| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Copyright © 2009. National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Terms of Use and Privacy Statement |
Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter.
Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.
OCR for page 15
THE MANAGEMENT AND COST OF LABORATORY WASTE ASSOCIATED WITH THE CONDUCT OF RESEARCH: Report of a Workshop
Appendix II
GOVERNMENT-UNIVERSITY-INDUSTRY RESEARCH ROUNDTABLE WORKSHOP
The Management and Cost of Laboratory Waste Associated with the Conduct of Research
National Academy of Sciences Building
2101 Constitution Ave. NW
Washington, DC 20418
Lecture Room
February 10-11, 1994
AGENDA
Thursday, February 10
9:00
Welcome and Workshop Overview by Workshop Co-Chairs
Theodore Brown, Professor Emeritus, Department of Chemistry, University of Illinois
William Raub, Science Advisor to the Administrator, U.S. EPA
9:30
Panel on Laboratory Waste Management Concerns: How do regulations and the costs for managing laboratory waste currently have a substantial impact on the conduct of research? What impact do they have on laboratory practices? Is that impact likely to increase in the future?
Emmett Barkley, Director, Office of Laboratory Safety, Howard Hughes Medical Institute
Lawrence Gibbs, Associate Vice President, Environmental Health and Safety, Stanford University
Robert Stephens, Chief, Hazardous Materials Laboratory, California Environmental Protection Agency
Douglas Raber, Director, Board on Chemical Sciences and Technology, National Academy of Sciences
10:30
Break
10:45
Panel Discussion (continued)
12:00
Lunch
OCR for page 16
THE MANAGEMENT AND COST OF LABORATORY WASTE ASSOCIATED WITH THE CONDUCT OF RESEARCH: Report of a Workshop
Plenary Discussion
Identification of Problems Discussion
1:00
Issue 1: What are the special needs and characteristics of research laboratories as opposed to other waste producers?
2:00
Issue 2: What are the regulatory constraints faced by laboratories--particularly to waste storage, waste minimization, on-site waste treatment, and mixed waste disposal? How do federal, state, and local regulations overlap, and how do these jurisdictions coordinate with each other, if at all?
3:00
Break
3:15
Issue 3: What are the costs of waste management, and what are the best mechanisms for managing these costs? How are they allocated within the university?
Identification of Potential Solutions Discussion
4:15
Issue 4: What positive changes could be made in the conduct of research or the training of research personnel to improve its management of mixed, chemical, radioactive, and biohazardous waste?
5:15
Summary of day's discussion (Brown and Raub)
5:30
Adjourn
Friday, February 11
Plenary Discussion (continued)
Solutions Discussion (continued)
8:30
Overview of previous and current day's discussion
9:45
Break
10:00
Issue 5: What possible regulatory or legislative policy mechanisms could be used to alleviate the regulatory constraints faced by laboratories? (e.g., emphasize best practice under existing regulations; establish waivers within existing regulations; modify regulations)
Mechanisms for Analyzing Problems and Solutions Discussion
11:00
Issue 6: What are the appropriate mechanisms for considering the problems and possible policies and practices in response to them? Is the Roundtable the appropriate mechanism, what approach should it use to address this problem? If it is not the Roundtable, than what other entities might be more appropriate?
12:00
Summary of Workshop Discussion
12:30
Adjourn
Representative terms from entire chapter:
solutions discussion