| Copyright © 2009. National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Terms of Use and Privacy Statement |
Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter.
Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.
OCR for page R1
Shopping for Safety: Providing Consumer Automotive Safety Information
SPECIAL REPORT 248
Shopping for Safety
Providing Consumer Automotive Safety Information
Committee for Study of Consumer Automotive Safety Information
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD
National Research Council
National Academy Press
Washington, D.C.
1996
OCR for page R2
Shopping for Safety: Providing Consumer Automotive Safety Information
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD SPECIAL REPORT 248
Subscriber Category
IVB safety and human performance
Transportation Research Board publications are available by ordering directly from TRB. They may also be obtained on a regular basis through organizational or individual affiliation with TRB; affiliates or library subscribers are eligible for substantial discounts. For further information, write to the Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, 2101 Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20418.
Copyright 1996 by the National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Printed in the United States of America.
NOTICE: The project that is the subject of this report was approved by the Governing Board of the National Research Council, whose members are drawn from the councils of the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, and the Institute of Medicine. The members of the committee responsible for the report were chosen for their special competencies and with regard for appropriate balance.
This report has been reviewed by a group other than the authors according to the procedures approved by a Report Review Committee consisting of members of the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, and the Institute of Medicine.
The study was sponsored by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration of the U.S. Department of Transportation.
LIBRARY OF CONGRESS CATALOGING-IN-PUBLICATION DATA
National Research Council (U.S.). Committee for Study of Consumer Automotive Safety Information.
Shopping for safety : providing consumer automotive safety information / Committee for Study of Consumer Automotive Safety Information, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council.
p. cm. — (Special report / Transportation Research Board, National Research Council ; 248)
ISBN 0-309-06209-8
1. Automobiles—Crashworthiness. 2. Automobiles—Defects—Reporting. 3. Consumer education. I. Title. II. Series: Special report (National Research Council (U.S.). Transportation Research Board) ; 248.
TL242.N38 1996
381′.45629222—dc20
96-11131
CIP
Cover design: Karen L. White
OCR for page R3
Shopping for Safety: Providing Consumer Automotive Safety Information
COMMITTEE FOR STUDY OF CONSUMER AUTOMOTIVE SAFETY INFORMATION
M. GRANGER MORGAN, Chairman,
Carnegie-Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
ANN BOSTROM,
Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta
THOMAS D. GILLESPIE,
The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
LINDSAY I. GRIFFIN III,
Texas Transportation Institute, College Station
ALBERT I. KING,
Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan
WESLEY A. MAGAT,
Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
ROGER E. MAUGH,
Ford Motor Company (retired), Ann Arbor, Michigan
R. DAVID PITTLE,
Consumers Union of United States, Inc., Yonkers, New York
ALLAN F. WILLIAMS,
Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, Arlington, Virginia
Liaison Representatives
TOM CARR,
American Automobile Manufacturers Association, Washington, D.C.
GREG DANA,
Association of International Automobile Manufacturers, Arlington, Virginia
DOUGLAS GREENHAUS,
National Automobile Dealers Association, McLean, Virginia
HENRY JASNY,
Advocates for Highway and Auto Safety, Washington, D.C.
STEPHEN R. KRATZKE,
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, D.C.
RICHARD PAIN,
Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
Transportation Research Board Staff
NANCY P. HUMPHREY, Study Director
OCR for page R4
Shopping for Safety: Providing Consumer Automotive Safety Information
This page in the original is blank.
OCR for page R5
Shopping for Safety: Providing Consumer Automotive Safety Information
PREFACE
Mindful of growing consumer interest in motor vehicle safety features and the federal role in providing consumer automotive safety information, Congress requested an independent study of consumer information needs by the National Academy of Sciences. The Conference Committee Report authorizing the study recognized that the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) already provides information to consumers on the crashworthiness of vehicles in frontal collisions. However, the information is limited in scope and does not provide a comprehensive assessment of a vehicle's likely overall safety performance. Hence the request for a study, sponsored by NHTSA, that would broadly examine motor vehicle consumer safety information needs and the most cost-effective methods of communicating this information to the public.
Growth of the consumer movement in the 1960s and 1970s led to the introduction of information regulations in the belief that incomplete or inaccurate information about product attributes and risks can distort consumer choices and lessen the incentives for firms to produce safer products. Information labels and hazard warnings proliferated on consumer products ranging from household chemical cleaners to food products to major appliances.
In theory, more complete information should foster more informed purchase decisions, at the same time allowing for individual differences in preferences and risk aversion. In practice, the results have been mixed. Information is effective to the extent that consumers perceive it as important and are able to process and use the message conveyed. Thus this study examines what vehicle safety information should be developed for consumers. It also addresses how the information should be structured and communicated and how a process can be put in place that promotes continuing improvements in consumer information and safer vehicle designs.
To conduct the study, the Transportation Research Board (TRB) formed a panel of nine members under the leadership of M. Granger Morgan, Head of the Department of Engineering and Public Policy at
OCR for page R6
Shopping for Safety: Providing Consumer Automotive Safety Information
Carnegie-Mellon University. The committee includes experts in motor vehicle and highway safety, highway safety data, consumer education and information, risk communication, information regulation and public policy, product evaluation, and product development and manufacturing. Panel members, who are drawn from universities, highway safety organizations, the insurance industry, and consumer groups, reached consensus on all the report findings and recommendations.
The committee wishes to acknowledge the work of many individuals and organizations who contributed to the report, in particular those who participated in a 1-day workshop held early in the committee 's deliberations.1 The workshop, which responded to congressional concerns that the committee obtain the views of a wide array of experts, from industry to consumer and safety advocates, addressed motor vehicle safety information needs and public perceptions of safety in automobile purchase decisions. Special thanks are expressed to Eva Kasten, Executive Vice President of the Advertising Council, Inc., who provided the committee with information about public advertising strategies and moderated one of the workshop sessions.
Nancy P. Humphrey managed the study and drafted major portions of the final report under the guidance of the committee and the supervision of Stephen R. Godwin, Director of Studies and Information Services. Suzanne Schneider, Assistant Executive Director of TRB, managed the report review process. In accordance with the National Research Council report review procedures, the report was reviewed by an independent group of reviewers.
The final report was edited and prepared for publication under the supervision of Nancy A. Ackerman, Director of Reports and Editorial Services, TRB. Special appreciation is expressed to Norman Solomon, who edited the report; to Rona Briere, who helped reorganize sections of the report, and to Marguerite Schneider, who assisted in meetings, logistics, and communications with the committee and provided word processing support for numerous drafts.
NOTE
1. The workshop agenda, including speakers, is included as Appendix A.
OCR for page R7
Shopping for Safety: Providing Consumer Automotive Safety Information
CONTENTS
Executive Summary
1
1
Introduction and Overview
10
Legislative Context and Scope of Study
11
What Is Vehicle Safety?
13
Crash Causation and the Role of Vehicle-Related Factors
14
Federal Regulation of Vehicle Safety Features
15
Driver Attitudes to Crash Likelihood and Vehicle Safety
17
Institutional Issues
18
Implications for Study
18
Organization of Report
19
2
Current Understanding of Motor Vehicle Crash Avoidance and Crashworthiness
24
Vehicle Safety Data
24
Current State of Knowledge from Available Data
29
Summary of the State of Knowledge
47
3
Currently Available Consumer Automotive Safety Information
56
Sources of Consumer Vehicle Safety Information
56
Dissemination Outlets
61
Development of the NCAP Star-Rating System: A Case Study
64
Strengths and Weaknesses of Current Information
67
Why Better Information Is Not Provided
69
Making Better Use of Existing Information
71
OCR for page R8
Shopping for Safety: Providing Consumer Automotive Safety Information
4
Consumer Decision Making, Information Needs, and Communication Strategies
76
Framework for Understanding Major Product Purchase Decisions
76
Automobile Purchase Decisions and the Importance of Vehicle Safety Information
80
Structuring and Communicating Vehicle Safety Information
88
Research Needs
99
5
Developing and Communicating New Measures of Safety
110
Attributes of Good Summary Measures
110
Designing Effective Communications
113
Content of Communications
116
Getting the Message Out
124
6
Organizational Arrangements
127
Organizational Objectives
127
Institutional Concept and Functions
128
Organizational Options
129
Implementation Strategy and Next Steps
138
Benefits of Consumer Vehicle Safety Information
139
Appendix A
Workshop Agenda and Speakers, June 21, 1995
143
Appendix B
Congressional Requests for Consumer Automotive Safety Information Study, 1994
147
Appendix C
Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards for Passenger Cars and Light Truck Vehicles
149
Appendix D
Interview Protocol and Questionnaire
154
Study Committee Biographical Information
157