Transportation Improvement Program Revision Process (2011) / Chapter Skim
Currently Skimming:
Pages 7-12
The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.
From page 7... ...
; and • A public participation plan that frequently includes language on how TIP revisions are to be coordinated with process stakeholders and the general public. Additional responsibilities are assigned to MPOs with populations of more than 200,000 or those in an area designated as not conforming to federal air quality standards.
|
From page 8... ...
However, changing project cost estimates also trigger the need for many TIP administrative modifications or amendance on TIP amendment and modification procedures. As a result MPOs have developed diverse processes for TIP revisions.
|
From page 9... ...
The MPO survey contained detailed questions about sources of delay, satisfaction with established processes, and issues encountered in both amendment and modification processes and the mitigations developed to respond to those issues. From the completed second-phase surveys, 10 MPOs were selected for case examples to further develop key concepts of agency relationships and individual experiences that may be transferable to other MPOs and state transportation agencies.
|
From page 10... ...
TABLE 1 TIP REVISION ACTIONS OR INNOVATIONS Action or Innovation Innovation Area Procedural Technology Standardization Development of Templates for Information Input ■ ■ Online Database of TIP Revisions ■ ■ Online Data Entry for TIP Revisions Online Routing of TIP Revisions ■ ■ Training Videos or Workshops on TIP Revision Tools ■ ■ Absentee Voting Call for Unscheduled Board Meeting ■ Grouping Revisions for Next Scheduled Board Meeting Improve Communications in Early Stages of TIP Revision ■ Procedural Guidance (Statewide or MPO-Specific) ■ Collaboration on Defining TIP Amendments and Administrative Modification Threshold Criteria ■ ■ Modifications to Public Participation Requirements ■ Updates of TIP on Annual Basis ■ (■)
|
From page 11... ...
55,365 No Madison Area Transportation Planning Board (WI) 350,247 No Indianapolis MPO (Indianapolis, IN)
|
From page 12... ...
10 FTA Region and MPO Size1 AQ2 Case Study Region 10: Washington, Oregon, Idaho, and Alaska Metro (Portland, OR) 1,313,695 Yes COMPASS (Boise, ID)
|
Key Terms
This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More
information on Chapter Skim is available.