Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:

2 Evaluating the Effectiveness of the Mission-Extension Paradigm
Pages 4-7

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 4...
... Because the cost of extending mission operations is only a fraction of that required for developing new systems, 1 approving mission extensions provides a means for achieving high-quality science for relatively low cost in many cases. Box 2.1 provides historic examples of missions extended for scientific reasons.
From page 5...
... The MODIS instrument on the Terra mission provides a global land cover data set. The higher spatial detail provided by the ETM+ instrument on the Landsat mission, launched many years before the Terra mission, has proven essential to algorithm training for this data set.
From page 6...
... This is often true for missions with known operational utility but no funded operational follow-on mission.4 It is also true for missions with science returns that are not expected to decline over time, such as those contributing to long time-series data sets. 2 NASA safety guidelines call for a controlled reentry when a satellite would pose a greater than 1 in 10,000 chance of harming people or damaging property on the ground if it were left to reenter in an uncontrolled manner.
From page 7...
... · Earth science missions have unique considerations, such as future operational utility and interagency partnerships, that distinguish them from space science missions; these considerations should be explicitly included in a mission-extension decision-making process. Recommendation.


This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.