Testing is Enough? a background paper prepared for The Workshop on Statistical Issues in Defense Analysis and Testing, Committee on National Statistics, National Research Council. September 24-25.
von Winterfeldt, and W. Edwards 1986 Decision Analysis and Behavioral Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wiesenhahn, D.F., and R.D. Dighton 1993 A Framework for Using Advanced Distributed Simulation in Operational Test. Alexandria, Va.: The Institute for Defense Analyses.
Wright, S.J. 1993 Assessment of the Utility of Simulation Environments in Support of Operational Test & Evaluation. Briefing for Dr. William J. Perry, Deputy Secretary of Defense, September 30. U.S. Operational Test and Evaluation Command .
Zelen, M., and M. Dannemiller 1961 The robustness of life testing procedures derived from the exponential distribution. Technometrics 3:29-49.