Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:

6 Methodologies for Assessment of Structural Performance
Pages 49-56

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 49...
... Ill Analytical Methods
From page 51...
... In spite of over 60 years of experience by researchers and industry in designing metallic structure and 25 years of experience designing composite structure, the lack of naorous analytical methods to predict residual strength and fatigue life can inhibit the cost-effective introduction of advanced materials with superior specific strength and stiffness relative to 51 current conventional materials. Continuing, efforts are needed to develop-and insert into standard engineering practiceadvanced mechanics-based analytical prediction methodologies that would allow innovative designs to be evaluated and optimized at acceptable cost.
From page 52...
... Stiffened shell analysis methods should include automated, adaptive remeshing capability, as well as a capability to analyze structures with nonlinear materials properties and at large deformations. These improved methods should be integrated into the structural analysis methodology to predict fatigue crack growth and residual strength of aircraft structures.
From page 53...
... Progress has been made developing damage onset criteria, particularly for those special cases where an individual damage mechanism can be isolated, but three-dimensional models of the material system may be required to predict the correct local stresses to use in the criteria. This results in a massive computational process involving an iterative and incremental loading scheme and may require a very refined finite element mesh with many degrees of freedom.
From page 54...
... The three-dimensional behavior of composite materials is well suited to global, local, and hierarchical methods of analysis. New methods can efficiently couple local matenal-level damage mechanisms to global responses, such as load redistribution, geometric nonlinear and instability phenomena, and predict structural failure modes.
From page 55...
... For composite structure, complex failure modes that may involve the interaction of several different damage mechanisms are major design considerations when addressing durability and damage tolerance requirements. There are several key technical barriers to developing reliable methods to predict failure of composite structure, including incomplete understanding of complex three-dimensional stress states, damage progression laws, processing residual stresses, and understanding of failure mechanisms and associated failure criteria.


This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.