Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
22 5 REFERENCES 1. AASHTO-FHWA. AASHTO/FHWA Joint Implementation Agreement for the AASHTO Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware 2015, 2015. 2. Everett, T., and M. Griffith. AASHTO/FHWA Joint Imlementation Agreement for Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware (MASH), U. S. Department of Transportation, 2016. 3. American Association of State, H., and O. Transportation. A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets. 2018. 4. Griffith, M. S. Eligibility Letter B-240 (TX DOT 31-inch W-Beam Guardrail). Publication HSST-1/B-240, Washington, D.C., 2012. 5. Ross, H. E., D. L. Sicking, R. A. Zimmer, and J. D. Michie. NCHRP Report 350: Recommended Procedures for the Safety Performance Evaluation of Highway Features. Transportation Research Board, National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Washington, D.C., 1993. 6. FHWA. Design Standards for Highways; Requirements for Roadside Barriers and Safety Appurtenances: 23 CFR Part 625. Publication 23 CFR Part 625, U. S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., 1993. 7. AASHTO-FHWA. Agreement: AASHTO 350 Task Force on NCHRP 350 Implementation, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., 1998. 8. AASHTO. Roadside Design Guide. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C, 2011. 9. AASHTO. Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C., 2016. 10. NHTSA, and GHSA. MMUCC Guideline: Model Minimum Uniform Crash Criteria. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, D.C., 2017. 11. Carrigan, C. E. Recommended Guidelines for the Selection and Placement of Test Levels 2 through 5 Median Barriers. National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2020. 12. Ray, M. H., and C. E. Carrigan. Meta-Analysis of the Risk of Fatal and Incapacitating Injury in Tangent W-Beam Guardrail Terminal Collisions.In International Conference on Transportation and Development 2018, American Society of Civil Engineers, 2018. pp. 141- 151. 13. Carrigan, C. E., M. H. Ray, and A. M. Ray. Evaluating the Performance of Roadside Hardware. Presented at 96th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2017. 14. Wallis, S. Binomial Confidence Intervals and Contingency Tests: Mathematical Fundamentals and the Evaluation of Alternative Methods. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, Vol. 20, No. 3, 2013, pp. 178-208. 15. Duval, T. Treatment of the Economic Value of a Statistical Life in Departmental Analyses, U. S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., 2008. 16. FHWA. Treatment of the Economic Value of a Statistical Life in Departmental Analyses. Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C. , 2008.
23 17. Moran, M. Guidance on Treatment of the Economic Value of a Statistical Life (VSL) in U.S. Department of Transportation Analyses -2016 Adjustment, U. S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., 2016. 18. Barreto, H., and F. Howland. Introductory Econometrics: Using Monte Carlo Simulation with Microsoft Excel. Cambridge University Press, 2006. 19. Ray, M. H. In-Service Performance of the ET Plus.In letter to F. A. G. Nadeau, Canton, Maine, November 4, 2014. 20. FHWA. State Statistical Abstracts -- Ohio. Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/policyinformation/statistics/abstracts/2015/ohio_2015.pdf. Accessed July 7, 2020. 21. AASHTO-FHWA. Safety Analysis of Extruding W-Beam Guardrail Terminal Crashes. Federal Highway Administration and American Association of State Highway and Transportaiton Officials, Washington, D. C., 2015. 22. FHWA. Guidance on Treatment of the Economic Value of a Statistical Life (VSL) in U.S. Department of Transportation Analysesâ2016 Adjustment. Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., 2016.