National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

PAPERBACK
price:$43.50
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

New Vaccine Development: Establishing Priorities: Volume II, Diseases of Importance in Developing Countries (1986)
Board on Population Health and Public Health Practice (BPH)

Citation Manager

. "Appendix D-2: The Prospects for Immunizing Against Escherichia coli." New Vaccine Development: Establishing Priorities: Volume II, Diseases of Importance in Developing Countries. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 1986.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
185
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


New Vaccine Development: Establishing Priorities, Volume II, Diseases of Importance in Developing Countries

Because a large portion of the enterotoxigenic E. coli that cause disease produce only ST, attempts have been made to immunize against this toxin, despite its poor immunogenicity. Encouraging results were obtained by conjugating ST to porcine IgG. Subsequently, a bivalent toxoid was prepared by cross-linking ST to LT. Testing of a bivalent toxoid consisting of a laboratory-synthesized ST conjugated to the B subunit also has begun. Both of these bivalent toxoids have demonstrated immunogenicity and protective effects in animal models.

Another approach toward prevention of enterotoxigenic E. coli diarrhea involves the use of attenuated strains of E. coli bearing critical antigens. These strains should be capable of colonizing the small intestine and stimulating an immune response, without causing adverse reactions. One live strain, a CFA II-positive, LT- and ST-negative variant of a previously enterotoxigenic strain, has been evaluated in humans. When given to volunteers, all excreted the strain, most had positive cultures of jejunal fluid, and most had serological responses. About 10 percent of the volunteers developed mild diarrhea, however, presumably as a consequence of colonization of the proximal small intestine.

With the advent of recombinant DNA technology, it is possible to construct an E. coli vaccine strain engineered to produce large quantities of multiple colonization factor antigens, B subunit, and perhaps an ST toxoid. Further work will be necessary to understand, and if possible eliminate, the mild diarrhea resulting from CFA-positive strains of E. coli.

A potential problem with all of the proposed vaccines is that there is no assurance they will provide long-term (up to 5 years) protection. This is an important goal, especially for vaccine use in developing countries.

REFERENCES

Black, R.E. 1984. Personal communication, Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health, Baltimore, Md.


Dupont, H.L. 1982. Escherichia coli diarrhea. Pp. 219–234 in Bacterial Infections of Human, A.S.Evans and H.A.Feldman, eds. New York: Plenum.


Levine, M.L., J.B.Kaper, R.E.Black, and M.L.Clements. 1983. New knowledge on pathogenesis of bacterial enteric infections as applied to vaccine development. Microbiol. Rev. 47:510–550.

Page
185
Front Matter (R1-R16)
1. Summary (1-18)
2. Priority Setting for Health-Related Investments: A Review of Methods (19-29)
3. Overview of the Analytic Approach (30-43)
4. Comparison of Disease Burdens (44-62)
5. Predictions of Vaccine Development (63-75)
6. Assessing the Likely Utilization of New Vaccines (76-81)
7. Calculation and Comparison of the Health Benefits and Differential Costs Associated with Candidate Vaccines (82-105)
8. Additional Issues in the Selection of Priorities for Accelerated Vaccine Development (106-120)
9. Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendations (121-142)
Appendix A: Selection of Vaccine Candidates for Accelerated Development (143-148)
Appendix B: The Burden of Disease Resulting from Acute Respiratory Illness (149-158)
Appendix C: The Burden of Disease Resulting from Diarrhea (159-169)
Appendix D-1: The Prospects for Immunizing Against Dengue Virus (170-177)
Appendix D-2: The Prospects for Immunizing Against Escherichia coli (178-185)
Appendix D-3: The Prospects for Immunizing Against Hemophilus influenzae Type b (186-196)
Appendix D-4: The Prospects for Immunizing Against Hepatitis A Virus (197-207)
Appendix D-5: The Prospects for Immunizing Against Hepatitis B Virus (208-222)
Appendix D-6: The Prospects for Immunizing Against Japanese Encephalitis Virus (223-240)
Appendix D-7: The Prospects for Immunizing Against Mycobacterium leprae (241-250)
Appendix D-8: The Prospects for Immunizing Against Neisseria meningitidis (251-266)
Appendix D-9: The Prospects for Immunizing Against Parainfluenza Viruses (267-274)
Appendix D-10: The Prospects for Immunizing Against Plasmodium spp. (275-286)
Appendix D-11: The Prospects for Immunizing Against Rabies Virus (287-298)
Appendix D-12: The Prospects for Immunizing Against Respiratory Syncytial Virus (299-307)
Appendix D-13: The Prospects for Immunizing Against Rotavirus (308-318)
Appendix D-14: The Prospects for Immunizing Against Salmonella typhi (319-328)
Appendix D-15: The Prospects for Immunizing Against Shigella spp. (329-337)
Appendix D-16: The Prospects for Immunizing Against Streptococcus Group A (338-356)
Appendix D-17: The Prospects for Immunizing Against Streptococcus pneumoniae (357-375)
Appendix D-18: The Prospects for Immunizing Against Vibrio cholerae (376-389)
Appendix D-19: The Prospects for Immunizing Against Yellow Fever (390-402)
Appendix E: Questionnaire for Assessing Morbidity-Mortality Trade-Offs (403-411)
Appendix F: Technical Notes (412-412)
Appendix G: Biographical Notes on Committee Members (413-417)
Appendix H: Additional Sources of Advice to the Committee (418-419)
Appendix I: Contents of Supplement to Volume II (420-420)
Appendix J: Preface to Volume I (421-422)
Appendix K: Contents to Volume I (423-423)
Index (424-432)