Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:

Appendix L Current Evidence on Compliance --Sally W. Vernon, M.A., Ph.D.
Pages 208-219

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 208...
... Appendix L Current Evidence on Compliance Sally W Vernon, M.A., Ph.D.
From page 209...
... The 3rd question requires some extrapolation from existing data because it hasn't been studied directly. I will share some thoughts about how we might arrive at a best guess, but I think this question warrants discussion.
From page 210...
... There are 2 national data sources that have collected self-report data on use of CRC screening tests ­ the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) and the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS)
From page 211...
... And the BFRSS may ask more refined questions about such patterns in future surveys. SLIDE 4 SLIDE NOTES 4: Data from the other national survey, the BRFSS, cover the time period 1997 to 2002.
From page 212...
... The prevalence and the rate of increase are higher than for recent FOBT. As with FOBT, adults with less than a high school education were less likely to report SIG or colonoscopy than all adults.
From page 213...
... Another factor that has not been looked at in national surveys but that is strongly associated with adherence to cancer screening recommendations, including CRC screening, is having a physician recommend the test. Data from the National Cancer Institute's Health Information and Trends Survey (HINTS)
From page 214...
... Of all cancer screening tests for which we have data, Pap testing prevalence is the highest. Rates have been steady at ~85% since 1992.
From page 215...
... The question I would pose from the data viewed collectively is: What makes Pap testing different from the other tests, particularly DRE and PSA? They all are relatively inexpensive, require contact with a physician, can be done easily in the context of a primary care visit, and they aren't very different in terms of their invasiveness.
From page 216...
... . Roughly 60 to 70 percent of physicians say that they are recommending or performing colon cancer screening tests on their average-risk patients.
From page 217...
... A study by Myers and colleagues (Myers et al., 2001) compared measurement of complete diagnostic evaluation after a positive FOBT by 4 methods ­ external chart review, internal chart audit, administrative data review, and a combination of chart review and administrative data notes ­ and found that rates ranged from 49 to 79%.
From page 218...
... 2003. A national survey of primary care physicians' colorectal cancer screening recommendations and practices.
From page 219...
... 2003. Progress in cancer screening practices in the United States: Results from the 2000 National Health Interview Survey.


This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.