Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:

2 General Assessment of the NIST Center for Neutron Research
Pages 7-11

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 7...
... at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) and the approaching 10.5-month shutdown of the NCNR facility for upgrades and the installation of a new guide hall and new instruments.
From page 8...
... The maintaining of direct control of the Expansion Project and restart by the Director of the NCNR should enable rapid response to and mitigation of potential challenges for a timely restart. COMPARISON OF THE CENTER WITH OTHER USER FACILITIES The comparison between reactor sources and continuous and pulsed spallation sources is technically complicated by different power and neutron flux issues, since continuous and pulsed flux optimize different experiments.
From page 9...
... The NCNR oversubscription rates by beam line are in a healthy range, averaging 2.2 over the facility, indicative of a robust and vibrant user community. To provide a means to evaluate the NCNR relative to other comparable user facilities and to allow for a straightforward and direct comparison, the average number of beam days that a user team requires in order to develop a publication was considered here.
From page 10...
... Accessed June 30, 2011.  HFIR and SNS: Allen Ekkebus, Oak Ridge National Laboratory; and Oak Ridge National Laboratory, ORNL Neutron Sciences, Neutron Review, ORNL/TM-2011/88, April 2011.
From page 11...
... 5 Colin Carlisle, Director of the ESS Scandinavia Secretariat Lund, personal communication to the panel, March 23, 2011.


This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.