National Academies Press: OpenBook

Risk-Based Waste Classification in California (1999)

Chapter: Front Matter

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 1999. Risk-Based Waste Classification in California. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9466.
×

Risk-Based Waste Classification in California

Committee on Risk-Based Criteria for Non-RCRA Hazardous Waste

Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology

Commission on Life Sciences

National Research Council

NATIONAL ACADEMY PRESS
WASHINGTON, D.C.

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 1999. Risk-Based Waste Classification in California. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9466.
×

NATIONAL ACADEMY PRESS
2101 Constitution Ave., N.W. Washington, D.C. 20418

NOTICE: The project that is the subject of this report was approved by the Governing Board of the National Research Council, whose members are drawn from the councils of the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, and the Institute of Medicine. The members of the committee responsible for the report were chosen for their special competences and with regard for appropriate balance.

The National Academy of Sciences is a private, nonprofit, self-perpetuating society of distinguished scholars engaged in scientific and engineering research, dedicated to the furtherance of science and technology and to their use for the general welfare. Upon the authority of the charter granted to it by the Congress in 1863, the Academy has a mandate that requires it to advise the federal government on scientific and technical matters. Dr. Bruce Alberts is president of the National Academy of Sciences.

The National Academy of Engineering was established in 1964, under the charter of the National Academy of Sciences, as a parallel organization of outstanding engineers. It is autonomous in its administration and in the selection of its members, sharing with the National Academy of Sciences the responsibility for advising the federal government. The National Academy of Engineering also sponsors engineering programs aimed at meeting national needs, encourages education and research, and recognizes the superior achievements of engineers. Dr. William A. Wulf is president of the National Academy of Engineering.

The Institute of Medicine was established in 1970 by the National Academy of Sciences to secure the services of eminent members of appropriate professions in the examination of policy matters pertaining to the health of the public. The Institute acts under the responsibility given to the National Academy of Sciences by its congressional charter to be an adviser to the federal government and, upon its own initiative, to identify issues of medical care, research, and education. Dr. Kenneth I. Shine is president of the Institute of Medicine.

The National Research Council was organized by the National Academy of Sciences in 1916 to associate the broad community of science and technology with the Academy's purposes of furthering knowledge and advising the federal government. Functioning in accordance with general policies determined by the Academy, the Council has become the principal operating agency of both the National Academy of Sciences and the National Academy of Engineering in providing services to the government, the public, and the scientific and engineering communities. The Council is administered jointly by both Academies and the Institute of Medicine. Dr. Bruce M. Alberts and Dr. William A. Wulf are chairman and vice chairman, respectively, of the National Research Council.

This project was supported by Research Agreement No. 98RA1539 between the National Academy of Sciences and the University of California. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author[s] and do not necessarily reflect the view of the organizations or agencies that provided support for this project.

International Standard Book Number 0-309-06544-5

Additional copies of this report are available from:
National Academy Press
2101 Constitution Ave., NW Box 285 Washington, DC 20055 800-624-6242 202-334-3313 [in the Washington metropolitan area] http://www.nap.edu

Copyright 1999 by the National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 1999. Risk-Based Waste Classification in California. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9466.
×

COMMITTEE ON RISK-BASED CRITERIA FOR NON-RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE

ROGENE HENDERSON (Chair),

Lovelace Respiratory Research Institute, Albuquerque, New Mexico

MARK W. BELL,

Parsons Brinckerhoff Energy Services, Denver, Colorado

JOSEPH F. BORZELLECA,

Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia

EDWIN H. CLARK, II,

Clean Sites, Washington, DC

EDMUND A.C. CROUCH,

Cambridge Environmental Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts

JOHN P. GIESY,

Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan

P. BARRY RYAN,

Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia

JAMES N. SEIBER,

U.S. Department of Agriculture, Albany, California

CURTIS C. TRAVIS,

Project Performance Corporation, Knoxville, Tennessee

Staff

RAYMOND A. WASSEL, Program Director

ROBERTA WEDGE, Staff Officer

ROBERT J. CROSSGROVE, Editor

MIRSADA KARALIC-LONCAREVIC, Information Specialist

RUTH DANOFF, Senior Program Assistant

LUCY V. FUSCO, Project Assistant

Sponsor

Department of Toxic Substances Control, California Environmental Protection Agency

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 1999. Risk-Based Waste Classification in California. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9466.
×

BOARD ON ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES AND TOXICOLOGY

GORDON ORIANS (Chair),

University of Washington, Seattle, Washington

DONALD MATTISON (Vice Chair),

March of Dimes, White Plains, New York

DAVID ALLEN,

University of Texas, Austin, Texas

MAY R. BERENBAUM,

University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois

EULA BINGHAM,

University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio

PAUL BUSCH,

Malcolm Pirnie, Inc., White Plains, New York

PETER L. DEFUR,

Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia

DAVID L. EATON,

University of Washington, Seattle, Washington

ROBERT A. FROSCH,

Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts

JOHN GERHART,

University of California, Berkeley, California

MARK HARWELL,

University of Miami, Miami, Florida

ROGENE HENDERSON,

Lovelace Respiratory Research Institute, Albuquerque, New Mexico

CAROL HENRY,

Chemical Manufacturers Association, Arlington, Virginia

BARBARA HULKA,

University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina

DANIEL KREWSKI,

Health Canada and University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario

JAMES A. MACMAHON,

Utah State University, Logan, Utah

MARIO J. MOLINA,

Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts

CHARLES O'MELIA,

Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland

KIRK SMITH,

University of California, Berkeley, California

MARGARET STRAND,

Oppenheimer Wolff Donnelly & Bayh, LLP, Washington, D.C.

TERRY F. YOSIE,

Chemical Manufacturers Association, Arlington, Virginia

Senior Staff

JAMES J. REISA, Director

DAVID J. POLICANSKY, Associate Director and Senior Program Director for Applied Ecology

CAROL A. MACZKA, Senior Program Director for Toxicology and Risk Assessment

RAYMOND A. WASSEL, Senior Program Director for Environmental Sciences and Engineering

KULBIR BAKSHI, Program Director for the Committee on Toxicology

LEE R. PAULSON, Program Director for Resource Management

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 1999. Risk-Based Waste Classification in California. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9466.
×

COMMISSION ON LIFE SCIENCES

MICHAEL T. CLEGG (Chair),

University of California, Riverside, California

PAUL BERG (Vice Chair),

Stanford University, Stanford, California

FREDERICK R. ANDERSON,

Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft, Washington, D.C.

JOHN C. BAILAR III,

University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois

JOANNA BURGER,

Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey

SHARON L. DUNWOODY,

University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin

DAVID EISENBERG,

University of California, Los Angeles, California

JOHN EMMERSON,

Portland, Oregon

NEAL FIRST,

University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin

DAVID J. GALAS,

Keck Graduate Institute of Applied Science, Claremont, California

DAVID V. GOEDDEL,

Tularik, Inc., South San Francisco, California

ARTURO GOMEZ-POMPA,

University of California, Riverside, California

COREY S. GOODMAN,

University of California, Berkeley, California

HENRY HEIKKINEN,

University of Northern Colorado, Greeley, Colorado

BARBARA S. HULKA,

University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina

HANS J. KENDE,

Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan

CYNTHIA KENYON,

University of California, San Francisco, California

MARGARET G. KIDWELL,

University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona

BRUCE R. LEVIN,

Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia

OLGA F. LINARES,

Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Miami, Florida

DAVID LIVINGSTON,

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts

DONALD R. MATTISON,

March of Dimes, White Plains, New York

ELLIOT M. MEYEROWITZ,

California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California

ROBERT T. PAINE,

University of Washington, Seattle, Washington

RONALD R. SEDEROFF,

North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina

ROBERT R. SOKAL,

State University of New York, Stony Brook, New York

CHARLES F. STEVENS,

The Salk Institute, La Jolla, California

SHIRLEY M. TILGHMAN,

Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey

JOHN L. VANDEBERG,

Southwest Foundation for Biomedical Research, San Antonio, Texas

RAYMOND L. WHITE,

University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah

WARREN R. MUIR, Executive Director

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 1999. Risk-Based Waste Classification in California. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9466.
×

OTHER REPORTS OF THE BOARD ON ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES AND TOXICOLOGY

Research Priorities for Airborne Particulate Matter: I. Immediate Priorities and a Long-Range Research Portfolio (1998)

The National Research Council's Committee on Toxicology: The First 50 Years (1997)

Toxicologic Assessment of the Army's Zinc Cadmium Sulfide Dispersion Tests (1997)

Carcinogens and Anticarcinogens in the Human Diet: A Comparison of Naturally Occurring and Synthetic Substances (1996)

Upstream: Salmon and Society in the Pacific Northwest (1996)

Science and the Endangered Species Act (1995)

Wetlands: Characteristics and Boundaries (1995)

Biologic Markers [Urinary Toxicology (1995), Immunotoxicology (1992), Environmental Neurotoxicology (1992), Pulmonary Toxicology (1989), Reproductive Toxicology (1989)]

Review of EPA's Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program (three reports, 1994–1995)

Science and Judgment in Risk Assessment (1994)

Ranking Hazardous Waste Sites for Remedial Action (1994)

Pesticides in the Diets of Infants and Children (1993)

Issues in Risk Assessment (1993)

Setting Priorities for Land Conservation (1993)

Protecting Visibility in National Parks and Wilderness Areas (1993)

Dolphins and the Tuna Industry (1992)

Hazardous Materials on the Public Lands (1992)

Science and the National Parks (1992)

Animals as Sentinels of Environmental Health Hazards (1991)

Assessment of the U.S. Outer Continental Shelf Environmental Studies Program, Volumes I–IV (1991–1993)

Human Exposure Assessment for Airborne Pollutants (1991)

Monitoring Human Tissues for Toxic Substances (1991)

Rethinking the Ozone Problem in Urban and Regional Air Pollution (1991)

Decline of the Sea Turtles (1990)

Tracking Toxic Substances at industrial Facilities (1990)

Copies of these reports may be ordered from the National Academy Press (800) 624-6242 or (202) 334-3313 www.nap.edu

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 1999. Risk-Based Waste Classification in California. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9466.
×

Preface

The Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) of the State of California Environmental Protection Agency is in the process of complying with the Regulatory Structure Update. The Regulatory Structure Update is a comprehensive review and refocusing of California's system for identifying and regulating management of hazardous wastes. As part of this effort, the DTSC proposes to change its current waste classification system that categorizes wastes as hazardous or nonhazardous based on their toxicity. Under the proposed system there would be two risk-based thresholds rather than the single toxicity threshold currently used to distinguish between the wastes. Wastes that contain specific chemicals at concentrations that exceed the upper threshold will be designated as hazardous; those below the lower threshold will be nonhazardous; and those with chemical concentrations between the two thresholds will be "special" wastes and subject to variances for management and disposal. The proposed DTSC system combines toxicity information with short or long-term exposure information to determine the risks associated with the chemicals.

Under section 57004 of the California Health and Safety Code, the scientific basis of the proposed waste classification system is subject to external scientific peer review by the National Academy of Sciences, the University of California, or other similar institution of higher learning or group of scientists. This report addresses that regulatory requirement.

This report is intended to assist the DTSC in determining whether the proposed waste classification method will be scientifically well

Page viii Cite
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 1999. Risk-Based Waste Classification in California. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9466.
×

grounded and protective of human health and the environment. It identifies areas where the proposed DTSC approach is appropriate, as well as areas where the DTSC documentation is not sufficient. The report indicates where and what type of improvements could be made to clarify both the presentation of the approach and the goals of the classification system.

To prepare the report, the committee reviewed the materials supplied to it by the DTSC, additional supporting materials received from DTSC and other individuals and organizations, and the information gathered at two public meetings held in Irvine, California on September 10, and November 20, 1998. The committee wishes to thank the following members of the California Environmental Protection Agency's Department of Toxic Substances Control: Jesse Huff, Director, Robert Borzelleri, Chief Deputy Director, Dr. Robert Stephens, Deputy Director, David Nunenkamp, Daniel Weingarten, and Drs. James Carlisle, Edward Butler, Bart Simmons, and John Christopher; and Dr. Lauren Zeise of the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment for providing the committee with information on the models and framework for the risk methodology, for their presentations at the public meetings, and for their responses to written questions from committee members. We also gratefully acknowledge Barnes Johnson, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Jane Williams, California Communities Against Toxics; Michael Lakin and Michael Easter, ICF Kaiser International (representing the Western States Petroleum Association); Linda M. Shandler and Brent C. Perry, County Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County; Paul W. Abernathy, representing Mercury Technologies International/Advanced Environmental Recycling Corporation; Victor Hanna, City of Los Angeles, Bureau of Sanitation; Aspet Chater, Hugo Neu-Proler Company; Kirk T. Larson, representing San Diego Industrial Environmental Association; David Kay, Southern California Edison Company; and Charles A. White, Waste Management, Inc., for providing background information and for making presentations to the committee.

This report has been reviewed in draft form by individuals chosen for their diverse perspectives and technical expertise, in accordance with procedures for reviewing NRC reports approved by the NRC's Report Review Committee. The purpose of this independent review is to provide candid and critical comments that will assist the NRC in making the published report as sound as possible and to ensure that the report meets

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 1999. Risk-Based Waste Classification in California. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9466.
×

institutional standards for objectivity, evidence, and responsiveness to the study charge. The content of the final report is the responsibility of the NRC and the study committee, and not the responsibility of the reviewers. The review comments and draft manuscript remain confidential to protect the integrity of the deliberative process. We wish to thank the following individuals, who are neither officials nor employees of the NRC, for their participation in the review of this report: John C. Bailar, University of Chicago; Karen Florini, Environmental Defense Fund; Rolf Hartung, University of Michigan; Carol Henry, American Petroleum Institute; Donald M. Mackay, Trent University; Donald Mattison, March of Dimes Birth Defects Foundation; Glenn Paulson, Paulson and Cooper, Inc.; Emil Pfitzer, Ramsey, NJ; and Kenneth W. Sexton, University of Minnesota. These reviewers have provided many constructive comments and suggestions; it must be emphasized, however, that responsibility for the final content of this report rests entirely with the authoring committee and the NRC.

I am also grateful for the assistance of the NRC staff in the preparation of this report. In particular, the committee wishes to acknowledge Roberta Wedge, staff officer for the committee and Raymond A. Wassel, senior program director with the Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology. Other staff members who contributed to this effort are Robert J. Crossgrove, editor; Ruth Danoff, senior program assistant; and Lucy V. Fusco, project assistant.

Finally, I would like to thank the members of the committee for their valuable expertise and dedicated efforts throughout the preparation of this report. Their efforts in preparing this report within a very short time frame are much appreciated.

ROGENE F. HENDERSON, PH.D.

CHAIR, COMMITTEE ON RISK-BASED CRITERIA FOR NON-RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 1999. Risk-Based Waste Classification in California. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9466.
×
This page in the original is blank.
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 1999. Risk-Based Waste Classification in California. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9466.
×
Page xiii Cite
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 1999. Risk-Based Waste Classification in California. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9466.
×

Abbreviations


ADOM

acid deposition and oxidant model

AWQC

ambient water quality criteria


Cal/EPA

California Environmental Protection Agency

CAM

California Assessment Manual

CCR

California Code of Regulations

CFR

Code of Federal Regulations

CUPA

Certified Unified Program Agencies

CV

coefficient of variation


DAF

dilution attenuation factor

DDT

dichloro diphenyl trichloroethane

DTSC

Department of Toxic Substances Control


EFH

Exposure Factors Handbook

EP

extraction procedure

EPA

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

EQL

estimated quantitation level


FDM

fugitive dust model


HWIR

Hazardous Waste Identification Rule


ISC

industrial source complex dispersion model

IWMB

Integrated Waste Management Board


LC

lethal concentration

LD

lethal dose

LOD

limit of detection

LOQ

limit of quantitation

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 1999. Risk-Based Waste Classification in California. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9466.
×

MCL

maximum contaminant level

MSWL

municipal solid waste leachate


NAAQS

National Ambient Air Quality Standards

NIOSH

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health

NRC

National Research Council


OSHA

Occupational Safety and Health Administration


PEA

preliminary endangerment assessment (model)


RAGS

Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund

RCRA

Resource Conservation and Recovery Act

RSU

regulatory structure update


SD

standard deviation

SERT

soluble or extractable regulatory threshold

STLC

soluble threshold limit concentration

SWRCB

State Water Resources Control Board


TCDD

2,3,7,8-tetrachloro-dibenzo-p-dioxin

TCE

trichloroethylene

TCLP

toxicity characteristic leaching procedure

TTLC

total threshold limit concentration


WET

waste extraction test

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 1999. Risk-Based Waste Classification in California. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9466.
×
This page in the original is blank.
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 1999. Risk-Based Waste Classification in California. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9466.
×
This page in the original is blank.
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 1999. Risk-Based Waste Classification in California. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9466.
×
Page R1
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 1999. Risk-Based Waste Classification in California. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9466.
×
Page R2
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 1999. Risk-Based Waste Classification in California. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9466.
×
Page R3
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 1999. Risk-Based Waste Classification in California. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9466.
×
Page R4
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 1999. Risk-Based Waste Classification in California. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9466.
×
Page R5
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 1999. Risk-Based Waste Classification in California. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9466.
×
Page R6
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 1999. Risk-Based Waste Classification in California. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9466.
×
Page R7
Page viii Cite
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 1999. Risk-Based Waste Classification in California. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9466.
×
Page R8
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 1999. Risk-Based Waste Classification in California. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9466.
×
Page R9
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 1999. Risk-Based Waste Classification in California. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9466.
×
Page R10
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 1999. Risk-Based Waste Classification in California. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9466.
×
Page R11
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 1999. Risk-Based Waste Classification in California. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9466.
×
Page R12
Page xiii Cite
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 1999. Risk-Based Waste Classification in California. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9466.
×
Page R13
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 1999. Risk-Based Waste Classification in California. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9466.
×
Page R14
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 1999. Risk-Based Waste Classification in California. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9466.
×
Page R15
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 1999. Risk-Based Waste Classification in California. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9466.
×
Page R16
Next: Executive Summary »
Risk-Based Waste Classification in California Get This Book
×
 Risk-Based Waste Classification in California
Buy Paperback | $50.00 Buy Ebook | $40.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

The Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) of the State of California Environmental Protection Agency is in the process of complying with the Regulatory Structure Update. The Regulatory Structure Update is a comprehensive review and refocusing of California's system for identifying and regulating management of hazardous wastes. As part of this effort, the DTSC proposes to change its current waste classification system that categorizes wastes as hazardous or nonhazardous based on their toxicity. Under the proposed system there would be two risk-based thresholds rather than the single toxicity threshold currently used to distinguish between the wastes. Wastes that contain specific chemicals at concentrations that exceed the upper threshold will be designated as hazardous; those below the lower threshold will be nonhazardous; and those with chemical concentrations between the two thresholds will be "special" wastes and subject to variances for management and disposal. The proposed DTSC system combines toxicity information with short or long-term exposure information to determine the risks associated with the chemicals.

Under section 57004 of the California Health and Safety Code, the scientific basis of the proposed waste classification system is subject to external scientific peer review by the National Academy of Sciences, the University of California, or other similar institution of higher learning or group of scientists. This report addresses that regulatory requirement.

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!