Educating the Engineer of 2020 Adapting Engineering Education to the New Century (2005) / Chapter Skim
Currently Skimming:
5 Recommendations
5 Recommendations
Pages 51-58
The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.
From page 51... ...
REENGINEERING THE ENGINEERING EDUCATION SYSTEM Given the changing landscape sketched in the Phase I report, a number of possible implications for engineering education were evident. Supplemented by discussions at the Summit and deliberations by the Phase II committee, these "implications" formed the basis for the recommendations set forth below.
|
From page 52... ...
The engineering education establishment must also adopt a broader view of the value of an engineering education to include providing a "liberal" engineering education to those students who wish to use it as a springboard for other career pursuits, such as business, medicine, or law. Adequate depth in a specialized area of engineering cannot be achieved in the baccalaureate degree.
|
From page 53... ...
ABET should ensure that evaluators look for innovation and experimentation in the curriculum and not just hold institutions to a strict interpretation of the guidelines as they see them. Based on the curricular experiments that have been conducted under the National Science Foundation (NSF)
|
From page 54... ...
The engineering education establishment, for example, the Engineering Deans Council, should endorse research in engineering education as a valued and rewarded activity for engineering faculty as a means to enhance and personalize the connection to undergraduate students, to understand how they learn, and to appreciate the pedagogical approaches that excite them. At the application end of engineering practice, there is a growing disconnect with engineering education that begs for enlightened industrial engineering leaders and a new generation of faculty able to bridge the gap more effectively.
|
From page 55... ...
This dooms future engineers to make the same mistakes. The management of knowledge is somewhat better in the case of successes, but it is questionable whether the real elements of success are identified separate of the marketing "spin" for the product or service.
|
From page 56... ...
At the same time, however, they cannot afford to neglect domestic students. Indeed, improvements in engineering education that energize the undergraduate experience may encourage more domestic students to pursue advanced degrees.
|
From page 57... ...
In the spirit that the engineering community must "sell" the value and excitement of an engineering education, the community must make every effort to help interested students make an informed choice. The American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE)
|
From page 58... ...
58 EDUCATING THE ENGINEER OF 2020 student, for example, about program philosophy -- engineering up front, availability of team design activities, etc., and about student outcomes in terms of retention, years to degree completion and securing jobs at graduation.
|
Key Terms
This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More
information on Chapter Skim is available.