Liability Aspects of Bikeways (2010) / Chapter Skim
Currently Skimming:
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSION
Pages 43-44
The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.
From page 43... ...
The North Carolina Attorney General's Office reported that it was not aware of such a claim since 2000. Phoenix advised that potential tort liability would be a reason indirectly to deny establishment of an onstreet bicycle facility when there are insufficient resources or insufficient space for a safe facility.
|
From page 44... ...
Although the report analyzes public entities' tort liability with respect to bikeways, the reader is cautioned that tort claims acts, recreational use immunity statutes, and the courts' interpretations of the law differ from state to state. The nature of the legal issues and principles discussed herein does not allow for definitive statements concerning public entities' tort liability for bikeway claims.
|
Key Terms
This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More
information on Chapter Skim is available.