Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:

4 Establishing Relationships Between Dietary Patterns and Health Outcomes
Pages 49-64

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 49...
... He expressed the hope that eventual outcomes of this workshop will be the ranking of risks and the engagement in other opportunities for advancing the nutritional aspects of food that could improve the public's health. CHALLENGES IN ESTABLISHING RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN FOOD PATTERNS AND HEALTH OUTCOMES Presenter: Julie Mares The relationships between diet and chronic disease differ in character from the relationships between diet and deficiency or between diet and acute disease, but the techniques available for evaluating them often do not reflect this.
From page 50...
... Chronic diseases develop over decades, as shown in Figure 4-1. Among people exposed to conditions that increase the risk, however, relative risks for many chronic diseases decrease with age.
From page 51...
... The random error is compounded with bias in studies of middle-aged and older adults whose intakes change with time and also change in response to the presence of other chronic diseases that may increase risk for the disease being studied. (Cardiovascular disease, for example, may lead to dietary change and it
From page 52...
... observed that dietary assessment at the baseline gave odds ratio estimates very different from those obtained from retrospective estimates of the diet consumed 10 years earlier. For this reason, it is optimal to obtain multiple estimates of dietary intake over the time period that is expected to influence the development of the disease being studied.
From page 53...
... When the investigators compared women of all ages, they found lower odds ratios if they excluded women with unstable diets. Other Factors That Affect the Influence of Diet on Disease Other risk factors may modify the influence of diet.
From page 54...
... Differences in findings from different types of studies offer an opportunity to find the reasons for those differences. Biological Plausibility Animal Models Clinical Trials and Observations Relevance to Different Magnitude of Impact Groups of People Across Diet Levels Analytic Observational Population Comparisons: Studies: Ecological Studies Cohort and Case-Control Nested Populations Migrant Populations Importance: Relative to Other Risk and Protective Factors Analytic Observational Studies: Cohort and Case-Control FIGURE 4-3 Uses of different types of studies in examining the body of evidence.
From page 55...
... Clinical trials complement results of observational studies. For example, the Rotterdam Eye Study showed that diets rich in the components of the supplements used in the Age-Related Macular Degeneration Study reduced the incidence of intermediate AMD by 35 percent (Van Leeuwen et al., 2005)
From page 56...
... • Broaden trials so that they study a variety of disease outcomes, especially intermediate stages that reflect biological mecha nisms, and a variety of dietary attributes. EVIDENCE-BASED REVIEW PROCESS TO LINK DIETARY FACTORS WITH CHRONIC DISEASE Presenter: Alice H
From page 57...
... This is the most important step in the process. • Identify search terms, using enough terms to identify all the rele vant literature while minimizing extraneous articles.
From page 58...
... were all-cause mortality, myocardial infarc tion, stroke, and sudden death. Among the inclusion criteria that were used were experimental or observational studies of at least 1-year duration with at least five human subjects, with reported original CVD outcome data, and with all sources of omega-3 fatty acid intakes evaluated.
From page 59...
... Kathleen Ellwood provided background information on nutrition labeling and health claims, described the process for reviewing the scientific evidence, and summarized results from selected evidence-based reviews.
From page 60...
... . Process for Reviewing the Scientific Evidence The process for reviewing the evidence for significant scientific agreement health claims and qualified health claims is the same; the level of supportive evidence distinguishes the two.
From page 61...
... Classification of Relevant Studies FDA considers intervention studies to be the "gold standard" and uses intervention studies that measure modifiable risk factors. Among the observational studies, prospective cohort studies are considered more reliable than case–control studies and cross-sectional studies.
From page 62...
... The prostate cancer claim language statement for food labeling is, "Very limited and preliminary scientific research suggests that eating one-half to one cup of tomatoes and/or tomato sauce a week may reduce the risk of prostate cancer." FDA concludes that there is little scientific evidence supporting the claim.
From page 63...
... Qualifying health claim language in this case includes "a relationship between chromium picolinate and either insulin resistance or T2D is highly uncertain." Green Tea and Breast Cancer A review of the evidence identified three credible observational studies relating green tea intake to the risk of breast cancer. Two of these were prospective cohort studies that showed no relationship, and one was a case–control study that showed a beneficial relationship.
From page 64...
... 64 NUTRITIONAL RISK ASSESSMENT Concluding Remarks Kathleen Ellwood encouraged participants to visit the FDA website for more detailed information on this topic. OPEN DISCUSSION Moderator: Michael Doyle The key points made during the open discussion have been incorporated into Chapter 6, Perspectives on Challenges and Solutions: Summary Remarks and Suggested Next Steps.


This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.