National Academies Press: OpenBook

Streamlining Space Launch Range Safety (2000)

Chapter: Front Matter

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2000. Streamlining Space Launch Range Safety. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9790.
×

STREAMLINING SPACE LAUNCH RANGE SAFETY

Committee on Space Launch Range Safety

Aeronautics and Space Engineering Board

Commission on Engineering and Technical Systems

National Research Council

NATIONAL ACADEMY PRESS
Washington, D.C.

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2000. Streamlining Space Launch Range Safety. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9790.
×

NOTICE: The project that is the subject of this report was approved by the Governing Board of the National Research Council, whose members are drawn from the councils of the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, and the Institute of Medicine. The members of the committee responsible for the report were chosen for their special competencies and with regard for appropriate balance.

This study was supported by the U.S. Air Force Space Command under contract No. FO5604-99-C-9004. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the view of the Air Force.

International Standard Book Number: 0-309-06931-9

Available in limited supply from: Aeronautics and Space Engineering Board, HA 292, 2101 Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 20418. (202) 334-2855 www4.national-academies.org/cets/asebhome.nsf

Additional copies available for sale from:
National Academy Press,
2101 Constitution Avenue, N.W. Box 285, Washington, DC 20055. 1-800-624-6242 or (202) 334-3313 (in the Washington Metropolitan area). www.nap.edu

Copyright 2000 by the National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.

Printed in the United States of America

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2000. Streamlining Space Launch Range Safety. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9790.
×

THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES

National Academy of Sciences

National Academy of Engineering

Institute of Medicine

National Research Council

The National Academy of Sciences is a private, nonprofit, self-perpetuating society of distinguished scholars engaged in scientific and engineering research, dedicated to the furtherance of science and technology and to their use for the general welfare. Upon the authority of the charter granted to it by the Congress in 1863, the Academy has a mandate that requires it to advise the federal government on scientific and technical matters. Dr. Bruce M. Alberts is president of the National Academy of Sciences.

The National Academy of Engineering was established in 1964, under the charter of the National Academy of Sciences, as a parallel organization of outstanding engineers. It is autonomous in its administration and in the selection of its members, sharing with the National Academy of Sciences the responsibility for advising the federal government. The National Academy of Engineering also sponsors engineering programs aimed at meeting national needs, encourages education and research, and recognizes the superior achievements of engineers. Dr. William A. Wulf is president of the National Academy of Engineering.

The Institute of Medicine was established in 1970 by the National Academy of Sciences to secure the services of eminent members of appropriate professions in the examination of policy matters pertaining to the health of the public. The Institute acts under the responsibility given to the National Academy of Sciences by its congressional charter to be an adviser to the federal government and, upon its own initiative, to identify issues of medical care, research, and education. Dr. Kenneth I. Shine is president of the Institute of Medicine.

The National Research Council was organized by the National Academy of Sciences in 1916 to associate the broad community of science and technology with the Academy’s purposes of furthering knowledge and advising the federal government. Functioning in accordance with general policies determined by the Academy, the Council has become the principal operating agency of both the National Academy of Sciences and the National Academy of Engineering in providing services to the government, the public, and the scientific and engineering communities. The Council is administered jointly by both Academies and the Institute of Medicine. Dr. Bruce M. Alberts and Dr. William A. Wulf are chairman and vice chairman, respectively, of the National Research Council.

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2000. Streamlining Space Launch Range Safety. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9790.
×

COMMITTEE ON SPACE LAUNCH RANGE SAFETY

ROBERT E. WHITEHEAD, chair,

National Aeronautics and Space Administration (retired), Henrico, North Carolina

W. GAINEY BEST II,

Lockheed Martin Astronautics, Denver, Colorado

JOHN L. BYRON,

Johnson Controls, Inc., Cocoa Beach, Florida

BENJAMIN A. COSGROVE,

Boeing Commercial Airplane Group (retired), Seattle, Washington

JAMES W. DANAHER,

National Transportation Safety Board (retired), Alexandria, Virginia

KINGSTON A. GEORGE, aerospace consultant,

Santa Maria, California

BILL HAWLEY,

Hughes Space and Communications, Los Angeles, California

JAMES K. KUCHAR,

Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge

JOYCE A. McDEVITT,

Futron Corporation, Washington, D.C.

JOSEPH MELTZER,

Aerospace Corporation (retired), Redondo Beach, California

JIMMEY MORRELL,

U.S. Air Force (retired), Melbourne, Florida

NORMAN H. SCHUTZBERGER,

TRW Components International, Torrance, California

Liaison from the Aeronautics and Space Engineering Board

FREDERICK HAUCK,

AXA Space, Bethesda, Maryland

Staff

ALAN ANGLEMAN, Study Director

DOUGLAS BENNETT, Research Associate

CHRIS JONES, Senior Administrative Assistant

GEORGE LEVIN, Director,

Aeronautics and Space Engineering Board

JENNIFER PINKERMAN, Research Associate

LINDA VOSS, Technical Writer

MARVIN WEEKS, Senior Administrative Assistant

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2000. Streamlining Space Launch Range Safety. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9790.
×

AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ENGINEERING BOARD

WILLIAM W. HOOVER, chair,

U.S. Air Force (retired), Williamsburg, Virginia

A. DWIGHT ABBOTT,

Aerospace Corporation, Los Angeles, California

WILLIAM F. BALLHAUS, JR.,

Lockheed Martin Corporation, Bethesda, Maryland

RUZENA BAJSCY,

NAE, IOM, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia

ANTHNY J. BRODERICK, Aviation Safety Consultant,

Catlett, Virginia

AARON COHEN,

NAE, Texas A&M University, College Station

DONALD L. CROMER,

U.S. Air Force (retired), Lompoc, California

HOYT DAVIDSON,

Donaldson, Lufkin, and Jenrette, New York, New York

ROBERT A. DAVIS,

The Boeing Company (retired), Seattle, Washington

DONALD C. FRASER,

NAE, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts

JOSEPH FULLER, JR.,

Futron Corporation, Bethesda, Maryland

ROBERT C. GOETZ,

Lockheed Martin Skunk Works, Palmdale, California

RICHARD GOLASZEWSKI,

GRA Inc., Jenkintown, Pennsylvania

JAMES M. GUYETTE,

Rolls-Royce North America, Reston, Virginia

FREDERICK HAUCK,

AXA Space, Bethesda, Maryland

JOHN K. LAUBER,

Airbus Industrie of North America, Washington, D.C.

GEORGE MUELLNER,

The Boeing Company, Seal Beach, California

DAVA J. NEWMAN,

Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge

JAMES G. O’CONNOR,

NAE, Pratt & Whitney (retired), Coventry, Connecticut

WINSTON E. SCOTT,

Florida State University, Tallahassee

KATHRYN C. THORNTON,

University of Virginia, Charlottesville

DIANNE S. WILEY,

Northrop Grumman, Pico Rivera, California

RAY A. WILLIAMSON,

George Washington University, Washington, D.C.

Staff

GEORGE LEVIN, Director

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2000. Streamlining Space Launch Range Safety. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9790.
×
This page in the original is blank.
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2000. Streamlining Space Launch Range Safety. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9790.
×

Preface

Space launch is inherently risky, and accidents are not uncommon. However, the U.S. national ranges have an outstanding safety record. Never has a member of the public or the launch site workforce been killed as a result of a launch from the national ranges. The aging systems that have achieved this record are being modernized to improve performance and reduce costs. As part of this effort, the National Research Council (NRC) was asked to determine if alternate approaches to public safety might be more efficient and less expensive than current methods.

Because space launch activities and associated safety practices are highly technical, this study examined the technologies associated with launch range safety and assessed the ability of advanced technologies to improve efficiency and reduce costs. However, because safety also depends on other factors, the study was not a purely technological assessment. The statement of task called for a comprehensive review that included range safety guidelines and procedures. In addition, during the course of the study the committee concluded that a complete response to the statement of task would require that top-level organizational issues related to the efficiency and cost of range safety also be examined. The Air Force Space Command, which sponsored this study, concurred, and the committee’s findings and recommendations are framed accordingly.

The NRC appointed 10 individuals to the Committee on Space Launch Range Safety, which conducted this study. Like all NRC study committees, the membership was announced and comments from the general public were solicited regarding the committee’s composition and balance. A number of comments urged that the committee be expanded to include individuals who had worked for range safety organizations. In response, the NRC decided to add two members: a former commander of the 45th Space Wing, which operates the Eastern Range, and a former chief engineer and deputy director for safety at the 30th Space Wing, which operates the Western Range. Some committee members had experience with major launch vehicle manufacturers, satellite manufacturers, and other users, as well as technical expertise in risk analysis, global positioning system (GPS) technology, and public safety. Also, to provide an impartial, outside perspective, several committee members had little or no launch industry experience. Thus, the committee was well qualified to conduct both the technical and nontechnical aspects of the statement of task.

This study benefited from an extraordinary level of public interest. More than 100 individuals from interested organizations and members of the general public attended the committee’s information-gathering meetings, which included opportunities for public input. This broad participation greatly contributed to the committee’s deliberations, and the committee is indebted to everyone who gave of their time and talent during the meetings.

This report is being issued in parallel with a number of other reports concerned with launch range safety, infrastructure, operations, and organization. The findings and recommendations herein endorse some of the actions currently under way, recommend the acceleration and extension of others, and suggest some new initiatives. In particular, the committee recommends that the Air Force retain its key safety standards and make greater use of those standards for managing risk. By moving away from costly risk avoidance practices, the Air Force would conform range safety procedures to accepted risk standards and reduce costs for both the Air Force and the user community without compromising public safety.

This report has been reviewed by individuals chosen for their diverse perspectives and technical expertise, in accordance with procedures approved by the NRC’s Report Review Committee. The purpose of this independent review is to provide candid and critical comments that will assist the authors and the NRC in making the published report as sound as possible and to ensure that the report meets institutional standards for objectivity, evidence, and responsiveness to

Page viii Cite
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2000. Streamlining Space Launch Range Safety. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9790.
×

the study charge. The content of the review comments and draft manuscript remain confidential to protect the integrity of the deliberative process. We wish to thank the following individuals for their participation in the review of this report:

Silas Baker, Jr., Lockheed Martin (retired)

Robert Crippen, Thiokol Propulsion

Donald Cromer, U.S. Air Force (retired)

Robert Frosch, Harvard University

Daniel Hastings, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Donald Henderson, U.S. Air Force (retired)

Hal Lewis, University of California, Santa Barbara

James Means, SRI International

Sheila Widnall, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

While the individuals listed above have provided many constructive comments and suggestions, responsibility for the final content of this report rests solely with the authoring committee and the NRC.

Robert E. Whitehead, Chair

Committee on Space Launch Range Safety

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2000. Streamlining Space Launch Range Safety. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9790.
×
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2000. Streamlining Space Launch Range Safety. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9790.
×

Tables and Figures

TABLES

3-1

 

Comparison of Maximum Acceptable Collective Risks,

 

19

3-2

 

Probability of Failure vs. Phase for the Atlas IIAS,

 

23

FIGURES

ES-1

 

Comparison of life-cycle costs for radar and GPS-based range tracking systems,

 

4

3-1

 

Air Force roles and responsibilities for space launch,

 

16

3-2

 

Instantaneous impact point trace and Africa gate location for Titan IV-B25,

 

21

3-3

 

Ground track and elevation angle for an Atlas IIA launched from Pad 36A at the Eastern Range on an initial flight azimuth of 104 degrees,

 

22

3-4

 

Probability of failure vs. phase for the Atlas IIAS,

 

23

4-1

 

Changes in range tracking support under the RSA range modernization program,

 

28

4-2

 

Comparison of life-cycle costs for radar and GPS-based range tracking systems,

 

32

4-3

 

Flight safety angle limits,

 

34

5-1

 

Samples of multiple boat-hit contours,

 

39

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2000. Streamlining Space Launch Range Safety. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9790.
×
This page in the original is blank.
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2000. Streamlining Space Launch Range Safety. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9790.
×
Page R1
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2000. Streamlining Space Launch Range Safety. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9790.
×
Page R2
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2000. Streamlining Space Launch Range Safety. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9790.
×
Page R3
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2000. Streamlining Space Launch Range Safety. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9790.
×
Page R4
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2000. Streamlining Space Launch Range Safety. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9790.
×
Page R5
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2000. Streamlining Space Launch Range Safety. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9790.
×
Page R6
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2000. Streamlining Space Launch Range Safety. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9790.
×
Page R7
Page viii Cite
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2000. Streamlining Space Launch Range Safety. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9790.
×
Page R8
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2000. Streamlining Space Launch Range Safety. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9790.
×
Page R9
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2000. Streamlining Space Launch Range Safety. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9790.
×
Page R10
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2000. Streamlining Space Launch Range Safety. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9790.
×
Page R11
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2000. Streamlining Space Launch Range Safety. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9790.
×
Page R12
Next: Executive Summary »
Streamlining Space Launch Range Safety Get This Book
×
Buy Paperback | $36.00 Buy Ebook | $28.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

The U.S. space program is rapidly changing from an activity driven by federal government launches to one driven by commercial launches. In 1997, for the first time commercial launches outnumbered government launches at the Eastern Range (ER), located at Cape Canaveral Air Station, Florida. Commercial activity is also increasing at the Western Range (WR), located at Vandenberg Air Force Base, California. The government itself is emulating commercial customers, shifting from direct management of launch programs to the purchase of space launch services from U.S. commercial launch companies in an open, competitive market.

The fundamental goal of the U.S. space program is to ensure safe, reliable, and affordable access to space. Despite the inherent danger of space launches, the U.S. space program has demonstrated its ability to protect the public. No launch site worker or member of the general public has been killed or seriously injured in any of the 4,600 launches conducted at the ER and WR during the entire 50-year history of the space age.

Streamlining Space Launch Range Safety discusses whether range safety processes can be made more efficient and less costly without compromising public safety. This report presents six primary recommendations, which address risk management, Africa gates, roles and responsibilities, range safety documentation [EWR 127-1]), global positioning system (GPS) receiver tracking systems, and risk standards for aircraft and ships.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!