| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Copyright © 2009. National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Terms of Use and Privacy Statement |
Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter.
Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.
OCR for page 53
Addendum to page 30
National Research Council (1999) Assessment of Two Cost-Effectiveness Studies
on Cocaine Control Policy. Committee on Data and Research for Policy on
Illegal Drugs. Charles Manski, John V. Pepper, and Yonette F. Thomas,
editors. Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education.
Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
This table from We study by Crane, Rivolo, and Comfort is reproduced
here for comparison win TABLE 2 on page 30 of this report. It depicts the
original from which TABLE 2 is derived.
Table III-1 Summary of Price Elasticity Estimates for Various
Indicators of Cocaine Usage
Usage ~ Best 95~ Confidence Regression
Indicator Estimate Interval Coefficient
DAWN -0.63 -0.86 < e < -0.50 -0.71
DUE -0.29 ~ -0.51 < e < -0.19 -0.64
SBCL -0.60 -0.98 ~ e < -0.29 -0.51
TEDS -0.38 -0.49 < e < -0.29 -0.73
SOURCE: Crane, B.D., A.R. Rivolo, and G.C. Comfort, 1997. An Empirical
Examination of Counterdrug Interdiction Program Effectiveness. Paper
prepared for the Institute of Defense Analyses (IDA), Washington, DC.
NOTE: A different point of view regarding this report is expressed in
comments received from some of the authors of the IDA and RAND
studies. These comments are available to the public in the NRC public
access file for this project. All references in this report to IDA's analysis
or findings are based solely on the 1997 IDA report by Crane, Rivolo,
and Comfort. All references in this report to RAND's analysis or find-
ings are based solely on its 1994 report, Controlling Cocaine Supply
Versus Demand Programs by authors C.P. Rydell and S.S. Everingham.
Representative terms from entire chapter:
coefficient dawn