Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:

Appendix C Interpretability of the Follow-up Questionnaire Data
Pages 83-86

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 83...
... The resulting questionnaire was a compromise agreed on by the five panels and the National Research Council Committee on Use of Human Subjects. Several subjects of concern were not included in the final questionnaire, such as probes for specific symptoms, suicide attempts, diseases, treatments, behaviors, detailed history of later job-related exposure, accidents, and spontaneous abortions.
From page 84...
... In addition, as in any cohort study, there was no control of the subjects' environments after discharge from the service, so even legitimate complaints associated with exposure to toxic substances could have been due to occupational or accidental exposure to chemical agents, rather than to exposure at Edgewood. SUMMARY Some caution must be exercised in viewing the data obtained from the questionnaire.
From page 85...
... No major identifiable effects are observable in these data. However, the limited information available from the follow-up on these soldiers does not permit definitive conclusions regarding the nature and extent of possible long-term problems resulting from chemical exposure at Edgewood.


This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.