References

Abdal-Haqq, Ismat. 1998. Professional Development Schools: Weighing the Evidence. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET). 1997. Engineering Criteria 2000, 3rd ed. Baltimore, MD: Author.

American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). 1989. Science for All Americans. Washington, DC: Author.

AAAS. 1990. The Liberal Art of Science: Agenda for Action. Washington, DC: Author.

AAAS. 1993. Benchmarks for Science Literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.

American Association of Community Colleges (AACC). 2000. National Community College Snapshot. Washington, DC: Author. Available at <http://199.75.76.25/allaboutcc/snapshot.htm>

American Chemical Society (ACS). 1989. Recommendations for the Education of Chemistry Teachers. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society Committee on Education.

American Council on Education (ACE). 1999. To Touch the Future: Transforming the Way Teachers Are Taught. An Action Agenda for College and University Presidents. Washington, DC: Author.

American Federation of Teachers (AFT). 2000. Building a Profession: Strengthening Teacher Preparation and Induction. Report of the K-16 Teacher Education Task Force. Washington, DC: Author. Also available at <http://www.aft.org/higher_ed/reports/K16report.html>.

American Institute of Physics (AIP). 1999. Statement on the Education of Future Teachers. College Park, MD: Author. Available at <http://www.aip.org/education/futeach.htm>.

American Mathematical Association of Two-Year Colleges (AMATYC). 1995. Crossroads in Mathematics: Standards for Introductory College Mathematics Before Calculus. Memphis, TN.: Author.

Anderson, R.D., and Mitchener, C.P. 1994. Research on Science Teacher Education. Handbook of Research on Science Teaching and Learning . National Science Teachers Association. New York: Macmillan Publishing.

Apple. M. (ed.). 1997. Review of Research in Education. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.

Ariza, E.N., Knee, R.H., and Ridge, M.L. 2000. “Uniting teachers to embrace 21st century technology: A critical mass in a cohort of colleagues.” Technological Horizons in Education. 27(10): 22-30.

Arons, A.B. 1990. A Guide to Introductory Physics Teaching. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

Asimov, N. 1999. “Neediest students get least-prepared teachers.” San Francisco Chronicle, Dec. 3, 1999. Also available at <http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/1999/12/03/MN45594.DTL>.

Association for the Education of Teachers of Science (AETS). 1997. Professional Standards for Science Teacher Educators. Available at <http://www.aets.unr.edu>.

Association of American Universities (AAU). 1999. “Resolution on Teacher Education.” Washington, DC: Association of American



The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement



Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 131
Educating Teachers of Science, Mathematics, and Technology: New Practices for the New Millenium References Abdal-Haqq, Ismat. 1998. Professional Development Schools: Weighing the Evidence. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press. Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET). 1997. Engineering Criteria 2000, 3rd ed. Baltimore, MD: Author. American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). 1989. Science for All Americans. Washington, DC: Author. AAAS. 1990. The Liberal Art of Science: Agenda for Action. Washington, DC: Author. AAAS. 1993. Benchmarks for Science Literacy. New York: Oxford University Press. American Association of Community Colleges (AACC). 2000. National Community College Snapshot. Washington, DC: Author. Available at <http://199.75.76.25/allaboutcc/snapshot.htm> American Chemical Society (ACS). 1989. Recommendations for the Education of Chemistry Teachers. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society Committee on Education. American Council on Education (ACE). 1999. To Touch the Future: Transforming the Way Teachers Are Taught. An Action Agenda for College and University Presidents. Washington, DC: Author. American Federation of Teachers (AFT). 2000. Building a Profession: Strengthening Teacher Preparation and Induction. Report of the K-16 Teacher Education Task Force. Washington, DC: Author. Also available at <http://www.aft.org/higher_ed/reports/K16report.html>. American Institute of Physics (AIP). 1999. Statement on the Education of Future Teachers. College Park, MD: Author. Available at <http://www.aip.org/education/futeach.htm>. American Mathematical Association of Two-Year Colleges (AMATYC). 1995. Crossroads in Mathematics: Standards for Introductory College Mathematics Before Calculus. Memphis, TN.: Author. Anderson, R.D., and Mitchener, C.P. 1994. Research on Science Teacher Education. Handbook of Research on Science Teaching and Learning . National Science Teachers Association. New York: Macmillan Publishing. Apple. M. (ed.). 1997. Review of Research in Education. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association. Ariza, E.N., Knee, R.H., and Ridge, M.L. 2000. “Uniting teachers to embrace 21st century technology: A critical mass in a cohort of colleagues.” Technological Horizons in Education. 27(10): 22-30. Arons, A.B. 1990. A Guide to Introductory Physics Teaching. New York: John Wiley and Sons. Asimov, N. 1999. “Neediest students get least-prepared teachers.” San Francisco Chronicle, Dec. 3, 1999. Also available at <http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/1999/12/03/MN45594.DTL>. Association for the Education of Teachers of Science (AETS). 1997. Professional Standards for Science Teacher Educators. Available at <http://www.aets.unr.edu>. Association of American Universities (AAU). 1999. “Resolution on Teacher Education.” Washington, DC: Association of American

OCR for page 131
Educating Teachers of Science, Mathematics, and Technology: New Practices for the New Millenium Universities. Available at <http://www.tulane.edu/~aau/TeacherEdRes.html>.. Bacon, W.S. 2000. Bringing the Excitement of Science to the Classroom: Using Summer Research Programs to Invigorate High School Science. Tucson, AZ: Research Corporation. Ball, D.L. 1988. “Research on teacher learning: Studying how teachers’ knowledge changes.” Action in Teacher Education 10(2): 17-24. Ball, D.L. 1990. “Prospective elementary and secondary teachers’ understanding of division. “Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 21: 132-144. Ball, D.L. 1997. “Developing Mathematics Reform: What Don’t We Know About Teacher Learning-But Would Make Good Working Hypotheses.” In Friel, S.N., and Bright, G.W. (eds.), Reflecting on Our Work: NSF Teacher Enhancement in Mathematics. New York: University Press of America. Ball, D.L. 1998. “Unlearning to teach mathematics.” For the Learning of Mathematics 8(1): 40-48. Ball, D.L., and Wilson, S.M. 1990. “Becoming a Mathematics Teacher through College-Based and Alternate Routes: The Relationship between Knowing Your Subject and Learning to Teach It.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, April 1990, Boston. Becker, H.J. 1990. “Computer use in the United States: 1989. An initial report of U.S. participation in the IEA computers in education survey.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, April 1990, Boston. Becker, H.J., and Anderson, R. 1998. “Teaching, Learning, and Computing: 1998.” Available at <http://www.crito.uci.edu/tlc/html/findings.html>. Biehle, J.T., Motz, L.L, and West, S.S. 1999. NSTA Guide to School Science Facilities. Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers Association. Boles, K., and Troen, V. 1997. “How the emergence of teacher leadership helped build a professional development school.” In Levine, M. and Trachtman, R. (eds.), Making Professional Development Schools Work. New York: Teachers College Press. Borko, H., et al. 1993. “To teach mathematics for conceptual or procedural knowledge? A dilemma of learning to teach in the New World Order of mathematics education reform.” Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 24(2): 2-23. Boyer, S., and Layman, J. 1998. “CEPT Guidelines: introduction.” In NSF Collaboratives for Excellence in Teacher Preparation: Guidelines for Reform. Fourth annual CEPT meeting in Arlington, Virginia. Washington DC: National Science Foundation. Brandt, R., ed. 2000. Education in a New Era. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Brennan, S., Thames, W., and Roberts, R. 1999. “Kentucky—Mentoring for Success.” Educational Leadership 56(8): 49-52. Brown, C.A., and Borko, H. 1992. Becoming a Mathematics Teacher. In Grouws, D.A. (ed.), Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning. New York: Macmillan Publishing. Brown, C.A., Silver, E.A., and Smith, M.S. 1995. The Missing Link in Mathematics Instructional Reform in Urban Schools: The Assistance Provided by Resource Partners in the QUASAR Project. Presentation at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, April. Byrd, D.M., and McIntyre, S.J. 1999. Research on Professional Development Schools: Teacher Education Yearbook VII. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press, Callan, P.M., and Usdan, M.D. 1999. “Two different worlds.” American School Board Journal, December issue. pp. 44-46. Carlsen, W.S. 1987. “Why do you ask? The effects of science teacher subject-matter knowledge on teacher questioning and classroom discourse.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association (ERIC Document Reproduction Service NO.ED 293:181). Carlsen, W. 1988. “The effect of science teacher subject matter knowledge on teacher questioning and classroom discourse. Unpublished doctoral dissertation.” Stanford University, CA. Carpenter, T.P., Fennema, E., Petersen, P. L., and Carey, D. 1988. “Teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge of students’ problem solving in elementary arithmetic.” Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 19: 385-401. Carpenter, T.P., Fennema, A., Peterson, P.L., Chiang, C., and Loef, M. 1989. “Using knowledge of children’s mathematics thinking in

OCR for page 131
Educating Teachers of Science, Mathematics, and Technology: New Practices for the New Millenium classroom teaching: an experimental study.” Educational Research Journal 26(4): 499-531. CEO Forum on Education and Technology. 1999. “Professional Development: A Link to Better Learning.” The CEO Forum School Technology and Readiness Report. Washington, DC: Author. CEO Forum on Education and Technology. 2000. “Repairing a New Generation of Teachers—Teacher Preparation STaR Chart: A Self-Assessment Tool for Colleges of Education.” Washington, DC: Author. Chaney, B 1995. “Student outcomes and the professional preparation of eighth-grade teachers in science and mathematics: NSF/ NELS.” Rockville, MD: Westat. Coble, C.R., and Koballa, T. R. 1996. Science Education. Handbook of Research on Science Teaching and Learning. National Science Teachers Association. New York: Macmillan Publishing. Cochran, K.F. 1997. “Pedagogical content knowledge: Teachers’ integration of subject matter, pedagogy, students, and learning environments.” Brief. Research Matters – to the Science Teacher. No. 9702. National Association of Research in Science Teaching. Cohen, D.K., and Hill, H.C. 1998. Instructional Policy and Classroom Performance: The Mathematics Reform in California. CPRE Research Report Series. RR-39. Coleman, J.S., Campbell, E.Q., Hobson, C.J., McPortland, J., Mood, A.M., Weinfield, E.D., and York, R. 1966. “Equality of Educational Opportunity.” Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. Conference Board of the Mathematical Sciences (CBMS). In preparation. “CBMS Mathematical Education of Teachers Project.” Draft Report, -March 2000. Available at <http://www.maa.org/cbms/metdraft/index.htm> Confrey, J., Castro-Filho, J., and Wilhelm, J. In press. “Implementation research as a means to link systemic reform and applied psychology in mathematics education.” Educational Psychologist. Cooney, T.J. 1994. “Teacher education as an exercise in adaptation.” In: Aichele, D.B. and Coxford, A.F. (eds.), Professional Development for Teachers of Mathematics, 1994 Yearbook Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. pp. 9-22. Cuban, L., and Kirkpatrick, H. 1998. “Computers make kids smarter, right?” Technos 7(2): 26-31. Darling-Hammond, L. 1997. The Right to Learn: A Blueprint for Creating Schools that Work. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Darling-Hammond, L. 1998. “Teachers and Teaching: Testing Policy Hypotheses from a National Commission Report.” Educational Researcher 27(1): 5-15. Darling-Hammond, L., and Berry, B. 1998. “Investing in Teaching: The Dividend Is Student Achievement.” Education Week, May 27, 1998, p. 48. Darling-Hammond, L., and Macdonald, M.B. 2000. “Where There Is Learning There Is Hope: The Preparation of Teachers at the Bank Street College of Education.” In Darling-Hammond, L. (ed.). Studies of Excellence in Teacher Education: Preparation at the Graduate Level. Washington, DC: American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education. pp. 1-95. Del Prete, T. 1997. “The rounds model of professional development.” From the Inside 1(1): 12-13. Dietz, M.E. 1999. “Critical Components in the Preparation of Teachers.” In Roth, R.A. (ed.) The Role of the University in the Preparation of Teachers. Philadelphia, PA: Falmer Press, pp. 226-240. Downes, S. 2000. “Commentary: Nine Rules for Good Technology.” Technology Source, July/ August issue. Also available at <http://horizon.unc.edu/TS/commentary/200007a.asp>. Druva, C.A., and Anderson, R.D. 1983. “Science Teacher Characteristics by Teacher Behavior and by Student Outcome: A Meta-Analysis of Research.”Journal of Research in Science Training 20(5): 467-479. Edelfelt, R. (ed.). 1999. “University-School Teacher Education Partnerships: First Year Report.” Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina. Also available at <http://www.ga.unc.edu/21stcenturyschools/reports/>. Education Commission of the States. 2000. In Pursuit of Quality Teaching: Five Key Strategies for Policymakers. Denver, CO: Author. Education Trust. 1998. “Good Teaching Matters—How Well-Qualified Teachers Can Close the Gap.” Thinking K-16 3(2). Education Week. 2000. “Quality Counts 2000: Who Should Teach?” Available at <http://www.edweek.org/sreports/qc00/>.

OCR for page 131
Educating Teachers of Science, Mathematics, and Technology: New Practices for the New Millenium Feistritzer, C.E. 1999a. “The Evolution of Alternative Teacher Certification.” The Educational Forum 58, Winter Edition, 132-138. Feistritzer, C.E. 1999b. The Making of a Teacher: A Report on Teacher Preparation in the U.S. Washington, DC: Center for Education Information. Feistritzer, C.E., and Chester, D.T. 2000. Alternative Teacher Certification: a State-by-State Analysis. Washington DC: National Center for Education Information. Fennema, E., and Franke, M.L. 1992. “Teachers’ knowledge and its impact.” In: Grouws, D.A. (ed.), Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. Ferguson, R.F. 1991. “Paying for public education: new evidence on how and why money matters.” Harvard Journal on Legislation 28(2): 465-498. Ferguson, R.F., and Ladd, H.F. 1996. “How and Why Money Matters: An Analysis of Alabama Schools. “In Ladd, Helen (ed.), Holding Schools Accountable. Washington DC: The Brookings Institution. Fetler, M. 1999. “High School Staff Characteristics and Mathematics Test Results.” Education Policy Analysis Archives 7(9): 1-19. Fideler, E.F., and Haselkorn, D. 1999. Learning the Ropes: Urban Teacher Induction Programs and Practices in the United States. Belmont, MA: Recruiting New Teachers. Flexner, A. 1910. “Medical education in the United States and Canada: a report to the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.” New York: Bulletin of the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, Vol. 4. Fuhrman, H., and Massell, D. 1992. Issues and Strategies in Systemic Reform. New Brunswick, NJ and Philadelphia, PA: Consortium for Policy Research in Education (CPRE). Fullan, M.G. 1993. Why Teachers Must Become Change Agents. Educational Leadership 50(6). Gess-Newsome, J., and Lederman, N. 1993. “Preservice biology teachers’ knowledge structures as a function of professional teacher education: A year-long assessment.” Science Education 77, 25-45. Good, T., Biddle, B., and Brophy, J. 1975. Teachers Make a Difference. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. Goodlad, J. 1990. Teachers for Our Nation’s Schools. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Goodlad, J. 1994. Educational Renewal: Better Teachers, Better Schools. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Grouws, D.A., and Schultz, K.A. 1996. In Sikula, J. (ed.), Handbook of Research on Teacher Education, 2nd ed. New York: Macmillan. Halford, J.M. 1998. “Easing the way for new teachers.” Educational Leadership 55(5): 33-36. Hanushek, E.A. 1992. “The Trade-off between Child Quantity and Quality.” Journal of Political Economy 100(1): 84-117. Harmon, M., Smith, T.A., Martin, M.O., Kelly, D.L., Beaton, A.E, Mullis, I.V.S., Gonzalez, E.J., and Orpwood, G. 1997. Performance Assessment in IEA’s Third International Mathematics and Science Study. Chestnut Hill, MA: International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement. Hart, P.D. Research Associates, Inc. 1999. “Key Findings from Research on Young Americans’ Interest in the Public School Teaching Profession.” Report commissioned by the Milken Family Foundation. Santa Monica, CA: Milken Family Foundation. Haselkorn, D., and Harris, L. 1998. The Essential Profession: a National Survey of Public Attitudes Toward Teaching, Educational Opportunity, and School Reform. Belmont, MA: Recruiting New Teachers. Hashweh, M.Z. 1986. “An exploratory study of teacher knowledge and teaching: the effects of science teachers’ knowledge of subject matter and their conceptions of learning on their teaching.” Doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, 1985. Dissertation Abstracts International 46:3672A. Hashweh, M. 1987. “Effects of subject matter knowledge in the teaching of biology and physics.” Teaching and Teacher Education 3(2): 109-120. Hawk, P., Coble, C., and Swanson, M. 1985. “Certification: It Does Matter.” Journal of Teacher Education. May-June issue. Hawkins, E.F., Stancavage, F.B., and Dossey, J.A. 1998. “School Policies and Practices Affecting Instruction in Mathematics: Findings from the National Assessment of Educational Progress.” National Center for Education Statistics. Office of Educational Research and Improvement.

OCR for page 131
Educating Teachers of Science, Mathematics, and Technology: New Practices for the New Millenium Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. Henderson, D. 2000. “Texas Teachers, Moonlighting, and Morale: 1980-2000.” Austin, TX: Texas State Teachers Association. Heuser, D., and Owens, R.F. 1999. “Planting Seeds, Planting Teachers.” Educational Leadership 56(8): 53-56. Hirsch, E. 2000. “Teacher Pay for Performance.” LegisBrief Series. Washington, DC: National Council of State Legislatures. Hoff, D.L. 2000. “Science Teachers’ Turnover Dissatisfaction High, Survey Finds.” Education Week. April 19, 2000. Holmes Group. 1986. Tomorrow’s Teachers. East Lansing, MI: The Holmes Group. Summary available at <http://www.baylor.edu/~SOE/SCHOLMES/TT.HTML>. Holmes Group. 1990. Tomorrow’s Schools: Principles for the Design of Professional Development Schools. East Lansing, MI: The Holmes Group. Holmes Group. 1995. Tomorrow’s Schools of Education. East Lansing, MI: The Holmes Group. Houston, W.R., Hollis, LY., Clay, D., Ligons, C.M., and Roff, L. 1999. “The Effects of Collaboration on Urban Teacher Education Programs and Professional Development Schools.” In Research on Professional Development Schools, Teacher Education Yearbook VII. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press. Howard Hughes Medical Institute.1996. Beyond BIO 101. Chevy Chase, MD: Author. Howey, K. 1996. “Designing Coherent and Effective Teacher Education Programs.” In: Sikula, J., Buttery, T., and Guyton, E. (eds.). Handbook of Research on Teacher Education, 2nd ed. New York: Macmillan. pp. 143-170. Huling-Austin, L., 1992. “Research on Learning to Teach: Implications for Teacher Induction and Mentoring Programs.” Journal of Teacher Education 43(3): 173-180. Imel, S. 1992. “Reflective Practice in Adult Education.” ERIC Digest No. 122. Also available at <http://www.ed.gov/databases/ERIC_Digests/ed346319.html>. Ingersoll, R.M. 1999. “The Problem of Underqualified Teachers in American Secondary Schools.” Educational Researcher 28(2): 26-37. International Technology Education Association (ITEA). 2000. Standards for Technological Literacy: Content for the Study of Technology. Reston, VA: Author. Interstate New Teacher Support Consortium (INTASC). 1999. Core Standards. See <http://facstaff.uww.edu/speced/course/INTASC_Standards.htm >. See also <http://www.ccsso.org/intascst.html>. Kelley, C., Odden, A., Milanowski, A., and Heneman III, H. 2000. “The Motivational Effects of School-Based Performance Awards.” CPRE Policy Briefs. February ed. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Graduate School of Education. Kent, T., and McNergney, R. 1999. Will Technology Really Change Education? From Blackboard to Web. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press. King, B., and Newman, F.M. 2000. “Will Teacher Learning Advance School Goals?” Phi Delta Kappan 81(8): 576. Knuth, R., Hopey, C., and Rocap, K. (eds.) 1996. Guiding Questions for Technology Planning. Oak Brook, IL: North Central Regional Educational Laboratory. Available at <http://www.ncrtec.org/capacity/guidewww/gqhome.htm>. Koppich, J.K. 2000. “Trinity University: Preparing Teachers for Tomorrow’s Schools.” In Darling-Hammond, L. (ed.). Studies of Excellence in Teacher Education: Preparation in a Five- Year Program. Washington, DC: American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education. pp. 1-48. Lampert, M., and Ball, D.L. 1990. “Using hypermedia technology to support a new pedagogy of teacher education.” Issue paper No. 90-5. Lansing, MI: National Center for Research on Teacher Education. Lampert, M., and Ball, D.L. 1998. Teaching, Multimedia, and Mathematics: Investigations of Real Practice. New York: Teachers College Press. Learning First Alliance. 1998. Every Child Mathematically Proficient: An Action Plan. Washington, DC: Author. Lederman, N.G., and Gess-Newsome, J. 1999. Examining Pedagogical Content Knowledge. The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Lewis, J., and Tucker, A. In press. The Mathematics Education of Teachers. See <www.maa.org/cbms>. Lewis, L., Snow, K., Farris, E. Smerdon, B., Cronen, S., Kaplan, J., and Greene, B. 2000. Condition of America’s Public School Facilities:

OCR for page 131
Educating Teachers of Science, Mathematics, and Technology: New Practices for the New Millenium 1999. NCES 2000-032. National Center for Education Statistics. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. Also available at <http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2000032>. Loucks-Horsley, S., Bybee, R.W., and Wild, E.L.C. 1996. “The Role of Community Colleges in the Professional Development of Science Teachers.” Journal of College Science Teaching 26(2): 130-134. Loucks-Horsley, S., Hewson, P.W., Love, N., and Stiles, K.E. 1998. Designing Professional Development for Teachers of Science and Mathematics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press. Loucks-Horsley, S., and Matsumoto, C. 1999. “Research on professional development for teachers of mathematics and science: the state of the scene.” School Science and Mathematics 99(5): 258-271. Loughran, J. 1997. “Teaching about teaching: principles and practice.” In Loughran, J., and Russell, T., Teaching about Teaching: Purpose, Passion, and Pedagogy in Teacher Education. Washington, DC: Falmer Press. Ma, L. 1999. Knowing and Teaching Elementary Mathematics: Teachers’ Understanding of Fundamental Mathematics in China and the United States. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Mangan, K.S. 2000. “Aviation centers take off as airlines face pilot shortfall.” Chronicle of Higher Education 46(20), A47 McCullough, L., and Mintz, S. 1992. “Concerns of preservice students in the USA about the practice of teaching.” Journal of Education for Teaching 18(1): 59-67. McDiarmid, G.W., Ball, D.L., and Anderson, C.W. 1989. “Why staying ahead one chapter doesn’t really work: Subject-specific pedagogy.” In Reynolds, M.C. (ed.), Knowledge Base for the Beginning Teacher. New York: Pergamon. McIntyre, J., Byrd, D. and Foxx, S. 1996. Field and Laboratory Experiences. In Handbook of Research on Teacher Education, 171-193, 2nd ed. Sikula, J. (ed.), New York: Macmillan Library. McNeal, A.P., and D’Avanzo, C.D. (eds.). 1997. Student Active Science: Models of Innovation in College Science Teaching. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace. Manouchehri, A. 1997. “School Mathematics Reform: Implications for Mathematics Teacher Preparation.” Journal of Teacher Education 48 (3). Maryland State Department of Education. 1998. “Recommendations of Strategic Directions for Professional Development in Maryland’s Public Schools, 1996-2000.” Fact Sheet 42. Annapolis, MD: Author. See also <http://www.msde.state.md.us/fact%20sheets/fact42.html>. Mathematical Association of America (MAA). 1991. A Call for Change: Recommendations for the Mathematical Preparation of Teachers of Mathematics. Leitzel, J.R.C. (ed.). Washington, DC: Author. Means, B. 2000. “Technology in America’s Schools: Before and After Y2K.” In Brandt, Ron (ed.), Education in a New Era. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Merseth, K.K., 1993. How old is the shepherd? An essay about mathematics education. Phi Delta Kappan 74: 548-554. Merseth, K.K., and Koppich, J.K. 2000. “Teacher Education at the University of Virginia: A Study of English and Mathematics Preparation.” In Darling-Hammond, L. (ed.), Studies of Excellence in Teacher Education: Preparation in a Five-Year Program. Washington, DC: American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education. pp. 49-81. Milken Family Foundation. 1999. “Will New Teachers Be Prepared to Teach in a Digital Age?: A National Survey on Information Technology in Teacher Education.” Los Angeles, CA: Milken Family Foundation. Available at <http://www.mff.org/publications/>. Minstrell, J. 1999. “Expertise in Teaching.” In Sternberg, R. and Horvath, J. (eds.), Tacit Knowledge in Professional Practice. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Mundry, S., Spector, B., Stiles, K., and Loucks-Horsley, S. 1999. Working Toward a Continuum of Professional Learning Experiences for Teachers of Science and Mathematics. Madison, WI: National Center for Science Education, University of Wisconsin. Murnane, R.J., and Levy, F. 1997. “The new basics.” American School Board Journal. April issue, pp. 26-29. Murray, F.B. 1996. “Beyond Natural Teaching:

OCR for page 131
Educating Teachers of Science, Mathematics, and Technology: New Practices for the New Millenium The Case for Professional Education.” In The Teacher Educator’s Handbook: Building a Knowledge Base for the Preparation of Teachers. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. National Association of Biology Teachers (NABT). 1990. “Characteristics of an Outstanding Biology Teacher.” Position statement of the Board of Directors. Reston, VA: Author. Available at <http://www.nabt.org/characteristics.html>. National Board for Professional Teaching Standards (NBPTS). 1994. What Teachers Should Know and Be Able to Do. Detroit, MI: Author. National Commission on Excellence in Education (NCEE). 1983. A Nation at Risk: The Imperative for Educational Reform. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. Also available at <http://www.ed.gov/pubs/NatAtRisk/>. National Commission on Mathematics and Science Teaching for the 21st Century. 2000. Before It’s Too Late. Jessup, MD: Education Publications Center. National Commission on Teaching and America’s Future (NCTAF). 1996. What Matters Most: Teaching for America’s Future. New York: Author. NCTAF. 1997. Doing What Matters Most: Investing in Quality Teaching. New York: Author. National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education (NCATE). 2000. NCATE 2000 Unit Standards. Washington, DC: Author. Available at < http://www.ncate.org/2000/pressrelease.htm> National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). 1989. Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics. Reston, VA: Author. NCTM. 1991. Professional Standards for Teaching Mathematics. Reston, VA: Author. NCTM. 2000. Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. Reston, VA: Author. National Research Council (NRC). 1989. Every-body Counts: A Report to the Nation on the Future of Mathematics Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Also available at <http://books.nap.edu/books/0309039770/html/97.html>. NRC. 1990. Reshaping School Mathematics: A Philosophy and Framework for Curriculum. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Also available at <http://books.nap.edu/catalog/1498.html>. NRC. 1991. Moving Beyond Myths: Revitalizing Undergraduate Mathematics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Also available at <http://books.nap.edu/catalog/1782.html>. NRC. 1995. Engineering Education: Designing an Adaptive System. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Also available at <http://books.nap.edu/catalog/4907.html>. NRC. 1996a. National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Also available at <http://books.nap.edu/catalog/4962.htmll>. NRC. 1996b. “The Preparation of Teachers of Mathematics: Considerations and Challenges. A Letter Report from the Mathematical Sciences Education Board.” (MSEB) Washington, DC: MSEB. NRC. 1997a. Improving Teacher Preparation and Credentialing Consistent with the National Science Education Standards: Report of a Symposium. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Also available at <http://books.nap.edu/catalog/5592.html>. NRC. 1997b. Science Teacher Preparation in an Era of Standards-Based Reform. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Also available at <http://books.nap.edu/catalog/9078.html>. NRC. 1997c. Science Teaching Reconsidered: A Handbook. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Also available at <http://books.nap.edu/catalog/5287.html>. NRC. 1998. Developing a Digital National Library for Undergraduate Science, Mathematics, Engineering, and Technology Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Also available at <http://books.nap.edu/catalog/5952.html>. NRC. 1999a. Being Fluent with Information Technology. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Also available at <http://books.nap.edu/catalog/6482.html>. NRC. 1999b. The Changing Nature of Work: Implications for Occupational Analysis. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Also available at <http://books.nap.edu/catalog/9600.html>. NRC. 1999c. Global Perspectives for Local Action: Using TIMSS to Improve U.S. Mathematics and Science Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Also available at <http://books.nap.edu/catalog/9605.html>. NRC. 1999d. How People Learn: Brain, Mind,

OCR for page 131
Educating Teachers of Science, Mathematics, and Technology: New Practices for the New Millenium Experience, and School. Bransford, John D., Brown, Ann L., and Cocking, Rodney R. (eds.). Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Also available at <http://books.nap.edu/catalog/6160.html>. NRC. 1999e. How People Learn: Bridging Research and Practice. Donovan, M.S., Bransford, J.D., and Pellegrino, J.W. (eds.). Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Also available at <http://books.nap.edu/catalog/9457.html>. NRC. 1999f. Improving Student Learning: A Strategic Plan for Education Research and Its Utilization. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Also available at <http://books.nap.edu/catalog/6488.html>. NRC. 1999g. Serving the Needs of Pre-College Science and Mathematics Education: Impact of a Digital National Library on Teacher Education and Practice. Proceedings from a National Research Council Workshop. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Also available at <http://books.nap.edu/catalog/9584.html>. NRC. 1999h. Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science, Mathematics, Engineering, and Technology. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Also available at <http://books.nap.edu/catalog/6453.html>. NRC. 2000a. Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards: A Guide for Teaching and Learning. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Also available at <http://books.nap.edu/catalog/9596.html>. NRC. 2000b. Knowing and Learning Mathematics for Teaching: Proceedings of a Workshop. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. National Science Board (NSB). 1999. “Preparing our children: math and science education in the national interest.” NSB 99-31. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation. Also available at <http://www.nsf.gov/nsb/documents/1999/nsb9931/nsb9931.htm>. National Science Foundation (NSF). 1996. Shaping the Future: New Expectations for Undergraduate Education in Science, Mathematics, Engineering, and Technology. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation. Also available at <http://www.nsf.gov/cgi-bin/getpub?nsf96139>. NSF. 1998. Investing in Tomorrow’s Teachers: The Integral Role of Two-Year Colleges in the Science and Mathematics Preparation of Prospective Teachers. Report from a National Science Foundation Workshop. NSF-9949. Arlington, VA: Author. Also available at <http://www.nsf.gov/cgi-bin/getpub?nsf9949>. NSF. 2000. National Science, Mathematics, Engineering, and Technology Education Digital Library (NSDL)—Program Solicitation. Arlington, VA: Author. Available at <http://www.nsf.gov/cgi-bin/getpub?nsf0044>. National Science Teachers Association (NSTA). 1996. A Framework for High School Science Education. Arlington, VA: Author. Additional information is available at <http://www.nsta.org/store/fromoutside.asp?prodnum=PB132X>. NSTA. 1998. NSTA Standards for Science Teacher Preparation. Arlington, VA: Author. NSTA. 2000. “Science Teacher Credentials, Assignments, and Job Satisfaction: Results of a Survey.” Arlington, VA: Author. Also available at <http://www.nsta.org/pressrel/survey2000.asp>. Neuschatz, M., and McFarling, M. 1999. Maintaining Momentum: High School Physics for a New Millennium. College Park, MD: American Institute of Physics. Report #R-427. Also available at <https://webster.aip.org/forms/statorder.htm> Newmann, F., and Wehlage, G. 1995. Successful School Restructuring. Madison, WI: Center on Organization and Restructuring Schools, University of Wisconsin. North Central Regional Educational Laboratory. 1999. “Teacher Salary and Reward Strategies.” Oak Brook, IL: Author. Available at <http://www.ncrel.org/sdrs/areas/issues/envrnmnt/go/go3sal.htm>. Odden, A. 2000. “New and better forms of teacher compensation are possible.” Phi Delta Kappan 81(5): 361-366. Odden, A., and Kelley, C. 1997. Paying Teachers for What They Know and Do: New and Smarter Compensation Strategies to Improve Schools. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press. Olebe, M., Jackson, A., and Danielson, C. 1999. “Investing in beginning teachers: The California model.” Educational Leadership 56(8): 41-44. Olson, L. 1999. “Pay-performance link in salaries gains momentum.” Education Week 19(7): 1 and 18. Also available at <http://www.edweek.com/ew/ewstory.cfm?slug=07pay.h19&keywords=Olson>.

OCR for page 131
Educating Teachers of Science, Mathematics, and Technology: New Practices for the New Millenium Public Agenda. 2000. A Sense of Calling: Who Teaches and Why. New York: Author. Also available at <http://www.publicagenda.org/specials/teachers/teachers.htm>. Raizen, S.A., and Michelsohn, A.M. 1994. The Future of Science in Elementary Schools: Educating Prospective Teachers. The National Center for Improving Science Education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Resnick, L.B., and Hall, M.W. 1998. “Learning organizations for sustainable education reform.” Daedalus 127(4): 89-118. Richardson, S.W. 1994. The Professional Development School: A Common Sense Approach to Improving Education. Forth Worth, TX: Said W. Richardson Foundation. Rigden, D.W. 1996. “What Teachers Have to Say about Teacher Education.” Washington, DC: Council for Basic Education. Riley, R.W. 1998. “An end to quiet backwaters: Universities must make teacher education a much higher day-to-day priority.” Speech given at the National Press Club. Reprinted in Chronicle of Higher Education 45(5), B10. Riley, R.W. 2000. “Setting new expectations.” Seventh Annual State of American Education Address, February 22, 2000, Durham, NC. Available at <http://www.ed.gov/Speeches/022000/000222.html>. Rodriguez, E.M. 1998. Preparing Quality Teachers: Issues and Trends in the States. Washington, DC: State Higher Education Executive Officers. Romberg, T.A. (1994). “School Mathematics: Options for the 1990s (Volume 1).” Chairman’s report of a conference. Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement, U.S. Department of Education. Rothman, F., and Narum, J. 1999. “Then, Now, and in the Next Decade: A Commentary on Strengthening Undergraduate Science, Mathematics, Engineering, and Technology Education.” Washington, DC: Project Kaleido-scope. Rust, E. 1998. “Business Cares about Math and Science Achievement.” In Business Coalition for Education Reform, The Formula for Success: A Business Leader’s Guide to Supporting Math and Science Achievement. Washington, DC: National Alliance for Business. pp. 11-14. Sanders, W.L., and Rivers, J.C. 1996. Cumulative and Residual Effects of Teachers on Future Student Academic Achievement. Knoxville, TN: University of Tennessee Value-Added Research and Assessment Center. Schempp, P.G., Tan, S., Manross, D., and Fincher, M. 1998. “Differences in novice and competent teachers’ knowledge.” Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice. 4(1): 9-20. Schon, D.A. 1983. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Basic Books. Schon, D. 1987. Educating the Reflective Practitioner. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Schon, D. 1988. “Coaching Reflective Teaching.” In Grimmett, P.P., and Erickson, G.L. (eds.) Reflection in Teacher Education. New York: Teachers College Press. Seymour, E., and Hewitt, N.M. 1997. Talking About Leaving: Why Undergraduates Leave the Sciences. Boulder, CO: Westview Press. Shields, P.M., Esch, C., Humphrey, D.C., Young, V.M., Gaston, M., and Hunt, H. 1999. The Status of the Teaching Profession: Research Findings and Policy Recommendations. A Report to the Teaching and California’s Future Task Force. Santa Cruz, CA: The Center for the Future of Teaching and Learning. Shulman, L. 1986. “Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching.” Educational Researcher 15,4-14. Shulman, L. 1987. “Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform.” Harvard Educational Review 57,1-22. Shulman, L., and Grossman, P. 1988. “Knowledge growth in teaching: A final report to the Spencer Foundation.” Stanford, CA: Stanford University. Shroyer, M.G., Wright, E.L. and Ramey-Gassert, L. 1996. “An innovative model for collaborative reform in elementary school science reform.” Journal of Science Teacher Education 7(3): 151-168. Silverstein, S.C. 2000. “Impact of Teacher Participation in Columbia University’s Summer Research Program for Science Teachers on Interest and Achievement of Their Students in Science: A Preliminary Report.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Society for Cell Biology, Washington, DC, December 15, 1999. Smith, M.S., and O’Day, J. 1991. “Systemic School Reform.” In Fuhrman, S. and Malen, B. (eds.). Politics of Curriculum and Testing: The

OCR for page 131
Educating Teachers of Science, Mathematics, and Technology: New Practices for the New Millenium 1990 Yearbook of the Politics of Education Association, London: Falmer. pp. 233-267. Snyder, J. 2000. “Knowing Children—Under-standing Teaching: The Developmental Teacher Education Program at the University of California-Berkeley.” In Darling-Hammond, L. (ed.), Studies of Excellence in Teacher Education: Preparation at the Graduate Level. Washington, DC: American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education. pp. 97-172. Sparks, D., and Hirsh, S. 2000. “A National Plan for Improving Professional Development.” Oxford, OH: National Staff Development Council. Report is available on-line at <http://www.nsdc.org/library/NSDCPlan.html>. Steinberg, R., Haymore, J. and Marks, R. 1985. “Teachers’ knowledge and structuring content in mathematics.” Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, April 1985, Chicago. Stigler, J.W., and Hiebert, J. 1997. “Understanding and improving classroom mathematics instruction.” Phi Delta Kappan 79: 14-21. Stigler, J.W., and Hiebert, J. 1999. The Teaching Gap. New York: The Free Press. Stoddart, T., and Floden, R.W. 1995. “Traditional and alternative routes to teacher certification: issues, assumptions, and misconceptions. “In Zeichner, K. (ed.). Reforming Teacher Education in the United States. New York: Teachers College Press. Trachtman, R. 1996. The NCATE professional development school study: A survey of 28 PDS sites. Unpublished manuscript. (Available from Professional Development School Standards Project, National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education, Washington, DC 20036. Urban Teacher Collaborative. 2000. The Urban Teacher Challenge: Teacher Demand and Supply in the Great City Schools. Belmont, MA: Recruiting New Teachers, Council of the Great City Schools, Council of the Great City Colleges of Education. Also available at <http://www.rnt.org/quick/new.html>. U.S. Department of Education. 1996. National Center for Education Statistics. Pursuing Excellence. NCES 97-198. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. See also <http://www.ed.gov/NCES/timss>. U.S. Department of Education. 1997a. National Center for Education Statistics. America’s Teachers: Profile of a Profession, 1993-94. NCES 97-460. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics. U.S. Department of Education. 1997b. National Center for Education Statistics. Digest of Education Statistics. NCES 98-015. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics. See also <http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2000031>. U.S. Department of Education. 1999. National Center for Education Statistics. Digest of Education Statistics. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics. See also <http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2000031>. Valdez, G., McNabb, M., Foertsch, M., Anderson, M., Hawkes, M., and Raack, L. 1999. Computer-Based Technology and Learning: Evolving Uses and Expectations. Oak Brook, IL: North Central Regional Educational Laboratory. Available at <http://www.ncrel.org/tplan/cbtl/toc.htm>. Wasley, P. 1999. “Teaching worth celebrating.” Educational Leadership 56(8): 8-13. Whitford, B.L., and Metcalf-Turner, P. 1999. “Of promises and unresolved puzzles: Reforming teacher education through Professional Development Schools.” In Griffin, G.A. (ed.), The Education of Teachers: Ninety-eighth Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. pp. 257-278. Whitford, B.L., Ruscoe, G., and Fickel, L. 2000. “Knitting It All Together: Collaborative Teacher Education in Southern Maine.” In: Darling-Hammond, L. (ed.). Studies of Excellence in Teacher Education: Preparation at the Graduate Level. Washington, DC: American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education. pp. 173-257. Wiley, D., and Yoon, B. 1995. “Teacher Reports of Opportunity to Learn: Analyses of the 1993 California Learning Assessment System.” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 17(3): 355-370. Wilson, S.M., Shulman L.S., and Richert, A.E. 1987. “150 different ways of knowing: Representation of knowing in teaching.” In Calderhead, J. (ed.), Exploring Teachers’ Thinking. London: Cassell. pp. 104-124. Wright, S.P., Horn, S.P., and Sanders, W.L. 1997. “Teacher and classroom context effects on

OCR for page 131
Educating Teachers of Science, Mathematics, and Technology: New Practices for the New Millenium student achievement: implications for teacher evaluation.” Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education 11: 57-67. Yates, A. 1995. “Higher education has a link to real reform at the K-12 level.” The Denver Post, April 29, 8b. Zeichner, K. 2000. “Ability-Based Teacher Education: Elementary Teacher Education at Alverno College.” In Darling-Hammond, L. (ed.), Studies of Excellence in Teacher Education: Preparation in the Undergraduate Years. Washington, DC: American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education. pp. 1-66.

OCR for page 131
Educating Teachers of Science, Mathematics, and Technology: New Practices for the New Millenium This page intentionally left blank.