National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: OTHER TOPICS
Suggested Citation:"SUMMARY." Institute of Medicine. 1994. Research Strategies for Assessing Adverse Events Associated with Vaccines: A Workshop Summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9269.
×

Problems inherent in all the research strategies (case reports, passivesurveillance, LLDBs, and clinical trials) include the implicationsof not using unvaccinated children or adults as controls, a lackof information on the background incidence rates of the adverse reactions,long latencies for some reactions, and reactions with multifactorialetiologies. Basic research on both vaccines and the pathophysiologiesof adverse reactions should be continued.

SUMMARY

In sum, there was agreement that more consideration needs to be givento the use and utility of case reports, including those submittedto passive surveillance systems, that the role of clinical trials(including postmarketing studies) is limited due to frequent lackof randomization and small sample size, and that LLDBs show greatbut not unlimited promise. Vaccine safety must be studied on an ongoingbasis and with a variety of tools, including basic research.

REFERENCES

Asbury AK, Cornblath DR. Assessment of current diagnostic criteria for Guillain-Barré syndrome. Annals of Neurology 1990; 27(Suppl.):S21–S24.

Asbury AK, Arnason BG, Karp HR, McFarlin DE. Criteria for diagnosis of Guillain-Barré syndrome. Annals of Neurology 1978;3:565–566.

Institute of Medicine. Howson CP, Howe CJ, Fineberg HV, eds. Adverse Effects of Pertussis and Rubella Vaccines. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1991.

Institute of Medicine. Stratton KR, Howe CJ, Johnston RB, eds. Adverse Events Associated with Childhood Vaccines: Evidence Bearingon Causality. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1994a.

Institute of Medicine. Stratton KR, Howe CJ, Johnston RB, eds. DPT Vaccine and Chronic Nervous System Dysfunction: A New Analysis. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1994b.

Kramer MS. Difficulties in assessing the adverse effects of drugs. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 1981;11:105S–110S.

Kramer MS, Lane DA. Causal propositions in clinical research and practice. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 1992;45:639–649.

Suggested Citation:"SUMMARY." Institute of Medicine. 1994. Research Strategies for Assessing Adverse Events Associated with Vaccines: A Workshop Summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9269.
×

the question now is not whether the measles vaccine can prevent SSPE;obviously it can, by preventing disease from wild-type measles virusinfection. Still in question is whether there are rare cases of SSPEcaused by the vaccine. Although technical advances are making itpossible to isolate virus from the brains of patients with SSPE andtype the RNA as being of the vaccine strain or the wild-type, thefailure to isolate vaccine-strain virus does not prove that the vaccinecannot cause SSPE. As was articulated by the IOM committees (Instituteof Medicine, 1991, 1994a) it is impossible to prove a negative. However,typing an isolated virus from a patient with SSPE as vaccine strainwould be important data to suggest that measles vaccine can cause SSPE. This is hypothetical at present.

Multifactorial Etiologies

Adverse events that are multifactorial in etiology, for example,insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, provide particular challenges.In these instances, the vaccine might serve as an additional stimulusto a genetic background that predisposes a child toward the condition.It was mentioned that as more and more genes for diseases are identified,more conditions that fall into this category may be identified.

Once causality between a condition and a vaccine is established,epidemiologic methods could be used to study why some people whoreceived, for example, influenza vaccine got GBS and others did not.What is different about those who develop the disease or condition?But even if one could identify risk factors for adverse events, itmay not be feasible or practical to screen for them prior to immunization.

A participant commented that there are a number of suspicions aboutpredisposing conditions that might be exacerbated by vaccines (forexample, arthritis and hepatitis B vaccine). Such examples shouldbe defined and looked at in LLDBs. It was suggested that generalresearch projects designed primarily to study the pathophysiologyor genetics of conditions such as diabetes might include vaccineissues as part of their study designs.

Need for Basic Research

A participant stressed that it is important to understand the mechanismsof the adverse events. It would be a mistake to address the problemof safety only from the moment of licensure. Basic laboratory researchon possible immunopathologic or infectious sequelae of vaccines,in addition to surveillance and epidemiologic studies, is needed.

Suggested Citation:"SUMMARY." Institute of Medicine. 1994. Research Strategies for Assessing Adverse Events Associated with Vaccines: A Workshop Summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9269.
×
Page 20
Suggested Citation:"SUMMARY." Institute of Medicine. 1994. Research Strategies for Assessing Adverse Events Associated with Vaccines: A Workshop Summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9269.
×
Page 19
Next: REFERENCES »
Research Strategies for Assessing Adverse Events Associated with Vaccines: A Workshop Summary Get This Book
×
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!