Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Pages 1-5

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 1...
... PNWD-2227 HEDR describes the methods used to estimate doses received by representative individuals who ingested water, fish, or waterfowl from the Columbia River or who swam in or boated on the river. It uses information on radionuclides released from Hanford reactors (Heeb and Bates, 1994)
From page 2...
... A principal exposure pathway for many of these people was milk from cows that ate vegetation contaminated by iodine-131 released into the air from the Hanford site. This document describes the methods used to estimate doses received by representative individuals who consumed contaminated foodstuffs, inhaled contaminated air, or were directly exposed to radioactive materials released from the Hanford site, and it presents re-estimates of many of the doses that were given in an earlier report of a feasibility study for the atmospheric pathway (Pacific Northwest Laboratory, l991b)
From page 3...
... It would have been helpful too if the report contained a fuller definition of source terms, model validation, and demographic characteristics ascribed to the three representative individual types on whom doses are computed should be included. The details are presented in other reports, which 3
From page 4...
... ye is important that the readers of the HEDR reports understand the difference between modeling and dose calculation for environmental-impact assessment and for retrospective dose assessment. In environmental-impact assessment, as has been done at Hanford in the past, a model is developed with a hypothetical target individual and a hypothetical population in mind, and a "representative" source term is developed as input to the model to calculate projected exposures.
From page 5...
... Such an estimate of the "societal impact" would also have a benefit in terms of placing the risk estimates in perspective by contrasting them, for example, to similar estimates based on doses received from natural, background radiation.


This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.