Bridging Disciplines in the Brain, Behavioral, and Clinical Sciences

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

About | Ordering | New

LoginRegister

| Items in cart [0]

PAPERBACK
price:$46.75
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

Free PDF Access

Free Resources

Related Titles

Bridging Disciplines in the Brain, Behavioral, and Clinical Sciences (2000)
Institute of Medicine (IOM)

Citation Manager Export the bibliographic data for this book in your chosen format
Web Search Builder Use this book's key terms to search within this book, across our collection, or across the Web.
Skim This Chapter Skim this chapter and use this chapter's key terms to search within this book.
Reference Finder Paste in your own text to find books that relate to your topic.

Citation Manager

. "3 Barriers to Interdisciplinary Research and Training." Bridging Disciplines in the Brain, Behavioral, and Clinical Sciences. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2000.

Please select a format:

Page
57


E-mail Share on facebook Facebook Share on delicious Delicious Share on stumbleupon Stumble Share on twitter Twitter More Sharing ServicesMore

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.

Bridging Disciplines in the Brain, Behavioral, and Clinical Sciences

46. National Cancer Institute. 1994.Specialized programs of research excellence in breast cancer.NIH Guide 23.[Online].Available: www.nih.gov/grants/guide/rfa-files/RFA-CA-94-027.html[accessed 1999].

47. National Institutes of Health Loan Repayment Program.Eligibility Requirements. [Online].Available: lrp.info.nih.gov/aib/aib2.htm [accessed November 1999].

48. National Research Council. 1994.Meeting the Nation's Needs for Biomedical and Behavioral Scientists. Washington, DC:National Academy Press.

49. Rosenberg L. 1999.Physician-scientists—Endangered and essential.Science283:331–332.

50. Ruksznis E. 1999.Interdisciplinarity: Psychology + X.Observer 12:1.

51. Service RF. 1999.Interdisciplinary research—Berkeley puts all its eggs in two baskets.Science 286:226–227.

52. Sigma Xi. 1998.Removing the Boundaries: Perspectives on Cross-Disciplinary Research: Final Report on an Inquiry into Cross-Disciplinary Science. New Haven, Conn: Sigma Xi,The Scientific Research Society.

53. Smagtik, P. 2000.NIH seeks funding for neuroscience centerNature 403:123.

54. Society for Neuroscience. 1995.Society for Neuroscience 1995 membership survey. [Online]. Available: www.sfn.org/membdata/[accessed January 7, 2000].

55. Somerville MA. 1998.UNESCO transdisciplinary programmes, preliminary insights. Transdisciplinary. Paris:UNESCO, Division of Philosophy and Ethics [Online]. Avaliable: www.unesco.org/philosophy/transdisciplinarity[accessed January 4, 2000].

56. Their SO. 1981.Symposium on the academic physician: An endangered species. Recommendations for remedies. Bull NYAcad Med 57:480–487.

57. White B. 1997.Multiple authorship. Science 275:461.

58. Whitley R. 1981.The context of scientific investigation. In: Knorr KD, Krohn R, Whitley R.The Social process of scientific investigation. Boston: D Reidel Pub. Co.

59. Wilbanks T. 1986.Communications between hard and soft sciences. In: Chubin DE, Porter AL, Rossini FA, Connolly T.Interdisciplinary Analysis and Research: Theory and Practice of Problem-Focused Research and Development. Mt. Airy, Md: Lomond Publications, Inc..Pp. 131–140.

60. Wyngaarden JB. 1979.The clinical investigator as an endangered species. N Engl J Med 301:1254–1259.