Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:

Space and Earth Science Issues from the November 29-30, 2007, Workshop on U.S. Civil Space Policy
Pages 1-5

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 1...
... Some of the sessions focused more than others on issues of interest to NASA's Science Mission Directorate and hence receive more attention in this report, because, as noted 2 National Research Council, Issues and Opportunities Regarding the U.S. Space Program: A Summary Report of a Workshop on National Space Policy, The National Academies Press, Washington, D.C., 2004.
From page 2...
... One comment was that future decadal surveys need to include program managers and cost analysts in addition to scientists, as was done with the recent NRC study on the Beyond Einstein missions,6 to ensure more realistic predictions of what future missions might cost.7 Another comment 4 National Research Council, An Assessment of Balance in NASA's Science Programs, The National Academies Press, Washington, D.C., 2006, p.
From page 3...
... The panel moderator emphasized that there is an imbalance between the size of the program and the resources that have been allocated and stated, "This train wreck has a probability of 100 percent." 8 This viewpoint was also noted the 2006 SSB Balance report. See National Research Council, An Assessment of Balance in NASA's Science Programs, The National Academies Press, Washington, D.C., 2006.
From page 4...
... cut the instruments intended 12 See also National Research Council, Earth Science and Applications from Space: National Imperatives for the Next Decade and Beyond, The National Academies Press, Washington, D.C., 2007, and National Research Council, Satellite Observations of the Earth's Environment: Accelerating the Transition of Research to Operations, The National Academies Press, Washington, D.C., 2003.
From page 5...
... Another participant expressed the viewpoint that, given the decline in Earth science funding in NASA over the past decade, the Earth science community is somewhat dysfunctional and may not be able to respond effectively to a major initiative in the new federal administration. In addition to discussions of Earth observation programs and the space program's potential geopolitical role, Day Two involved considerable discussion of how to maintain interest in the goals enunciated in the Vision.


This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.