A Review of Decontamination and Decommissioning Technology Development Programs at the Department of Energy (1998) / Chapter Skim
Currently Skimming:
3 Recommendations
3 Recommendations
Pages 29-32
The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.
From page 29... ...
Prompt dissemination of sufficient technical and cost data to encourage site managers to adopt successfully demonstrated technologies was not achieved, nor were the LSDPs able to overcome institutional barriers to new technologies. Widespread user acceptance of the demonstrated technologies did not occur during the committee' s review period.
|
From page 30... ...
The plan should be disseminated widely to senior managers to provide a common basis for development and use of associated management and implementation plans. The Strategic Plan should be updated and reissued periodically as DOE policies, procedures, and objectives evolve.
|
From page 31... ...
To gain credibility with the site managers and other stakeholders, OST should develop and base its comparative technology assessments on a standard methodology that prevails across the various programs, sites, and projects. The committee recommends that DDFA refine its cost estimating methodologies for baseline and alternate technologies so that cost comparisons are meaningful and can be documented fully.
|
From page 32... ...
Where R&D efforts are proposed, the DDFA should sponsor such work only if a specific highpriority need has been identified. Technology development in this context should be assigned the role of addressing those needs that will remain after 2006.
|
Key Terms
This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More
information on Chapter Skim is available.