Assessment of Mission Size Trade-offs for NASA's Earth and Space Science Missions (2000) / Chapter Skim
Currently Skimming:
Appendix B Statement of Task
Appendix B Statement of Task
Pages 65-66
The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.
From page 65... ...
The report also should identify any criteria and methods that could be used to measure whether the science accomplished using small satellites is better than that accomplished with larger, more complex spacecraft.''] NASA's smaller, faster, cheaper, better strategy involves efforts to streamline mission development cycles and costs, thereby increasing the number and frequency of flight missions and providing more opportunities for investigators to access spaceflight data.
|
From page 66... ...
The draft report will go to external review in December 1999 and will be released in February 2000. 2Space Studies Board, National Research Council, An Integrated Strategy for the Planetary Sciences: 1995-2010, 1994; SSB, The Role of Small Missions in Planetary and Lunar Exploration, 1995; SSB, The Role of Small Satellites in NASA and NOAA Earth Observation Programs, 2000; SSB, A New Science Strategy for Space Astronomy and Astrophysics, 1997; SSB, A Science Strategy for Space Physics, 1995; SSB, Assessment of Recent Changes in the Explorer Program, 1996; SSB, Scientific Assessment of NASA's SMEX-MIDEX Space Physics Mission Selections, 1997; SSB and Aeronautics and Space Engineering Board, Reducing the Cost of Space Science Research Missions, 1997.
|
Key Terms
This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More
information on Chapter Skim is available.