Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:


Pages 281-296

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 281...
... Emerging Technologies for Nutrition Research, 1997 Pp.
From page 282...
... and I/B in many different subject populations by several laboratories, with a demonstrated precision (coefficient of variation) of 2 to 8 percent (Schoeller, 1988)
From page 283...
... has since been validated in soldiers under various conditions (DeLany et al., 1989; Forbes-Ewan et al., 1989; Hoyt et al., 1991, 1994)
From page 284...
... on the turnover of the two isotopes, which is dependent on H2O and CO2 output. For studies in typical adults, the optimal metabolic period is 4 to 21 days (Schoeller, 1988)
From page 285...
... multipoint DLW protocol, samples are obtained throughout the period, and elimination rates are calculated by regression analyses. The rationale of the multiple-point method is that by using more time points to calculate elimination rates, sample-to-sample variation (analytical error)
From page 286...
... energy expenditure and water turnover towards the end of the metabolic period due to environmental extremes (DeLany et al., 1991)
From page 287...
... between the two isotope dilution spaces. The ratio between the 2H and 18O dilution spaces (ND/NO)
From page 288...
... PARTICULAR CONCERNS FOR MILITARY NUTRITION DLW STUDIES Additional concerns when applying the DLW method to military nutrition studies are changes in baseline isotope during the study, the possible need for a higher dose of isotope and the need for administration of multiple doses of DLW to obtain energy expenditure during a long training study. For typical DLW studies, the baseline isotope abundance is measured before administration of the DLW and is assumed to remain constant throughout the study.
From page 289...
... Figure 12-4 Washout of isotope due to high water turnover. 0/00, ratio per mille derivations in heavy isotope ratio relative to standard mean ocean water (smow)
From page 290...
... Drawbacks of the DLW Method The major drawbacks of the DLW method are cost of the 18O-labeled water and the cost and technical difficulties associated with the isotope analyses. The need for an expensive isotope ratio mass spectrometer and sample preparation systems limits the number of laboratories that can carry out the method on-site.
From page 291...
... • Careful planning is required so that the optimum dosing and specimen collection protocol are utilized based on (1) estimated water turnover and energy expenditure, and (2)
From page 292...
... James, W.P.T., J.P. Haggarty, and B.A.
From page 293...
... Schoeller, D.A., R.F. Kushner, and P.J.H.
From page 294...
... riod of the water. Or depending on what point you have, if you are taking only two of them, you can change the slope of that line, depending on where you are.
From page 295...
... ROBERT WOLFE: Since you made the case so strongly for the two-point method, the other thing I would add that there is a potential advantage to collecting multiple points. It is that you use the jackknife technique to examine bad data points.
From page 296...
... JAMES DeLANY: It does not appear to be as good as energy expenditure, but some of the data that Tanya Jones has been compiling, some of the data that we have collected regarding the use of isotope versus the canteen measurements, look really good, with a correlation of maybe 0.85 between the measured intake and the isotope measurement of water turnover. JOAN CONWAY: Do you need doubly labeled water to do the water flux?

Key Terms



This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.