National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: The VA National Formulary and Veterans Health Care
Suggested Citation:"References." Institute of Medicine. 2000. Description and Analysis of the VA National Formulary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9879.
×

References

Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy (AMCP). Where We Stand . Alexandria, VA: AMCP; 1997.

Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy. Common practices in formulary management system. Acad. Managed Care Pharm. Newsl . In press.

Achusim LE. Therapeutic interchange as a cost-containment measure. Pharmaco-Economics . 1992; 2(5):347–351.

Aetna US Health Care. Members and Consumers. 2000 Precertification List [on line] . Available at: http://www.aetnaushc.com/products/rx/precert_00.html.

American Association of Health Plans (AAHP). Formularies . Washington, DC: AAHP; 1998.

American College of Clinical Pharmacy (ACCP). ACCP position statement guidelines for therapeutic interchange. Pharmacotherapy . 1993; 13(3):252–256.

American College of Physicians (ACP). Therapeutic substitution and formulary systems. Ann. Intern. Med. 1990; 113(2):160–163.

American Hospital Association (AHA). Statement of Guiding Principles on the Operation of the Hospital Formulary System . Chicago: AHA; 1974.

American Hospital Association. Operation of the Hospital Formulary System . Chicago: AHA; 1975.

American Hospital Association. American Hospital Association Statement on National Patient Safety Partnership Press Conference Attribute to Jack Lord, M.D., Chief Operating Officer, AHA. Chicago: AHA; 1999.

American Medical Association (AMA). AMA policy on drug formularies and therapeutic interchange in inpatient and ambulatory patient care settings. Am. J. Hosp. Pharm. 1994; 51:1808–1810.

Suggested Citation:"References." Institute of Medicine. 2000. Description and Analysis of the VA National Formulary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9879.
×

American Medical Association. Pharmaceutical Benefits Management Companies , Report of the Board of Trustees . Chicago: AMA; 1997.

American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP). Best Practices for Health-System Pharmacy . Bethesda, MD: ASHP; 1998.

American Society of Hospital Pharmacists. ASHP guidelines for the scientific and therapeutic evaluation of drugs for hospital formularies. Am. J. Hosp. Pharm. 1981; 38:1043–1044.

American Society of Hospital Pharmacists. Therapeutic Interchange . Bethesda, MD: ASHP; 1982.

American Society of Hospital Pharmacists. ASHP statement on the formulary system. Am. J. Hosp. Pharm. 1983; 40:1384–1385.

American Society of Hospital Pharmacists. ASHP technical assistance bulletin on the evaluation of drugs for formularies. Am. J. Hosp. Pharm. 1988; 45:386–387.

American Society of Hospital Pharmacists. Am J. Hosp. Pharm. 1991.

American Society of Hospital Pharmacists. ASHP statement on the pharmacy and therapeutics committee. Am. J. Hosp. Pharm. 1992; 49:2008–2009.

American Society of Hospital Pharmacists. 1996

American Society of Hospital Pharmacists, APA, AHA, AMA. Statement of guiding principles on the operation of the hospital formulary system. Am. J. Hosp. Pharm. 1964; 21:40–41.

Anonymous. An interview with John Ogden. Am. Pharm. 1988; NS28:8:22–23.

Ascione FJ, Bagozzi RP, Mannebach MA, et al.. Analysis of the Internal and External Factors Related to Performance of Pharmacy and Therapeutic Committees . Ann Arbor: University of Michigan; 1998.

Avorn J, Chen M, Hartley R. Scientific versus commercial sources of influence on the prescribing behavior of physicians. Am. J. Med. 1982; 73:4–8.

Avorn J, Soumerai SB. Improving drug-therapy decisions through educational out-reach—A randomized controlled trial of academically based “detailing.” N. Engl. J. Med. 1983; 308(24):1457–1463.

Baciewicz AM, Cowan RI, Michaels PE, Kyllonen KS. Quality and productivity assessment of clinical pharmacy interventions . Hosp. Formul 1994; 29:773–779.

Bajpai SK, Pathak DS. Predicting formulary decisions in health maintenance organizations involving nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. J. Res. Pharmaceut. Econ. 1998; 9(1):57–70.

Bakke OM. How many drugs do we need? World Health Forum . 1986; 7:252–255.

Barents Group LLC. Analysis of Benefits Offered by Medicare HMOs, 1999: Complexities and Implications . Menlo Park, CA: The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation; 1999a.

Barents Group LLC. Factors Affecting the Growth of Prescription Drug Expenditures . Washington, DC: National Institute for Health Care Management Research and Educational Foundation; 1999b.

Barksdale Air Force Base. Dihydropyridine switch program deemed not cost effective. Formulary . 1998; 33:12.

Bartlett S, Marshall JA, Prochazka A, et al. A Study of the Short-Term Clinical and Economic Outcomes of Converting Hypertensive Patients from Long-Acting Nifedipine to Short-Acting Nifedipine . Denver: Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center(unpublished) ; 1996.

Suggested Citation:"References." Institute of Medicine. 2000. Description and Analysis of the VA National Formulary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9879.
×

Basskin L. Pharmacoeconomics and the formulary decision-making process. Formulary . 1998; 33:460.

Baugh D, Pine P, Blackwell S. Trends in prescription drug utilization and payments. Health Care Financing Rev. 1999; 20:3 :79–105.

Berkowitz HS. Formulary designation of cimetidine as the primary intravenous histamine H2-receptor antagonist. Am. J. Hosp. Pharm. 1992; 49:134–135.

Black J, Griffin TN, Beisel WBMD. Implementation of an outpatient prescription drug formulary in a managed-care system. Am. J. Hosp. Pharm. 1988; 45:561–565.

Bloom BS, Jacobs J. Cost effects of restricting cost-effective therapy. Med. Care . 1985; 23(7):872–880.

Bodenbender, R. Henry. PVA, personal communication , 1999.

Bootman JL, Milne RJ. Costs, innovation and efficacy in anti-infective therapy. PharmacoEconomics . 1996; 9(Suppl. 1):31–39.

Boston D, Collins C. Safety, efficacy, and lipid profile of doxazosin at a VA medical center. Hosp. Formul. 1995; 30:233–236.

Briscoe TA, Dearing CJ. Clinical and economic effects of replacing enalapril with benazepril in hypertensive Patients. Am. J. Health-Syst. Pharm. 1996; 53:2191–2193 .

Brook RH et al.. Does free care improve adults' health? Results from a randomized trial. N. Engl. J. Med. 1983; 309(23) :1426–1434 .

Brown GR, Clarke AM. Therapeutic interchange of cefazolin with metronidazole for cefoxitin . Am. J. Hosp. Pharm. 1992; 49:1946–1950 .

Brown JS. Review of State Medicaid Formularies. Unpublished manuscript ; 1999.

Brown JS, Bienz-Tadnor B, Lasagna L. Availability of anticancer drugs in the United States, Europe, and Japan from 1960 through 1991. Clin. Pharmacol. Therapeut. 1995; 58:(3):243–256.

Brunsting J, Johnson M. Paper presented at the Western States Residents Conference , Pacific Grove, CA ; .

Buchanan R, Smith S. Medicaid policies for HIV-related prescription drugs. Health Care Financing Rev. 1994; 15:(3):43–61.

Bull S, Shoheiber O, Bailey M, et al. Utilization of pharmacy claims data to evaluate therapeutic interchange programs. J. Managed Care Pharm. 1999 : 331–334.

Calvo MV, Fruns I, Domínguez-Gil A. Decision analysis applied to selection of histamine H2-receptor antagonists for the formulary. Am. J. Hosp. Pharm. 1990; 47:2002–2006 .

Cantrell W, Kimber G, Morrill G. Evaluation of blood pressure and adverse effects in patients converted from lisinopril to benazepril. J. Managed Care Phar. 1999; 5:52–54.

Carroll NV. Formularies and therapeutic interchange: The health care setting makes a difference. Am. J. Health-System Pharm. 1999; 56:467–471 .

Cascio M, Williams J. Impact of non-formulary drug notification form. Am. J. Hosp. Pharm. 1982; 39:1039–1041 .

Centeon. Reimbursement alert. The debate over drug formularies. October December 1999 [on line]. Available at: www.adventisbehring.com/na/med/reimbursementrc/x_8med_99_4.asp.

Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER). 1998. CDER 1998 Report to the Nation: Improving Public Health Through Human Drugs [on line]. Available at: http://www.fda.gov/cder/reports/rptntn98.pdf.

Suggested Citation:"References." Institute of Medicine. 2000. Description and Analysis of the VA National Formulary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9879.
×

Center for Health Policy Research. Negotiating the New Health System: A Nationwide Study of Medicaid Managed Care Contracts . Washington, DC: George Washington University; 1998.

Chassin M.R., Galvin RW. The urgent need to improve health care quality. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 1998; 280(11):1000–1005.

Chinburapa V, Larson LN. The availability of new drugs in health maintenance organizations . J. Res. Pharmaceut. Econ. 1991; 3(1):91–110.

Chon HS, Suzuki NT. Evaluation of omeprazole to lansoprazole conversion in a VA medical center. ASGO Midyear Clin. Meet . 1998; P-122E.

Chren M-M, Landefield S. In reply letter. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 1994; 272:(5):355.

Congressional Budget Office (CBO). How the Medicaid Rebate on Prescription Drugs Affects Pricing to the Pharmaceutical Industry . Washington, DC: CBO; 1996.

Congressional Budget Office. How Increased Competition from Generic Drugs Has Affected Prices and Returns in the Pharmaceutical Industry . Washington, DC: CBO; 1998.

Cook A, Kornfield T, Gold M. The Role of PBMs in Managing Drug Costs: Implications for a Medicare Drug Benefit . Washington, DC: Mathematica Policy Research, Inc.; 2000.

Covington TR, Thornton JL. The Formulary System: A Cornerstone of Drug Benefit Management . Alexandria, VA: Foundation for Managed Care Pharmacy; 1995.

Crawford SY, Santell JP. ASHP national survey of pharmaceutical services in federal hospitals —1993. Am. J. Hosp. Pharm. 1994; 51:2377–2393.

Cromwell DM, Bass EB, Steinberg EP, et al. Can restrictions on reimbursement for anti-ulcer drugs decrease Medicaid pharmacy costs without increasing hospitalizations? Health Serviees Res. 1999; 33(6):1593–1610.

Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Administration. Pharmacy Benefits Management: A Valuable Product Line . Washington, DC: Department of Veterans Affairs; 1989.

Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Administration. ADE Report . Washington, DC: Department of Veterans Affairs; 1999a.

Department of Veterans Affairs, Pharmacy Benefits Management Strategic Health Group. Criteria for Use of Selected Drugs [on line]. Available at: http://www.dppm.med.va.gov/newsite/criteriadrop.html.

Department of Veterans Affairs, Pharmacy Benefits Management Strategic Health Group. Drug Class Reviews [on line]. Available at: http://www.dppm.med.va.gov/newsite/reviews.html.

Department of Veterans Affairs, Pharmacy Benefits Management Strategic Health Group. Treatment Guidelines [on line]. Available at: http://www.dppm.med.va.gov/newsite/treatment1.htm.

Department of Veterans Affairs, Pharmacy Benefits Management Strategic Health Group. Pharmacologic Management of Congestive Heart Failure [on line]. Available at: http://www.dppm.med.va.gov/newsite/DSMCHF.htm

Department of Veterans Affairs, Pharmacy Benefits Management Strategic Health Group [on line]. Available at: http://www.dppm.med.va.gov.

Desai N, Vigil JM, Wood MJ. Effects on lipids and liver function tests when patients are converted from lovastatin to fluvastatin. Paper presented at the Western States Residency Conference , Monterey, CA ; 1997.

Suggested Citation:"References." Institute of Medicine. 2000. Description and Analysis of the VA National Formulary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9879.
×

DeTorres OH, White RE. Effect of aminoglycoside-use restrictions on drug cost. Am. J. Hosp. Pharm. 1984; 41:1137–1139 .

Dillon M. Drug Formulary Management. In: Navarro RP , ed. Managed Care Pharmacy Practice . Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen Publishers, Inc.; 1999.

DiMasi JA, Brown JS, Lasagna L. An analysis of regulatory review times of supplemental indications for already-approved drugs: 1989–1994. Drug Inform. J. 1966; 30:(2):315–337.

Doering PL, Russell WL, McCormick WC, Klapp DL. Therapeutic substitution in the health maintenance organization outpatient environment. Drug Intell. Clin. Pharm. 1988; 22(2):125–130.

Donabedian A.Explorations in Quality Assessment and Monitoring , Vol 1: The Definition of Quality and Approaches to Its Assessment . Ann Arbor, MI: Health Administration Press; 1980.

Dranove D. Medicaid drug formulary restrictions. J. Law Econ. 1989; 32(1):143–162.

Dunagan WC, Medoff G. Formulary control of antimicrobial usage: What price freedom? Diag. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 1993; 16:265–274.

Dzierba S, Reilly RT, Caselnova DAI. Cost savings achieved through cephalosporin use review and restriction . Am. J. Hosp. Pharm. 1986; 43:2194–2197.

Edwards DE, Triplett JW, Izquierdo-San Juan AB. Conversion from pravastatin or fluvastatin to simvastatin through a protocol: Outcome study. ASHP Midyear Clin Meet . 1998; P-9R.

Edwards JG, Anderson I. Systematic review and guide to selection of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. Drugs . 1999; 57(4):507–533.

Farrow, H.M. ; Personal communication , VISN 16 . 1999.

Fink JL, Vivian JC, Reid KK, et al. Facts and Comparisons . St Louis, MO: Wolters Kluwer Co.; 1998.

Fonseca ML, Smith ME, Klein RE, Sheldon G. The Department of Veterans Affairs medical care system and the people it serves. Med. Care . 1996; 34(3 Suppl.):MS9–MS20.

Food and Drug Administration (FDA). FDA seeks help in evaluating consequences of therapeutic interchange . Am. J. Health-System Pharm. 1997; 54:(10):1149.

Food and Drug Administration. Letter to Health Practitioners on Therapeutic Equivalence of Generic Drugs . Washington, DC: FDA; 1998a.

Food and Drug Administration. TalkPaper . Washington, DC: FDA; 1998b.

Food and Drug Administration. Electronic Orange Book: Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations . Washington, DC: Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service; 1999a.

Food and Drug Administration. TalkPaper . Washington, DC: FDA; 1999b.

Food and Drug Administration. Manual of Policies and Procedures [on line]. Available at: www.fda.gov/MAPP.

Frank, G., et al. Prescription Drug Policy Issues in California , 1999.

Francke DE. The formulary system: Product of the teaching hospital. J. Am. Hosp. Assoc. 1967; 41:110–116.

Friedmann YM, Hanchak NA. Pharmacy Program Performance Measurement. In: Navarro RP , ed. Managed Care Pharmacy Practice . Gaithersburg, MD : Aspen Publishers, Inc.; 1999.

Suggested Citation:"References." Institute of Medicine. 2000. Description and Analysis of the VA National Formulary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9879.
×

Fudge KA, Moore KA, Schneider DN, et al. Change in prescribing patterns of intravenous histamine2-receptor antagonists results in significant cost savings without adversely affecting patient care. Ann. Pharmacother . 1993; 27:232–237.

Furberg CD, Herrington DM, Psaty BM. Are drugs within a class interchangeable? Lancet . 1999; 354:1202–1204.

Ganz MB, Saksa B. Switching long-acting nifedipine. The large elderly population of a VAMC made an ideal setting to study the effects of changing antihypertensive therapy. Fed Practioner . 1997 : 71 , 72 , 75.

General Accounting Office (GAO). Prescription Drugs in the Elderly: Many Still Receive Potentially Harmful Drugs Despite Recent Improvements . Washington, DC: GAO; 1995.

General Accounting Office. VA's Management of Drugs on Its National Formulary . Washington, DC: GAO; 1999.

Gerbrandt KR, Yedinak KC. Formulary management of ACE inhibitors. Pharmaco-Economics . 1996; 10(6):594–613.

Gibaldi M. Vertical Integration: The drug industry and prescription benefits managers. Pharmacotherapy . 1995; 15:265–271.

Glassman PA, Good CB, Kelley M, et.al. Physician perceptions of a national formulary. J. Int. Med. [submitted] . 1999.

Glennie JL, Woloschuk DMM, Hall KW. High-technology drugs for cancer: The decision process for adding to a formulary. PharmacoEconomics . 1993; 4(6):405–413.

Gold M, Joffe M, Kennedy TL, et al. Pharmacy benefits in health maintenance organizations. Health Affairs . 1989 : 182–190.

Goldberg RA. Managing the pharmacy benefit: The formulary system. J. Managed Care Pharmacy . 1997; 3(5):565–573.

Grabowski H. Medicaid patients' access to new drugs. Health Affairs . 1988; 7(5):103–114.

Grabowski H, Mullins CD. Pharmacy benefit management, cost-effectiveness analysis and drug formulary decisions. Soc. Sci. Med. 1997; 45(4):535–544.

Grabowski HG, Schweitzer SO, Shiota SR. The effect of Medicaid formularies on the availability of new drugs . PharmacoEconomics . 1992; 1(Suppl. 1):32–40.

Gray DR. Documentation and assessment of pharmacist-initiated drug therapy intervention. Topics Hosp. Pharm. Management . 1992; 11:69–79.

Gray DR. Evaluation of a Formulary Switch from Alodipine to Felodipine in a Veterans Affairs Medical Center [unpublished manuscript]. Long Beach, CA, VA Long Beach Healthcare System; 1999.

Green ER, Chrymko MM, Rozek SL, et al. Clinical consideration and costs associated with formulary conversion from tobramycin to gentamicin. Am. J. Hosp. Pharm. 1989; 46:714–719.

Green M. Pharmaceutical Payola: How Secret Commercial Deals Are Dictating Your Next Prescription and Harming Your Health . New York: New York City Public Advocate; 1997.

Gross JD. Prescription drug formularies in managed care: Concerns for the elderly population. Clin. Therapeutics . 1998; 20(6):1277–1291.

Guastella C. Cost savings realized from interchanging ceftizoxime for cefoxitin . Am. J. Hosp. Pharm. 1988; 45:2376–2377.

Suggested Citation:"References." Institute of Medicine. 2000. Description and Analysis of the VA National Formulary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9879.
×

Gustin G, White WB, Taylor S. Clinical outcome of a mandatory formulary switch for dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker therapy at a Veterans Administration medical center. Am. J. Hypertens . 1996; 9(4 Pt 1):312–316.

Guze BH. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors: Assessment for formulary inclusion. PharmacoEconomics . 1996; 9(5):430–442.

Haig GM, Kiser LA. Effect of pharmacist participation on a medical team on costs, charges, and length of stay. Am. J. Hosp. Pharm. 1991; 48:1457–1462.

Hanson C, Shepherd M, Pleil A. How P&T committee members in HMOs make formulary decisions. P&T. 1992 : 247–254.

Hatcher RA, Stainsby WJ. The hospital formulary. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 1933; 101:1802–1807.

Hatoum HT, Freeman RA. The use of pharmacoeconomic data in formulary selection. Topics Hosp. Pharm Manage . 1994; 13(4):47–53.

Hazlet TK, Hu T-W. Association between formulary strategies and hospital drug expenditures . Am. J. Hosp. Pharm. 1992; 49:2207–2210.

Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA). Medicare and Medicaid statistical supplement. Health Care Financing Rev. 1966.

Health Care Financing Administration. Medicaid Program Statistics (HCFA-2082 Report) [on line]. Available at: http://www.hcfa.gov/medicaid/mstats.htm.

Health Care Financing Administration. Drug Policy. Medicaid Coverage of Viagra [on line]. Available at: http://www.hcfa.gov/medicaid/drpolicy.htm.

Health Care Financing Administration. Medicaid Managed Care Enrollment Report [on line]. Available at: http://www.hcfa.gov/medicaid/omc1998.htm.

Health Care Financing Administration. Medicaid Program Statistics (HCFA-2082 Report) [on line]. Available at: http://www.hcfa.gov/medicaid/mstats.htm.

Herstek J. Managed Care Drug Formularies . Washington, DC: National Conference of State Legislatures; 1999.

Hilleman DE, Mohiuddin SM, Wurdeman RL, Wadibia EC. Outcomes and cost savings of an ACE inhibitor therapeutic interchange . J. Managed Care Pharm. 1997; 3(2):219–223.

Hisnanick JJ, Gujral SS. Veterans' health insurance status and their use of VA medical facilities: A joint-choice analysis. Soc. Sci. Q. 1996; 77(2):393–407.

Hoechst Marion Roussel. Managed Care Digest Series 1998, HMO-PPO/Medicare/ Medicaid Digest . Hoechst Marion Roussel; 1998.

Hoffmann RP. Perspectives on the hospital formulary. Hosp. Pharm. 1984; 19(5):359–361 , 364.

Holdford D, Smith S. Improving the quality of outcomes research involving pharmaceutical services. Am. J. Health-System Pharm. 1997; 54(12):1434–1442.

Horn S, Sharkey P, Gassaway J. Managed care outcomes project: Study design, baseline patient characteristics, and outcome measures. Am. J. Managed Care . 1996; 2:237–247.

Hudson T. State Medicaid officials battle drug firms in war to cut costs. Hospitals . 1990; 64(7):30–34.

Iglehart JK. The American health care system: Expenditures. N. Engl. J. Med. 1999; 340(1):70–76.

IMS Health. Direct-to-Consumer Prescription Drug Advertising in U.S. Reaches $1.5 Billion for Twelve Months Through March; TV Ad Expenditures Reach $825 Mil

Suggested Citation:"References." Institute of Medicine. 2000. Description and Analysis of the VA National Formulary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9879.
×

lion, Up 24 Percent. [on line] Available at: http://www.imshealth.com/html/news_arc/06_07_1999_211.htm.

Institute of Medicine. Clinical Practice Guidelines . Directions for a New Program . Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1990a.

Institute of Medicine. Medicare: A Strategy for Quality Assurance . Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1990b.

Institute of Medicine. To Err Is Human: Building a Safer Health System . Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1999.

Ito MK, Stolley SN, Morreale AP, et al. Rationale, design, and baseline results of the Pravastatin-to-Simvastatin Conversion Lipid Optimization Program (PSCOP). Am. J. Health-Syst Pharm. 1999; 56:1107–1113.

Jackson R. Practice guidelines, physician groups, and drug formularies. J. Managed Care Pharm. 1997; 3:489–492.

Jang R. Medicaid formularies: A critical review of the literature. J. Pharmaceut. Market. Manage . 1988; 2(3):39–61.

Jay GT, Quercia RA, Gousse G et al. Procedure for evaluating nonformulary drug orders. Am. J. Hosp. Pharm. 1993; 50:2554–2556.

Johnson RE, Goodman MJ, Hornbrook MC, et al. The impact of increasing patient prescription drug cost sharing on therapeutic classes of drugs received and on the health status of elderly HMO members. Health Services Res. 1997; 32(1):103–122.

Joint National Committee on the Prevention, Detection, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. The Sixth Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. Arch. Int. Med. 1997; 157:2413–2446.

Jones WN. Statin Conversion Study, Memo to Coussens , IOM . 1999.

Kazis LE, Miller DR, Clark J, et al. Health-related quality of life in patients served by the Department of Veterans Affairs. Arch. Intern. Med. 1998; 158:626–632.

Kellick KA, Burns K, McAndrew E, et al. Outcome monitoring of fluvastatin in a Department of Veterans Affairs lipid clinic. Am. J. Cardiol. 1995; 76:(2):62A–64A.

King N. Pharmacopoeias and Formularies. In: King N , ed. A Selection of Primary Source for the History of Pharmacy in the United States: Books and Trade Catalogs from the Colonial Period to 1940 . Madison: American Institute of the History of Pharmacy, University of Wisconsin-Madison ; 1987; 8–25.

Kinnon A, Bourne J, Blizzard S, et al. Outcome analysis of a formulary transition from nifedipine to felodipine at a Veterans Affairs medical center. J. Managed Care Pharm. 1999; 5(5):425–428.

Kittel JF, Swatzell RH, Williams MP, Forrester CW, Bancroft WH. Development of a flexible formulary for a Veterans Administration hospital. Hosp. Formul. 1978; 13(1):46–48.

Kizer KW. Transforming the veterans health care system— The “new VA.” J. Am. Med. Assoc. 1996; 275(14):1069.

Kizer KW. The “new VA”: A national laboratory for health care quality management. Am. J. Med. Qual. 1999; 14(1):3–20.

Kotzan JA, McMillan JA, Jankel CA, Foster AL. Initial impact of a Medicaid prior authorization program for NSAID prescriptions. J. Res. Pharmaceut. Econ. 1993; 5(1):25–41.

Suggested Citation:"References." Institute of Medicine. 2000. Description and Analysis of the VA National Formulary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9879.
×

Kozma C.M., Reeder CE, Lingle EW. Expanding Medicaid drug formulary coverage: Effects on Utilization of related services Med. Care . 1990; 28(10):963–977.

Kozma CM, Reeder CE, Schultz RM. Economic, clinical and humanistic outcomes: A planning model for pharmacoeconomic research. Clin. Ther. 1993; 15:1121–1132.

Kreling DH, Mucha RE. Drug product management in health maintenance organizations. Am. J. Hosp. Pharm. 1992; 49:374–381

Kreling DH, Collins T, Lipton HL, et al. Assessment of the Impact of Pharmacy Benefit . Managers . Washington, DC: Health Care Financing Administration; 1996a.

Kreling DH, Knocke DJ, Hammel RW. Changes in market share for internal analgesic products after a Medicaid formulary restriction. J. Pharmaceut. Market. Manage . 1989a; 3(2):65–76.

Kreling DH, Knocke DJ, Hammel RW. The effects of an internal analgesic formulary restriction on Medicaid drug expenditures in Wisconsin. Medical Care . 1989b; 27(1):34–44.

Kreling DH, Lipton HL, Collings T, Hertz KC. Assessment of the Impact of Pharmacy Benefit Managers . Springfield, VA: U.S. Department of Commerce, National Technical Information Service ; 1996b.

Kresel J, Hutchings C, MacKay D, et al. Application of decision analysis to drug selection for formulary addition. Hospital Formul. 1987; 22:658–676.

Laetz T, Silberman G. Reimbursement policies constrain the practice of oncology (erratum, J. Am. Med. Assoc. 1992; 267[24]:3287 ) . J. Am. Med. Assoc. 1991; 266(21):2996–3000 .

Langley PC. Guidelines for Formulary Submissions for Pharmaceutical Product Evaluation . Denver: Blue Cross Blue Shield of Colorado, Blue Cross Blue Shield of Nevada; 1998.

Langley PC, Sullivan SD. Pharmacoeconomic evaluations: Guidelines for drug purchasers. J. Managed Care Pharm. 1996; 2:(6):671–677.

Leape LL, Bates DW, Cullen DJ, et al. Systems analysis of adverse drug events. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 1995; 274(1):35–43.

Leape LL, Brennan T, Laird N, et al. The nature of adverse events in hospitalized patients. N. Engl. J. Med. 1991; 324:377–384.

Leape LL, Cullen DJ, Clapp MD, et al. Pharmacist participation on physician rounds and adverse drug events in the intensive care unit. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 1999; 282(3):267–270 .

Lederle FA, Rogers EM. Lowering the cost of lowering the cholesterol: A formulary policy for lovastatin. J. Gen. Int. Med. 1990; 5:459–463.

Lehmann DF, Frey HS, Smalley WE, Griffin MR, Ray WA. Effect of a prior-authorization requirement on the use of non-steroid antiinflammatory drugs. N. Engl. J. Med. 1995; 333(19):1289–1290.

Leibowitz A, Manning WG, Newhouse JP. The demand for prescription drugs as a function of cost-sharing. Soc. Sci. Med. 1985; 21(10):1063–1069.

Levit K, Cowan C, Braden B, et al. National health expenditures in 1997: More slow growth. Health Affairs . 17,(6) :99–119.

Levy RA, Cocks D. Component Management Fails to Save Health Care System Costs: The Case of Restrictive Formularies (2nd Ed.). Reston, VA: National Pharmaceutical Council; 1999.

Suggested Citation:"References." Institute of Medicine. 2000. Description and Analysis of the VA National Formulary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9879.
×

Liang FA, Greenberg RB, Hogan GF. Legal issues associated with formulary product-selection when there are two or more recognized drug therapies. Am. J. Hosp. Pharm. 1988; 45:2372–2375.

Liang FZ, Greenberg RB, Hogan GF. New Medicare conditions of participation for hospitals. Am. J. Hosp. Pharm. 1987; 44:1119–1122.

Lin JC, Ito MK, Stolley SN, Morreale AP, Marcus DB. The effect of converting from pravastatin to simvastatin on the pharmacodynamics of warfarin. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 1999; 39:86–90.

Lindgren-Furmaga E, Schuna A, Wolff N, Goodfriend T. Cost of switching hypertensive patients from enalapril maleate to lisinopril. Am. J. Hosp. Pharm. 1991; 48:276–279.

Lipsy RJ. Institutional formularies: The relavance of pharmacoeconomic analysis to formulary decisions. PharmacoEconomics . 1992; 1(4):265–281.

Lipton HL, Kreling DH, Collins T et al. Pharmacy benefit management companies: Dimensions of performance. Annu. Rev. Public Health . 1999; 20:361–401

Lowe JC, Trilli LE. Development of a multifacility core formulary. ASHP Midyear Clin. . Meeting . 1995; 30:P-485(D).

Luce BR, Lyles CA, Rentz AM. The view from managed care pharmacy . Health Affairs . 1996; 15(4):168–176.

Lyles A, Luce B, Rentz A. Managed care pharmacy, socioeconomic assessments, and drug adoption decisions. Soc. Sci. Med. 1997; 45:511–521.

MacPherson P. The FDA just says yes. Hosp. Health Network . 1996; 70(10):34–36 , 38.

Majercik PL, May JR, Longe RL, et al. Evaluation of pharmacy and therapeutics committee drug evaluation reports. Am. J. Hosp. Pharm. 1985; 42:1073–1076.

Mannebach MA, Ascione FJ, Gaither CA, et al. Activities, functions, and structure of pharmacy and therapeutics committees in large teaching hospitals. Am. J. Health-Syst. Pharm. 1999; 56(7):622–628.

Martin BC, McMillan JA.. Med. Care. 1996; 34(7):686–701.

Massachusetts Out Patient Formulary Guide. 1999. Mather DB, Sullivan SD, Augenstein D, Fullerton PDS, Atherly D. Incorporating Clinical Outcomes and Economic Consequences into Drug Formulary Decisions: A Practical Approach. The American Journal of Managed Care . 1999; 5(3):277–285.

McAllister FA, Laupacis A, Wells GA, et al. Users' guides to the medical literature XIX. Applying clinical trial results. B. Guidelines for determining whether a drug is exerting (more than) a class effect. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 1999; 282(14):1371–1377.

McDonough KP, Weaver RH, Viall GD. Enalapril to lisinopril: Economic impact of a voluntary angiotensin-converting enzyme-inhibitor substitution program in a staff-model health maintenance organization. Ann. Pharmacother . 1992; 26:399–404.

McMillan K. Considerations in the formulary selection of hydroxymethlglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase inhibitors. Am J. Health-SystPharm. 1996; 53(18):2206–2214.

Mehl B, Santell JP. Projecting future drug expenditures—1998. Am J Health-Syst Pharm. 1998; 55:127–136.

Mehl B, Santell JP. Projecting future drug expenditures—1999. Am J Health-Syst Pharm. 1999; 56(1):31–39.

Suggested Citation:"References." Institute of Medicine. 2000. Description and Analysis of the VA National Formulary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9879.
×

Meier JL, Swislocki ALM, Lopez JF. Implementation of VA guidelines for Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose (SMBG): Effect on Glucose Control and Pharmacy Costs. Medicaid Managed Care Program . 1998; Summary.

Meyer MC, Bates H Jr, Swift RG. The role of state formularies. J. Am. Pharmaceut. Assoc. 1974; NS14(12):663–666.

Minnilch BN, Swanson KM, Dutro MP. Conversion from Amlodipine to Felodipine in VISN 18 . Monterrey, CA.: Western States Conference for Pharmacy Residents; 1997.

Mitchell J, Greenberg J, Finch K, et al. Effectiveness and economic impact and antidepressant medications: A review. Am. J. Managed Care . 1997; 3(2):323–330.

Moisan J, Vaillancourt R, Gregoire J-P, Gaudet M, Cote I, Leach A. Preferred hydroxymentyglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase inhibitors: treatment-modification program and outcomes. Am. J. Health-Syst. Pharm. 1999; 56:1437–1441.

Moore W, Newman R. Drug formulary restrictions as a cost-containment policy in medicaid programs. J. Law Econ. 1993; 36:71–97.

Nash DB, Catalano ML, Wordell CJ. The formulary decision-making process in a U.S. academic medical centre. PharmacoEconomics . 1993; 3(1):22–35.

Nash DB, Shulkin DJ, Owerbach J., et al. Physician attitudes toward managed care formularies: An initial survey . J. Res. Pharmaceut. Economy . 1992; 4(2):31–41.

National Academy for State Health Policy. Medicaid Managed Care: A Guide for States . Portland, ME: National Academy for State Health Policy; 1999.

National Committee to Review Current Procedures for Approval of New Drugs for Cancer and AIDS. Final Report of the National Committee to Review Current Procedures for Approval of New Drugs for Cancer and AIDS . Washington, DC: National Cancer Institute; 1990.

National Pharmaceutical Council. Pharmaceutical Benefits Under State Medical Assistance Programs . Washington, DC: National Pharmaceutical Council; 1973.

National Pharmaceutical Council. Pharmaceutical Benefits Under State Medical Assistance Programs . Washington, DC: National Pharmaceutical Council; 1989.

National Pharmaceutical Council. 1998.

Navarro RP, Cahill JA. The U.S. Health Care System and the Development of Managed Care. In : Navarro RP , ed. Managed Care Pharmacy Practice . Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen Publishers, Inc.; 1999.

New York Office of Mental Health . Guidelines for Monitoring Committee Approval Process for Clozapine Treatment . Albany, NY: Office of Mental Health; 1991.

Nightingale CH, Gousse GC, On A, et al. Antibiotic use and formulary considerations. J. Pharmacy Pract. 1991; 4(3):153–157.

Nightingale SL. Therapeutic Equivalence of Generic Drugs: Letter to Health Practitioners [on line]. Available at: http://www.fda.gov/cder/news/nightgenlett.htm. Food and Drug Administration; 1998.

Nightingale SL, Morrison JC. Generic drugs and the prescribing physician. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 1987; 258(9):1200–1204.

Novartis. Pharmacy Benefit Report: Trends and Forecasts . East Hanover, NJ: Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.; 1999.

Novartis. Pharmacy Benefit Report . East Hanover, NJ: Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.; 1998.

Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Acts 1990, 1993.

Suggested Citation:"References." Institute of Medicine. 2000. Description and Analysis of the VA National Formulary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9879.
×

Ogden JE, Muniz A, Patterson AA, Ramirez DJ, Kizer KW. Phamaceutical services in the Department of Veterans Affairs. Am J Health–Sys Pharm. 1997; 54(7):761–765.

Oh T, Franko TG. Implementing therapeutic interchange of intravenous famotidine for cimetidine and rantidine. Am. J. Hosp. Pharm. 1990; 47:1547–1551.

Owens MK. Medicaid Pharmacy Benefit Management. In : Navarro RP , ed. Managed Care Pharmacy Practice . Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen Publishers, Inc.; 1999.

Packer LA, Mahoney CD, Rich DS, et al. Effect of pharmacists' clinical interventions on nonformulary drug use. Am. J. Hosp. Pharm. 1986; 43:1461–1466.

Patterson AA, Pierce RAI, Powell AP. Prime vendor purchasing of pharmaceuticals in the Veterans Affairs health care system. Am. J. Health-Syst. Pharm. 1995; 52(17):1886–1889.

Pear R. Drug Industry Gathers a Mix of Voices to Bolster Its Case . New York: New York Times; 1993.

Pennstate Geisinger Health Plan, Formulary 1999.

Petitta A, Ward RE, Anandan JV, et al. The cost-effectiveness impact of a preferred agent HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor policy in managed care population J. Managed Care. Pharm. 1997; 3(5):548–553.

Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association. Waxman Airs Plan to End OBRA 90's Medicaid Formularies Ban . Washington, DC: Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association; 1993.

Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association (PMA). Towns Urge Black Caucus Oppose Planned Medicaid Restrictive Formulary . Washington, DC: Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association; 1993.

Pharmacy Benefits Management in a Valuable Product Line. 1995.

Phillips CR, Larson LN. Evaluating the operational performance and financial effects of a drug prior authorization program. J. Managed Care Pharm. 1997; 3(6):699–706.

Pollard M, Coster J. Savings for Medicaid drug spending. Health Affairs . 1991; Summer:196–206.

Portner TS, Srnka QM, Gourley DR, et al. Comparison of Department of Veteran Affairs pharmacy services in 1992 and 1994 with strategic-planning goals. Am J. Health-Syst. Pharm. 1996; 53(9):1032–1040.

Premier. Summary of Premier's Products and Services . 1998.

Quigley MA, Brown WM. A survey of selective administration procedures in formulary maintenance . Hosp. Pharm. 1981; 16:371–380.

Raiford D, Shulman S, Lasagna L. Determining appropriate reimbursement for prescritionn drugs: off-label uses and investigational therapies. Food Drug Law J. 1994; 49(1):37–76.

Rascati KL. Survey of formulary system policies and procedures. Am J. Hosp. Pharm. 1992; 49:100–103.

Reeder CE. Overview of pharmacoeconomics and pharmaceutical outcomes evaluations . Am. J. Health-Syst Pharm. 1995; 52(Suppl. 4):S5–S8.

Reeder CE, Dickson M, Kozma CM, et al. ASHP national survey of pharmacy practice in acute care setting—1996. Am. J. Health-Syst. Pharm. 1997; 54:653–669.

Rich DS. Experience with a two-tiered therapeutic interchange policy. Am. J. Hosp. Pharm. 1989; 46:1792–1798.

Suggested Citation:"References." Institute of Medicine. 2000. Description and Analysis of the VA National Formulary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9879.
×

Richton-Hewett S, Foster E, Apstein CS. Medical and economic consequences of a blinded oral anticoagulant brand change at a municipal hospital. Arch. Intern. Med. 1988; 148:806–808.

Rindone JP, Arriola G. Conversion from fluvastatin to simvastatin therapy at a dose ratio of 8 to 1: Effect on serum lipid levels and cost. Clinical Therapeutics . 1998; 20(2):340–346.

Roberts MJ, Summerfield MR. Formulary management to reduce costs: P&T committee strategies. Hosp Formul. 1986; 21:481–490.

Rucker TD. Formularies: conceptual and experimental factors related to product selection. Drug Inform. J. 1982a; 16(3):115–121.

Rucker TD. Formularies: principles, problems, and prognosis. Hosp. Pharm. 1982b; 17(9):460–461.

Rucker TD. A public policy strategy for drug formularies: preparation or procrastination necessity for implementing an effective national formulary. 1999.

Rucker TD. Quality control of hospital formularies. Pharmaceutisch Weekblad Scient. Ed. 1988; 10:145–150.

Rucker TD. Restricted formulary drugs: An exploratory study. Hosp. Pharm. 1982c; 17:246–253.

Rucker TD. Superior hospital formularies: A critical analysis. Hosp. Pharm. 1982d; 17(9):465–471 , 474–475 , 477–479.

Rucker TD, Schiff G. Drug formularies: Myths-in-formation. Med. Care . 1990; 28(10):928–939.

Rucker TD, Visconti JA. Hospital formularies: Organizational aspects and supplementary components . Am. J. Hosp. Pharm. 1976; 33:912–917.

Rucker TD, Visconti JA. How Effective Are Drug Formularies? A Descriptive and Normative Study . USDA . 1978.

Sax M, Emigh R. Managed care formularies in the United States. J. Managed Care Pharm. 1999; 5(4):289–295.

Schulman KA, Rubenstein LE, Abernathy DR, Seils DM, Sulmasy DP. The effect of pharmaceutical benefits managers: Is it being evaluated? Ann. Int. Med. 1996 ; 124(10):906–913.

Schwartz RK, Soumerai SB, Avorn J. Physician motivations for nonscientific drug prescribing. Soc. Sci. Med. 1989; 28(6):577–582.

Schweitzer, SO, Shiota S. Access and cost implications of state limitations on Medicaid reimbursement for pharmaceuticals. Annu. Rev. Public Health . 1992; 13:399–410.

Segal R, Pathak DS. Formulary decision making: identifying factors that influence P&T committee drug evaluations. Hosp. Formul. 1988 ; 23:174–178.

Shea BF, Churchill WW, Powell SH, Cooley TW, Maguire JH. P&T committee over-view: Bringham and Women's Hospital. Pharm. Pract. Manage. Q. 1998; 17(4):76–83 .

Shepherd MD, Salzman RD. The formulary decision-making process in a health maintenance organization setting. PharmacoEconomics . 1994; 5(1):29–38.

Shulman SR, Brown JS. The Food and Drug Administration's early access and fast-track approval initiatives: How have they worked? Food Drug Law J. 1995; 50(4):503–531 .

Siegal D, Lopez J. Trends in antihypertensive drug use in the United States. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 1997; 278(21):1745–1748.

Suggested Citation:"References." Institute of Medicine. 2000. Description and Analysis of the VA National Formulary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9879.
×

Siegel D, Meier JL, Lopez JR. Academic Detailing to Promote Hyperension (HTN) clinical Practice Guidelines. Am. J. Hypertension. 1999; 12(4):2 (37A).

Sloan FA. Drug Formularies, Prior Authorization, and Medicaid Cost Containment: Is There a Relationship. Unpublished manuscript ; 1989.

Sloan FA, Whetten-Goldstein K, Wilson A. Hospital pharmacy decisions, cost containment, and the use of cost-effectiveness analysis. Soc. Sci. Med. 1997; 45(4):523–533.

Smalley WE, Griffin M, Fought RL, et al. Effect of a prior authorization requirement on the use of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs by medicaid patients. N. Engl. J. Med. 1995; 332(24):1612–1617.

Smith DM, McKercher PL. The elimination of selected drug products from the Michigan Medicaid formulary: a case study. Hosp. Formul 1984; 19(5):366–372.

Smith DG. The effects of copayments and generic subsitution on the use and costs of prescription drugs. Inquiry . 1993; 30:189–198.

Smith KS, Briceland LL, Nightengale CH, Quintiliani R. Formulary conversion of cefoxitin usage to cefotetan: experience at a large yeaching hospital. DICP Ann. Pharmacother. 1989; 23:1024–1030.

Sonnedecker G. Earliest formulary for a civilian hospital, U.S.A. Drug Intell. Clin. Pharm. 1972; 6:425–434.

Sonnedecker G. Kremers and Urdang's History of Pharmacy. Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott Co.; 1976.

Soumerai SB, Avorn J, Ross-Degnan D, Gortmaker S. Payment restrictions for presecription drugs under Medicaid: Effects on therapy, cost, and equity. N. Engl. J. Med. 1987; 317(9):550–556.

Soumerai SB, Lipton HJL. Computer based drug utilization review–Risk, boondoggle? N. Engl. J. Med. 1995; 332(24):1641–1645.

Soumerai SB, McLaughlin TJ, Ross-Degnan D, Casteris CS, Bollini P. Effects of limiting Medicaid drug-reimbursement benefits on the use of psychotropic agents and acute mental health services by patients with schizophrenia. N. Engl. J. Med. 1994; 331(10):650–655.

Soumerai SB, Ross-Degnan D. Experience of state drug benefit programs. Health Affairs. 1990; 9(3):36–54.

Soumerai SB, Ross-Degnan D, Avorn J et al. Effects of Medicaid drug-payment limits on admission to hospitals and nursing homes. N. Eng. J. Med. 1991; 325(15):1072–1077.

Soumerai SB, Ross-Degnan D, Fortess EE et al. Examining product risk in context: market withdrawal of Zomepirac as a case study. J. Amer. Med. Assoc. 1993; 270(16):1937–1942.

Soumerai SB, Ross-Degnan D, Fortess EE, Abelson J. A critical analysis of studies of state drug reimbursement policies: research in need of discipline. Milbank Q. 1993a; 71(2): 217–252.

Spencer NA, Crouse MT. Drug Policy and Regulation in Managed Care. In : Navarro RP , ed. Managed Care Pharmacy Practice . Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen Publishers, Inc.; 1999.

Sprague MS, Gray DR. Impact of a formulary switch from amlodipine to felodipine. ASHP Midyear Clin. Meet . 1998; P-424E.

Suggested Citation:"References." Institute of Medicine. 2000. Description and Analysis of the VA National Formulary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9879.
×

Stanaszek MB, Foss, ND. Lansoprazole-associated diarrhea: Case report and experience at a Veterans Affairs medical center.

Stock AJ, Kofoed L. Therapeutic interchange of fluoxetine and sertraline: Experience in the clinical setting. Am. J. Hosp. Pharm. 1994; 51:2279–2281.

Streja DA, Hui RL, Streja E, McCombs JS. Selective contracting and patient outcomes: A case study of formulary restrictions for selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor anti-depressants . Am. J. Managed Care . 1999; 5(9):1133–1142.

Strom BL. Generic drug substitution revisited. N. Engl. J. Med. 1987; 316(23):1456–1462.

Summers KH, Szeinbach SL. Formualries: The role of pharmacy-and-therapeutics (P&T) committees. Clin. Ther. 1993; 15(2):433–441.

Taniguchi R. Pharmacy benefit management companies. Am. J. Health-System Pharm. 1995; 52:1915–1917.

The Office of the Medical Inspector, Veterans Health Administration . Special Report: VA Patient Safety Event Registry: First Nineteen Months of Reported Cases Summary and Analysis . Washington, DC: Department of Veterans Affairs, 1999.

The Pink Sheet . Florida Medicaid prior authorization for four drug categories. Pink Sheet . 1993.

Tufts Health Plan. Prescription Alternative Program: Non-Covered Drugs [on line] . Available at: http://www.tuftshealthplan.com/members/pharmacy-index.html.

United Health Care. Preferred Drug List [on line]. Available at: http://www.unitedhealthcare.com/pharmacy/pdl00/pdl00.html

Vivian E, Morreale A, Boyce E, Lowry K, Ereso O, Hlavin P. Efficacy and cost effectiveness of lansoprazole versus omeprazole in maintenance treatment of symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease . Am. J. Managed Care . 1999; 5(7):881–886.

Wall DS, Abel SR. Therapeutic interchange algorithm for multiple drug classes. Am. J. Health-Syst. Pharm. 1996; 53(11):1295–1296.

Walser BL, Ross-Degnan D, Soumerai SB. Do open formularies increase access to clinically useful drugs? Health Affairs . 1996; 15(3):95–107.

Weintraub M. The United States: Hospital Formularies in Controlling the Use of Therapeutic Drugs: An International Comparison . Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research; 1978.

Weintraub M, Singh S, Byrne L, et al. Consequences of the 1989 New York State triplicate benzodiazepine prescription regulations. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 1991; 266(17):2392–2397.

Wilson J, Burke S. Member Satisfaction Strategies. In : Navarro RP , ed. Managed Care Pharmacy Practice . Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen Publishers, Inc.; 1999.

Wilson NJ, Kizer KW. The VA health care system: An unrecognized national safety net. Health Affairs . 1997; 16(4):200–204.

Wyeth Ayerst Laboratories. The Wyeth Ayerst Prescription Drug Benefit Cost and Plan Design Survey Report. Albuquerque, NM: Wellman Publishing, Inc. 1998.

Yankelovich Partners. VA Physicians Study . Washington, DC, unpublished report ; 1999.

Zellmer WA. Medication error versus medication misadventure—What's in a name? Am. J. Hosp. Pharm. 1993; 50:315–318.

Zhanel GG, Gin AS, Przybylo A, Louie TJ, Otten NH. Effect of interventions on prescribing of antimicrobials for prophylaxis in obstetric and gynecologic surgery. Am. J. Hosp. Pharm. 1989; 46:2493–2496.

Suggested Citation:"References." Institute of Medicine. 2000. Description and Analysis of the VA National Formulary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9879.
×

Zimmerman DL, Daley J. Using Outcomes to Improve Health Care Decision Making . Boston: Department of Veterans Affairs, Office of Research and Development ; 1997.

Zoeller J. Does therapeutic interchange hurt patients? Am. Druggist. 1991; 66–79.

Suggested Citation:"References." Institute of Medicine. 2000. Description and Analysis of the VA National Formulary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9879.
×
Page 201
Suggested Citation:"References." Institute of Medicine. 2000. Description and Analysis of the VA National Formulary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9879.
×
Page 202
Suggested Citation:"References." Institute of Medicine. 2000. Description and Analysis of the VA National Formulary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9879.
×
Page 203
Suggested Citation:"References." Institute of Medicine. 2000. Description and Analysis of the VA National Formulary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9879.
×
Page 204
Suggested Citation:"References." Institute of Medicine. 2000. Description and Analysis of the VA National Formulary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9879.
×
Page 205
Suggested Citation:"References." Institute of Medicine. 2000. Description and Analysis of the VA National Formulary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9879.
×
Page 206
Suggested Citation:"References." Institute of Medicine. 2000. Description and Analysis of the VA National Formulary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9879.
×
Page 207
Suggested Citation:"References." Institute of Medicine. 2000. Description and Analysis of the VA National Formulary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9879.
×
Page 208
Suggested Citation:"References." Institute of Medicine. 2000. Description and Analysis of the VA National Formulary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9879.
×
Page 209
Suggested Citation:"References." Institute of Medicine. 2000. Description and Analysis of the VA National Formulary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9879.
×
Page 210
Suggested Citation:"References." Institute of Medicine. 2000. Description and Analysis of the VA National Formulary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9879.
×
Page 211
Suggested Citation:"References." Institute of Medicine. 2000. Description and Analysis of the VA National Formulary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9879.
×
Page 212
Suggested Citation:"References." Institute of Medicine. 2000. Description and Analysis of the VA National Formulary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9879.
×
Page 213
Suggested Citation:"References." Institute of Medicine. 2000. Description and Analysis of the VA National Formulary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9879.
×
Page 214
Suggested Citation:"References." Institute of Medicine. 2000. Description and Analysis of the VA National Formulary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9879.
×
Page 215
Suggested Citation:"References." Institute of Medicine. 2000. Description and Analysis of the VA National Formulary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9879.
×
Page 216
Next: Acronyms »
Description and Analysis of the VA National Formulary Get This Book
×
 Description and Analysis of the VA National Formulary
Buy Paperback | $78.00 Buy Ebook | $64.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

The VA National Formulary generated controversy, which motivated congressional scrutiny and a directive to the VA to commission this report reviewing the experience with the National Formulary and formulary system. This Institute of Medicine committee was pleased to assist the Congress with this review, in part because the committee saw in the VHA example an opportunity to understand and anticipate problems that all publicly funded programs are likely to encounter in this new age of pharmaceuticals. The Congress asked the committee to review the restrictiveness of the National Formulary, its impact on the costs and quality of care in the VHA, and how it compared to formularies and drug management practices in the private sector and in other public programs, especially Medicaid. Detailed in the pages that follow, the committee's findings and conclusions on these questions are, the committee believes, highly instructive, though not always in the ways that we anticipated.

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!