Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:


Pages 21-26

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 21...
... The model year within EDMS was set to 2011 to force a low sulfur content fuel for the GSE. This choice was made because using an earlier year with high sulfur content fuel would overstate the benefits of an alternative jet fuel, and an alternative jet fuel will not realistically be available in large quantities while the high sulfur content diesel fuel is in use; therefore, the reductions in SOx would be overstated.
From page 22...
... Of this portion, diesel GSE makes up 78%. Unlike the aircraft flight schedule, which provided actual flights and aircraft used, the GSE vehicle inventory was produced by an internal EDMS algorithm.
From page 23...
... The aircraft NOx emissions for ULSJ are reduced by the change in fuel burn 0.5%, while the NOx emissions for 100% SPK would be reduced by 2.1% and the 50-50 blend would be reduced by 1.3%. This result is likely conservative since preliminary studies show that NOx is reduced with SPK fuels.
From page 24...
... 24 0 1,000,000 2,000,000 3,000,000 4,000,000 5,000,000 6,000,000 7,000,000 NOx (kg)
From page 25...
... With Jet A, the largest contribution to PM2.5 is due to sulfates. With each of the alternative fuels considered, the ultralow sulfur content of the fuels makes the sulfate contribution negligible.
From page 26...
... Ambient PM2.5 concentration from aircraft for each of the four fuel compositions considered in this work, with the breakout of individual species [from Donohoo (2010) with permission]


This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.