| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Copyright © 2009. National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Terms of Use and Privacy Statement |
Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter.
Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.
OCR for page 3
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION AND RESEARCH APPROACH
I.! Introduction
The application of grouted post-tensioning utilizing internal tendons has gained acceptance
world-wide as an economically viable and popular form of bridge superstructure construction. Serious
problems can develop in grouted post-tensioned structures if voids are present within the grout that
is used to fill the tendon ducts and protect the prestressing steel. Inadequate grouting may allow water
to penetrate into the ducts, initiate corrosion of the tendons and potentially lead to failure of the
structure. The sudden collapse of the Bickton Meadows footbridge in 1967 and of the Ynys-y-Gwas
Bridge in 1985 due to corrosion of tendons in addition to other documented problems with post-
tensioned bridges led to a ban in 1 992 on the construction of new bonded post-tensioned bridges by
the U.K. Ministry of Transportationi 2. In 1 996, the moratorium on grouted post-tensioned cast-in-
place construction was lifted but remains in force for segmental construction apparently because of
concerns about the corrosion protection of tendons as they pass through the bridge segment joints.
It is generally perceived that the experience in the United States (U.S.) with durability of
segmental construction utilizing internal tendons has been good. Thus, this general perception appears
to be contradictory to the experience in the United Kingdom (U.K.) as evidenced by the continued ban
there on segmental construction. There is a pressing need for U.S. bridge engineers to gain an
understanding of durability issues associated with segmental construction and to be able to judge on
a technical and rational basis the veracity of the on-going moratorium in the U.K. pertaining to
segmental construction.
I.2 Research Objective
The principal objectives of the study reported herein were to analyze and summarize the
information on durability of precast segmental concrete bridges which utilize grouted internal tendons
3
OCR for page 4
and to provide definitive recommendations to the AASHTO Highway Subcommittee on Bridges and
Structures relative to durability of segmental construction.
The focus of the study was principally a comparative assessment of the durability, with the
primary emphasis on the corrosion performance, of precast segmental bridges in the U.S. and the U.K.
The study includes a summary of selected information available on materials, design, construction,
performance data, inspection, structural evaluation, repair and rehabilitation, and corrosion protection
of internal tendons across segment joints.
1.3 Research Approach
In order to meet the research objectives, the study included a literature search, a survey, and
personal contacts. Initially, a review of the literature was conducted regarding the durability of precast
segmental bridges with internal tendons. This search was conducted using a variety of technical data
bases available through engineering societies, the Internet, and in-house publications and personal
contacts.
The research team collectively possessed a wealth of personal contacts, both nationally and
internationally, that were surveyed regarding the corrosion protection issues of internal tendons across
segmental joints. One member of the research team, Mr. Jeffrey West, a doctoral student of Dr. John
E. green's at the University of Texas at Austin, met with Dr. George Somerville, who is Chairman of
the Working Party in the U.K. charged with reviewing durability of grouted post-tensioned
construction in the U.K. Mr. West met with Dr. Somerville in July 1997 in conjunction with his
attendance at the Structural Faults Symposium in Edinburgh. This was an invaluable and unique
opportunity to gain an understanding of the U.K. perspective. Additional contacts were made with
Dr. Sommerv~lle via electronic mail regarding clarification and elaboration on several issues.
Key State and Federal governmental agencies, members of the AASHTO Subcommittee on
Bridges and Structures, the American Segmental Bridge Institute (ASBl), and selected design
consultants were surveyed regarding experience with durability of segmental construction. The survey
was in the form of a questionnaire.
A key research project was in progress at the time of the publication of this report that was
particularly relevant to the study. Interim results of the on-going research study at the Ferguson
4
OCR for page 5
Structural Engineering Laboratory at the University of Texas at Austin sponsored by the Texas
Department of Transportation of accelerated segmental exposure specimens were reviewed. In
addition, evaluation of projects recently completed by the principal investigator involving corrosion
susceptibility and non-destructive testing of existing segmental bridges provided relevant information
to the study issues.
I.4 Report Contents
The findings from NCHRP Project 20-7, Task 92, "Durability of Precast Segmental Bridges"
are reported herein. Chapter 2 summarizes the findings from the study. Chapter 3 presents the
implications from the studyin the context ofthe relevance of the U.K. moratorium with respect to the
performance experience in the U.S. Chapter 4 presents the major conclusions from the study and
suggested research needs.
.
5
Representative terms from entire chapter:
internal tendons