Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:

Chapter Four - Impacts of Highway Cost Allocation Studies
Pages 23-25

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 23...
... Horizontal and vertical equity are not fully achievable in most state transportation tax structures owing to the heavy reliance on registration fees, non-mileage-based weight fees, and motor fuel taxes. Mileage-based taxes and fees can be used to more completely achieve equity and fully implement the findings of HCASs.
From page 24...
... Therefore, when the Oregon HCAS finds that heavy-truck tax payments are forecast to exceed cost responsibility by 5%, the Oregon Legislature responds by reducing all weight-mile tax rates by 5%. This practice has led to a disparity in terms of the cost responsibility among heavy-truck classes with the most recent Oregon HCAS projecting that tax payments from vehicles with declared weights of between 10,000 and 26,000 lb would exceed their cost responsibility by 26%, whereas tax payments from heavy trucks weighing between 80,000 and 105,500 lb would fall short of cost responsibility by 16% (ECONorthwest 2007)
From page 25...
... This condition is often made in cases where one particular highway-user group is seriously concerned that a study may lead to a recommendation for a significant fee increase for vehicles in that class. Another possible outcome might be an agreement on a quid pro quo solution -- for example, a tax or fee increase offset in value by a favorable change in a non-tax condition, such as liberalization on vehicle combination or length limits or restrictions on access to more parts of the highway network.


This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.