Items in cart [0] Questions? Call 888-624-8373

PAPERBACK list:$21.00 Web:$18.90 add to cart Rights & Permissions Free PDF Access Free Resources Sign in to download PDF book and chapters PDF EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Display this book on your site! Related Titles NAEP Reporting Practices: Investigating District-Level and Market-Basket Reporting Systems for State Science Assessment Other Related Titles Designing a Market Basket for NAEP: Summary of a Workshop (2000) Board on Testing and Assessment (BOTA) Web Search Builder Use this book's key terms to search within this book, across our collection, or across the Web. Skim This Chapter Skim this chapter and use this chapter's key terms to search within this book. Reference Finder Paste in your own text to find books that relate to your topic. Page 58   E-mail  Facebook  Digg  Stumble  Twitter More The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy. References Beaton, A.E. and R. Zwick 1992 Overview of the National Assessment of Educational Progress. Journal of Educational Statistics. 17(2): 95-109. Bock, R.D. 1993 Domain-Referenced Reporting in Large-Scale Educational Assessments. Paper commissioned by the National Academy of Education for the Capstone Report of the NAE Technical Review Panel on State/NAEP Assessment. Bock, R.D. D. Thissen, and M.F. Zimowski 1997 IRT Estimation of Domain Scores. Journal of Educational Measurement 34: 197-211. Forsyth, F., R. Hambleton, R. Linn, R. Mislevy, and W. Yen, 1996 Design and Feasibility Team: Report to the National Assessment GoverningBoard, Report of July 1. Hawkes, M., P. Kimmelman, and D. Kroeze 1997 Becoming “First in the World” in Math and Science. Phi Delta Kappan, September. Johnson, E., S. Lazer, and O'Sullivan 1997 NAEP reconfigured: An integrated redesign of the National Assessment of Educational Progress. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics. Lord, Frederick M. 1980 Applications of Item Response Theory to Practical Testing Problems. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. Mazzeo, J. 2000 NAEP's Year-2000 Market-Basket Study: What Do We Expect to Learn? Paper prepared for National Research Council Workshop on Market-Basket Reporting. Page 58 Front Matter (R1-R14) 1 Introduction (1-8) 2 Origin of the Market-Basket Concept (9-15) 3 The Consumer Price Index Market Basket (16-18) 4 The Perspectives of NAEP's Sponsors and Contractors (19-29) 5 Using Innovations in Measurement and Reporting: Releasing a Representative Set of Test Questions (30-33) 6 Using Innovations in Measurement and Reporting: Reporting Percent Correct Scores (34-39) 7 Simplifying NAEP's Technical Design: The Role of the Short Form (40-50) 8 Summing Up: Issues to Consider and Address (51-57) References (58-60) Appendix A Workshop Agenda and Participants (61-67)

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 58
DESIGNING A MARKET BASKET FOR NAEP: SUMMARY OF A WORKSHOP References Beaton, A.E. and R. Zwick 1992 Overview of the National Assessment of Educational Progress. Journal of Educational Statistics. 17(2): 95-109. Bock, R.D. 1993 Domain-Referenced Reporting in Large-Scale Educational Assessments. Paper commissioned by the National Academy of Education for the Capstone Report of the NAE Technical Review Panel on State/NAEP Assessment. Bock, R.D. D. Thissen, and M.F. Zimowski 1997 IRT Estimation of Domain Scores. Journal of Educational Measurement 34: 197-211. Forsyth, F., R. Hambleton, R. Linn, R. Mislevy, and W. Yen, 1996 Design and Feasibility Team: Report to the National Assessment GoverningBoard, Report of July 1. Hawkes, M., P. Kimmelman, and D. Kroeze 1997 Becoming “First in the World” in Math and Science. Phi Delta Kappan, September. Johnson, E., S. Lazer, and O'Sullivan 1997 NAEP reconfigured: An integrated redesign of the National Assessment of Educational Progress. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics. Lord, Frederick M. 1980 Applications of Item Response Theory to Practical Testing Problems. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. Mazzeo, J. 2000 NAEP's Year-2000 Market-Basket Study: What Do We Expect to Learn? Paper prepared for National Research Council Workshop on Market-Basket Reporting.

OCR for page 59
DESIGNING A MARKET BASKET FOR NAEP: SUMMARY OF A WORKSHOP National Assessment Governing Board 1996 Redesigning the National Assessment of Educational Progress. Policy Statement. 1997 Resolution on Market Basket Reporting, August 2. 1999a Policy Guidance on the NAEP Short Form: Summary of Principles Related to Measurement Issues. 1999b The National Assessment of Educational Progress: Design 2000-2010. National Education Goals Panel 1994 The National Education Goals Report: Building a Nation of Leaders. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office. National Research Council 1999a Embedding Questions: The Pursuit of a Common Measure in Uncommon Tests. Committee on Embedding Common Test Items in State and District Assessments. D.M. Koretz, M.W. Bertenthal, and B.F. Green, eds. Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. 1999bGrading the Nation's Report Card: Evaluating NAEP and Transforming the Assessment of Educational Progress. Committee on the Evaluation of National and State Assessments of Progress. J.W. Pellegrino,L.R. Jones, and K.M. Mitchell, eds. Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. 1999cReporting District-Level NAEP Data: Summary of a Workshop. Committee on NAEP Reporting Practices: Investigating District-Level and Market-Basket Reporting. P.J. DeVito and J.A. Koenig, eds. Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. 1999d Uncommon Measures: Equivalence and Linkage Among Educational Tests. Committee on the Equivalency and Linkage of Educational Tests. M.J. Feuer, P.W. Holland, B.F. Green, M.W. Bertenthal, and F.C. Hemphill, eds. Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

OCR for page 60
DESIGNING A MARKET BASKET FOR NAEP: SUMMARY OF A WORKSHOP This page in the original is blank.

Representative terms from entire chapter:

educational progress