Cover Image

Not for Sale

View/Hide Left Panel
Click for next page ( 7636

The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine
500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001

Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 7635
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 96, pp. 7635-7639, July 1999 Colloquium Paper This paper was presented at the National Academy of Sciences colloquium "The Neurobiology of Pain, " held December 11-13, 1998, at the Arnold and Mabel Beckman Center in Irvine, CA. Sodium channels and pain (dorsal root ganglion neurons/hyperexcitability/ion channels/nerve injury/inflammation) S. G. WAXMAN*, S. DIB-HA]I, T. R. CUMMINS, AND J. A. BLACK Department of Neurology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510; and Paralyzed Veterans of America/Eastern Paralyzed Veterans Association Neuroscience Research Center, Veterans Administration Medical Center, West Haven, CT 06516 ABSTRACT Although it is well established that hyperex" citability and/or increased baseline sensitivity of primary sensory neurons can lead to abnormal burst activity associ- ated with pain, the underlying molecular mechanisms are not fully understood. Early studies demonstrated that, after in- jury to their axons, neurons can display changes in excitabil- ity, suggesting increased sodium channel expression, and, in fact, abnormal sodium channel accumulation has been ob- served at the tips of injured axons. We have used an ensemble of molecular, electrophysiological, and pharmacological tech- niques to ask: what types of sodium channels underlie hyper- excitability of primary sensory neurons after injury? Our studies demonstrate that multiple sodium channels, with distinct electrophysiological properties, are encoded by dis- tinct mRNAs within small dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neu- rons, which include nociceptive cells. Moreover, several DRG neuron-specific sodium channels now have been cloned and sequenced. After injury to the axons of DRG neurons, there is a dramatic change in sodium channel expression in these cells, with down-regulation of some sodium channel genes and up-regulation of another, previously silent sodium channel gene. This plasticity in sodium channel gene expression is accompanied by electrophysiological changes that poise these cells to fire spontaneously or at inappropriate high frequen- cies. Changes in sodium channel gene expression also are observed in experimental models of inflammatory pain. Thus, sodium channel expression in DRG neurons is dynamic, changing significantly after injury. Sodium channels within primary sensory neurons may play an important role in the pathophysiology of pain. Pain pathways begin with primary sensory neurons tdorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurons; trigeminal neurons]. It is now clear that, in some pain syndromes, hyperexcitability and/or in- creased baseline sensitivity of these cells leads to abnormal bursting that can produce chronic pain (1-3~. The pivotal position of primary sensory neurons as distal sites of impulse generation along the nociceptive pathway, and the experimen- tal and clinical accessibility of these neurons, has resulted in intense interest in mechanisms underlying action potential generation and transmission in them in disease states charac- terized by pain. Voltage-gated sodium channels, which pro- duce the inward membrane current necessary for regenerative action potential production within the mammalian nervous system, are, of course, expressed in primary sensory neurons and have emerged as important targets in the study of the molecular pathophysiology of pain and in the search for new pain therapies. In this paper we focus on the potential role of sodium channels in the molecular pathophysiology of pain. We will emphasize, in particular, three motifs: first, that DRG neurons express a complex repertoire of multiple distinct PNAS is available online at sodium channels, encoded by different genes; second, that some of these sodium channels are sensory neuron specific; and third, that sodium channel expression in DRG neurons is highly dynamic, changing substantially not only during devel- opment, but also in various disease states incl~`lins, grime. that are accompanied by pain. Hyperexcitability in DRG Cells After Injury _ _ 7 ~AAA= ~ Early studies (4, 5) demonstrated that, after injury to their axons, motor neurons display changes in excitability, suggest- ing increased sodium channel expression over the cell body and the dendrites, and similar changes were subsequently observed in sensory neurons (6, 7). Abnormal sodium channel accumu- lation at the tips of injured axons also has been observed (8-10), and both electrophysiological and computer simula- tion studies have suggested that abnormal increases in sodium conductance can lead to inappropriate, repetitive firing (11- 13). Indeed, there is substantial evidence indicating that the abnormal excitability of DRG neurons, after axonal injury, is associated with an increased density of sodium channels (13, 14). These observations, together with experimental and clin- ical observations on partial efficacy of sodium channel- blocking agents in neuropathic pain (15-18), established a link between sodium channel activity and sensory neuron hyper- excitability producing pain. However, these studies did not examine the crucial question: what type(s) of sodium channels produce inappropriate sensory neuron discharge associated with pain? Multiple Sodium Channels in Primary Sensory Neurons Over the past decade, it has become clear that nearly a dozen, molecularly distinct voltage-gated sodium channels are en- coded within mammals by different genes. DRG neurons, which had been known to display multiple, distinct sodium currents (19-22), express at least six sodium channel tran- scripts (23), as illustrated by the in situ hybridizations and reverse transcription-PCR shown in Figs. 1 and 2. These include high levels of expression of the a-I and Na6 channels, also expressed at high levels by other neuronal cell types within the central nervous system, which are known to support tetrodotoxin (TTX)-sensitive sodium currents. In addition, DRG neurons are unique in expressing four additional sodium channel transcripts that are not expressed at significant levels in other neuronal cell types: (i) PN1/hNE, which is expressed preferentially in DRG neurons (24), produces a fast, transient TTX-sensitive sodium current in response to sudden depolar Abbreviations: DRG, dorsal root ganglia; TTX; tetrodotoxin; NGF, nerve growth factor. *To whom reprint requests should be addressed at: Department of Neurology, LCI 707, Yale Medical School, 333 Cedar Street, New Haven, CT 06510. e-mail: 7635 1

OCR for page 7635
7636 Colloquium Paper: Waxrnan et al. INNS ~SITS . ii? ~ ~ ~.~.~ ~ ~ i ~ s3aG`S3 ^: 'A i] ~' t~ FIG. 1. Sodium channel a-subunit mRNAs visualized in sections from adult rat DRG by in situ hybridization with subtype-specific antisense riboprobes. mRNAs for or-I, Na6, hNE/PN1, SNS, NaN, and NaG are present at moderate to high levels in DRG neurons. Hybridization signal is not present with sense riboprobes, e.g., for NaG (S ). (Bar indicates 100 ,u m. ) izations and a persistent current elicited by slow depolariza- tions close to resting membrane potential (25~; (ii) SNS/PN3, expressed preferentially in small DRG and trigeminal neurons, encodes a TTX-resistent sodium current (26, 27~; (iii) NaN, expressed preferentially in small and trigeminal neurons, ex- hibits an amino acid sequence that, although only 47% similar to SNS-PN3, predicts that it encodes a TTX-resistant sodium channel (28~; and (iv) NaG, another putative sodium channel that was originally cloned from astrocytes and at first thought to be glial specific (29), is also preferentially expressed at high M 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 M ~ 600 bp 200 100 FIG. 2. Restriction enzyme profile analysis of Na channel domain 1 reverse transcription-PCR products from DRG. M lanes contain 100-bp ladder marker. Lane 1 contains the amplification product from DRG cDNA. Lanes 2-9 show the result of cutting this DNA with EcoRV, EcoNl,AvaI, SphI, BamHI,ApII, XbaI, and EcoRI, which are specific to subunits a-I, -II, -III, Na6, PN1, SNS, NaG, and NaN, respectively. Reproduced with permission from ref. 28. (Copyright 1998, National Academy of Sciences, USA). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96 (1999) levels within DRG neurons (23) and at low levels within other neurons of neural crest origin but not within other neuronal types (30). Preferential expression of SNS/PN3 and NaN within small DRG neurons provides a molecular correlate for the obser- vation (l9-22, 32, 33) that these cells express several distinct sodium currents, including TTX-resistant sodium currents. A role for TTX-resistant sodium channels in action potential conduction along small diameter afferent fibers has been postulated (34), and TTX-resistant sodium potentials have, in fact, been recorded from unmyelinated C-fibers (35~. Preferential expression of SNS/PN3 and NaN in small DRG neurons, which include nociceptive cells, and the demonstra- tion of a role of TTX-resistant sodium currents in conduction along their axons, have suggested that these channels may represent unique targets for the pharmacologic treatment of pain. PNl and NaG also may represent useful molecular targets for the pharmacologic manipulation of DRG neurons because of their preferential expression in these cells. Sodium Channel Gene Expression Is Altered After Injury to DRG Neurons The first observations indicating that, in addition to production of excess channels, there is a switch in the type of channels produced after axonal injury were provided by Waxman et al. (36), who found a significant up-regulation of expression of the previously silent or-III sodium channel gene in DRG neurons _ 3 5 7 14_ M C A C A C A C A C A Control Axotomy ~::: ~ ~'~_ _ 3 S 7 14_ M C AC AC AC A C A (bp) 800 ~__~ ~-SNS 600 SOO # - M 1 2 3 4 S 6 800 ~ - ~ _: _ _ ~_ 600 _: a-NON ~_ 400 _ ~ ~ o ~ .~ ti . ~ ~i_ i~ ~ FIG. 3. Transcripts for sodium channel or-III (A) are up-regulated, and transcripts for SNS (B) and NaN (C) are down-regulated, in DRG neurons after transection of their axons within the sciatic nerve. The micrographs (Right) show in situ hybridizations in control DRG, and at 5-7 days postaxotomy. Reverse transcription-PCR (Left) shows products of coamplification of c~-III (A) and SNS (B) together with ,B-actin transcripts in control (C) and axotomized (A) DRG (days postaxotomy indicated above gels in A and B), with computer- enhanced images of amplification products shown below gels. Coam- plification of NaN (392 bp) and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydro- genase (GAPDH) (606 bp) (C) shows decreased expression of NaN mRNA at 7 days postaxotomy (lanes 2, 4, and 6) compared with controls (lanes 1, 3, and 5). A and B modified from ref. 37; C modified from ref. 28. (Copyright 1998, National Academy of Sciences, USA).

OCR for page 7635
Colloquium Paper: Waxman et al. A control B DPA6 Q 1.00 ._ g 0.75 0.50 o `' 0.25 0.00 0 1.00 its 075 'a 0.50 . I 025 ~ 0.00 ,, I. -100 -50 0 mV C .. ~. -100-50 0 750 :t 500 250 o Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96 (1999J 7637 TTX-R Current Density control 2 6 22 60 mV days post axotomy control 2 6 22 60 days post axotomy FIG. 4. TTX-resistant sodium currents in small DRG neurons are down-regulated after axotomy. (A and B. Left) Whole-cell patch-clamp recordings from representative control (A) and axotomized (B. 6 days postaxotomy) DRG neurons. Note the loss of the TTX-resistant slowly inactivating component of sodium current after axotomy. Steady-state inactivation curves (A and B. Right) show loss of a component characteristic of TTX-resistant currents. (C) Attenuation of TTX-resistant current persists for at least 60 days postaxotomy. (D) Cell capacitance, which provides a measure of cell size, does not change significantly after axotomy (modified from ref. 39~. after axotomy. This finding was followed by demonstration of down-regulation of the SNS/PN3 gene expression, which can persist as long as 210 days after axotomy (37), and of down- regulation of the NaN gene (28~. These changes are illustrated in Fig. 3. Physiologic Changes Accompany Altered Sodium Gene Expression After DRG Neuron Injury On the basis of the down-regulation of SNS/PN3 and NaN genes in DRG neurons after axonal transection, it would be expected that TTX-resistant sodium currents should be re- duced in these cells after axotomy. Patch-clamp studies have demonstrated that, indeed, there is a loss of TTX-resistant sodium currents in DRG neurons after axonal transection (38~; this down-regulation persists in small DRG neurons for at least 60 days (39), consistent with the long-lasting changes in gene expression that have been described (37) in these cells (Fig. 4~. In addition, as shown in Fig. 5, there is a switch in the properties of the TTX-sensitive sodium currents in these cells after axotomy, with the emergence of a rapidly repriming current (i.e., a current that recovers rapidly from inactivation) (394. Cummins and Waxman (39) have suggested that the type III sodium channel is responsible for the rapidly repriming sodium current, but this conjecture remains to be proven. These changes may poise DRG neurons to fire spontane- ously, or at inappropriately high frequencies, after injury. Increased sodium channel densities, in themselves, will tend to lower threshold (12~. In addition, Rizzo et al. (40) have pointed out that the overlap between steady-state activation and inactivation curves, together with weak voltage dependence of TTX-resistant sodium channels may confer instability on the neuronal membrane. Coexpression of abnormal combinations of several types of channels, whose window currents can bracket each other, would be expected to permit subthreshold ocillations in voltage, supported by TTX-resistant channels, to cross-activate other sodium channels, thereby producing spon- taneous activity (40~. Cummins and Waxman (39) noted that, because the TTX-sensitive sodium current in DRG neurons after axotomy reprimes relatively rapidly, injured neurons would be expected to sustain higher firing frequencies. More- over, if persistent currents participate in setting the resting potential, as demonstrated in optic nerve axons (41), loss of TTX-resistant currents in DRG neurons after axotomy could produce a hyperpolarizing shift in resting potential, which, by relieving resting inactivation, might increase the amount of TTX-sensitive sodium current available for electrogenesis. Neurotrophins Modulate Sodium Channel Expression in DRG Neurons A number of studies have suggested that, in response to nerve or tissue injury, there are changes in synthesis or delivery of various neurotrophins to neurons. Early studies in culture demonstrated that nerve growth factor (NGF) can affect sodium channel expression in DRG neurons (42, 43~. Black et al. (44) showed that NGF, delivered directly to DRG cell bodies, acts to down-regulate a-III mRNA and maintain high levels of SNS/PN3 mRNA expression in small DRG neurons in an in vitro model that mimics axotomy. Following up on these observations, Dib-Hajj et al. (45) studied small DRG neurons in viva after axotomy and demonstrated that admin- istration of exogenous NGF to the proximal nerve stump results in an up-regulation of TTX-resistant sodium current and of SNS/PN3 mRNA levels in small DRG neurons (Fig. 6~. These observations suggest that at least some of the changes 1.00 ~ a) O 0 75 c' a, . 0.50 o . _ . 0.25 ~ . 0.00 l -DPA22 TTX-S control TTX-S C ......... ......... 10 101 102 recovery time (ms) FIG. 5. The kinetics of recovery from inactivation in TTX-sensitive sodium currents are different in axotomized DRG neurons. The graph shows recovery of TTX-sensitive sodium current from inactivation as a function of time in DRG neurons after axonal transection (6 and 22 days postaxotomy, results pooled) compared with uninjured controls. Note the leftward shift in the recovery curve. Modified from ref. 39.

OCR for page 7635
7638 Colloquium Paper: Waxman et al. (gp)M 1 234 5678 M 800 i~ ~ ~ I: ~ ~ : :~: ~ I: ~ ~:~ ~ ala _ Aids Ad. User ~4~0 600 ~- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~: ~ ~ ~ ~s 3.5 _ ~ :~. _ i" ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~_ 3 0 400 - ~ 25 _ ~ ~, ~ 2.0 I; ~ 1.5 at , ~Z CO 1.0 A 0.5 0.0 . _ ::~:: ~ ~ ~3 :3 If, B r ~ ~ ~ o . ~ 1~12 dpa ~ ~6 ~O Is, :~: b c d~ ~ ~ _; casts EM 43~' my' ~ Control Axot ~ Ringer's Axot ~ NGF C D E 1.00 ~` 0.75 ~ 0. ~ ~ 0.25 ~ - 0.00 Em, -120 80-40 0 bel polenUsI (mV) 1 00 _,__ 0.75 0.50 025 0.00 ~ . .120 .60 -40 0 1.00 ~ 0.7S ~ 0.50 ~ 0.25 _ - 0.00 ~ -120 -80 40 FIG. 6. Reverse transcription-PCR (A), in situ hybridization (B), and patch-clamp recordings (C), showing partial rescue of SNS mRNA and TTX-resistant sodium currents in axotomized DRG neurons after delivery of NGF to the proximal nerve stump. (A) Coamplification of SNS (479 bp) and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) (666 bp) products in Ringer's solution-treated axotomized DRG (lanes 1, 2, 5, and 6) and NGF-treated axotomized DRG (lanes 3, 4, 7, and 8~. The graph shows the increase in SNS amplification product in NGF-treated DRG. (B) In situ hybridization showing down-regulation of SNS mRNA in DRG after axotomy (axotomy + Ringer's solution compared with control), and the partial rescue of SNS mRNA by NGF. (C) Representative patch-clamp recordings showing partial rescue of slowly inactivating TTX-resistant sodium currents in axotomized DRG neurons after exposure to NGF. Cor- responding steady-state inactivation curves are shown below the recordings. Modified from ref. 45. observed in DRG neurons after axotomy reflect loss of access to peripheral pools of neurotrophic factors. Brain-derived growth factor has been studied and has been found not to alter sodium currents in DRG neurons, although it affects the expression of "y-aminobutyric acid receptor- mediated currents in these cells (46~. Glial-derived growth factor has been found to modulate the expression of NaN in a subpopulation of small DRG neurons, which are known to express the ret receptor (53~. Multiple neurotrophins and growth factors have effects on DRG neurons, and it is likely that sodium channel expression in these cells reflects combi- natorial effects of multiple factors. Sodium Channel Expression in Inflammatory Pain Models Several studies have demonstrated that inflammatory mole- cules such as prostaglandins and serotonin can modulate TTX-resistant sodium currents in DRG neurons (47), possibly acting through a cyclic AMP-protein kinase A cascade (48~. However, the question, of whether sodium channel gene expression is affected in inflammatory models of pain had not been addressed. To understand the role of sodium channels in Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96 (1999) ~ ( naive , 1 0 ms 5 Carr (4d) Contra E F FIG. 7. SNS mRNA levels and TTX-resistant sodium currents are increased 4 days after injection of carrageenan into the projection fields of DRG neurons. (,Upper) In situ hybridization showing SNS mRNA in carrageenan-injected (A), contralateral control (B), and naive (C) DRG. Patch-clamp recordings ( OCR for page 7635
Colloquium Paper: Waxman et al. genesis within primary sensory neurons, including DRG neu- rons. Second, a multiplicity of sodium channels are present within DRG neurons, where they probably subserve multiple functions (transduction, signal amplification, action potential electrogenesis, etc.) and interact in a complex manner. Third, DRG neurons express a number of sodium channel genes (SNS/PN3, NaN, PN1, and NaG) in a preferential manner, at levels much higher than in any other neuronal cell type. This observation may present a therapeutic opportunity for the selective manipulation of primary sensory neurons in general, or nociceptive neurons in particular. Fourth, sodium channel expression in DRG neurons is highly dynamic, with multiple sodium channel genes (including or-III, SNS/PN3, and NaN) exhibiting up- or down-regulation after various injuries to these cells. Importantly, different injuries may trigger opposing changes of certain sodium channel genes (e.g., down- regulation of SNS/PN3 after axotomy vs. up-regulation in the carageenan inflammation model) in DRG neurons, so that it may be difficult to extrapolate from one model system to another. Nevertheless, we have learned, at a minimum, that sodium channel expression in DRG neurons is dynamic and can change significantly after injury, and that changes in sodium channel expression can substantially alter excitability in these cells. Delineation of the precise role~s) of each sodium channel subtype in the physiology of DRG neurons and the patho- physiology of pain remains to be established, and the utility of selective blockade of each channel subtype as an approach to the treatment of pain will require further careful study. However, the stage has been set for these investigations. It is quite likely, in our opinion, that sodium channel blockade will emerge as a viable strategy for pharmacologic treatment of pain. This work has been supported in part by grants from the National Multiple Sclerosis Society and the Paralyzed Veterans of America/ Eastern Paralyzed Veterans Association, and by the Medical Research Service, Department of Veterans Affairs. T.R.C. was supported in part by a fellowship from the Spinal Cord Research Foundation. 12. 13. 14. 1. Ochoa, J. & Torebjork, H. E. (1980) Brain 103, 835-854. 2. Nordin, M., Nystrom, B., Wallin, U. & Hagbarth, K.-E. (1984) Pain 20, 231-245. 3. Devor, M. (1994) in Textbook of Pain, eds. Wall, P. D. & Melzack, R. (Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh), 2nd Ed., pp. 79-101. 4. Eccles, J. C., Libel, B. & Young, R. R. (1958)J. Physiol. (London) 143, 11-40. 5. Kuno, M. & Llinas, R. (1970) J. Physiol. (London) 210, 807-821. 6. Gallego, R., Ivorra, I. & Morales, A. (1987) J. Physiol. (London) 391, 39-56. 7. Gurtu, S. & Smith, P. A. (1988) J. Neurophysiol. 59, 408-423. 8. Devor, M., Keller, C. H., Deerinck, T. J. & Ellisman, M. H. (1989) Neurosci. Lett. 102, 149-154. 9. England, J. D., Gamboni, F., Ferguson, M. A. & Levinson, S. R. (1994) Muscle Nerve 17, 593-598. 10. England, J. D., Happel, L. T., Kline, D. G., Gamboni, F., Thouron, C. L., Liu, Z. P. & Levinson, S. R. (1996) Neurology 47, 272-276. 11. Waxman, S. G. & Brill, M. H. (1978) J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatr. 41, 408-417. Matzner, O. & Devor, M. (1992) Brain Res. 597, 92-98. Matzner, O. & Devor, M. (1994) J. Neurophysiol. 72, 349-359. Zhang, J.-M., Donnelly, D. F., Song, X.-J. & LaMotte, R. H. (1997) J. Neurophysiol. 78, 2790-2794. 15. Chabal, C., Russell, L. C. & Burchiel, K. J. (1989) Pain 38, 333-338. 16. Devor, M., Wall, P. D. & Catalan, N. (1992) Pain 48, 261-268. 17. Omana-Zapata, I., Khabbaz, M. A., Hunter, J. C. & They, K. R. (1997) Brain Res. 771, 228-237. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sc'. USA 96 (1999) 7639 18. Rizzo, M. A. (1997) J. Neurol. Sci. 152, 103-106. 19. Kostyuk, P. G., Veselovsky, N. S. & Tsyandryenko, A. Y. (1981) Neuroscience 6, 2423-2430. 20. Roy, M. L. & Narahashi, T. (1992) J. Neurosci. 12, 2104-2111. 21. Caffrey, J. M., Eng, D. L., Black, J. A., Waxrnan, S. G. & Kocsis, J. D. (1992) Brain Res. 592, 283-297. 22. Elliott, A. A. & Elliott, J. R. (1993) J. Physiol. (London) 463, 39-56. 23. Black, J. A., Dib-Hajj, S., McNabola, K., Jeste, S., Rizzo, M. A., Kocsis, J. D. & Waxman, S. G. (1996) Mol. Brain Res. 43, 117-132. 24. Toledo-Aral, J. J., Moss, B. L., He, Z.-J., Koszowski, A. G., Whisenand, T., Levinson, S. R., Wolff, J. J., Silos-Santiago, I., Halegoua, S. & Mandel, G. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94, 1527-1532. 25. Cummins, T. R., Howe, J. R. & Waxman, S. G. (1999) J. Neurosci. 18, 9607-9619. 26. Akopian, A. N., Sivilotti, L. & Wood, J. N. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 5953-5956. 27. Sangameswaran, L., Delgado, S. G., Fish, L. M., Koch, B. D., Jakeman, L. B., Stewart, G. R., Sze, P., Hunter, J. C., Eglen, R. M. & Herman, R. C. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 5953-5956. 28. Dib-Hajj, S. D., Tyrrell, L., Black, J. A. & Waxman, S. G. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95, 8963-8969. 29. Gautron, S., Dos Santos, G., Pinto-Henrique, D., Koulkoff, A., Gros, F. & Berwald-Netter, Y. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89, 7272-7276. 30. Felts, P. A., Black, J. A., Dib-Hajj, S. D. & Waxman, S. G. (1997) Glia 21, 269-277. 31. Rizzo, M. A., Kocsis, J. D. & Waxman, S. G. (1995) J. Neuro physzol. 72, 2796-2816. 32. Rush, A. M., Brau, M. E., Elliott, A. A. & Elliott, J. R. (1998) J. Physiol. (London) 511, 771-789. 33. Scholz, A., Appel, N. & Vogel, W. (1998) Eur. J. Neurosci. 10, 2547-2556. 34. Jeftinija, S. (1994) Brain Res. 639, 125-134. 35. Quasthoff, S., Grosskreutz, J., Schroder, J. M., Schneider, U. & Grafe, P. (1995) Neuroscience 69, 955-965. 36. Waxman, S. G., Kocsis, J. K. & Black, J. A. (1994)J. Neurophysiol. 72, 466-471. 37. Dib-Hajj, S., Black, J. A., Felts, P. & Waxman, S. G. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93, 14950-14954. 38. Rizzo, M. A., Kocsis, J. D. & Waxman, S. G. (1995) Neurobiol. Dis. 2, 87-96. 39. Cummins, T. R. & Waxman, S. G. (1997) J. Neurosci. 17, 3503-3514. 40. Rizzo, M. A., Kocsis, J. D. & Waxman, S. G. (1996) Eur. Neurol. 36, 3-12. 41. Stys, P. K., Ransom, B. R. & Waxman, S. G. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90, 6976-6980. 42. Aguayo, L. G. & White, G. (1992) Brain Res. 570, 61-67. 43. Zur, K. B., Oh, Y., Waxman, S. G. & Black, J. A. (1995) Mol. Brain Res. 30, 97-103. 44. Black, J. A., Langworthy, K., Hinson, A. W., Dib-Hajj, S. D. & Waxman, S. G. (1997) NeuroReport 8, 2331-2335. 45. Dib-Hajj, S. D., Black, J. A., Cummins, T. R., Kenney, A. M., Kocsis, J. D. & Waxman, S. G. (1998) J. Neurophysiol. 79, 2668-2678. Oyelese, A. A., Rizzo, M. A., Waxman, S. G. & Kocsis, J. D. (1997) J. Neurophysiol. 78, 31-42. 47. Gold, M. S., Reichling, D. B., Shuster, M. J. & Levine, J. D. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93, 1108-1112. 48. England, S., Bevan, S. & Docherty, R. J. (1996) J. Physiol. (London) 495, 429-440. 49. Tanaka, M., Cummins, T. R., Ishikawa, K., Dib-Hajj, S. D., Black, J. A. & Waxman, S. G. (1998) NeuroReport 9, 967-972. 50. Gould, H. J. III, England, J. D., Liu, Z. P. & Levinson, S. R. (1998) Brain Res. 802, 69-74. 51. Woolf, C. J., Safieh-Garabedian, B., Ma, Q.-P., Crilly, P. & Winter, J. (1994) Neuroscience 62, 327-331. 52. Weskamp, G. & Otten, U. (1987) J. Neurochem. 48, 1779-1786. 53. Fzell, J., Cummins, P. R., Dib-Hajj, S. D., Fried, K., Black, J. A. & Waxman, S. G. (1999) Mol. Brain Res. 67, 267-282.