Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:

VII. Physics Programs
Pages 117-140

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 117...
... universities in this five-year span. On the average, 56 full-time and part-time students intending to earn doctorates were enrolled in a program in December 1980, with an average faculty size of 28 members.2 The 123 programs, listed in Table 7.1, represent 122 different universities -- only Stanford University has two physics programs included in the assessment.
From page 118...
... Since a large majority of faculty evaluators indicated that they were unfamiliar with this program and it is quite possible that some of them were misled by the inaccurate identification of this institution, the committee has decided not to report the survey results for this program. To assist the reader in interpreting results of the survey evaluations, estimated standard errors have been computed for mean ratings of the scholarly quality of faculty in 121 physics programs (and are given in Table 7.1~.
From page 119...
... 5 See pp. 29-31 for a discussion of the interpretation of mean ratings and associated confidence intervals.
From page 120...
... indicates program was initiated since 1970. NOTE: On the first line of data for every program, raw values for each measure are reported; on the second line values are reported in standardized form, with mean = 50 and standard deviation = 10.
From page 121...
... (14) NA NA .33 NA 48 .46 56 .08 32 .50 59 PublishedSurvey Ratings Articles_ Standard Error (15)
From page 122...
... line of data for every program, raw values for ~ . ~ ~d line values are reported in standardized form, we standard deviation = 10.
From page 123...
... 2.3 1.5 1.0 0.5 NA .52 1781 82 .10 .09 .09 .07 47 47 45 45 61 47 48 47 040. 4.9 2.8 1.0 1.7 3.0 .68 5602 337 .03 .05 .06 .06 73 73 46 72 78 71 56 73 80 NOTE: On the first line of data for every program, raw values for each measure are reported: on the second line values are reported in standardized form, with mean = 50 and standard deviation = 10.
From page 124...
... Minnesota, University of 46 43 83 .28 7.8 .66 .42 Physics and Astronomy 63 53 55 52 43 50 63 * indicates program was initiated since 197u NOTE: On the f irst line of data for every program, raw values for each measure are reported; on the second line values are reported in standardized form, with mean = 50 and standard deviation = 10.
From page 125...
... 3.7 2.1 1.0 1.1 1.8 .42 2912 169 .07 .05 .08 .08 60 60 43 60 66 54 50 56 56 060. 3.5 2.0 1.0 1.0 1.2 .28 2664 197 .07 .06 .08 .07 59 5 7 44 56 60 45 49 59 59 NOTE: On the first line of data for every program, raw values for each measure are reported; on the second line values are reported in standardized form, with mean = 50 and standard deviation z 10.
From page 126...
... NOTE: On the first line of data for every program, raw values for each measure are reported; on the second line values are reported in standardized form, with mean ~ 50 and standard deviation s 10. "NAT indicates that the value for a measure is not available.
From page 127...
... 2.1 1.41.5 0.3 -0.6 .27 NA 34 .12 .12 .12 .05 44 4468 40 44 44 4343 080. 1.8 1.21.0 0.3 NA .29 NA 47 .15 .13 .09 .06 41 4045 40 46 4445 NOTE: On the first line of data for every program, raw values for each measure are reported; on the second line values are reported in standardized form, with mean = 50 and standard deviation = 10.
From page 128...
... NOTE: On the first line of data for every program, raw values for each measure are reported; on the second line values are reported in standardized form, with mean - 50 and standard deviation - 10. "NA" indicates that the value for a measure is not available.
From page 129...
... 4.6 2.7 1.0 1.5 2.0 .65 14262 365 .07 .06 .05 .06 70 71 43 70 69 69 76 75 71 100. 2.4 1.5 0.8 0.6 NA .21 508 23 .12 .13 .10 .07 4 7 46 36 46 40 44 42 41 NOTE: On the first line of data for every program, raw values for each measure are reported; on the second line values are reported in standardized form, with mean = 50 and standard deviation = 10.
From page 130...
... NOTE: On the first line of data for every program, raw values for each measure are reported; on the second line values are reported in standardized form, with mean = 50 and standard deviation = 10.
From page 131...
... 2.4 1.6 1.2 0.6 NA .50468 34 .11 .09 .08 .06 47 48 53 46 5944 4343 120. 3.8 2.1 0.9 1.4 1.6 .265082 279 .08 .06 .06 .07 61 60 42 65 64 4355 6765 NOTE: On the first line of data for every program, raw values for each measure are repot tea: on the second line values are reported in standardized form, with mean = 50 and standard deviation - 10.
From page 132...
... indicates program was initiated since 1970 i. NOTE: On the f irst line of data for every program, raw values for each measure are reported; on the second line values are reported in standardized form, with mean = 50 and standard deviation = 10.
From page 133...
... 121. 1.8 1.3 1.0 0.4 NA .35 415 NA .17 .11 .14 .06 42 42 45 42 50 44 NA 1.7 1.2 1.1 0.3 NA .28 936 11 .14 .17 .12 .06 40 40 51 40 45 45 4141 4.2 2.4 0.9 1.4 2.1 .15 4215 178 .08 .06 .07 .07 65 65 42 66 69 3 7 53 5 75 7 NOTE: On the first line of data for every program, raw values for each measure are reported; on the second line values are reported in standardized form, with mean = 50 and standard deviation = 10.
From page 134...
... Since the scale used to compute measure 16 is entirely arbitrary, only data in standardized form are reported for this measure.
From page 135...
... 135 TABLE 7.3 Intercorrelations Among Program Measures on 123 Programs in Physics Measure 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Program Size 01 .77 .80 -.13 .21 .19 .38 .68.60 .02 .71 .44-.07 .54 .71.72 02 .92 -.02 .32 .40 .41 .76.73 -.17 .78 .47.13 .66 .85.86 03 -.05 .28 .34 .39 .75.70 -.09 .77 .54.09 .68 .86.85 Program Graduates 04 .11 .17 .01 .15.19 .06 .11 .05-.03 .04 .07.05 05 .34 .29 .42.44 .00 .38 .23.21 .31 .37.38 06 .51 .42.44 -.14 .43 .25.13 .25 .41.43 07 .58.56 -.18 .56 .34.14 .31 .47.48 Survey Results 08 .96 -.15 .96 .67.24 .61 .85.86 09 -.17 .92 .65.23 .61 .82.82 10 - .18 - .11- .05 - .08 - .13- . 14 11 .66.27 .58 .85.86 University Library 12 .17 .33 .63.61 Research Suppor t 13 14 Publication Records 15 16 .07 .20 .21 .80 .80 .99 NOTE: Since in computing correlation coefficients program data must be available for both of the measures being correlated, the actual number of programs on which each coefficient is based varies.
From page 136...
... * r ~ .70 O.O +/++++++++++/++++++++++/++++++++++/++++++++++/++++++++++/++++++++++/++++++++++/++++++++++/++++++++++/ 1 4 9 16 25 36 49 64 81 100 Measure 01 (square root scale)
From page 137...
... FIGURE 7.2 Mean rating of program effectiveness in educating research scholars/scientists (measure 09) versus number of graduates in last f ive years (measure 02)
From page 138...
... 138 TABLE 7.4 Characteristics of Survey Participants in Physics Respondents N Field of Specialization % Atomic/Molecular Physics2914 Elementary Particles5627 Nuclear Structure3014 Solid State Physics5526 Other/Unknown4119 Faculty Ran k Professor14870 Associate Professor5024 Assistant Professor136 Year of H inkiest Degree Pre-1950136 1950-596229 1960-691034 9 Post-19693215 Unknown11 Evaluator Selection .. Nominated by Institution16980 Other4220 Survey Form With Faculty Names19191 Without Names2010 Total Evalu211100
From page 139...
... . x x ~~~~~~~x~~____ ~~~~X~~ = · · · xx · ~~~~~x~~__ x · · · xx · ~~~~x~~__ ~ ~ ~~~ x -- -- · · x x · · · x · ~ ~~ x-~ ~ x · · x · · · x · x · · · ~ ~ ~ ~-x-~ ~ ~ ~ · · ~ ~ ~~ x-~ ~ ~ · · ~ ~ ~~ x-~ ~ ~ · · · x · x · · · x · x · · · x · x x · · ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ x ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ · · ~~~~x~~__ · · ~~~~~~~x~~_____ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ x-~ ~ ~ ~ 5~0 4~0 3~0 2~0 1~0 0~0 Mean Survey Rating (Measure 08)


This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.