|
Indicator
|
Advantages
|
Disadvantages
|
-
Employer or other reports of exposure to compound—qualitative
|
-
Provides details of accidental releases
-
Can indicate safety procedures/protective measures
|
-
Data may be incomplete (unreported)
-
Exposure quantified subjectively
-
Episodic measurement of unusual occurrences rather than “average” workday exposure
|
-
Self-reports of exposure to compound—qualitative
|
-
Provides details of accidental releases
-
Can indicate personal hygiene and safety habits
-
Can obtain chronology of work experience with multiple agent exposures
|
-
Potential for recall bias
-
Employees may be unaware of exposure
-
Potential for falsification of exposure for personal gain
-
Potential for lost to follow-up (missing information) in retrospective studies
|
|
2. INDIRECT
|
|
-
Biological monitoring
|
|
|
(1) with chromosome studies—quantitative or qualitative
|
-
Identified changes in the genetic material
-
Indicates systemic exposure to a mutagen
|
-
Expensive, due to need for specially trained personnel and sophisticated equipment
-
Relationship between changes in mutation rates and reproductive outcomes is unknown
-
Results may be confounded by smoking and environmental factors (e.g., effect of smoking on sister chromatid exchanges in lymphocytes; radiation effects)
-
Individual variability in baseline rates
-
Most chromosomal aberrations are nonspecific
|
|
(2) by measuring changes in biochemical responses (e.g., elevated rate of thiocyanate production in
|
-
Identifies alterations in normal constituents of body fluids and changes in rate of normal biochemical processes
|
-
Does not quantify body burden
-
Results may be confounded by drugs, nutrition, and disease
|