6
CONCLUSION

On the basis of experiments in mathematics, immunology, and materials science and engineering, COSEPUP concludes that international benchmarking by panels of experts can provide an efficient and reasonably objective means of assessing the world leadership status of the United States in research fields.

The committee suggests further that such assessments can be completed in a timely fashion and at reasonable cost. Such a technique might be useful to policy-makers and federal agencies in evaluating their leadership status in research programs (for example, to comply with the GPRA).

In summary, benchmarking seems well suited to

  • Assessing whether US researchers in a field are among or behind the world leaders or are the world leader and determining the leadership status of the United States in particular subfields.

  • Identifying institutional and human-resources factors that are crucial to maintaining leadership status in a field.



The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement



Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 27
Experiments in International Benchmarking of US Research Fields 6 CONCLUSION On the basis of experiments in mathematics, immunology, and materials science and engineering, COSEPUP concludes that international benchmarking by panels of experts can provide an efficient and reasonably objective means of assessing the world leadership status of the United States in research fields. The committee suggests further that such assessments can be completed in a timely fashion and at reasonable cost. Such a technique might be useful to policy-makers and federal agencies in evaluating their leadership status in research programs (for example, to comply with the GPRA). In summary, benchmarking seems well suited to Assessing whether US researchers in a field are among or behind the world leaders or are the world leader and determining the leadership status of the United States in particular subfields. Identifying institutional and human-resources factors that are crucial to maintaining leadership status in a field.

OCR for page 27
Experiments in International Benchmarking of US Research Fields This page in the original is blank.