Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:

V. Geoscience Programs
Pages 75-94

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 75...
... , Ohio State University (Columbus) , Princeton University, and Texas A&M University each have two geoscience programs included in the assessment, and Pennsylvania State University and Stanford University each have three.
From page 76...
... Although in both figures there is a significant positive correlation between program size and reputational rating, it is quite apparent that some of the smaller programs received high mean ratings and some of the larger programs received low mean ratings. Table 5.4 describes the 177 faculty members who participated in the evaluation of geoscience programs.
From page 77...
... To assist the reader in interpreting results of the survey evaluations, estimated standard errors have been computed for mean ratings of the scholarly quality of faculty in 91 geoscience programs (and are given in Table 5.1~. For each program the mean rating and an associated "confidence interval" of 1.5 standard errors are illustrated in Figure 5.3 (listed in order of highest to lowest mean rating)
From page 78...
... indicates program was initiated since 1970. 10 14 9 43 46 42 .36 7.5 57 44 .79 52 NOTE: On the first line of data for every program, raw values for each measure are reported; on the second line values are reported in standardized form, with mean ~ 50 and standard deviation ~ 10.
From page 79...
... 4.0 2.3 1.7 1.4 1.6 .39 2887 84 .07 .06 .05 .06 63 62 70 66 62 46 4 7 60 63 020. 1.8 1.3 1.2 0.5 NA .30 3086 33 .14 .11 .14 .07 37 39 51 39 42 48 47 d7 NOTE: On the first line of data for every program, raw values for each measure are reported; on the second line values are reported in standardized form, with mean a 50 and standard deviation = 10.
From page 80...
... (07) 16 46 14 45 36 55 22 49 26 50 NA .19 45 64 .24 69 48 16 .16 46 42 9 NA 42 68 71 41 58 18 47 7 41 4 40 83 .20 78 45 NANA .098.5 3733 .426.2 6259 .318.3 5435 NANA .317.0 5450 .445.5 6466 .147.3 4046 NA NA NANA .216.0 4661 .198.3 4435 NA NA .297.0 1 5250 .337.0 5550 7.3 .65 47 40 6.8 .79 52 52 5.9 .81 62 54 NA NA 8.5 NA 33 NA NA NA NA .76 .36 49 60 .56 .19 33 47 NA NA .15 45 .30 56 .38 61 NA .72 .28 46 54 .89 .44 60 66 .82 .18 54 47 NA NA NA NA NA .77 .37 50 61 .75 .13 49 43 NA NA ,.00 .29 70 55 .80 .33 53 58 NOTE: On the first line of data for every program, raw values for each measure are reported; on the second line values are reported in standardized form, with mean = 50 and standard deviation = 10.
From page 81...
... (11) .10 .09 .10 O07 .14 .14 .08 .06 .11 .08 .11 .08 .12 .05 .08 .06 .08 .07 .08 .06 .12 .08 .06 .08 .06 .10 .07 .09 .07 .07 .08 .10 .13 .10 .06 .15 .10 .10 .07 .08 .07 .08 .07 .08 .06 .06 .07 .09 .09 .15 .13 .09 .09 .11 .09 .11 .05 .05 .09 .07 .11 .07 .10 .08 .09 .05 .07 .06 .07 .07 .06 .08 .07 .10 .07 .09 .07 .08 .07 NOTE: On the first line of data for every program, raw values for each measure are reported; on the second~line values are reported in standardized form, with mean = 50 and standard deviation s 10.
From page 82...
... indicates program was initiated since 1970. NOTE: On the first line of data for every program, raw values for each measure are reported; on the second line values are reported in standardized form, with mean = 50 and standard deviation = 10.
From page 83...
... 2.3 1.41.0 0.5 0.1 .331044 24 .12 .10 .11 .06 42 4244 40 47 4443 4544 060. 4.0 2.31.1 1.5 0.9 .712832 48 .07 .06 .07 .05 63 6248 69 55 6147 5153 NATE;: On the first line of data for every program, raw values for each measure are reported; on the second line values are reported in standardized form, with mean = 50 and standard deviation ~ 10.
From page 84...
... NOTE: On the first line of data for every program, raw values for each measure are reported; on the second line values are reported in standardized form, with mean = 50 and standard deviation = 10. NINA" indicates that the value for a measure is not available.
From page 85...
... 3.8 2.2 1.4 1.4 1.6 .32 10789 62 .08 .05 .06 .06 60 60 60 64 62 43 66 55 50 080. 2.6 1.7 1.2 0.8 NA .75 652 NA .09 .07 .09 .07 46 49 52 49 63 42 NA NOTE On the first line of data for every program, raw values for each m-ncllr" ;'r" Tar on the second line values are reported in standardized form, with mean = 50 and standard deviation = 10.
From page 86...
... indicates program was initiated since 1970. 24 20 60 51 22 ~8 26 17 63 4B 10 13 43 46 12 4 46 40 17 41 52 65 16 12 51 45 19 33 54 60 18 49 23 33 59 60 30 52 13 12 46 44 25 50 9 42 18 47 16 46 5 40 45 60 22 49 40 57 .21 7~5 46 44 NA NA .18 7.8 44 41 NA NA NA NA .29 6.2 52 58 NA NA .22 6.4 47 57 .39 7.0 59 50 6.1 60 .64 .07 39 39 NA NA .46 .09 23 40 NA NA NA NA .73 .40 46 63 NA NA .87 .27 59 53 .69 .15 44 45 .83 .53 56 73 NOTE: On the first line of data for every program, raw values for each measure are reported on the second line values are reported in standardized form, with mean ~ 50 and standard deviation ~ 10.
From page 87...
... 2.8 1.8 1.3 O.8 NA .47 2474 21 .08 .07 .09 .07 48 50 55 48 50 46 44 44 091. 4.1 2.3 0.8 1.5 2.1 .78 715 36 .08 .07 .07 .06 64 62 37 68 67 65 42 48 51 NOTE: On the first line of data for every program, raw values for each measure are reported; on the second line values are reported in standardized form, with mean ~ 50 and standard deviation a 1Q.
From page 88...
... 88 TABLE 5.2 Summary Statistics Describing Each Program Measure -- Geosciences Number of ProgramsStandard D E C I L E S Measure Evaluated Mean Deviation123456789 Program Size 01 Raw Value 91 16 8 7 9 10 12 14 17 18 20 25 Std Value 91 50 10 39 42 43 46 48 52 53 55 62 02 Raw Value 91 19 15 6 9 11 12 16 18 20 27 33 Std Value 91 50 10 41 43 44 45 48 49 51 55 60 03 Raw Value 89 25 21 7 9 12 15 18 24 28 39 45 Std Value 89 50 10 41 42 44 45 47 50 51 57 60 Program Graduates 04 Raw Value 66 .26 .13 .12 .16 .18 .21 .24 .28 .31 .36 .39 Std Value 66 50 10 39 42 44 46 48 52 54 58 60 05 Raw Value 66 7.0 .9 8.3 7.7 7.5 7.3 6.9 6.7 6.5 6.2 5.9 Std Value 66 50 10 35 42 44 46 51 53 55 59 62 06 Raw Value 63 .77 .12 .60 .68 .70 .74 .79 .81 .82 .86 .92 Std Value 63 50 10 36 43 44 48 52 53 54 58 63 07 Raw Value 63 .22 .13 .00 .10 .14 .18 .21 .27 .30 .34 .39 Std Value 63 50 10 33 41 44 47 49 54 56 59 63 Survey Results 08 Raw Value 91 2.9 .8 2.0 2.2 2.5 2.7 2.9 3.1 3.3 3.7 4.1 Std Value 91 50 10 39 41 45 47 50 52 55 59 64 09 Raw Value 91 1.8 .4 1.1 1.4 1.5 1.7 1.8 1.9 2.0 2.1 2.3 Std Value 91 50 10 35 42 44 49 51 53 56 58 63 10 Raw Value 89 1.1 .3 .8 .9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 Std Value 89 50 10 37 41 45 49 52 52 56 60 63 11 Raw Value 91 .9 .4 .4 .5 .6 .8 .8 .9 1.0 1.2 1.4 Std Value 91 50 10 37 40 43 48 48 51 54 59 65 University Library 12 Raw Value 69 .4 1.0 -1.0 -.6 -.4 -.3 .0 .7 .9 1.5 2.0 Std Value 69 50 10 37 41 43 44 47 53 55 61 66 Research Support 13 Raw Value 72 .47 .22 .20 .27 .32 .38 .47 .50 .60 .66 .75 Std Value 72 50 10 38 41 43 46 50 51 56 59 63 14 Raw Value 73 3996 4279 677 840 1320 2250 2637 2873 3341 6180 9785 Std Value 73 50 10 42 43 44 46 47 47 48 55 64 Publication Records 15 Raw Value 90 44 39 9 13 17 23 32 38 54 64 102 Std Value 90 50 10 41 42 43 45 47 49 53 55 65 16 Std Value 90 50 10 41 42 43 44 46 49 51 54 67 NOTE: Standardized values reported in the preceding table have been computed from exact values of the mean and standard deviation and not the rounded values reported here. Since the scale used to compute measure 16 is entirely arbitrary, only data in standardized form are reported for this measure.
From page 89...
... 89 TABLE 5.3 Intercorrelations Among Program Measures on 91 Programs in Geosciences Measure 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Program Size 01 .42 .40 -.06 -.08 -.14 .21 .45 .42.47 .39.22 .18 .61 .39 .36 02 .72 -.01 .29 .05 .36 .64 .67.06 .67.43 .40 .25 .73 .74 03 -.04 .16 .06 .45 .61 .62.17 .59.30 .33 .28 .66 .64 Program Graduates 04 .24 .00 .04 .08 .10-.10 .17-.01 .09 .22 .03 .07 05 .51 .49 .50 .51 -.09 .44 .26 .38 -.05 .27 .31 06 .30 .24 .29 -.13 .35 .10 .20 -.04 .01 .00 07 .58 .58 .05 .59 .31 .61 .06 .33 .39 Survey Results 08 .97 .29 .87 .58 .72 .27 .75 .77 09 .29 .87 .58 .72 .25 .73 .75 10 .19 -.08 .02 .13 .09 .09 11 .43 .70 .18 .66 .70 University Library 12 .36 .33 .66 .66 Research Support 13 14 Publication Records 15 16 .20 . 45 .51 .42 .35 .97 NOTE: Since in computing correlation coefficients program data must be available for both of the measures being correlated, the actual number of programs on which each coefficient is based varies.
From page 90...
... * r ~ .50 /+++++++++++++/+++++++++++++/+++++++++++++/+++++++++++++/+++++++++++++/ 9 16 25 36 49 64 Measure 01 ( square root scale)
From page 91...
... * r - .70 Measure 02 ( square root scale)
From page 92...
... 92 TABLE 5.4 Characteristics of Survey Participants in Geosciences Respondents N% Field of Specialization Geochemistry 1810 Geology 6637 Geophysics 2916 Mineralogy/Petrology 3118 Paleontology 137 Other/Unknown 2011 Faculty Rank P rofessor 11565 Associate Professor 3620 Assistant Professor 2112 Other/Unknown 53 Year of Highest Degree Pre-1950 85 1950-59 5129 1960-69 7040 Post-1969 4827 Evaluator Selection Nominated by Institution 15487 Other 2313 Survey Form With Faculty Names 15789 Without Names 2011 Total Evaluators 177100
From page 93...
... indicate a confidence interval of +1.5 standard errors around the reported mean (x) of each program.


This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.