Review of the Research Program of the U.S. DRIVE Partnership Fourth Report (2013) / Chapter Skim
Currently Skimming:
5 Adequacy and Balance of the Partnership
5 Adequacy and Balance of the Partnership
Pages 144-154
The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.
From page 144... ...
However, recent economic conditions, including the need for government support to prevent the collapse of two major automobile manufacturers, influence what the committee and the government consider "appropriate." It is still believed by the committee that support for precompetitive research on long-term technologies 144
|
From page 145... ...
The NRC (2010) Phase 3 report noted that these four challenges are indeed huge, but also stated the belief that the other two possible pathways to achieving the ultimate Partnership goals of significant reduction of petroleum use and of emissions -- namely, vehicles using biofueled internal combustion engines (ICEs)
|
From page 146... ...
FY 2012 ($) Fuel Cell R&D 80,067,500 75,608,830 41,916,000 43,622,000 Rescission 0 0 0 188,000 SBIR and STTR 2,232,500 1,873,170 1,084,000 1,190,000 TOTAL FUEL CELL R&D 82,300,000 77,482,000 43,000,000 45,000,000 Production and Delivery R&D 10,000,000 14,601,000 17,521,000 16,918,000 Rescission 0 0 0 94,000 SBIR and STTR 0 399,000 479,000 488,000 TOTAL PRODUCTION AND DELIVERY 10,000,000 15,000,000 18,000,000 17,500,000 Hydrogen Storage R&D 57,823,000 31,149,000 14,601,000 16,918,000 Rescission 0 0 0 94,000 SBIR and STTR 1,377,000 851,000 399,000 488,000 TOTAL HYDROGEN STORAGE R&D 59,200,000 32,000,000 15,000,000 17,500,000 Technology Validation 14,789,000 13,005,000 8,988,000 8,986,000 SBIR and STTR 211,000 92,000 12,000 14,000 TOTAL TECHNOLOGY VALIDATION 15,000,000 13,097,000 9,000,000 9,000,000 Safety, Codes and Standards 12,237,500 8,653,000 6,790,000 6,938,000 SBIR and STTR 262,500 186,000 210,000 62,000
|
From page 147... ...
SOURCE: U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.
|
From page 148... ...
FY 2009 FY 2010 FY Comparable FY 2009 FY FY Comparable FY 2010 2010 FY FY 2011 DOE Budget Approp. Freedom 2009 2009 Approp.
|
From page 149... ...
U.S. Planned Planned with SBIR DRIVE 21CTP Other with SBIR DRIVE 21CTP Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 81,549 81,549 0 0 89,934 89,934 0 0 21,614 21,614 0 0 27,806 27,806 0 0 2,972 0 2,972 3,579 0 3,579 106,135 103,163 0 2,972 121,319 117,740 0 3,579 42,647 30,047 12,600 0 47,198 34,598 12,600 0 581 0 0 581 635 635 43,228 30,047 12,600 581 47,833 34,598 12,600 635 47,239 29,500 17,739 0 49,320 30,799 18,521 0 8,748 8,000 748 0 8,707 8,000 707 0 1,613 0 0 1,613 1,764 1,764 57,600 37,500 18,487 1,613 59,791 38,799 19,228 1,764 12,989 6,108 6,881 0 12,576 5,914 6,662 $0 29,097 26,977 2,120 0 27,284 25,164 2,120 $0 5,662 0 0 5,662 970 0 0 970 1,375 0 0 1,375 1,241 0 0 1,241 49,123 33,085 9,001 7,037 42,071 31,078 8,782 2,211 0 0 0 0 0 10,692 5,835 4,857 0 17,904 9,771 8,133 0 308 0 0 308 544 544 11,000 5,835 4,857 308 18,448 9,771 8,133 544 continues
|
From page 150... ...
Total 242,011 174,571 28,870 38,570 311,365 228,756 40,091 42,518 NOTE: The following Fuel Cell line items were part of the Vehicle Technology Program (VTP) in FY 2009 but were transferred back to Hydrogen Fuel Cell Technologies (HFCT)
|
From page 151... ...
As noted above, the ARRA-funded activities are beyond the purview of Partnership leadership or this committee, and DOE biofuel activity is also outside the Partnership, but it is nonetheless clear that taken together, VTP and ARRA funding represent a substantial emphasis on hybrid and battery electric vehicles, without concomitant emphases on the other two potential pathways to achieving Partnership and national transportation energy goals referenced above.
|
From page 152... ...
In that regard, engaging the Partnership's Executive Steering Group to set clearer targets would be desirable in order to provide a framework for ranking technology readiness and for assessing the seriousness of hurdles and evaluating them against potential societal benefits over time. As an example, the National Academies' report America's Energy Future: Technology and Transformation (NAS/NAE/NRC, 2009)
|
From page 153... ...
–22.80 Solar Energy 259,556 288,951 310,000 21,049 7.28 Water Power 29,201 58,787 20,000 (38,787) –65.98 Wind Energy 78,834 93,254 95,000 1,746 1.87 Energy Efficiency Advanced Manufacturing 105,899 115,580 290,000 174,420 150.91 Building Technologies 207,310 219,204 310,000 90,796 41.42 Federal Energy Management Program 30,402 29,891 32,000 2,109 7.06 Vehicle Technologies 293,151 328,807 420,000 91,193 27.73 Weatherization and Intergovernmental 231,300 128,000 195,000 67,000 52.34 Corporate Facilities and Infrastructure 51,000 26,311 26,400 89 0.34 Program Direction 170,000 165,000 164,700 (300)
|
From page 154... ...
Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press. NRC/NAE (National Research Council/National Academy of Engineering)
|
Key Terms
This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More
information on Chapter Skim is available.