Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:

Topic I What Should Be the Underpinnings and Motivating Science and Applications Questions in a New Science of Hydrologic Extremes?
Pages 3-5

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 3...
... A defensible and successful approach to mapping changing flood risk in time would need to recognize both systematic natural climate variations over decadal scales and anthropogenic changes in climate. The challenge is to develop a framework to encompass assessment of conditional (given observed climate conditions, as reflected in slowly varying ocean temperature fields)
From page 4...
... Returning to river issues, Lall summarized what he called "dogmas"; that extreme rainfall plus antecedent land conditions equals an extreme river flood, that topography and channel network structure lead to scaling laws for flood extremes, and that various principles for regionalization of flood frequency related to area or statistical homogeneity are available. All, he said, assume stationarity, and we have done very limited causal analysis of climate mechanisms and their use in prediction of static or dynamic risk.
From page 5...
... Finally, several participants noted that while 30 years ago a meeting like this to consider linked atmospheric and hydrologic processes would never have occurred, hydrologists will need to improve their communication with social scientists, economists, insurers, biogeographers, and others to effectively understand and address the flood vulnerability issue. BREAKOUT SESSION REPORT Rapporteur Eric Wood summarized the discussion in the first breakout group.


This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.