The following HTML text is provided to enhance online
readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML.
Please use the page image
as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.
Page 4
supercomputing capabilities, need to be provided to the
climate modeling community.
4. The reliance of the United States upon other countries for
high-end climate modeling must be redressed.
In order to avoid the aforementioned problem regarding priority
setting, the USGCRP could assume increased responsibility for
identifying, from an interagency perspective, any gaps or
imbalances in the research priorities established by the individual
agencies. At present, however, this is made difficult because some
agencies have excluded from their USGCRP budgets the computational
and human resources to support comprehensive, coupled
atmosphere-ocean climate modeling efforts on a par with those in
several foreign countries. Although an entirely top-down
management approach for climate modeling is viewed as undesirable,
national economic and security interests nevertheless require a
more comprehensive national strategy for setting priorities, and
improving and applying climate models. An effective national
approach to climate modeling should ensure that available resources
are allocated appropriately according to agreed upon science
research and societal priorities and are efficiently utilized by
the modeling community. We acknowledge that justification for and
design of such a strategy would require a more complete evaluation
of the current status of climate modeling in the United States than
was possible in developing this report. Development of such a
strategy should take place with full involvement of climate
modelers within academia and the national climate research centers,
along with users of climate modeling results and agency program
managers.
Climate modeling in the United States promotes a healthy
competition among various groups, but without better coordination
of research among national laboratories and between them and the
academic community, it may be difficult to optimally utilize
available human and high-end computer resources. In particular,
standardization of model output, model evaluation tools, and
modular programming structures can facilitate model development and
minimize duplication of effort, with the possibility that prudent
standardization may yield some cost savings. High-end modeling
coordination could also be