Sex-Specific Reporting of Scientific Research A Workshop Summary (2012) / Chapter Skim
Currently Skimming:
INTRODUCTION
INTRODUCTION
Pages 2-3
The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.
From page 2... ...
Nancy Adler, professor of medical psychology at the University of California, San Francisco, and workshop chair, cited a recent review of high-impact publications of clinical studies, including clinical trials and prospective cohort studies, of non–sex-specific cancers. It found that women constituted less than 40% of participants (Jagsi et al., 2009)
|
From page 3... ...
To address the recommendation, the NIH ORWH requested that the IOM convene a 1-day workshop to explore the benefits of and barriers to sex-specific reporting of scientific data. The workshop brought together representatives of academe, industry, government, and researchadvocacy organizations and editors of leading scientific and medical journals to consider the need for sex-specific reporting of scientific results; potential barriers to and unintended consequences of sex-specific reporting of scientific results; experiences of journals that have implemented sex-specific re quirements, including the challenges and benefits of such editorial policies; and steps to facilitate the reporting of sex-specific results.
|
Key Terms
This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More
information on Chapter Skim is available.